[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3412841.3441891acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

EMIDAS: explainable social interaction-based pedestrian intention detection across street

Published: 22 April 2021 Publication History

Abstract

An explainable, accurate, and fast prediction of pedestrian movements in streets is an essential requirement for self-driving cars and remains a daunting challenge. Current algorithmic approaches rely solely on visual information. The information about social interaction between pedestrians across the street is not considered yet. The intention to cross the street can be influenced by social interaction with another pedestrian across the street, which comes with observable social signals such as hand waving. This paper presents EMIDAS, a dynamic Bayesian network model that uses various social signals to predict the intention to meet another pedestrian across the street. For training and evaluating this model, we adopted typical procedures from the area of social signal analysis, which consists of collecting real prototypical scenarios, annotating them concerning the pedestrians' intention to cross the street, and creating scenes from the car's field of view to test the model. This approach's benefit is that it can be employed to explain the reasoning and its underlying knowledge base. Both aspects are essential for future self-driving cars, especially when considering that such future cars have to maintain a level of trust towards the car's passengers.

References

[1]
Wagner, J., André, E. (2018): Real-time sensing of affect and social signals in a multimodal framework: a practical approach. In The Handbook of Multimodal-Multisensor Interfaces: Signal Processing, Architectures, and Detection of Emotion and Cognition-Volume 2 (pp. 227--261).
[2]
Abduallah, M.; Kun, Q.; Mohamed, E.; Claudel, C. (2020): Social-STGCNN: A Social Spatio-Temporal Graph Convolutional Neural Network for Human Trajectory Prediction. In Proc. of IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).
[3]
Alahi, A.; Goel, K.; Ramanathan, V; Robicquet, A.; Fei-Fei, L.; Savarese, S. (2016): Social LSTM: Human trajectory prediction in crowded spaces. In Proc. of IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).
[4]
Baur, T. (2018): Cooperative and transparent machine learning for the context-sensitive analysis of social interactions. Dissertation, CSD, University of Augsburg, Germany.
[5]
BayesFusion, LLC (2020): GeNIe Modeler User Manuel (Version 2.5.R4). Retrieved from https://support.bayesfusion.com/docs/GeNIe.pdf. Accessed: June 29, 2020.
[6]
Birdwhistell, R. L. (2011): Kinesics and context: Essays on body motion communication. University of Pennsylvania press.
[7]
Blaiotta C. (2019): Learning generative socially aware models of pedestrian motion. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 4(4):3433--3440.
[8]
Clark, H. H. and Krych, M. A. (2004) Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding. Journal of memory and language, 50(1):62--81.
[9]
Ferrer G.; Sanfeliu A (2014): Behavior estimation for a complete framework for human motion prediction in crowded environments. In Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).
[10]
Good, I.J. (1985): Weight of Evidence: A Brief Survey. Bayesian Statistics, (2), 249--270.
[11]
Gupta, A., Johnson, J., Fei-Fei, L., Savarese, S., Alahi, A. (2018): Social GAN: Socially Acceptable Trajectories with Generative Adversarial Nnetworks. In Proc. of the IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 2255--2264).
[12]
Lee, N., Choi, W., Vernaza, P., Choy, C. B., Torr, P. H., Chandraker, M. (2017): Desire: Distant Future Prediction in Dynamic Scenes with Interacting Agents. In Proc. of the IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 336--345).
[13]
Liang, J., Jiang, L., Niebles, J. C., Hauptmann, A. G., Fei-Fei, L. (2019): Peeking into the future: Predicting Future Person Activities and Locations in Videos. In Proc. of the IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 5725--5734).
[14]
Madigan, D., Mosurski, K., Almond, R. G. (1997): Graphical explanation in belief networks. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 6(2), 160--181.
[15]
Mehrabian, A. (1980): Public Places and Private Spaces: The Psychology of Work, Play, and Living Environments. Basic Books.
[16]
Muscholl, N., Poibrenski, A., Klusch, M. and Gebhard, P. (2020) SIMP3: Social Interaction-Based Multi-Pedestrian Path Prediction By Self-Driving Cars In: Proc. of IEEE International Symp. on Computational Intelligence in Vehicles and Transportation Systems (CIVTS) (pp. t.b.a.).
[17]
Pearson, E. S. (1931): The Test of Significance for the Correlation Coefficient. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 26(174), 128--134.
[18]
Picard, R. W. (1997): Affective Computing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
[19]
Rasouli, A., Kotseruba, I., Kunic, T., Tsotsos, J. K. (2019): PIE: A large-scale Dataset and Models for Pedestrian Intention Estimation and Trajectory Prediction. In Proc. of the IEEE International Conf. on Computer Vision (pp. 6262--6271).
[20]
Vinciarelli, A., Salamin, H., Pantic, M. (2009): Social Signal Pprocessing: Understanding Social Interactions Through Nonverbal Behavior Analysis. In Proc. of IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (pp. 42--49).
[21]
Vinciarelli, A., Esposito, A. (2018): Multimodal Analysis of Social Signals. In The Handbook of Multimodal-Multisensor Interfaces: Signal Processing, Architectures, and Detection of Emotion and Cognition-Volume 2 (pp. 203--226).
[22]
Xue, H., Huynh, D. Q., Reynolds, M. (2018): SS-LSTM: A hierarchical LSTM model for Pedestrian Trajectory Prediction. In Proc. of IEEE Conf. on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) (pp. 1186--1194). IEEE.
[23]
Yuan, C., Lim, H., Lu, T. C. (2011): Most relevant explanation in Bayesian networks. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 42, 309--352.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Explainable AI for Safe and Trustworthy Autonomous Driving: A Systematic ReviewIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems10.1109/TITS.2024.347446925:12(19342-19364)Online publication date: Dec-2024
  • (2024)Knowledge-based explainable pedestrian behavior predictor2024 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)10.1109/IV55156.2024.10588605(3348-3355)Online publication date: 2-Jun-2024
  • (2023)Pedestrians and Cyclists’ Intention Estimation for the Purpose of Autonomous DrivingInternational Journal of Automotive Engineering10.20485/jsaeijae.14.1_1014:1(10-19)Online publication date: 2023

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SAC '21: Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
March 2021
2075 pages
ISBN:9781450381048
DOI:10.1145/3412841
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 April 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. autonomous driving
  2. pedestrian intention estimation
  3. social interaction

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

  • German Research Foundation (DFG)
  • German Ministry for Research

Conference

SAC '21
Sponsor:
SAC '21: The 36th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing
March 22 - 26, 2021
Virtual Event, Republic of Korea

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,650 of 6,669 submissions, 25%

Upcoming Conference

SAC '25
The 40th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing
March 31 - April 4, 2025
Catania , Italy

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)15
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 19 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Explainable AI for Safe and Trustworthy Autonomous Driving: A Systematic ReviewIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems10.1109/TITS.2024.347446925:12(19342-19364)Online publication date: Dec-2024
  • (2024)Knowledge-based explainable pedestrian behavior predictor2024 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)10.1109/IV55156.2024.10588605(3348-3355)Online publication date: 2-Jun-2024
  • (2023)Pedestrians and Cyclists’ Intention Estimation for the Purpose of Autonomous DrivingInternational Journal of Automotive Engineering10.20485/jsaeijae.14.1_1014:1(10-19)Online publication date: 2023

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media