[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3485447.3512053acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Optimal Collaterals in Multi-Enterprise Investment Networks

Published: 25 April 2022 Publication History

Abstract

We study a market of investments on networks, where each agent (vertex) can invest in any enterprise linked to her, and at the same time, raise capital for her firm’s enterprise from other agents she is linked to. Failing to raise sufficient capital results with the firm defaulting, being unable to invest in others. Our main objective is to examine the role of collateral contracts in handling the strategic risk that can propagate to a systemic risk throughout the network in a cascade of defaults. We take a mechanism-design approach and solve for the optimal scheme of collateral contracts that capital raisers offer their investors. These contracts aim at sustaining the efficient level of investment as a unique Nash equilibrium, while minimizing the total collateral.
Our main results contrast the network environment with its non-network counterpart (where the sets of investors and capital raisers are disjoint). We show that for acyclic investment networks, the network environment does not necessitate any additional collaterals, and systemic risk can be fully handled by optimal bilateral collateral contracts between capital raisers and their investors. This is, unfortunately, not the case for cyclic investment networks. We show that bilateral contracting will not suffice to resolve systemic risk, and the market will need an external entity to design a global collateral scheme for all capital raisers. Furthermore, the minimum total collateral that will sustain the efficient level of investment as a unique equilibrium may be arbitrarily higher, even in simple cyclic investment networks, compared with the corresponding non-network environment. Additionally, we prove computational-complexity results, both for a single enterprise and for networks.

References

[1]
Daron Acemoglu, Asuman Ozdaglar, and Alireza Tahbaz-Salehi. 2015. Systemic risk and stability in financial networks. American Economic Review 105, 2 (2015), 564–608.
[2]
Moshe Babaioff, Yoav Kolumbus, and Eyal Winter. 2020. Optimal Collaterals in Multi-Enterprise Investment Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.06247(2020). https://arxiv.org/pdf/2011.06247.pdf
[3]
Ana Babus. 2013. The formation of financial networks. (2013). https://ssrn.com/abstract=939754
[4]
Ana Babus and Tai-Wei Hu. 2017. Endogenous intermediation in over-the-counter markets. Journal of Financial Economics 125, 1 (2017), 200–215.
[5]
Amir Ban and Moran Koren. 2020. Sequential Fundraising and Social Insurance. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM Conference on Economics and Computation (Virtual Event, Hungary) (EC ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 45–46. https://doi.org/10.1145/3391403.3399479
[6]
Ben Bernanke and Mark Gertler. 1990. Financial fragility and economic performance. The quarterly journal of economics 105, 1 (1990), 87–114.
[7]
Ben S Bernanke and Mark Gertler. 1986. Agency costs, collateral, and business fluctuations. Technical Report. National Bureau of Economic Research.
[8]
Jordi Brandts and David J. Cooper. 2006. A Change Would Do You Good.... An Experimental Study on How to Overcome Coordination Failure in Organizations. American Economic Review 96, 3 (2006), 669–693. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.3.669
[9]
Fabio Caccioli, Paolo Barucca, and Teruyoshi Kobayashi. 2018. Network models of financial systemic risk: a review. Journal of Computational Social Science 1, 1 (2018), 81–114.
[10]
Larry Eisenberg and Thomas H Noe. 2001. Systemic risk in financial systems. Management Science 47, 2 (2001), 236–249.
[11]
Matthew Elliott, Benjamin Golub, and Matthew O Jackson. 2014. Financial networks and contagion. American Economic Review 104, 10 (2014), 3115–53.
[12]
Selman Erol and Rakesh Vohra. 2018. Network formation and systemic risk. Available at SSRN 2546310(2018).
[13]
Maryam Farboodi. 2014. Intermediation and voluntary exposure to counterparty risk. Available at SSRN 2535900(2014).
[14]
Prasanna Gai and Sujit Kapadia. 2010. Contagion in financial networks. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 466, 2120 (2010), 2401–2423.
[15]
Marina Halac, Ilan Kremer, and Eyal Winter. 2020. Raising Capital from Heterogeneous Investors. American Economic Review 110, 3 (March 2020), 889–921. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20190234
[16]
Matthew O Jackson and Agathe Pernoud. 2019. Distorted Investment Incentives, Regulation, and Equilibrium Multiplicity in a Model of Financial Networks. Regulation, and Equilibrium Multiplicity in a Model of Financial Networks (March 1, 2019) (2019).
[17]
Matthew O Jackson and Agathe Pernoud. 2021. Systemic risk in financial networks: A survey. Annual Review of Economics 13 (2021), 171–202.
[18]
Dov Monderer and Moshe Tennenholtz. 2004. k-Implementation. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 21 (2004), 37–62.
[19]
Dov Monderer and Moshe Tennenholtz. 2009. Strong mediated equilibrium. Artificial Intelligence 173, 1 (2009), 180–195.
[20]
Noam Nisan and Amir Ronen. 2001. Algorithmic mechanism design. Games and Economic behavior 35, 1-2 (2001), 166–196.
[21]
Leonard CG Rogers and Luitgard AM Veraart. 2013. Failure and rescue in an interbank network. Management Science 59, 4 (2013), 882–898.
[22]
Steffen Schuldenzucker and Sven Seuken. 2020. Portfolio Compression in Financial Networks: Incentives and Systemic Risk. (2020), 79–79.
[23]
Steffen Schuldenzucker, Sven Seuken, and Stefano Battiston. 2020. Default ambiguity: Credit default swaps create new systemic risks in financial networks. Management Science 66, 5 (2020), 1981–1998.
[24]
Ilya Segal. 1999. Contracting with externalities. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 114, 2 (1999), 337–388.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)How and why to manipulate your own agentProceedings of the 36th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems10.5555/3600270.3602306(28080-28094)Online publication date: 28-Nov-2022

Index Terms

  1. Optimal Collaterals in Multi-Enterprise Investment Networks
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

          Information & Contributors

          Information

          Published In

          cover image ACM Conferences
          WWW '22: Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022
          April 2022
          3764 pages
          ISBN:9781450390965
          DOI:10.1145/3485447
          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Sponsors

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          Published: 25 April 2022

          Permissions

          Request permissions for this article.

          Check for updates

          Author Tags

          1. Financial Networks
          2. Investment
          3. Mechanism Design
          4. Strategic Risk

          Qualifiers

          • Research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Funding Sources

          • The European Research Council (ERC)

          Conference

          WWW '22
          Sponsor:
          WWW '22: The ACM Web Conference 2022
          April 25 - 29, 2022
          Virtual Event, Lyon, France

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

          Contributors

          Other Metrics

          Bibliometrics & Citations

          Bibliometrics

          Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)19
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
          Reflects downloads up to 17 Jan 2025

          Other Metrics

          Citations

          Cited By

          View all
          • (2022)How and why to manipulate your own agentProceedings of the 36th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems10.5555/3600270.3602306(28080-28094)Online publication date: 28-Nov-2022

          View Options

          Login options

          View options

          PDF

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format.

          HTML Format

          Media

          Figures

          Other

          Tables

          Share

          Share

          Share this Publication link

          Share on social media