[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3405656.3420229acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free access

On economic, societal, and political aspects in ICN

Published: 22 September 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Information-centric networking (ICN), as an antithesis of host-centric networking, denotes a paradigm shift in communication networks. It introduces names to the network layer and favors de-localized content instead of addresses and hosts. ICN is an attempt to design a network tailored to demands of users who only care about data. The simplicity of this basic premise, however, turns out to be rather deceptive; a pitfall in waiting on the path of ICN to wide-scale deployment. Surely users care about data, but they also care about trust, accountability, private communication, and everything else that the current Internet provides beside mere content. This paper is a first attempt in pinpointing the missing non-technical aspects that are crucial to success of ICN as a viable replacement for the Internet.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (p155-tehrani-presentation.mp4)

References

[1]
Somaya Arianfar, Teemu Koponen, Barath Raghavan, and Scott Shenker. 2011. On preserving privacy in content-oriented networks. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Information-centric networking (ICN '11). ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 19--24.
[2]
Manuel Castells. 2011. A Network Theory of Power. International Journal of Communication 5 (2011), 773--787.
[3]
David R Cheriton and Mark Gritter. 2000. TRIAD: A New Next-Generation Internet Architecture. Technical Report. Distributed Systems Group, Stanford University.
[4]
Steven DiBenedetto, Paolo Gasti, Gene Tsudik, and Ersin Uzun. 2011. ANDaNA: Anonymous Named Data Networking Application. CoRR abs/1112.2205 (Dec. 2011), 18. arXiv:1112.2205
[5]
Dirk Trossen and Alexandros Kostopoulos. 2012. Techno-Economic Aspects of Information-Centric Networking. Journal of Information Policy 2 (2012), 26--50.
[6]
Nikos Fotiou, Somaya Arianfar, Mikko Särelä, and George C. Polyzos. 2014. A Framework for Privacy Analysis of ICN Architectures. In Privacy Technologies and Policy, Bart Preneel and Demosthenes Ikonomou (Eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 8450. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 117--132.
[7]
Paolo Gasti, Gene Tsudik, Ersin Uzun, and Lixia Zhang. 2013. DoS and DDoS in Named Data Networking. In 2013 22nd International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN). IEEE Press, 1--7.
[8]
Ali Ghodsi, Scott Shenker, Teemu Koponen, Ankit Singla, Barath Raghavan, and James Wilcox. 2011. Information-centric networking. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (HotNets '11). ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 1--6.
[9]
Global Commission on Internet Governance. 2017. Who Runs the Internet?: The Global Multi-stakeholder Model of Internet Governance. Technical Report. Centre for International Governance Innovation.
[10]
Internet Assigned Numbers Authority. 2007. IANA Report on the Delegation of the. KP Top-Level Domain. https://www.iana.org/reports/2007/kp-report-11sep2007.html [Online; accessed 05-July-2020].
[11]
Van Jacobson, Diana K Smetters, James D Thornton, Michael F. Plass, Nicholas H. Briggs, and Rebecca L. Braynard. 2009. Networking named content. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Emerging networking experiments and technologies (CoNEXT '09). ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 1--12.
[12]
Teemu Koponen, Mohit Chawla, Byung-Gon Chun, Andrey Ermolinskiy, Kye Hyun Kim, Scott Shenker, and Ion Stoica. 2007. A data-oriented (and beyond) network architecture. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 37, 4 (Oct. 2007), 181.
[13]
Alexandros Kostopoulos, Ioanna Papafili, Costas Kalogiros, Tapio Levä, Nan Zhang, and Dirk Trossen. 2012. A Tussle Analysis for Information-Centric Networking Architectures. In The Future Internet, Federico Álvarez, Frances Cleary, Petros Daras, John Domingue, Alex Galis, Ana Garcia, Anastasius Gavras, Stamatis Karnourskos, Srdjan Krco, Man-Sze Li, Volkmar Lotz, Henning Müller, Elio Salvadori, Anne-Marie Sassen, Hans Schaffers, Burkhard Stiller, Georgios Tselentis, Petra Turkama, and Theodore Zahariadis (Eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 7281. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 6--17.
[14]
Tobias Lauinger, Nikolaos Laoutaris, Pablo Rodriguez, Thorsten Strufe, Ernst Biersack, and Engin Kirda. 2012. Privacy risks in named data networking: what is the cost of performance? ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 42, 5 (Sept. 2012), 54--57.
[15]
Kebina Manandhar, Ben Adcock, and Xiaojun Cao. 2014. Preserving the Anonymity in MobilittyFirst networks. In 2014 23rd International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN). IEEE Press, 1--6.
[16]
Helen Nissenbaum. 1994. Computing and accountability. Commun. ACM 37, 1 (Jan. 1994), 72--80.
[17]
H. Nissenbaum. 2001. Securing trust online: Wisdom or oxymoron? Boston University Law Review 81, 3 (June 2001), 635--664.
[18]
Börje Ohlman. 2015. From ID/locator split to ICN. In 2015 12th Annual IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC '12). IEEE Press, 256--261.
[19]
Diego Perino and Matteo Varvello. 2011. A reality check for content centric networking. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Information-centric networking (ICN 11). ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 44--49.
[20]
Katie Shilton, Jeffrey A. Burke, KC Claffy, and Lixia Zhang. 2016. Anticipating policy and social implications of named data networking. Commun. ACM 59, 12 (Dec. 2016), 92--101.
[21]
Pouyan Fotouhi Tehrani, Eric Osterweil, Jochen H. Schiller, Thomas C. Schmidt, and Matthias Wählisch. 2019. The Missing Piece: On Namespace Management in NDN and How DNSSEC Might Help. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Information-Centric Networking (ICN '19). ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 37--43.
[22]
Reza Tourani, Satyajayant Misra, Travis Mick, and Gaurav Panwar. 2018. Security, Privacy, and Access Control in Information-Centric Networking: A Survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 20, 1 (2018), 566--600.
[23]
Dirk Trossen, Mikko Sarela, and Karen Sollins. 2010. Arguments for an information-centric internetworking architecture. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 40, 2 (April 2010), 26.
[24]
Matthias Wählisch, Thomas C. Schmidt, and Markus Vahlenkamp. 2013. Backscatter from the Data Plane -- Threats to Stability and Security in Information-Centric Network Infrastructure. Computer Networks 57, 16 (Nov. 2013), 3192--3206.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ICN '20: Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Information-Centric Networking
September 2020
181 pages
ISBN:9781450380409
DOI:10.1145/3405656
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 September 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. ICN
  2. accountability
  3. policy
  4. privacy
  5. trust

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung

Conference

ICN '20
Sponsor:
ICN '20: 7th ACM Conference on Information-Centric Networking
September 29 - October 1, 2020
Virtual Event, Canada

Acceptance Rates

ICN '20 Paper Acceptance Rate 15 of 39 submissions, 38%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 133 of 482 submissions, 28%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 130
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)14
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 18 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media