[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2331801.2331805acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiiwebConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Ranking tweets considering trust and relevance

Published: 20 May 2012 Publication History

Abstract

The increasing popularity of Twitter and other microblogs makes improved trustworthiness and relevance assessment of microblogs evermore important. We propose a method of ranking of tweets considering trustworthiness and content based popularity. The analysis of trustworthiness and popularity exploits the implicit relationships between the tweets. We model microblog ecosystem as a three-layer graph consisting of: (i) users (ii) tweets and (iii) web pages. We propose to derive trust and popularity scores of entities in these three layers, and propagate the scores to tweets considering the inter-layer relations. Our preliminary evaluations show improvement in precision and trustworthiness over the baseline methods and acceptable computation timings.

Supplementary Material

ZIP File (a4-ravikumar.zip)
Supplemental file.

References

[1]
About top search results. https://support.twitter.com/groups/31-twitter-basics/topics/110-search/articles/131209-about-top-search-results.
[2]
State of twitter spam. http://blog.twitter.com/2010/03/state-of-twitter-spam.html.
[3]
Trec 2011 microblog track. http://trec.nist.gov/data/tweets/.
[4]
Zombie followers and fake re-tweets. http://www.economist.com/node/21550333.
[5]
F. Abel, Q. Gao, G. Houben, and K. Tao. Analyzing user modeling on twitter for personalized news recommendations. User Modeling, Adaption and Personalization, pages 1--12, 2011.
[6]
R. Balakrishnan and S. Kambhampati. Sourcerank: Relevance and trust assessment for deep web sources based on inter-source agreement. In Proceedings of WWW, 2011.
[7]
S. Brin and L. Page. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Computer networks and ISDN systems, pages 107--117, 1998.
[8]
C. Castillo, M. Mendoza, and B. Poblete. Information credibility on twitter. In Proceedings of WWW, 2011.
[9]
W. Cohen, P. Ravikumar, and S. Fienberg. A comparison of string distance metrics for name-matching tasks. In Proceedings of IIWeb, pages 73--78, 2003.
[10]
A. Dong, R. Zhang, P. Kolari, J. Bai, F. Diaz, Y. Chang, Z. Zheng, and H. Zha. Time is of the essence: improving recency ranking using twitter data. In Proceedings of WWW Workshop, pages 331--340, 2010.
[11]
Y. Duan, L. Jiang, T. Qin, M. Zhou, and H. Shum. An empirical study on learning to rank of tweets. In Proceedings of Computational Linguistics, pages 295--303, 2010.
[12]
M. Gupta and J. Han. Heterogeneous network-based trust analysis: a survey. ACM SIGKDD Explorations, pages 54--71, 2011.
[13]
R. Nagmoti, A. Teredesai, and M. De Cock. Ranking approaches for microblog search. In Proceedings of web intelligence, pages 153--157, 2010.
[14]
Twitter death hoaxes, alive and sadly, well. www.nytimes.com/2012/02/26/nyregion/the-twitter-death-hoax-is-alive-and-sadly-well.htm.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A two-stage framework for Arabic social media text misinformation detection combining data augmentation and AraBERTSocial Network Analysis and Mining10.1007/s13278-024-01201-414:1Online publication date: 8-Mar-2024
  • (2022)Entity Level QA Pairs Dataset for Sentiment Analysis2022 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT)10.1109/WI-IAT55865.2022.00046(270-276)Online publication date: Nov-2022
  • (2022)Tweet and user validation with supervised feature ranking and rumor classificationMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-022-12616-681:22(31907-31927)Online publication date: 11-Apr-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
IIWeb '12: Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Information Integration on the Web
May 2012
47 pages
ISBN:9781450312394
DOI:10.1145/2331801
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 20 May 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

IIWeb '12
Sponsor:

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 03 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A two-stage framework for Arabic social media text misinformation detection combining data augmentation and AraBERTSocial Network Analysis and Mining10.1007/s13278-024-01201-414:1Online publication date: 8-Mar-2024
  • (2022)Entity Level QA Pairs Dataset for Sentiment Analysis2022 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT)10.1109/WI-IAT55865.2022.00046(270-276)Online publication date: Nov-2022
  • (2022)Tweet and user validation with supervised feature ranking and rumor classificationMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-022-12616-681:22(31907-31927)Online publication date: 11-Apr-2022
  • (2021)Social Media and Microblogs Credibility: Identification, Theory Driven Framework, and RecommendationIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2021.31144179(137744-137781)Online publication date: 2021
  • (2021)A reranking-based tweet retrieval approach for planned eventsWorld Wide Web10.1007/s11280-021-00962-8Online publication date: 21-Oct-2021
  • (2020)A deep learning-based social media text analysis framework for disaster resource managementSocial Network Analysis and Mining10.1007/s13278-020-00692-110:1Online publication date: 9-Sep-2020
  • (2019)Credibility in Online Social Networks: A SurveyIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2018.28863147(2828-2855)Online publication date: 2019
  • (2018)Tweets Ranking Considering Dynamic Social Influence and Personal InterestsProceedings of the 2018 10th International Conference on Machine Learning and Computing10.1145/3195106.3195126(276-282)Online publication date: 26-Feb-2018
  • (2017)Pro-ana versus Pro-recovery: A Content Analytic Comparison of Social Media Users’ Communication about Eating Disorders on Twitter and TumblrFrontiers in Psychology10.3389/fpsyg.2017.013568Online publication date: 11-Aug-2017
  • (2017)Urbanscope: A Lens to Observe Language Mix in CitiesAmerican Behavioral Scientist10.1177/000276421771756261:7(774-793)Online publication date: Jul-2017
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media