[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2371574.2371612acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Touch behavior with different postures on soft smartphone keyboards

Published: 21 September 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Text entry on smartphones is far slower and more error-prone than on traditional desktop keyboards, despite sophisticated detection and auto-correct algorithms. To strengthen the empirical and modeling foundation of smartphone text input improvements, we explore touch behavior on soft QWERTY keyboards when used with two thumbs, an index finger, and one thumb. We collected text entry data from 32 participants in a lab study and describe touch accuracy and precision for different keys. We found that distinct patterns exist for input among the three hand postures, suggesting that keyboards should adapt to different postures. We also discovered that participants' touch precision was relatively high given typical key dimensions, but there were pronounced and consistent touch offsets that can be leveraged by keyboard algorithms to correct errors. We identify patterns in our empirical findings and discuss implications for design and improvements of soft keyboards.

References

[1]
Bao, P., Pierce, P., Whittaker, S., and Zhai, S. (2011). Smart phone use by non-mobile business users. Proc. MobileHCI '11, 445--454.
[2]
Clarkson, E., Lyons, K., Clawson, J., and Starner, T. (2007). Revisiting and validating a model of two-thumb text entry. Proc. CHI '07, 163--166.
[3]
Clawson, J., Lyons, K., Rudnick, A., Iannucci, Jr., R., and Starner, T. (2008). Automatic whiteout++: correcting mini-QWERTY typing errors using keypress timing. Proc. CHI '08, 573--582.
[4]
Findlater, L., Wobbrock, J. O., and Wigdor, D. (2011). Typing on flat glass: examining ten-finger expert typing patterns on touch surfaces. Proc. CHI '11, 2453--2462.
[5]
Gong, J., Tarasewich, P., and MacKenzie, I. S. (2008). Improved word list ordering for text entry on ambiguous keypads. Proc. NordiCHI '08, 152--161.
[6]
Goodman, J., Venolia, G., Steury, K., Parker, C. 2002. Language modeling for soft keyboards. Proc. IUI '02, 194--195.
[7]
Gunawardana, A., Paek, T., and Meek, C. (2010). Usability guided key-target resizing for soft keyboards. Proc. IUI '10, 111--118.
[8]
Henze, N., Rukzio, E., and Boll, S. (2011). 100,000,000 taps: analysis and improvement of touch performance in the large. Proc. MobileHCI '11, 133--142.
[9]
Himberg, J., Häkkilä, J., Kangas, P., and Mäntyjärvi, J. (2003). On-line personalization of a touch screen based keyboard. Proc. IUI '03, 77--84.
[10]
Hoggan, E., Brewster, S., & Johnston, J. (2008). Investigating the effectiveness of tactile feedback for mobile touchscreens. Proc. of CHI '08, 1573--1582.
[11]
Holz, C. and Baudisch, P. (2010). The Generalized Per-ceived Input Point Model and How to Double Touch Accuracy by Extracting Fingerprints. Proc. CHI '10, 581--590.
[12]
Holz, C. and Baudisch, P. (2011). Understanding Touch. Proc. CHI '11, 2501--2510.
[13]
Kristensson, P.-O., Zhai, S. (2005). Relaxing Stylus Typing Precision by Geometric Pattern Matching. Proc. IUI '05, 151--158.
[14]
Kristensson, P. O. and Zhai, S. (2004). SHARK2: A Large Vocabulary Shorthand Writing System for Pen-based Computers. Proc. UIST '04, 43--52.
[15]
Kristensson, P. O., and Vertanen, K. (2012). Performance comparisons of phrase sets and presentation styles for text entry evaluations. Proc. IUI '12, 29--32.
[16]
Lee, S., Zhai, S. (2009). The performance of touch screen soft buttons. Proc. CHI '09, 309--318.
[17]
MacKenzie, I. S. and Soukoreff, R. W. (2003). Phrase Sets for Evaluating Text Entry Techniques. Proc. EACHI '03. 754--755
[18]
MacKenzie, I. S. and Soukoreff, R. W. (2002). A Model of Two-Thumb Text Entry. Proc. GI '02, 117--124.
[19]
MacKenzie, I. S., Zhang, S. X. (1999) The design and evaluation of a high-performance soft keyboard. Proc. CHI '99, 25--31.
[20]
Paek, T., and Hsu, B.-J. P. (2011). Sampling representative phrase sets for text entry experiments: a procedure and public resource. Proc. CHI '11, 2477--2480.
[21]
Rudchenko, D., Paek, T., and Badger, E. (2011). Text Text Revolution: A game that improves text entry on mobile touchscreen keyboards. Proc. Pervasive '11, 206--213.
[22]
Kumiko Tanaka-ishii. (2007). Word-based predictive text entry using adaptive language models. Nat. Lang. Eng. 13, 1 51--74.
[23]
Wang, F. and Ren, X. (2009). Empirical evaluation for finger input properties in multi-touch interaction. Proc. CHI '09, 1063--1072.
[24]
Wobbrock, J. O., and Myers, B. A. (2006). Analyzing the input stream for character-level errors in unconstrained text entry evaluations. ACM TOCHI 13 (4), pp. 458--489.
[25]
Wobbrock, J. O., Myers, B. A., and Aung, H. H. (2008) The performance of hand postures in front- and back-of-device interaction for mobile computing. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 66, 12, 857--875.
[26]
Yamada, H. (1980). A historical study of typewriters and typing methods: from the position of planning Japanese parallels. Journal of Information Processing, 1980. 2(4): 175--20.
[27]
Zhai, S. and Kristensson, P.-O. (2003). Shorthand Writing on Stylus Keyboard. Proc. CHI '03, 97--104.
[28]
Zhai, S. and Kristensson, P. O. (2006). Introduction to Shape Writing. IBM Research Report RJ10393 (also as Chapter 7 of I. S. MacKenzie and K. Tanaka-Ishii (eds), Text Entry Systems: Mobility, Accessibility, Universality, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 139--158.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)0.2-mm-Step Verification of the Dual Gaussian Distribution Model with Large Sample Size for Predicting Tap Success RatesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36981538:ISS(674-693)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Usability Optimization for Mobile Menu Design: An Empirical Study of Hand Grips and User PreferencesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36765088:MHCI(1-19)Online publication date: 24-Sep-2024
  • (2024)BendAide: A Deformable Interface to Augment Touchscreen Mobile DevicesProceedings of the 50th Graphics Interface Conference10.1145/3670947.3670960(1-10)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Touch behavior with different postures on soft smartphone keyboards

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    MobileHCI '12: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services
    September 2012
    468 pages
    ISBN:9781450311052
    DOI:10.1145/2371574
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 21 September 2012

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. mobile text entry
    2. touch interfaces

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    MobileHCI '12
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 202 of 906 submissions, 22%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)120
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)22
    Reflects downloads up to 21 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)0.2-mm-Step Verification of the Dual Gaussian Distribution Model with Large Sample Size for Predicting Tap Success RatesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36981538:ISS(674-693)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2024
    • (2024)Usability Optimization for Mobile Menu Design: An Empirical Study of Hand Grips and User PreferencesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36765088:MHCI(1-19)Online publication date: 24-Sep-2024
    • (2024)BendAide: A Deformable Interface to Augment Touchscreen Mobile DevicesProceedings of the 50th Graphics Interface Conference10.1145/3670947.3670960(1-10)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Can Capacitive Touch Images Enhance Mobile Keyboard Decoding?Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3654777.3676420(1-17)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
    • (2024)CRTypist: Simulating Touchscreen Typing Behavior via Computational RationalityProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642918(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Behavioral Differences between Tap and Swipe: Observations on Time, Error, Touch-point Distribution, and Trajectory for Tap-and-swipe Enabled TargetsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642272(1-12)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Real-time 3D Target Inference via Biomechanical SimulationProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642131(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Eye-Hand Typing: Eye Gaze Assisted Finger Typing via Bayesian Processes in ARIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2024.337210630:5(2496-2506)Online publication date: 19-Mar-2024
    • (2024)Exploring the Affordance Effect of Visual Properties Associated with Virtual Keyboard Buttons on SmartphonesInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2024.2389349(1-20)Online publication date: 14-Aug-2024
    • (2024)Using large language models to accelerate communication for eye gaze typing users with ALSNature Communications10.1038/s41467-024-53873-315:1Online publication date: 1-Nov-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media