[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3487757.3490862acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdefinConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Bank Cards Usage by Russian Students: a Step Forward or a Fading Reality?

Published: 13 February 2022 Publication History

Abstract

The rise in non-cash payments sets the grounds for the world to abandon the use of cash in the near future. Bank cards are increasingly replacing cash is. The advantage of bank cards of various types has already been proven. A debit card allows its holder to keep control of spending, while a credit card expands financial opportunities and reduces the “pain of paying”. The process of switching to cashless payments varies from country to country. The peculiarities of this process in Russia have not been covered enough in the scientific literature. This determines the relevance of the study, the purpose which is to examine the behavioural habits of the younger generation of Russians to make payments. The CAWI method was used to obtain empirical results on the use of cash and non-cash payments by Moscow university students and to analyse their views on the possible withdrawal of cash from circulation. The findings show that young people under the age of 25 prefer to make non-cash payments. They are more likely to use debit cards for regular small payments in order to maintain psychological control over their expenditure. At the same time, they prefer to replace plastic bank cards as physical media with apps on their smartphones. If the necessary technical conditions for cashless payment are created, more than 40% of respondents are ready to stop using cash today. But at the moment they are forced to use cash for payments to small businesses and individuals. 70% of students believe that the complete transition to cashless payment is highly likely in the next 20 years. At the same time, almost 10% of young people use cash on a regular basis and claim that the global economy will not be able to abnegate it in the next 20 years.

References

[1]
Pedro de Almeida, Paulo Fazendeiroa and Pedro R.M. Inácio. 2018. Societal risks of the end of physical cash. Futures 104, 47-60.
[2]
Fernando Alvarez and Francesco Lippi. 2017. Cash burns: an inventory model with a cash-credit choice. Journal of Monetary Economics 90, 99-112.
[3]
C.A. Arango-Arango, Yassine Bouhdaoui, David Bounie, Martina Eschelbach and Lola Hernandez. 2018. Cash remains top-of-wallet! International evidence from payment diaries. Economic Modelling 69, 38-48.
[4]
Mohammed Badi, Stefan Dab, Alexander Drummond, Sushil Malhotra, Federico Muxi, Maarten Peeters, Preateek Roongta, Michael Strauß and Yann Senant. 2018. Global Payments [Electronic resource]. Reimagining the customer experience. Available at: http://image-src.bcg.com/Images/ BCG-Global-Payments-2018-Oct-2018_tcm9-205095.pdf.
[5]
John Bagnall, David Bounie, Kim P. Huynh, Anneke Kosse, Tobias Schmidt, Scott D. Schuh and Helmut Stix. 2016. Consumer cash usage: a cross-country comparison with diary survey data. International Journal of Central Banking, Forthcoming 1685, 53.
[6]
David Bounie, Abel François and Patrick Waelbroeck. 2008. Transaction pricing and the adoption of electronic payments: a cross-country comparison. International Journal of Central Banking 4 (1), 89-123.
[7]
David Bounie, Abel François and Patrick Waelbroeck. 2016. Debit card and demand for cash. Journal of Banking and Finance 73, 55-56.
[8]
Nissim Cohen, Anna Rubinchik and Labib Shami. 2020. Towards a cashless economy: Economic and socio-political implications. European Journal of Political Economy 61, 101820.
[9]
Cyril Fouillet, Isabelle Gu´erin, Jean-Michel Servet. 2021. Demonetization and digitalization: The Indian government's hidden agenda. Telecommunications Policy 45, 102079.
[10]
Hiroshi Fujiki. 2020. Cash demand and financial literacy: A case study using Japanese survey data. Japan & The World Economy 54, 100998.
[11]
Daniela Gabor and Sally Brooks. 2017. The digital revolution in financial inclusion: International development in the fintech era. New Political Economy 22 (4), 423-436.
[12]
Luke Greenacrea, Skye Akbarb. 2019. The impact of payment method on shopping behaviour among low income consumers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 47, 87-93.
[13]
Julian Gruin. 2019. Financializing authoritarian capitalism: Chinese fintech and the institutional foundations of algorithmic governance. Finance and Society 5 (2), 84-104.
[14]
Jun Ho Huh, Saurabh Verma, Swathi Sri V Rayala, Rakesh Bobba, Konstantin Beznosov and Hyoungshick Kim. 2017. I Don't Use Apple Pay because it's less secure...: perception of security and usability in mobile tap-and-pay. Proc. Workshop Usable Security (USEC 12).
[15]
Rakesh Kochhar. 2015. A Global Middle Class Is More Promise than Reality [Electronic resource]. Available at: http:// www.pewglobal.org/2015/07/08/a-global-middle-class-is-more-promise-thanreality.
[16]
Egor Krivosheya. 2020. The role of financial innovations in consumer behavior in the Russian retail payments market. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 161, 120304.
[17]
Se Hun Lim, Dan J. Kim, Yeon Hur and Kunsu Park. 2019. An empirical study of the impacts of perceived security and knowledge on continuous intention to use mobile fintech payment services. Int. J. of Hum. – Comput. Interact 35 (10), 886-898.
[18]
Jiajia Liu, Xuerong Li and Shouyang Wang. 2020. What have we learnt from 10 years of fintech research? a scientometric analysis. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 155, 120022.
[19]
Xiu-Ming Loh, Voon-Hsien Lee, Garry Wei-Han Tan, Jun-Jie Hew and Keng-Boon Ooi, 2019. Towards a cashless society: the imminent role of wearable technology. J. Comput. Inform. Syst., 1-11.
[20]
Moscow School of Management SKOLKOVO, Payment instruments: attitudes and perceptions of Russian consumers [Electronic resource]. 2019. Available at: https://finance.skolkovo.ru/downloads/documents/FinChair/Research_Reports/ SKOLKOVO_Payment_instruments_Resume_2019-12_En.pdf.
[21]
National Bank of Poland NBP. 2020. “Porównanie wybranych elementów polskiego systemu płatniczego z systemami innych krajów Unii Europejskiej (2018)” [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://www.nbp.pl/systemplatniczy/obrot_bezgotowkowy/porownanie_UE_2018.pdf.
[22]
Nationalbanken. 2014. Report on new payment solutions. Copenhagen, Denmark.
[23]
Johannes Petry. 2020. Financialization with Chinese characteristics? Exchanges, control and capital markets in authoritarian capitalism. Economy and Society 49 (2), 213-238.
[24]
Drazen Prelec and George Loewenstein. 1998. The red and the black: mental accounting of savings and debt. Marketing Science 17, 4-28.
[25]
Kenneth Rogoff. 2015. Costs and benefits to phasing out paper currency. NBER Macroecon. Annu 29 (2.1), 445-456.
[26]
Kenneth S. Rogoff. 2017. The Curse of Cash: How Large-Denomination Bills Aid Crime and Tax Evasion and Constrain Monetary Policy. Princeton University Press.
[27]
Emma Runnemark, Jonas Hedman and Xiao Xiao. 2015. Do consumers pay more using debit cards than cash? Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 14, 285-291.
[28]
Rzeczpospolita. 2019. Polacy zwolennikami płatności bezgotówkowych (6 June) [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://www.rp.pl/Finanse/306069931-Polacyzwolennikami-platnosci-bezgotowkowych.html.
[29]
Ekaterina Semerikova. 2020. What hinders the usage of smartphone payments in Russia? Perception of technological and security barriers. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 161, 120312.
[30]
Ekaterina Semerikova. 2019. Payment instruments choice of Russian consumers: reasons and pain points. J. Enterp. Communities 14 (1), 22-41. 2019-0089.
[31]
Oz Shy. 2020. Low-income consumers and payment choice. Research in Economics 74, 292-300.
[32]
Ewelina Sokołowska. 2015. Innovations in the payment card market: The case of Poland. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 14, 292-304.
[33]
Oskar Szumski. 2020. Digital payment methods within Polish students – leading decision characteristics. Procedia Computer Science 176, 3456-3465.
[34]
Carin van der Cruijsen, Lola Hernandez and Nicole Jonker. 2017. In love with the debit card but still married to cash. Appl. Econ. 49 (30), 2989-3004.
[35]
Yanying Zhang, Gaiyan Zhang, Liuling Liu, Tania De Renzis and Heiko Schmiedel. 2019. Retail payments and the real economy. Journal of Financial Stability 44, 1006690.

Index Terms

  1. Bank Cards Usage by Russian Students: a Step Forward or a Fading Reality?
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        DEFIN-2021: IV International Scientific and Practical Conference
        March 2021
        476 pages
        ISBN:9781450390323
        DOI:10.1145/3487757
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 13 February 2022

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. Bank cards
        2. NFC-payment
        3. cash
        4. cash withdrawal
        5. cashless payment
        6. demonetization
        7. shopping
        8. smartphone payment
        9. students

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Conference

        DEFIN-2021
        DEFIN-2021: IV INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL CONFERENCE
        March 18 - 19, 2021
        St.Petersburg, Russian Federation

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • 0
          Total Citations
        • 26
          Total Downloads
        • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
        Reflects downloads up to 13 Dec 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        View Options

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format.

        HTML Format

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media