More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

Political polarization and popularity in online participatory media: an integrated approach

Authors:

Fernando Mendez,

Frank SchweitzerAuthors Info & Claims

PLEAD '12: Proceedings of the first edition workshop on Politics, elections and data

Pages 3 - 10

https://doi.org/10.1145/2389661.2389665

Published: 02 November 2012 Publication History

Abstract

We present our approach to online popularity and its applications to political science, aiming at the creation of agent-based models that reproduce patterns of popularity in participatory media. We illustrate our approach analyzing a dataset from Youtube, composed of the view statistics and comments for the videos of the U.S. presidential campaigns of 2008 and 2012. Using sentiment analysis, we quantify the collective emotions expressed by the viewers, finding that democrat campaigns elicited more positive collective emotions than republican campaigns. Techniques from computational social science allow us to measure virality of the videos of each campaign, to find that democrat videos are shared faster but republican ones are remembered longer inside the community. Last we present our work in progress in voting advice applications, and our results analyzing the data from choose4greece.com. We show how we assess the policy differences between parties and their voters, and how voting advice applications can be extended to test our agent-based models.

References

[1]

S. Asur, B. A. Huberman, G. Szabo, and C. Wang. Trends in Social Media: Persistence and Decay. In ICWSM'11, Palo Alto, 2011.

[2]

P. F. Berelson, Bernard R. Lazarsfeld and W. N. McPhee. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. University of Chicago Press, 1954.

[3]

S. P. Borgatti, A. Mehra, D. J. Brass, and G. Labianca. Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 323(5916):892--895, 2009.

[4]

M. D. Conover, B. Gonc, A. Flammini, and F. Menczer. Partisan Asymmetries in Online Political Activity. EPJ DataScience, 1(6):1--17, 2012.

[5]

M. D. Conover, B. Goncalves, J. Ratkiewicz, A. Flammini, and F. Menczer. Predicting the Political Alignment of Twitter Users. In SocialCom'11, pages 192--199, 2011.

[6]

R. Crane and D. Sornette. Robust dynamic classes revealed by measuring the response function of a social system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(41):15649--15653, Oct. 2008.

[7]

A. Downs. An economic theory of political action in a democracy. The Journal of Political Economy, 65(2):135--150, 1957.

[8]

L. Festinger. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7:117--140, 1954.

[9]

A. Garas, D. Garcia, M. Skowron, and F. Schweitzer. Emotional persistence in online chatting communities. Scientific Reports, 2:402, May 2012.

[10]

D. Garcia and F. Schweitzer. Emotions in Product Reviews--Empirics and Models. In SocialCom'11, pages 483--488, 2011.

[11]

D. Gayo-Avello. Nepotistic Relationships in Twitter and their Impact on Rank Prestige Algorithms. In Congreso Espa\ nol de Recuperación de Información, page 31, Madrid, Spain, 2010.

[12]

D. Gayo-avello. I Wanted to Predict Elections with Twitter and all I got was this Lousy Paper - A Balanced Survey on Election Prediction using Twitter Data. arXiv:1204.6441v1, 2012.

[13]

R. Huckfeldt. Interdependence, density dependence, and networks in politics. American Politics Research, 37(5):921--950, 2009.

[14]

O. Kucuktunc, B. B. Cambazoglu, I. Weber, and H. Ferhatosmanoglu. A large-scale sentiment analysis for Yahoo! answers. In WSDM'12, page 633, 2012.

Digital Library

[15]

D. Lacy and P. Paolino. Testing proximity versus directional voting using experiments. Electoral Studies, 29:460--471, 2010.

[16]

A. Ladner and J. Pianzola. Do voting advice applications have an effect on electoral participation and voter turnout? Electronic Participation, pages 211--224, 2010.

Digital Library

[17]

J. Leskovec, L. A. Adamic, and B. A. Huberman. The dynamics of viral marketing. ACM Transactions on the Web, 1(1):39, May 2007.

Digital Library

[18]

J. Lorenz. Zur Methode der agenten-basierten Simulation in der Politikwissenschaft am Beispiel von Meinungsdynamik und Parteienwettstreit. In T. Brauninger, A. Bachtiger, and S. Shikano, editors, Jahrbuch für Handlungs- und Entscheidungstheorie. Band 7: Experiment und Simulation. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2012.

[19]

M. McPherson, L. Smith-Lovin, and J. M. Cook. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27:pp. 415--444, 2001.

[20]

F. Mendez. Matching voters with political parties and candidates: An empirical test of four algorithms. International Journal of Electronic Governance, (Special issue on Voting Advice Applications and the State of the Art), forthcoming.

[21]

P. Pettit. Democracy, electoral and contestatory. In I. Shapiro and S. Macedo, editors, Designing Democratic Institutions. Nomos, NYU Press, New York, 2000.

[22]

A. Ramonaité. Voting advice applications in lithuania: Promoting programmatic competition or breeding populism? Policy and Internet, 2(1):117--141, 2010.

[23]

F. Schweitzer and D. Garcia. An agent-based model of collective emotions in online communities. The European Physical Journal B, 77(4):533--545, 2010.

[24]

E. R. Smith and F. R. Conrey. Agent-based modeling: a new approach for theory building in social psychology. Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 11(1):87--104, Feb. 2007.

[25]

G. Szabo and B. A. Huberman. Predicting the popularity of online content. Communications of the ACM, 53(8):80, Aug. 2010.

Digital Library

[26]

M. Thelwall, K. Buckley, and G. Paltoglou. Sentiment in Twitter events. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(2):406--418, 2011.

Digital Library

[27]

M. Thelwall, K. Buckley, and G. Paltoglou. Sentiment strength detection for the social web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(1):163--173, Jan. 2012.

Digital Library

[28]

M. Thelwall, K. Buckley, G. Paltoglou, D. Cai, and A. Kappas. Sentiment strength detection in short informal text. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12):2544--2558, Dec. 2010.

[29]

J. Thurman and U. Gasser. Three case studies from switzerland: Smartvote. Berkman Center Research Publication, No. 2009-03.3, 2009.

[30]

M. Tomz and R. P. Van Houweling. Candidate positioning and voter choice. American Political Science Review, 102(03):303--318, 2008.

[31]

P. Van Mieghem. Human Psychology of Common Appraisal: The Reddit Score. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 13(6):1404--1406, Dec. 2011.

Digital Library

[32]

S. Walgrave, M. Nuytemans, and K. Pepermans. Voting aid applications and the effect of statement selection. West European Politics, 32(6):1161--1180, 2009.

[33]

A. Westholm. Distance versus direction: The illusory defeat of the proximity theory of electoral choice. The American Political Science Review, 91(4):865--883, 1997.

Cited By

Somandepalli KSiy OJou B(2024)Relational Affect in Dyadic InteractionsExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3637206(1-9)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3637206
Campos IFuchs DRepo PJager WKlöckner CWang SLamas DCots FBarchiesi ELöfström EPeniche DSion YButh VLimão JOliveira SDiaz CŽivčič L(2024)What roles can democracy labs play in co-creating democratic innovations for sustainability?Socio-Ecological Practice Research10.1007/s42532-024-00197-76:4(367-380)Online publication date: 20-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-024-00197-7
Reiter-Haas MKlösch BHadler MLex E(2022)Polarization of Opinions on COVID-19 Measures: Integrating Twitter and Survey DataSocial Science Computer Review10.1177/0894439322108766241:5(1811-1835)Online publication date: 5-May-2022
https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393221087662
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Political polarization and popularity in online participatory media: an integrated approach
1. Applied computing
  1. Law, social and behavioral sciences
    1. Psychology
    2. Sociology
2. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)

Recommendations

Partisan alignments and political polarization online: a computational approach to understanding the french and US presidential elections
PLEAD '13: Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on Politics, elections and data

With the advent of Twitter and the ability to collect large datasets from this technology, researchers have the opportunity to analyze political participation in cross-national electoral contexts. This paper capitalizes on this capability to examine ...
Predicting Arabic Tweet Popularity by Use of Data and Text Mining Techniques
MEDES '14: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems

Among the emerging "social media" or "social networks" applications facilitating communication between individuals, such as YouTube, LinkedIn, and Facebook, Twitter has become one of the most-used of these applications in Arab countries. Twitter works ...
Profiling Online Political Content Creators: Advancing the Paths to Democracy

The Internet has allowed digital media users to be more than just consumers of political information, allowing the chance to create their own online political content. Thus, users can now create personal blogs, post comments on others' blogs, contribute ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

PLEAD '12: Proceedings of the first edition workshop on Politics, elections and data

November 2012

44 pages

ISBN:9781450317139

DOI:10.1145/2389661

Program Chairs:
Ingmar Weber
Yahoo! Research, Spain
,
Ana-Maria Popescu
Research Consulting, USA
,
Marco Pennacchiotti
eBay Inc., USA

Copyright © 2012 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 November 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

CIKM'12

Sponsor:

CIKM'12: 21st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management

November 2, 2012

Hawaii, Maui, USA

Acceptance Rates

PLEAD '12 Paper Acceptance Rate 6 of 8 submissions, 75%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 9 of 18 submissions, 50%

Upcoming Conference

CIKM '25

Sponsor:
sigir
sigir

The 34th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management

November 10 - 14, 2025

Seoul , Republic of Korea

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

30
Total Citations
View Citations
874
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)31
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

Reflects downloads up to 12 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Somandepalli KSiy OJou B(2024)Relational Affect in Dyadic InteractionsExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3637206(1-9)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3637206
Campos IFuchs DRepo PJager WKlöckner CWang SLamas DCots FBarchiesi ELöfström EPeniche DSion YButh VLimão JOliveira SDiaz CŽivčič L(2024)What roles can democracy labs play in co-creating democratic innovations for sustainability?Socio-Ecological Practice Research10.1007/s42532-024-00197-76:4(367-380)Online publication date: 20-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-024-00197-7
Reiter-Haas MKlösch BHadler MLex E(2022)Polarization of Opinions on COVID-19 Measures: Integrating Twitter and Survey DataSocial Science Computer Review10.1177/0894439322108766241:5(1811-1835)Online publication date: 5-May-2022
https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393221087662
Brandenberger LCasiraghi GAndres GSchweighofer SSchweitzer F(2022)Comparing Online and Offline Political SupportSwiss Political Science Review10.1111/spsr.1252428:4(604-623)Online publication date: 29-May-2022
https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12524
Romero Moreno GChakraborty SBrede M(2021)Shadowing and shielding: Effective heuristics for continuous influence maximisation in the voting dynamicsPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.025251516:6(e0252515)Online publication date: 18-Jun-2021
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252515
Mavrodiev PSchweitzer F(2021)Enhanced or distorted wisdom of crowds? An agent-based model of opinion formation under social influenceSwarm Intelligence10.1007/s11721-021-00189-3Online publication date: 7-May-2021
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11721-021-00189-3
Aman Ullah MArif Hasnayeen MShan-A-Alahi ARahman FAkhter S(2020)A Search for Optimal Feature in Political Sentiment Analysis2020 IEEE International Women in Engineering (WIE) Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (WIECON-ECE)10.1109/WIECON-ECE52138.2020.9397966(340-343)Online publication date: 26-Dec-2020
https://doi.org/10.1109/WIECON-ECE52138.2020.9397966
Mersy GSantore VRand IKleinman CWilson GBonsall JEdwards T(2020)A Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms Applied to American Legislature Polarization2020 IEEE 21st International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration for Data Science (IRI)10.1109/IRI49571.2020.00075(451-456)Online publication date: Aug-2020
https://doi.org/10.1109/IRI49571.2020.00075
Yarchi MBaden CKligler-Vilenchik N(2020)Political Polarization on the Digital Sphere: A Cross-platform, Over-time Analysis of Interactional, Positional, and Affective Polarization on Social MediaPolitical Communication10.1080/10584609.2020.1785067(1-42)Online publication date: 14-Jul-2020
https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1785067
Kumar SHamilton WLeskovec JJurafsky DChampin PGandon FMédini LLalmas MIpeirotis P(2018)Community Interaction and Conflict on the WebProceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference10.1145/3178876.3186141(933-943)Online publication date: 10-Apr-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3178876.3186141
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents