[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2317956.2318067acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Do you care if a computer says sorry?: user experience design through affective messages

Published: 11 June 2012 Publication History

Abstract

While traditional HCI research emphasizes usability based on models of cognition, user experience (UX) focuses on affect and emotion through the provision of positive interactive experiences. Providing affective cues, such as apologetic on-screen display messages, appears to be a way to influence users' affective states as well as their perceptions toward an information retrieval system. A study was designed to determine whether users' affect and perceptions differ between three types of systems: neutral, apologetic, and non-apologetic. Our results revealed that the users perceived the apologetic system as more aesthetically appealing and usable than the neutral or non-apologetic system. The result also showed that users' frustration was the lowest when using the apologetic system. We discuss the implications of these results in designing a more experience-centered system.

References

[1]
Akgun, M., Cagiltay, K., and Zeyrek, D. The effect of apologetic error messages and mood states on computer users' self-appraisal of performance. J. of Pragmatics 42, 9 (2010), 2430--2448.
[2]
Bagby, R. M., Taylor, G. J., and Parker, J. D. A. The twenty-item Toronto alexithymia scale-II. Convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 38, 1 (1994), 33--40.
[3]
Baylor, A. L. and Rosenberg-Kima, R. B. Interface agents to alleviate online frustration. In Proc. ICLS 2006, ICLS (2006), 30--26.
[4]
Bessière, K., Newhagen, J. E., Robinson, J. P., and Shneiderman, B. A model for computer frustration: the role of instrumental and dispositional factors on incident, session, and post-session frustration and mood, Computers in Human Behavior 22, 6 (2006), 941--961.
[5]
Boehner K., DePaula, R., Dourish, P., and Sengers, P. Affect: From Information to Interaction. In Proc. Critical Computing 2005, ACM Press (2005), 59--68.
[6]
Brown, P. J. Error messages: the neglected area of the man/machine interface. CACM 26, 4 (1983), 246--249.
[7]
Caridakis, G., Malatesta, L., Kessous, L., Amir, N., Raouzaiou, A., and Karpouzis, K. Modeling naturalistic affective states via facial and vocal expressions recognition. In Proc. ICMI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 146--154.
[8]
Ceaparu, I., Lazar, J., Bessiere, K., Robinson, J., and Shneiderman, B. Determining causes and severity of end-user frustration. Int. J. Human-Computer Interaction 17, 3 (2004), 333--356.
[9]
Csikszentmihalyi, M. Creativity, Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. Harper Perennial, New York, NY, USA, 1996.
[10]
Dolen, W. M., Ruyter, K., and Streukens, S. The effect of humor in electronic service encounters, Journal of Economic Psychology 29, 2 (2008), 160--179.
[11]
Dunn, J. R. and Schweitzer, M. E. Feeling and Believing: the Influence of Emotion. J. of Personality and Social Psychology 88, 5 (2005), 736--748.
[12]
Ferreira, S. M. and Pithan, D. N. Usability of digital libraries: a study based on the areas of information science and human-computer interaction. In Proc. IFLA 2005, IFLA (2005), 1--12.
[13]
Field, H. A., Allan, J., and Jones, R. Predicting searcher frustration. In Proc. SIGIR 2010, ACM Press (2010), 34--41.
[14]
Fogg, B. J. Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do. Morgan Kaufmann, Boston, MA, USA, 2003.
[15]
Freud, S. Types of onset and neurosis. In J. Strachey (ed.) The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud. Hogarth Press, London, UK, 1921.
[16]
Hartmann, J., Sutcliffe, A., and De Angeli, A. Towards a Theory of User Judgment of Aesthetics and User Interface Quality. ACM TOCHI 15, 4 (2008).
[17]
Hassenzahl, M. The Effect of Perceived Hedonic Quality on Product Appealingness. Int. J. Human-Computer Interaction 13, 4 (2001), 481--499.
[18]
Hassenzahl, M. The Interplay of Beauty, Goodness, and Usability in Interactive Products, Human-Computer Interaction 19, 4 (2004), 319--349.
[19]
Hassenzahl, M. and Tractinsky, N. User experience -- a research agenda. Behaviour & Information Technology 25, 2 (2006), 91--97.
[20]
Hone, K. Empathic agents to reduce user frustration: The effects of varying agent characteristics. Interacting with Computers 18, 2 (2006), 227--245.
[21]
Hudlicka, E. To feel or not to feel: The role of affect in human-computer interaction. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 59, 1/2 (2003), 1--32.
[22]
Isa, B. S., Boyle, J. M., Neal, A. S., and Simons, R. M. A Methodology for Objectively Evaluating Error Messages. In Proc. CHI 1983, ACM Press (1983), 68--71.
[23]
Jian, J. Y., Bisantz, A. M., Drury, C. G., and Llinas, J. Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. Int. J. of Cognitive Ergonomics 4, 1 (1998), 53--71.
[24]
Jones, G. R. and George, J. M. The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. The Academy of Management Review 23, 3 (1998), 531--546.
[25]
Kador, J. (2009). Effective Apology: Mending Fences, Building Bridges, and Restoring Trust. Berrett-Koehler, Williston, VT, USA, 2009.
[26]
Karvonen, K. The Beauty of Simplicity. In Proc. CUU 2000, ACM Press (2000), 85--90.
[27]
Klein, J., Moon, Y., and Picard, R. W. This computer responds to user frustration: Theory, design, and results. Interacting with Computers 14, 2 (2002), 119--140.
[28]
Lavie, T. and Tractinsky, N. Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 60, 3 (2004), 269--298.
[29]
Lazare, A. On Apology. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2004.
[30]
Lazar, J., Jones, A., Hackley, M., and Shneiderman, B. Severity and impact of computer user frustration: A comparison of student and workplace users. Interacting with Computers 18, 2 (2006), 187--207.
[31]
Lewis, J. R. IBM Computer Usability Satisfaction Questionnaires: Psychometric Evaluation and Instructions for Use. Int. J. Human-Computer Interaction 7, 1 (1995), 57--78.
[32]
Lindgaard, G. Aesthetics, Visual Appeal, Usability and User Satisfaction: What Do the User's Eyes Tell the User's Brain? Australian Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society 5, 1 (2007), 1--14.
[33]
McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., and Kacmar, C. Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an integrative typology. Information Systems Research 13, 3 (2002), 334--359.
[34]
Nash, J. B. and Moroz, P. A. An examination of the factor structures of the computer attitude scale. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (1997).
[35]
Neilsen, J. Improving the Dreaded 404 Error Message. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/404_improvement.html
[36]
Norman, D. Emotional Design: Why We Love (Or Hate) Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York, NY, USA, 2004.
[37]
O'Brien, H. L. The case of online shopping experiences. Interacting with Computers 22, 5 (2010), 344--352.
[38]
Picard, R. W. Affective Computing. M. I. T. Media Laboratory Perceptual Computing Section Technical Report No. 321 (1995), 1--16.
[39]
Picard, R. W. Affective Computing for HCI. In Proc. HCII 1999, ACM Press, 829--833.
[40]
Prinz, J. Emotion and Aesthetic Value. Journal of Aesthetic Education 10, 2 (2007), 1--14.
[41]
Reeves, B. and Nass, C. The Media Equation. Ctr for the study of language and information, Stanford, CA, 2003.
[42]
Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., and Preece, J. Interaction Design: beyond human-computer interaction. John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, UK, 2011.
[43]
Schlenker, B. R. and Darby, B. W. The use of apologies in social predicaments. Social Psychology Quarterly 44, 3 (1981), 271--278.
[44]
Schweitzer, M., Hershey, J., and Bradlow, E. T. Promises and lies: Restoring violated trust. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 101, 1 (2006), 1--19.
[45]
Shneiderman, B. Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human Computer Interaction (3rd ed.). Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1998.
[46]
Simpson, S. Q. Apology: The Importance and Power of Saying "I'm Sorry." Balcony Publications, Gaylord, MI, USA, 2004.
[47]
Stefanucci, J. K., Gagnon, K. T., and Lessard, D. A. Follow your heart: emotion adaptively influences perception. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 5, 6 (2011), 296--308.
[48]
Thüring, M. and Mahlke, S. Usability, aesthetics and emotions in human-technology interaction. Int. J. of Psychology 42, 4 (2007), 253--264.
[49]
Tractinsky, N., Katz, A. S., and Ikar, D. What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers 13, 2 (2000), 127--145.
[50]
Tzeng, J. Y. Toward a more civilized design: studying the effects of computers that apologize. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 61, 3 (2004), 319--345.
[51]
Wright, P., and McCarthy, J. Experience-Centered Design. Morgan & Claypool Publisher, San Rafael, CA, 2010.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Designing Empathetic Interfaces Enhancing User Experience Through EmotionHumanizing Technology With Emotional Intelligence10.4018/979-8-3693-7011-7.ch004(47-64)Online publication date: 31-Jan-2025
  • (2024)SIME - An analytical method for evaluating emotional responses in Human-Computer InteractionProceedings of the XXIII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3702038.3702106(1-12)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Risk of desirable user experiences: insights from those who create, facilitate and accept mobile paymentsElectronic Commerce Research10.1007/s10660-024-09835-4Online publication date: 15-Apr-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Do you care if a computer says sorry?: user experience design through affective messages

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    DIS '12: Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference
    June 2012
    828 pages
    ISBN:9781450312103
    DOI:10.1145/2317956
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 11 June 2012

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. OSD messages
    2. aesthetics
    3. apology
    4. emotion
    5. frustration
    6. perceived usability
    7. trust

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    DIS '12
    Sponsor:
    DIS '12: Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2012
    June 11 - 15, 2012
    Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,158 of 4,684 submissions, 25%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)24
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
    Reflects downloads up to 18 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2025)Designing Empathetic Interfaces Enhancing User Experience Through EmotionHumanizing Technology With Emotional Intelligence10.4018/979-8-3693-7011-7.ch004(47-64)Online publication date: 31-Jan-2025
    • (2024)SIME - An analytical method for evaluating emotional responses in Human-Computer InteractionProceedings of the XXIII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3702038.3702106(1-12)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2024
    • (2024)Risk of desirable user experiences: insights from those who create, facilitate and accept mobile paymentsElectronic Commerce Research10.1007/s10660-024-09835-4Online publication date: 15-Apr-2024
    • (2023)The Mediating Effect of Emotions on Trust in the Context of Automated System UsageIEEE Transactions on Affective Computing10.1109/TAFFC.2021.309488314:2(1572-1585)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2023
    • (2022)Human vs. Automation: Which One Will You Trust More If You Are About to Lose Money?International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2022.207677239:12(2420-2435)Online publication date: 2-Jun-2022
    • (2021)Do Integral Emotions Affect Trust? The Mediating Effect of Emotions on Trust in the Context of Human-Agent InteractionProceedings of the 2021 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3461778.3461997(1492-1503)Online publication date: 28-Jun-2021
    • (2020)Investigating the Effects of (Empty) Promises on Human-Automation Interaction and Trust RepairProceedings of the 8th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction10.1145/3406499.3415064(6-14)Online publication date: 10-Nov-2020
    • (2020)User Preference and Categories for Error Responses in Conversational User InterfacesProceedings of the 2nd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces10.1145/3405755.3406126(1-8)Online publication date: 22-Jul-2020
    • (2020)Platform for Studying Self-Repairing Auto-Corrections in Mobile Text Entry based on Brain Activity, Gaze, and ContextProceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3313831.3376815(1-13)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2020
    • (2020)Designing for Positive Emotional Responses in Users of Interactive Digital Technologies: A Systematic Literature ReviewResponsible Design, Implementation and Use of Information and Communication Technology10.1007/978-3-030-45002-1_38(441-451)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2020
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media