[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3478431.3499355acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

A Framework for Socially-Relevant Service-Learning Internship Experiences for High School Students

Published: 22 February 2022 Publication History

Abstract

By age 15 girls start to lose interest in STEM, and less than 50% consider a STEM-related career. Providing hands-on internship opportunities has been one of the leading ways to help connect students with exploring computing careers; however, these opportunities are limited in high school. We propose a framework for a university-led high school internship initiative that focuses on service learning, co-design, and the propagation of engaging computing curricula for younger audiences. We piloted this model virtually in summer 2021, with high school students and teachers as interns mentored by university role models. Teams led the development and implementation of computing-infused curricula for a virtual summer coding camp. In this article, we share our framework and review the importance of service-learning for recruiting diverse participants and the use of co-design as a way to broker relationships between developers and community stakeholders. Additionally, we provide preliminary outcomes of our internship model on student and teacher participants gathered from qualitative data including end-of-summer presentations and post-program interviews.

References

[1]
Susan A Ambrose, Michael W Bridges, Michele DiPietro, Marsha C Lovett, and Marie K Norman. 2010. How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching .John Wiley & Sons, San Francisco, CA, USA.
[2]
Alexander W Astin, Lori J Vogelgesang, Elaine K Ikeda, and Jennifer A Yee. 2000. How service learning affects students. Higher Education, Vol. 2000, 144 (2000), bibinfonumpages7 pages.
[3]
Lecia Barker, Christopher Lynnly Hovey, and Leisa D Thompson. 2014. Results of a large-scale, multi-institutional study of undergraduate retention in computing. In 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings . IEEE, USA, 1--8.
[4]
Tim Bell and Jan Vahrenhold. 2018. CS unplugged-how is it used, and does it work? In Adventures between lower bounds and higher altitudes. Springer, Switzerland, 497--521.
[5]
Hart Blanton. 2013. Evaluating the self in the context of another: The three-selves model of social comparison assimilation and contrast. In Cognitive social psychology . Psychology Press, NY, NY, USA, 79--91.
[6]
Catherine Bovill, Alison Cook-Sather, Peter Felten, Luke Millard, and Niamh Moore-Cherry. 2016. Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: Overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student--staff partnerships. Higher Education, Vol. 71, 2 (2016), 195--208.
[7]
Catherine Bovill, Kate Morss, and Catherine Bulley. 2009. Should students participate in curriculum design? Discussion arising from a first year curriculum design project and a literature review. Pedagogical Research in Maximising Education, Vol. 3, 2 (2009), 17--25.
[8]
Michael Buckley, John Nordlinger, and Devika Subramanian. 2008. Socially relevant computing. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Vol. 40, 1 (2008), 347--351.
[9]
Abraham P Buunk, José Maria Peiró, and Chris Griffioen. 2007. A positive role model may stimulate career-oriented behavior 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 37, 7 (2007), 1489--1500.
[10]
Anthony P Carnevale, Jeff Strohl, and Michelle Melton. 2013. What's it Worth?: The economic value of college majors. (2013).
[11]
Sarah Chapman and Rebecca Vivian. 2017. Engaging the future of STEM: A study of international best practice for promoting the participation of young people, particularly girls, in science, technology, engineering and maths (STEM). Sydney: Chief Executive Women (2017).
[12]
Code Advocacy Coalition. 2020. state of computer science education: Illuminating disparities.
[13]
Allan Collins, John Seely Brown, and Susan E Newman. 1988. Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics. Thinking: The journal of philosophy for children, Vol. 8, 1 (1988), 2--10.
[14]
James M Conway, Elise L Amel, and Daniel P Gerwien. 2009. Teaching and learning in the social context: A meta-analysis of service learning's effects on academic, personal, social, and citizenship outcomes. Teaching of psychology, Vol. 36, 4 (2009), 233--245.
[15]
Teresa Dahlberg, Tiffany Barnes, Kim Buch, and Karen Bean. 2010. Applying service learning to computer science: attracting and engaging under-represented students. Computer Science Education, Vol. 20, 3 (2010), 169--180.
[16]
Jill Denner. 2011. What predicts middle school girls' interest in computing? International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, Vol. 3, 1 (2011).
[17]
Betsy James DiSalvo, Mark Guzdial, Tom Mcklin, Charles Meadows, Kenneth Perry, Corey Steward, and Amy S Bruckman. 2009. Glitch Game Testers: African American Men Breaking Open the Console. In Digra conference . Academia, USA.
[18]
Yihuan Dong, Veronica Catete, Robin Jocius, Nicholas Lytle, Tiffany Barnes, Jennifer Albert, Deepti Joshi, Richard Robinson, and Ashley Andrews. 2019. PRADA: A practical model for integrating computational thinking in K-12 education. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM, NY, NY, USA, 906--912.
[19]
W DuBow and J.J. Gonzalez. 2020. NCWIT Scorecard: The Status of Women in Technology. Boulder, CO: NCWIT.
[20]
Jacquelynne Eccles. 1983. Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. Achievement and achievement motives (1983).
[21]
National Science Foundation. 2020. Research Experiences for Teachers (RET) in Engineering and Computer Science . National Science Foundation. https://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=505170
[22]
Meg Fryling, MaryAnne Egan, Robin Y Flatland, Scott Vandenberg, and Sharon Small. 2018. Catch'em Early: Internship and Assistantship CS Mentoring Programs for Underclassmen. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM, NY, NY, USA, 658--663.
[23]
Google Inc. 2014. Women Who Choose Computer Science - What Really Matters: The Critical Role of Encouragement and Exposure . Technical Report. http://www.google.com/edu.
[24]
Lynda Gratton, Elisabeth Kelan, Andreas Voigt, Lamia Walker, and Hans-Joachim Wolfram. 2007. Innovative potential: men and women in teams. The Lehman Brothers Centre for Women in Business. London Business School (2007).
[25]
John Hoxmeier and Margarita M Lenk. 2003. Service-learning in information systems courses: Community projects that make a difference. Journal of Information Systems Education, Vol. 14, 1 (2003), 91--100.
[26]
Amy Isvik. 2020. FLAMES: A Socially Relevant Computing Experience for High School Students. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education . ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1428--1428.
[27]
Amy Isvik, Veronica Cateté, Lauren Alvarez, Nicholas Lytle, and Tiffany Barnes. 2020. Exploring Differences Between Student and Teacher Created Snap! Projects. In 2020 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) . IEEE, USA, 1--5.
[28]
Ghaith M Jaradat. 2017. Internship training in computer science: Exploring student satisfaction levels. Evaluation and program planning, Vol. 63 (2017), 109--115.
[29]
Sanna J"arvel"a, Marjaana Veermans, and Piritta Leinonen. 2008. Investigating student engagement in computer-supported inquiry: A process-oriented analysis. Social Psychology of Education, Vol. 11, 3 (2008), 299--322.
[30]
Amanpreet Kapoor and Christina Gardner-McCune. 2019. Understanding CS undergraduate students' professional development through the lens of internship experiences. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM, NY, NY, USA, 852--858.
[31]
Nazish Zaman Khan and Andrew Luxton-Reilly. 2016. Is computing for social good the solution to closing the gender gap in computer science?. In Proceedings of the Australasian Computer Science Week Multiconference. ACM, 1--5.
[32]
Karen A Kim, Amy J Fann, and Kimberly O Misa-Escalante. 2011. Engaging women in computer science and engineering: Promising practices for promoting gender equity in undergraduate research experiences. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), Vol. 11, 2 (2011), 1--19.
[33]
Jake Knapp, John Zeratsky, and Braden Kowitz. 2016. Sprint: How to solve big problems and test new ideas in just five days .Simon and Schuster, NY, NY, USA.
[34]
A Martinez and C Christnacht. 2021. Women making gains in STEM occupations but still underrepresented. Available from United States Census Bureau. https://www. census. gov/library/stories/2021/01/women-making-gains-in-stem-occupations-but-still-underrepresented. html#: : text= Women% 20Make% 20Gains% 20in% 20Some, up, Vol. 2048 (2021), 25.
[35]
Valerie J Morganson, Meghan P Jones, and Debra A Major. 2010. Understanding women's underrepresentation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: The role of social coping. The Career Development Quarterly, Vol. 59, 2 (2010), 169--179.
[36]
Daphna Oyserman and Mesmin Destin. 2010. Identity-based motivation: Implications for intervention. The Counseling Psychologist, Vol. 38, 7 (2010), 1001--1043.
[37]
Michael Papadimitriou. 2014. High school students' perceptions of their internship experiences and the related impact on career choices and changes. Online Journal for Workforce Education and Development, Vol. 7, 1 (2014), 8.
[38]
Rita Manco Powell. 2008. Improving the persistence of first-year undergraduate women in computer science. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Vol. 40, 1 (2008), 518--522.
[39]
Julie L Quimby and Angela M De Santis. 2006. The influence of role models on women's career choices. The Career Development Quarterly, Vol. 54, 4 (2006), 297--306.
[40]
Linda Rising and Norman S Janoff. 2000. The Scrum software development process for small teams. IEEE software, Vol. 17, 4 (2000), 26--32.
[41]
Wolff-Michael Roth. 2012. Authentic school science: Knowing and learning in open-inquiry science laboratories. Vol. 1. Springer Science & Business Media, Netherlands.
[42]
Richard M Ryan and Edward L Deci. 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, Vol. 55, 1 (2000), 68.
[43]
R Keith Sawyer. 2005. The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences .Cambridge University Press, cambridge, UK.
[44]
Linda J Sax, Kathleen J Lehman, Jerry A Jacobs, M Allison Kanny, Gloria Lim, Laura Monje-Paulson, and Hilary B Zimmerman. 2017. Anatomy of an enduring gender gap: The evolution of women's participation in computer science. The Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 88, 2 (2017), 258--293.
[45]
Jacquelyn F Sullivan, Derek Reamon, and Beverly Louie. 2003. Girls embrace technology: A summer internship for high school girls. In 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education, 2003. FIE 2003., Vol. 1. IEEE, Westminster, CO, USA, T4D--6.
[46]
Andrew Trotman. 2017. Why don't European girls like science or technology. Retrieved November, Vol. 12 (2017), 2018.
[47]
Jennifer Wang and Sepehr Hejazi Moghadam. 2017. Diversity barriers in K-12 computer science education: Structural and social. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education . ACM, 615--620.
[48]
Carmen Werder and Megan Michelle Otis. 2010. Engaging student voices in the study of teaching and learning .Stylus, Sterling, VA, USA.
[49]
Sina Wetzel and Matthias Ludwig. 2020. " Digitechnikum" a space to create meaningful CS projects. In Proceedings of the 15th Workshop on Primary and Secondary Computing Education. ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1--2.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Initiatives of Female Empowerment in Computing Implemented at the High School Level: A Systematic MappingSocieties10.3390/soc1409016714:9(167)Online publication date: 30-Aug-2024
  • (2023)Student Reflections on Service-Learning in Software Engineering and Their Experiences with Non-technical ClientsProceedings of the ACM Conference on Global Computing Education Vol 110.1145/3576882.3617929(112-118)Online publication date: 5-Dec-2023
  • (2022)Case Studies on the Use of Storyboarding by Novice ProgrammersProceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education Vol. 110.1145/3502718.3524749(318-324)Online publication date: 7-Jul-2022

Index Terms

  1. A Framework for Socially-Relevant Service-Learning Internship Experiences for High School Students

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGCSE 2022: Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education - Volume 1
        February 2022
        1049 pages
        ISBN:9781450390705
        DOI:10.1145/3478431
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Sponsors

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 22 February 2022

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Badges

        • Best Paper

        Author Tags

        1. high school internship
        2. service learning
        3. tiered-mentoring

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article

        Funding Sources

        Conference

        SIGCSE 2022
        Sponsor:

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate 1,595 of 4,542 submissions, 35%

        Upcoming Conference

        SIGCSE TS 2025
        The 56th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
        February 26 - March 1, 2025
        Pittsburgh , PA , USA

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)233
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)34
        Reflects downloads up to 21 Dec 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2024)Initiatives of Female Empowerment in Computing Implemented at the High School Level: A Systematic MappingSocieties10.3390/soc1409016714:9(167)Online publication date: 30-Aug-2024
        • (2023)Student Reflections on Service-Learning in Software Engineering and Their Experiences with Non-technical ClientsProceedings of the ACM Conference on Global Computing Education Vol 110.1145/3576882.3617929(112-118)Online publication date: 5-Dec-2023
        • (2022)Case Studies on the Use of Storyboarding by Novice ProgrammersProceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education Vol. 110.1145/3502718.3524749(318-324)Online publication date: 7-Jul-2022

        View Options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Login options

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media