More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

Exploring an Architectural Framework for Human-Building Interaction via a Semi-Immersive Cross-Reality Methodology

Authors:

Binh Vinh Duc Nguyen,

Adalberto L. Simeone,

Andrew Vande MoereAuthors Info & Claims

HRI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

Pages 252 - 261

https://doi.org/10.1145/3434073.3444643

Published: 08 March 2021 Publication History

Abstract

The vision of responsive architecture predicts that human experience can be evoked through the dynamic orchestration of space-defining elements. Whereas recent studies have robotically actuated furniture for functional goals, little is known how this capability can be deployed meaningfully on an architectural scale. We thus evaluated the spatial impact of a responsive wall on the inhabitants of ordinary apartments. To maintain safety during the COVID-19 pandemic, we developed a novel remote, semi-immersive cross-reality simulation evaluation methodology. Based on the orchestration of three space-defining operations, we define a theoretical framework that suggests how the position of a responsive wall can be determined through five distinct architectural qualities. This framework thus proposes how human-building interaction (HBI) could complement its functional goals with augmenting the well-being of occupants in the physical as well as the virtual realm.

Supplementary Material

PDF File (hrifp1006aux.pdf)

Download
3.43 MB

References

[1]

Abhijeet Agnihotri and Heather Knight. 2019. Persuasive ChairBots: A (Mostly) Robot-Recruited Experiment. In 2019 28th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE Press, New Delhi, India, 1--7. https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN46459.2019.8956262

Digital Library

[2]

Hamed S. Alavi, Elizabeth F. Churchill, Mikael Wiberg, Denis Lalanne, Peter Dalsgaard, Ava Fatah gen Schieck, and Yvonne Rogers. 2019 a. Introduction to Human-Building Interaction (HBI): Interfacing HCI with Architecture and Urban Design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Vol. 26, 2, Article 6 (2019), bibinfonumpages10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3309714

Digital Library

[3]

Hamed S. Alavi, Denis Lalanne, Julien Nembrini, Elizabeth Churchill, David Kirk, and Wendy Moncur. 2016. Future of Human-Building Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI EA '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3408--3414. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2856502

Digital Library

[4]

Hamed S. Alavi, Himanshu Verma, Jakub Mlynar, and Denis Lalanne. 2018. The Hide and Seek of Workspace: Towards Human-Centric Sustainable Architecture. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173649

Digital Library

[5]

Hamed S. Alavi, Himanshu Verma, Jakub Mlynar, and Denis Lalanne. 2019 b. On the Temporality of Adaptive Built Environments. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 13--40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70875-1_2

[6]

Christopher Alexander, Sara Ishikawa, Murray Silverstein, Max Jacobson, Ingrid Fiksdahl-King, and Shlomo Angel. 1977. A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. Oxford University Press, Berkeley, CA, USA. 74022874

[7]

Gaston Bachelard. 1994. The Poetics of Space. Beacon Press, Boston, MA, USA. 93027874

[8]

Patrick Bader, Alexandra Voit, Huy Viet Le, Paweł W. Woundefinedniak, Niels Henze, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2019. WindowWall: Towards Adaptive Buildings with Interactive Windows as Ubiquitous Displays. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Vol. 26, 2, Article 11 (2019), bibinfonumpages42 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3310275

Digital Library

[9]

Sebastian Hølt Bak, Nina Rask, and Sebastian Risi. 2016. Towards Adaptive Evolutionary Architecture. In Evolutionary and Biologically Inspired Music, Sound, Art and Design, Colin Johnson, Vic Ciesielski, Jo ao Correia, and Penousal Machado (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 47--62.

[10]

Maryam Banaei, Javad Hatami, Abbas Yazdanfar, and Klaus Gramann. 2017. Walking through Architectural Spaces: The Impact of Interior Forms on Human Brain Dynamics. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Vol. 11 (2017), 477. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00477

[11]

Gernot Bö hme. 2013. Atmosphere as Mindful Physical Presence in Space. OASE Journal for Architecture, Vol. 91 (2013), 21--32. https://www.oasejournal.nl/en/Issues/91/AtmosphereAsMindfulPhysicalPresenceInSpace

[12]

Cameline Bolbroe. 2016. Mapping the Intangible: On Adaptivity and Relational Prototyping. In Architectural Design BT - Architecture and Interaction: Human Computer Interaction in Space and Place, Nicholas S Dalton, Holger Schnä delbach, Mikael Wiberg, and Tasos Varoudis (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 205--229. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30028-3_10

[13]

Isabella Bower, Richard Tucker, and Peter G. Enticott. 2019. Impact of Built Environment Design on Emotion Measured via Neurophysiological Correlates and Subjective Indicators: A Systematic Review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 66 (2019), 101344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101344

[14]

Arianna Brambilla, Hamed Alavi, Himanshu Verma, Denis Lalanne, Thomas Jusselme, and Marilyne Andersen. 2017. "Our Inherent Desire for Control": a Case Study of Automation's Impact on the Perception of Comfort. Energy Procedia, Vol. 122 (2017), 925--930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.414

[15]

Stewart Brand. 1994. How Buildings Learn : What Happens After They're Built. Viking, New York, NY, USA.

[16]

Dennis P.H. Claessens, Sjonnie Boonstra, and Hèrm Hofmeyer. 2020. Spatial zoning for better structural topology design and performance. Advanced Engineering Informatics, Vol. 46 (2020), 101162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2020.101162

[17]

John Coles. 2015. The Fundamentals of Interior Architecture. In The Fundamentals of Interior Architecture 2nd ed.), John Coles (Ed.). Fairchild Books, London, UK. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474221610

[18]

Cameron Duff. 2010. On the Role of Affect and Practice in the Production of Place. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, Vol. 28, 5 (2010), 881--895. https://doi.org/10.1068/d16209

[19]

Charles Eastman. 1971. Adaptive - Conditional Architecture. In Proceedings of the Design Research Society's Conference Manchester 1971. Institute of Physical Planning, Carnegie-Mellon University, London, UK, 51--57.

[20]

Lauren Herckis, Jessica Cao, Jacqui Fashimpaur, Anna Henson, Rachel Rodgers, Thomas W. Corbett, and Jessica Hammer. 2020. Exploring Hybrid Virtual-Physical Homes. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (DIS '20). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 669--680. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395561

Digital Library

[21]

Anders Hermund, Lars Simon Klint, Ture Slot Bundgaard, Rune Noë l Meedom, and Meldgaard Bjørnson-Langen. 2018. The Perception of Architectural Space in Reality, in Virtual Reality, and through Plan and Section Drawings: A Case Study of the Perception of Architectural Atmosphere. In Computing for a better tomorrow - Proceedings of the 2018 eCAADe Conference, Vol. 2. eCAADe, Lodz, Poland, 735--744.

[22]

Arsalan Heydarian, Joao P. Carneiro, David Gerber, Burcin Becerik-Gerber, Timothy Hayes, and Wendy Wood. 2015. Immersive Virtual Environments Versus Physical Built Environments: A Benchmarking Study for Building Design and User-Built Environment Explorations. Automation in Construction, Vol. 54 (2015), 116--126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.03.020

[23]

Henrique Houayek, Keith Evan Green, Leo Gugerty, Ian D Walker, and James Witte. 2014. AWE: an Animated Work Environment for Working with Physical and Digital Tools and Artifacts. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Vol. 18, 5 (2014), 1227--1241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0731-6

[24]

Nils Jäger, Holger Schnädelbach, Jonathan Hale, David Kirk, and Kevin Glover. 2019. WABI: Facilitating Synchrony Between Inhabitants of Adaptive Architecture. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 41--75. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70875-1_3

[25]

Axel Kilian. 2018. The Flexing Room Architectural Robot: An Actuated Active-Bending Robotic Structure using Human Feedback. In Recalibration: On Imprecision and Infidelity, Proceedings of the 2018 ACADIA Conference. Acadia Publishing Company, Bar Harbor, ME, USA, 232--241.

[26]

Peter Kraftl. 2010. Geographies of Architecture: The Multiple Lives of Buildings. Geography Compass, Vol. 4, 5 (2010), 402--415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749--8198.2010.00332.x

[27]

Saskia Felizitas Kuliga, Tyler Thrash, Ruth Conroy Dalton, and Christoph Hö lscher. 2015. Virtual Reality as an Empirical Research Tool - Exploring User Experience in a Real Building and a Corresponding Virtual Model. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, Vol. 54 (2015), 363--375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2015.09.006

[28]

Henri Lefebvre. 1992. The Production of Space. John Wiley and Sons, London, UK. gb91002865

[29]

Guopeng Li. 2019. The Dynamics of Architectural Form: Space, Emotion and Memory. Art and Design Review, Vol. 07, 04 (2019), 187--205. https://doi.org/10.4236/adr.2019.74016

[30]

Bohyeon Lim, Yvonne Rogers, and Neil Sebire. 2019. Designing to Distract: Can Interactive Technologies Reduce Visitor Anxiety in a Children's Hospital Setting? ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Vol. 26, 2, Article 9 (2019), 19 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301427

Digital Library

[31]

Tina Anette Madsen. 2017. Walking and Sensing at Faaborg Museum. Atmosphere and Walk-along Interviews at the Museum. Nordisk Museologi, Vol. 2017, 2 (2017), 124--141. https://doi.org/10.5617/nm.6351

[32]

Harry Mallgrave. 2015. Embodiment and Enculturation: the Future of Architectural Design. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 6 (2015), 1398. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01398

[33]

Daryl Martin, Sarah Nettleton, and Christina Buse. 2019. Affecting Care: Maggie's Centres and the Orchestration of Architectural Atmospheres. Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 240 (2019), 112563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112563

[34]

John McCarthy and Peter Wright. 2004. Technology as Experience. Interactions, Vol. 11, 5 (2004), 42--43. https://doi.org/10.1145/1015530.1015549

Digital Library

[35]

Benjamin R. Meagher and Kerry L. Marsh. 2015. Testing an Ecological Account of Spaciousness in Real and Virtual Environments. Environment and Behavior, Vol. 47, 7 (2015), 782--815. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916514525039

[36]

Mark Meagher. 2015. Designing for change: The poetic potential of responsive architecture. Frontiers of Architectural Research, Vol. 4, 2 (2015), 159--165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2015.03.002

[37]

Maurice Merleau-Ponty. 1962. Phenomenology of Perception 1st ed.). Taylor & Francis, London, UK. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203981139

[38]

Samantha Mitchell Finnigan and Adrian K. Clear. 2020. "No Powers, Man!": A Student Perspective on Designing University Smart Building Interactions. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI '20). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376174

Digital Library

[39]

Mark P. Mobach. 2008. Do Virtual Worlds Create Better Real Worlds? Virtual Real., Vol. 12, 3 (2008), 163--179.

Digital Library

[40]

Sara Nabil, David S. Kirk, Thomas Plötz, Julie Trueman, David Chatting, Dmitry Dereshev, and Patrick Olivier. 2017. Interioractive: Smart Materials in the Hands of Designers and Architects for Designing Interactive Interiors. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Edinburgh, United Kingdom) (DIS '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 379--390. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064745

Digital Library

[41]

Pranab Kumar Nag. 2019. Spatial and Behavioural Attributes in Office Design. Springer Singapore, Singapore, 29--49. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2577-9_2

[42]

Asma Naz, Regis Kopper, Ryan P. McMahan, and Mihai Nadin. 2017. Emotional qualities of VR space. In Proceedings - IEEE Virtual Reality. IEEE, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 3--11. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2017.7892225

[43]

Kas Oosterhuis. 2012. Simply complex, toward a new kind of building. Frontiers of Architectural Research, Vol. 1, 4 (2012), 411--420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2012.08.003

[44]

Kas Oosterhuis, Henriette Bier, Cas Aalbers, and Sander Boer. 2004. File to Factory and Real-Time Behavior in ONL-Architecture. In Fabrication: Examining the Digital Practice of Architecture, Proceedings of the 2004 AIA/ACADIA Conference. Coach House Press, Toronto, ON, Canada, 294--305.

[45]

Gordon Pask. 1969. The Architectural Relevance of Cybernetics. Architectural Design, Vol. September, 7 (1969), 494--500. Issue 6.

[46]

Kirsten Kaya Roessler. 2012. Healthy Architecture! Can environments evoke emotional responses? Global journal of health science, Vol. 4, 4 (2012), 83--89. https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v4n4p83

[47]

Yvonne Rogers, William R. Hazlewood, Paul Marshall, Nick Dalton, and Susanna Hertrich. 2010. Ambient Influence: Can Twinkly Lights Lure and Abstract Representations Trigger Behavioral Change?. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (Copenhagen, Denmark) (UbiComp '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 261--270. https://doi.org/10.1145/1864349.1864372

Digital Library

[48]

Shane Saunderson and Goldie Nejat. 2019. How Robots Influence Humans: A Survey of Nonverbal Communication in Social Human--Robot Interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics, Vol. 11, 4 (2019), 575--608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00523-0

[49]

Holger Schnädelbach. 2016. Adaptive Architecture. Interactions, Vol. 23, 2 (2016), 62--65. https://doi.org/10.1145/2875452

Digital Library

[50]

Peter Scupelli. 2016. Creative Workplace Alchemies: Individual Workspaces and Collaboration Hotspots. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 85--111. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30028-3_5

[51]

Mel Slater, Beau Lotto, Maria Marta Arnold, and Maria V Sanchez-Vives. 2009. How We Experience Immersive Virtual Environments: The Concept of Presence and Its Measurement. Anuario de Psicologí a, Vol. 40, 2 (2009), 193--210.

[52]

Marco Spadafora, Victor Chahuneau, Nikolas Martelaro, David Sirkin, and Wendy Ju. 2016. Designing the Behavior of Interactive Objects. In Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (TEI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 70--77. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839462.2839502

Digital Library

[53]

Koen Steemers. 2020. Architecture for Well-being and Health. Daylight. http://thedaylightsite.com/architecture-for-well-being-and-health/ Retrieved September 13, 2020 from

[54]

Ryo Suzuki, Hooman Hedayati, Clement Zheng, James L. Bohn, Daniel Szafir, Ellen Yi-Luen Do, Mark D. Gross, and Daniel Leithinger. 2020. RoomShift: Room-Scale Dynamic Haptics for VR with Furniture-Moving Swarm Robots. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI '20). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376523

Digital Library

[55]

Roger S. Ulrich, Leonard L. Berry, Xiaobo Quan, and Janet Turner Parish. 2010. A Conceptual Framework for the Domain of Evidence-Based Design. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, Vol. 4, 1 (2010), 95--114. https://doi.org/10.1177/193758671000400107

[56]

Roger S. Ulrich, Craig Zimring, Xuemei Zhu, Jennifer DuBose, Hyun Bo Seo, Young Seon Choi, Xiaobo Quan, and Anjali Joseph. 2008. A Review of the Research Literature on Evidence-Based Healthcare Design. Herd, Vol. 1, 3 (2008), 61--125. https://doi.org/10.1177/193758670800100306

[57]

Muhammad Usman, Brandon Haworth, Glen Berseth, Mubbasir Kapadia, and Petros Faloutsos. 2017. Perceptual Evaluation of Space in Virtual Environments. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Motion in Games (Barcelona, Spain) (MIG '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 16, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3136457.3136458

Digital Library

[58]

Anna Vallgrarda. 2014. The Dress Room: Responsive Spaces and Embodied Interaction. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational (Helsinki, Finland) (NordiCHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 618--627. https://doi.org/10.1145/2639189.2639254

Digital Library

[59]

Oshin Vartanian, Gorka Navarrete, Anjan Chatterjee, Lars Brorson Fich, Jose Luis Gonzalez-Mora, Helmut Leder, Cristián Modroño, Marcos Nadal, Nicolai Rostrup, and Martin Skov. 2015. Architectural Design and the Brain: Effects of Ceiling Height and Perceived Enclosure on Beauty Judgments and Approach-Avoidance Decisions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 41 (2015), 10--18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.11.006

[60]

Jennifer A Veitch and Anca D Galasiu. 2011. The physiological and psychological effects of windows, daylight and view at home. National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada. 60 pages. https://doi.org/10.1037/e554552013-001

[61]

Himanshu Verma, Hamed S. Alavi, and Denis Lalanne. 2017. Studying Space Use: Bringing HCI Tools to Architectural Projects. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3856--3866. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3026055

Digital Library

[62]

Stijn Verwulgen, Sander Van Goethem, Gustaaf Cornelis, Jouke Verlinden, and Tom Coppens. 2020. Appreciation of Proportion in Architecture: A Comparison Between Facades Primed in Virtual Reality and on Paper. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol. 973. Springer Verlag, Washington D.C., USA, 305--314. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20476-1_31

[63]

Yixiao Wang, Keith Evan Green, Rod Grupen, Johnell Brooks, and Ian D. Walker. 2018. Designing Intelligent Spaces as if They Were Human: A "Space Agent" Framework. In 2018 4th International Conference on Universal Village (UV). IEEE, Boston, MA, USA, 1--6. https://doi.org/10.1109/UV.2018.8642135

[64]

Mikael Wiberg. 2020. Interaction and Architecture is Dead.: Long Live Architectural Interactivity! Interactions, Vol. 27, 2 (2020), 72--75. https://doi.org/10.1145/3378567

Digital Library

[65]

Xi Zhang, Zhiwei Lian, and Yong Wu. 2017. Human Physiological Responses to Wooden Indoor Environment. Physiology & Behavior, Vol. 174 (2017), 27--34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.02.043

[66]

William Zuk and Roger H Clark. 1970. Kinetic Architecture. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, USA.

Cited By

Economidou EItzlinger AFrauenberger C(2024)Lived experience in human-building interaction (HBI): an initial frameworkFrontiers in Computer Science10.3389/fcomp.2023.12339045Online publication date: 4-Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2023.1233904
Lim SHo DYu JWang Y(2024)Virtual Reality “Space Agent” as a Socially Interactive Design Partner: A study investigating users’ perception of and interaction with Socially Interactive Virtual Environment (SIVE) as a design partnerProceedings of the 12th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction10.1145/3687272.3688295(1-10)Online publication date: 24-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3687272.3688295
Çetin Er CÖzcan O(2024)Learning from Users: Everyday Playful Interactions to Support Architectural Spatial ChangesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36770858:CHI PLAY(1-25)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3677085
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Exploring an Architectural Framework for Human-Building Interaction via a Semi-Immersive Cross-Reality Methodology
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Empirical studies in HCI

Recommendations

Towards Responsive Architecture that Mediates Place: Recommendations on How and When an Autonomously Moving Robotic Wall Should Adapt a Spatial Layout
CSCW

Responsive architecture envisions the built environment to adapt to the changing needs of its occupants dynamically. Although it is increasingly feasible to move space-defining objects like room dividers by mobile robots, little is known about how or ...
Future of Human-Building Interaction
CHI EA '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

In 2030, we will have a different interactive experience with our built environments, at home, at work, and even in public urban spaces. This is attributed to advancements in sensing and actuation systems that can integrate into the building ...
Introduction to Human-Building Interaction (HBI): Interfacing HCI with Architecture and Urban Design
Special Issue on Human-Building Interaction

Buildings and urban spaces increasingly incorporate artificial intelligence and new forms of interactivity, raising a wide span of research questions about the future of human experiences with, and within, built environments. We call this emerging area ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

HRI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

March 2021

425 pages

ISBN:9781450382892

DOI:10.1145/3434073

General Chairs:
Cindy Bethel
Mississippi State University, USA
,
Ana Paiva
INESC-ID, IST, University of Lisbon, Portugal & Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, Harvard University, USA
,
Program Chairs:
Elizabeth Broadbent
University of Auckland, New Zealand
,
David Feil-Seifer
University of Nevada Reno, USA
,
Daniel Szafir
University of Colorado Boulder, USA

Copyright © 2021 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 March 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

CELSA

Conference

HRI '21

Sponsor:

HRI '21: ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

March 8 - 11, 2021

CO, Boulder, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,124 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

15
Total Citations
View Citations
867
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)150
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)13

Reflects downloads up to 13 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Economidou EItzlinger AFrauenberger C(2024)Lived experience in human-building interaction (HBI): an initial frameworkFrontiers in Computer Science10.3389/fcomp.2023.12339045Online publication date: 4-Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2023.1233904
Lim SHo DYu JWang Y(2024)Virtual Reality “Space Agent” as a Socially Interactive Design Partner: A study investigating users’ perception of and interaction with Socially Interactive Virtual Environment (SIVE) as a design partnerProceedings of the 12th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction10.1145/3687272.3688295(1-10)Online publication date: 24-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3687272.3688295
Çetin Er CÖzcan O(2024)Learning from Users: Everyday Playful Interactions to Support Architectural Spatial ChangesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36770858:CHI PLAY(1-25)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3677085
Zhang YHan RZhou RGyory PZheng CShih PDo EJung MJu WLeithinger DCiolfi LHogan TDöring TJenkins Tvan Dijk JHuron SLi ZCoyle DSigner B(2024)Wizard of Props: Mixed Reality Prototyping with Physical Props to Design Responsive EnvironmentsProceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3623509.3633395(1-15)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3623509.3633395
Nguyen BVande Moere A(2024)The Adaptive Architectural Layout: How the Control of a Semi-Autonomous Mobile Robotic Partition was Shared to Mediate the Environmental Demands and Resources of an Open-Plan OfficeProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642465(1-20)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642465
Hirsch L(2024)Human-Building Interaction for Interactive Cultural Heritage SiteDesign for Equality and Justice10.1007/978-3-031-61698-3_36(321-329)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61698-3_36
Zhiyu SKoh HAguiar CShihang JWang Y(2023)Could Socially Interactive Architectural Robotics Promote Restorative Environments?International Journal of Social Robotics10.1007/s12369-023-01040-x16:5(919-936)Online publication date: 25-Aug-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-023-01040-x
Schaumann DDuvdevani NElya ALevin ISofer TDrusinsky BOzery ERaz OFeldman T(2023)Coupling Co-presence in Physical and Virtual Environments Toward Hybrid PlacesComputer-Aided Architectural Design. INTERCONNECTIONS: Co-computing Beyond Boundaries10.1007/978-3-031-37189-9_35(532-546)Online publication date: 5-Jul-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37189-9_35
Park SLee KIm JKim J(2022)The Need for Smart Architecture Caused by the Impact of COVID-19 upon Architecture and City: A Systematic Literature ReviewSustainability10.3390/su1413790014:13(7900)Online publication date: 28-Jun-2022
https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137900
Nguyen BHan JVande Moere A(2022)Towards Responsive Architecture that Mediates PlaceProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35555686:CSCW2(1-27)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3555568
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents