[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

“What Happens to the Raspado man in a Cash-free Society?”: Teaching and Learning Socially Responsible Computing

Published: 15 October 2021 Publication History

Abstract

The Computer Science for All movement is bringing CS to K-12 classrooms across the nation. At the same time, new technologies created by computer scientists have been reproducing existing inequities that directly impact today's youth, while being “promoted and perceived as more objective or progressive than the discriminatory systems of a previous era” [1, p. 5–6]. Current efforts are being made to expose students to the social impact and ethics of computing at both the K-12 and university-level—which we refer to as “socially responsible computing” (SRC) in this paper. Yet there is a lack of research describing what such SRC teaching and learning actively involve and look like, particularly in K-12 classrooms. This paper fills this gap with findings from a research-practice partnership, through a qualitative study in an Advanced Placement Computer Science Principles classroom enrolling low-income Latino/a/x students from a large urban community. The findings illustrate 1) details of teaching practice and student learning during discussions about SRC; 2) the impact these SRC experiences have on student engagement with CS; 3) a teacher's reflections on key considerations for effective SRC pedagogy; and 4) why students’ perspectives and agency must be centered through SRC in computing education.

References

[1]
Ruha Benjamin. 2019. Race after Technology. Polity. Medford, MA.
[2]
Emily M. Bender, Timnit Gebru, Angelina McMillan-Major, and Shmargaret Shmitchell. 2021. On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT’21), March 3–10, 2021, Virtual Event, Canada. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
[3]
Timnit Gebru. 2021. The hierarchy of knowledge in machine learning and related fields and its consequences. Center of Excellence for Minority Women in STEM. Spelman College.
[4]
Joy Buolamwini. 2016. How I'm fighting bias in algorithms. TEDxBeaconStreet. Retrieved on October 29, 2020 from https://www.ted.com/talks/joy_buolamwini_how_i_m_fighting_bias_in_algorithms.
[5]
Cathy O'Neil. 2016/17. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Broadway Books. New York, NY.
[6]
Virginia Eubanks. 2018. Automating Inequality: How High-tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. St Martin's Press. New York, NY.
[7]
Safiya Noble. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York University Press. New York, NY.
[8]
Sara Wachter-Boettcher. 2017. Technically Wrong: Sexist Apps, Biased Algorithms, and Other Threats of Toxic Tech. W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. New York, NY.
[9]
Meredith Broussard. 2018. Artificial Unintelligence. How Computers Misunderstand the World. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA.
[10]
Simone Browne. 2015. Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness. Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
[11]
Kapor Center & ASUCGEST. 2018. Data brief: Women and girls of color in computing.
[12]
Casey Fiesler. 2018. What our tech ethics crisis says about the state of computer science education. Medium: Next Magazine. Retrieved on April 28, 2020 from https://howwegettonext.com/what-our-tech-ethics-crisis-says-about-the-state-of-computer-science-education-a6a5544e1da6.
[13]
Jane Margolis, Rachel Estrella, Joanna Goode, Jennifer Jellison Holme, and Kimberly Nao. 2008/2017. In Stuck in the Shallow End: Education, Race, and Computing. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA.
[14]
Exploring Computer Science. Retrieved on October 29, 2020 from http://exploringcs.org.
[15]
Frank Pasquale. 2014. The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms that Control Money and Information. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
[16]
John Fiske. 1998. Surveilling the city: Whiteness, the Black man and democratic totalitarianism. Theory, Culture and Society 15, 2 (1998), 67–88.
[17]
David Lyon. 2003. Surveillance after September 11. Polity Press, Cambridge, MA.
[18]
David A. Banks and Michael Lachney. 2018. Engineered violence: Confronting the problems of neutrality and violence in engineering. International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice, and Peace 5, 1–2 (2018), 1–12.
[19]
Dean Nieusma and Ethan Blue. 2012. Engineering and war. International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice, and Peace 1, 1 (2012), 50–62.
[20]
Clark Thompson. 1986. Military direction of academic CS research. Communications of the ACM (July 1986), 29, 7, 583–585.
[21]
Casey Fiesler, Natalie Garrett, and Nathan Beard. 2020. What do we teach when we teach tech ethics? A syllabi analysis. In The 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’20), March 11–14, 2020, Portland, OR, USA. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366825
[22]
Moshe Vardi. 2018. Computer professionals for social responsibility. Communications of the ACM, (Jan 2018), 61, 1, 9.
[23]
Keith Miller. 1988. Integrating computer ethics into the computer science curriculum. Computer Science Education 1, 1 (1988), 37–52, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/0899340880010104
[24]
Charles Huff and C. Diane Martin. 1995. Computing consequences: A framework for teaching ethical computing. Communications of the ACM 38, 12, 75–84.
[25]
Sara Vogel, Rafi Santo, and Dixie Ching. 2017. Visions of computer science education: Unpacking arguments for and projected impacts of CS4All initiatives. SIGCSE Conference.
[26]
Rafi Santo, Sara Vogel, and Dixie Ching. 2019. CS for what? Diverse visions of Computer Science Education in Practice. CSforAll, New York, NY.
[27]
Kimberly A. Scott and Patricia Garcia. 2017. Techno-social change agents: Fostering activist dispositions among girls of color. Meridians: Feminism, Race, Transnationalism 15, 1 (2017), 65–85.
[28]
Sepehr Vakil and Jennifer Higgs. 2019. It's about power: A call to rethink ethics and equity in computing education. Communications of the ACM 62, 3 (2019), 31–33.
[29]
Yolanda Rankin, Jakita O. Thomas, and Sheena Erete. 2021. Real talk: Saturated sites of violence in CS education. SIGCSE 2021. https://doi.org/10.1145/3408877.3432432
[30]
Sepehr Vakil. 2018. Ethics, identity, and political vision: Toward a justice-centered approach to equity in computer science education. Harvard Educational Review 88, 1, 26–52.
[31]
Daniel Morales-Doyle, Shirin Vossoughi, Sepehr Vakil, and Megan Bang. 2020. In an era of pandemic and protest, STEM education can't pretend to be apolitical. Truthout. Retrieved on June 25, 2021 from https://truthout.org/articles/in-an-era-of-pandemic-and-protest-stem-education-cant-pretend-to-be-apolitical/.
[32]
Saber Kahn. 2017. #ethicalCS: Programming. Medium. Retrieved October 28, 2020 from https://medium.com/@ed_saber/ethicalcs-programming-52d09da1c1cd.
[33]
Alicia Nicki Washington. 2020. When twice as good isn't enough: The case for cultural competence in computing. SIGCSE 2020.
[34]
Robert Moses and Charles E. Cobb Jr. 2001. Radical Equations: Civil Rights from Mississippi to the Algebra Project. Beacon Press. Boston.
[35]
Danny B. Martin. 2003. Hidden assumptions and unaddressed questions in mathematics for all rhetoric. The Mathematics Educator 13, 2, 17–21.
[36]
Katie Shilton. 2018. Values and ethics in human-computer interaction. Foundations and Trends in Human–Computer Interaction 12, 2 (2018), 107–171. https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000073
[38]
Cynthia E. Coburn, William R. Penuel, and Kimberly E. Geil. 2013. Research-Practice Partnerships: A strategy for leveraging research for educational improvement in school districts. William T. Grant Foundation, New York, NY.
[39]
Vivian Tseng. 2012. Partnerships: Shifting the dynamics between research and practice. William T. Grant Foundation, New York, NY.
[40]
Lev S. Vygotsky. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Mental Processes. Harvard University Press.
[41]
Hal Abelson, Ken Ledeen, and Harry Lewis. 2008. Blown to Bits: Your Life, Liberty, and Happiness After the Digital Explosion. Addison-Wesley. Upper Saddle River, NJ.
[42]
Vint Cerf. 2002. The internet is for everyone. Retrieved on June 25, 2021 from https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3271.
[43]
Zaretta Hammond. 2015. Culturally Responsive Teaching and the Brain. Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, CA.
[44]
Center for Humane Technology. 2021. June 25, 2021 https://www.humanetech.com/what-we-do.
[45]
Henri Giroux. 1987. Liberal arts, public philosophy, and the politics of civic courage. JSTOR 17 3, (Autumn, 1987), 331–335.
[46]
Jean J. Ryoo, Cynthia Estrada, Tiera Tanksley, and Jane Margolis. 2019. Connecting computer science education to students’ passions: A critical step toward supporting equity in CS education. University of California, Los Angeles, Center X: Computer Science Equity Project.
[47]
Jean J. Ryoo, Tiera Tanksley, Cynthia Estrada, and Jane Margolis. 2020. Take space, make space: How students use computer science to disrupt and resist marginalization in schools. Computer Science Education, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2020.1805284
[48]
Paulo Freire. 1970/1997. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Bloomsbury, NY.
[49]
Bettina Love. 2019. We Want to do More than Survive: Abolitionist Teaching and the Pursuit of Educational Freedom. Beacon Press, Boston, MA.
[50]
Joanna Goode, Allison Ivey, Stephany RunningHawk Johnson, Jean J. Ryoo, and Christine Ong. 2020. Rac(e)ing to computer science for all: how teachers talk and learn about equity in professional development. Computer Science Education
[51]
Jacqueline Leonard, Wanda Brooks, Joy Barnes-Johnson, and Robert Q. Berry III. 2010. The nuances and complexities of teaching mathematics for cultural relevance and social justice. Journal of Teacher Education 61, 3 (2010), 261–270.
[52]
John Lewis. 2020. Together, you can redeem the soul of our nation. NY Times Op Ed. (2020). Retrieved October 28, 2020 from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/30/opinion/john-lewis-civil-rights-america.html.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Decoloniality, Digital-coloniality and Computer Programming EducationACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/370233224:4(1-30)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2024
  • (2024)How Economically Marginalized Adolescents of Color Negotiate Critical Pedagogy in a Computing ClassroomACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/370233025:1(1-29)Online publication date: 30-Oct-2024
  • (2024)“Show Them the Playbook That These Companies Are Using”: Youth Voices about Why Computer Science Education Must Center Discussions of Power, Ethics, and Culturally Responsive ComputingACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/366064524:3(1-21)Online publication date: 23-Apr-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. “What Happens to the Raspado man in a Cash-free Society?”: Teaching and Learning Socially Responsible Computing

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Transactions on Computing Education
    ACM Transactions on Computing Education  Volume 21, Issue 4
    December 2021
    290 pages
    EISSN:1946-6226
    DOI:10.1145/3487991
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 15 October 2021
    Accepted: 01 July 2021
    Revised: 01 June 2021
    Received: 01 June 2020
    Published in TOCE Volume 21, Issue 4

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Research-practice partnership
    2. instructional pedagogy
    3. socially responsible computing
    4. student agency

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Refereed

    Funding Sources

    • National Science Foundation
    • Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)176
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)16
    Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Decoloniality, Digital-coloniality and Computer Programming EducationACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/370233224:4(1-30)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2024
    • (2024)How Economically Marginalized Adolescents of Color Negotiate Critical Pedagogy in a Computing ClassroomACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/370233025:1(1-29)Online publication date: 30-Oct-2024
    • (2024)“Show Them the Playbook That These Companies Are Using”: Youth Voices about Why Computer Science Education Must Center Discussions of Power, Ethics, and Culturally Responsive ComputingACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/366064524:3(1-21)Online publication date: 23-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Generation and Evaluation of a Culturally-Relevant CS1 Textbook for Latines using Large Language ModelsProceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3649217.3653600(325-331)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2024
    • (2023)Modeling Conceptual Knowledge of Computing Impacts for K-12Proceedings of the 18th WiPSCE Conference on Primary and Secondary Computing Education Research10.1145/3605468.3605469(1-10)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2023
    • (2023)Why We Should Supplement Ethics with CitizenshipProceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Information Technology for Social Good10.1145/3582515.3609519(68-73)Online publication date: 6-Sep-2023
    • (2023)Funds of Knowledge used by Adolescents of Color in Scaffolded Sensemaking around Algorithmic FairnessProceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3568813.3600110(191-205)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2023
    • (2023)Racial Justice Amidst the Dangers of Computing Creep: A DialogueTechTrends10.1007/s11528-023-00835-z67:3(467-474)Online publication date: 25-Feb-2023
    • (2022)Can Citizenship Education Benefit Computing?Informatics10.3390/informatics90400939:4(93)Online publication date: 18-Nov-2022
    • (2022)Introduction to the Special Issue on Justice-Centered Computing Education, Part 2ACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/353098222:3(1-6)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Full Text

    View this article in Full Text.

    Full Text

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media