[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3474717.3483964acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

AI-BPO: Adaptive incremental BLE beacon placement optimization for crowd density monitoring applications

Published: 04 November 2021 Publication History

Abstract

With the pandemic of COVID-19, indoor crowd density monitoring has become one of the most critical responsibilities of public space managers. Beacon placement optimization has been tackled as fundamental research work as the performance of crowd density monitoring highly depends on how BLE beacons are allocated. In this research, we propose a novel beacon placement optimization approach to incrementally place the beacon on the updated detection status adaptively in favor of Bayesian optimization, which can help to provide the optimal beacon placement. Our proposed method can optimize the beacon placement effectively to improve the signal coverage quality in the given environment and minimize human workload.

References

[1]
Pe Lin Chiu and Frank YS Lin. 2004. A simulated annealing algorithm to support the sensor placement for target location. In Proc. on CCECE, Vol. 2. 867--870.
[2]
Thai-Mai Thi Dinh, Ngoc-Son Duong, and Kumbesan Sandrasegaran. 2020. Smartphone-based Indoor Positioning Using BLE iBeacon and Reliable Lightweight Fingerprint Map. Jour. on IEEE Sensors 20, 17 (2020), 10283--10294.
[3]
Francisco Domingo-Perez, Jose Luis Lazaro-Galilea, Ignacio Bravo, Alfredo Gardel, and David Rodriguez. 2016. Optimization of the Coverage and Accuracy of an Indoor Positioning System with a Variable Number of Sensors. Jour. on Sensors 16, 6 (2016), 934.
[4]
Raphael Falque, Mitesh Patel, and Jacob Biehl. 2018. Optimizing placement and number of RF beacons to achieve better indoor localization. In Proc. on ICRA. 2304--2311.
[5]
Amitabha Ghosh and Sajal K Das. 2008. Coverage and connectivity issues in wireless sensor networks: A survey. Jour. on PMC 4, 3 (2008), 303--334.
[6]
Volkan Isler and Ruzena Bajcsy. 2005. The sensor selection problem for bounded uncertainty sensing models. In Proc. on IPSN. 151--158.
[7]
Shengbing Jiang, Ratnesh Kumar, and Humberto E Garcia. 2003. Optimal sensor selection for discrete-event systems with partial observation. Trans. on Automatic Control 48, 3 (2003), 369--381.
[8]
Hyunseok Kim, Seongju Chang, and Jinsul Kim. 2014. Consensus achievement of decentralized sensors using adapted particle swarm optimization algorithm. Jour. on DSNs 10, 4 (2014), 950683.
[9]
Peng Li, Liuwei Huang, and Jiachao Peng. 2018. Sensor distribution optimization for structural impact monitoring based on NSGA-II and wavelet decomposition. Jour. on Sensors 18, 12 (2018), 4264.
[10]
Avishek Mukhopadhyay, Sarbani Roy, and Nandini Mukherjee. 2012. An approach of beacon placement and beacon based routing towards mobile sink in WSN. In Proc. on CUBE. 149--154.
[11]
Sarbani Roy and Nandini Mukherjee. 2014. Integer linear programming formulation of optimal beacon placement problem in WSN. In Proc. on AIMoC. 111--117.
[12]
Akihiro Sato, Madoka Nakajima, and Naohiko Kohtake. 2019. Rapid BLE beacon localization with range-only EKF-SLAM using beacon interval constraint. In Proc. on IPIN. 1--8.
[13]
Charles Schaff, David Yunis, Ayan Chakrabarti, and Matthew R Walter. 2017. Jointly optimizing placement and inference for beacon-based localization. In Proc. on IROS. 6609--6616.
[14]
Masamichi Shimosaka and Osamu Saisho. 2016. Efficient calibration for RSSI-based indoor localization by bayesian experimental design on multi-task classification. In Proc. on Ubicomp. 244--249.
[15]
Masamichi Shimosaka, Osamu Saisho, Takuya Sunakawa, Hidenori Koyasu, Keisuke Maeda, and Ryoma Kawajiri. 2016. ZigBee based wireless indoor localization with sensor placement optimization towards practical home sensing. Trans. on Advanced Robotics 30, 5 (2016), 315--325.
[16]
Iuliia Vlasenko, Ioanis Nikolaidis, and Eleni Stroulia. 2014. The smartcondo: Optimizing sensor placement for indoor localization. Trans. on SMC 45, 3 (2014), 436--453.
[17]
Hui Wu, Zhe Liu, Jin Hu, and Weifeng Yin. 2020. Sensor placement optimization for critical-grid coverage problem of indoor positioning. Jour. on Distributed Sensor Networks 16, 12 (2020), 1550147720979922.
[18]
Yourim Yoon and Yong-Hyuk Kim. 2013. An efficient genetic algorithm for maximum coverage deployment in wireless sensor networks. Trans. on Cybernetics 43, 5 (2013), 1473--1483.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Data-driven Simulation of Wireless Communication Signal Strength in Indoor Environments2023 13th International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN)10.1109/IPIN57070.2023.10332523(1-6)Online publication date: 25-Sep-2023
  • (2022)Analyzing the Impact of COVID-19 Control Policies on Campus Occupancy and Mobility via WiFi SensingACM Transactions on Spatial Algorithms and Systems10.1145/35165248:3(1-26)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2022

Index Terms

  1. AI-BPO: Adaptive incremental BLE beacon placement optimization for crowd density monitoring applications

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGSPATIAL '21: Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems
      November 2021
      700 pages
      ISBN:9781450386647
      DOI:10.1145/3474717
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 04 November 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. adaptive optimization
      2. crowd density monitoring
      3. placement optimization

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      SIGSPATIAL '21
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 257 of 1,238 submissions, 21%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
      Reflects downloads up to 26 Dec 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2023)Data-driven Simulation of Wireless Communication Signal Strength in Indoor Environments2023 13th International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN)10.1109/IPIN57070.2023.10332523(1-6)Online publication date: 25-Sep-2023
      • (2022)Analyzing the Impact of COVID-19 Control Policies on Campus Occupancy and Mobility via WiFi SensingACM Transactions on Spatial Algorithms and Systems10.1145/35165248:3(1-26)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2022

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media