Article

Free access

Software requirements negotiation and renegotiation aids

Authors:

Barry Boehm,

Prasanta Bose,

Ellis Horowitz,

Ming June LeeAuthors Info & Claims

ICSE '95: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Software engineering

Pages 243 - 253

https://doi.org/10.1145/225014.225037

Published: 23 April 1995 Publication History

PDF eReader

References

[1]

Communications of theACM, "Multimedia in the Workplace", CACM, Vol. 36, Number 1, January 1993.

Google Scholar

[2]

J. Bamberger, cd., "STARS/Users Workshop: Final Report - Issues for Discussion Groups," CMU/SEI-90-TR-32, Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, December 1990.

Google Scholar

[3]

B.W. Boehm, "A Spiral Model of Software Development and Enhancement" Comrwter, May 1988, pp. 61-72.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[4]

B.W. Boehm and F.C. Belz, "Applying Process Programming to the Spiral Model: Lessons Learned" Proceeciinm. IEEE 4th Software Process Workshon, May 1988.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[5]

B.W. Boehm and R. Ross, "Theory W Software Project Management Principles and Examples," IEEE Trans. Software Enm., July 1989.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[6]

B. W. Boehm, P. Bose, E. Horowitz, W. Scacchi, S. Bemlifall,ah and A. Madni, "Next-Generation Software Processes and Their Environment Support", Proceedings. USC Center for Software Engineering Inaugural Convocation, June 1993.

Google Scholar

[7]

, B, W, Boehm, P. Bose, E. Horowitz, and M-J. Lee, "Experimental Results from a Prototype Next Generation Process Support System", TRW SIG Technolmw Review Journal, Volume 2, Number 1, 1994,

Google Scholar

[8]

B. W, Boehm, P. Bose, E. Horowitz, and M-J. Lee, "Software Requirements As Negotiated Wln Conditions", Proceeding. 1994 International Conference on Requirements Engineering, IEEE, April 1994.

Google Scholar

[9]

S. Bandinelli, A. Fuggetta, and C. Ghezzi, "Software Process Model Evolution in the SPADE Environment", to appear on TSE Special Issues on Process Evolution.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[10]

N.S. Borensteiu and C.A. Thyberg, "Power, Ease of Use, aml Cooperative Work in a Practical Multimedia Message System," Int'1 J. Man- Machine Studies, Vol. 34, No. 2, Feb. 1991, pp. 229-259.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[11]

E. Carmel, R.D. Whitaker, and J.F. George, "PD and Joint Application Design: a Transatlantic Comparison", Comm. ACM, Jun. 1993, pp. 40-48.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[12]

J. Conklin and M. Begenwn, "gIBIS: A Hypertext Tool for Exploratory Policy Discussion;' ACM Trans. Office Info. Svstems, Oct. 1988, pp. 303-331.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[13]

A. Dardenne, S. Fickas and A. van Lamsweerde, "Goal-directed Concept Acquisition in Requirement Elicitation", Proceeding, Sixth Intimation'al Workshon on Software Specification and Design, Oct. 1991, pp. 14-21.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[14]

S. Easterbrook, "Handling Conflict between Domain Descriptions with Computer-supported Negotiation", Knowledne Acquisition, Vol. 3, 1991, pp 255- 289.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[15]

M.S. Feather, "Constructing Specifications by Combing Parallel Elaborations", IEEE Trans. on Software Engr, 15, 1989, pp 198-208.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[16]

F. Flores, M. Graves, B. Hartfield, and T. Winograd, "Computer Systems and the Design of Organizational Interaction," ACM Trans. Office Info. a, April 1988, PP. 153-172.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[17]

P.K. Garg and W. Scacchi, "ISHYS: Designing an Intelligent Software Hypertext System", IEEE -, VO1.4(3), Fall 1989> PP 52-62.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[18]

J. Goguen, "The Dry and the Wet", Proceedings of the IFIP TC8/WG 8, 1 Working Conference on Information Svstem Concerits: Imtxoving the Jnderstanding, April, 1992.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[19]

M. Jarke and K. Pohl, "Vision Driven System Engineering", Proceeding of the IFIP WG8.1 Working Conference on Information Svstem Development Process, September, 1993.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[20]

K-Y. Lai, T.W. Malone, and K-C Yu, "Object Lens: A "Spreadsheet" for Cooperative Work ACM Trans. Office Info. Svstems, October 1988, pp. 332- 353.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[21]

J. Lee, "SIBYL: A Qualitative Decision Management System," in Artificial Intellitmnce at MIT. Extmndimz Frontiers, P. Winston and S. Shellard, eds., MIT Press, 1990, pp. 106-133.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[22]

J.F. Nunamaker, A.R. Dennis, J.S. Valacich, D.R. Vogel, and J.F, George, "Electronic Meeting Systems to Support Group Work:' Comm. Am, Vol. 34, No, 7, July 1991, pp 40-61.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[23]

B. Nuseibeh, J. Kramer, A, W. Finkelstein, "Expressing the Relationship Between Multiple Views in Requirements Specification", Doceedirws of thel 5th International Conference on Software Erwineering, 1993.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[24]

J. D. Palmer and N. Ann Fields, "An Integrated Environment for Requirements Engineering", IEEE Soft ware, Vol. 6, No. 3, May 1992.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[25]

B. Ramesh and V. Dhar, "Supporting Systems Development by Capturing Deliberations During Requirements Engineering," IEEE Trans. SW Engr., June 1992, pp. 498-510.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[26]

M. Stefik, G. Foster, D.G. Bobrow, K. Kahn, S. Laming, and L. Suchman, "Beyond the Chalkboard: Computer Support for Collaboration and Problem Solving in Meetings," Comm. ACM, Vol. 30, No. 1, Jan. 1987, pp. 32-47.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Gambo ITaveter K(2022)Stakeholder-Centric Clustering Methods for Conflict Resolution in the Requirements Engineering ProcessEvaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering10.1007/978-3-030-96648-5_9(183-210)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2022
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96648-5_9
Hassine JKroumi DAmyot D(2021)A Game-theoretic approach to analyze interacting actors in GRL goal modelsRequirements Engineering10.1007/s00766-021-00349-1Online publication date: 9-Apr-2021
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-021-00349-1
Hassan THussain MHasan MUllah ZQamar N(2019)Quantitative Based Mechanism for Resolving Goals Conflicts in Goal Oriented Requirement EngineeringIntelligent Technologies and Applications10.1007/978-981-13-6052-7_71(822-831)Online publication date: 12-Mar-2019
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6052-7_71
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Software requirements negotiation and renegotiation aids
1. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Management of computing and information systems
      1. Software management
2. Software and its engineering
  1. Software creation and management
    1. Designing software
      1. Requirements analysis

Recommendations

Contract renegotiation and bargaining power: evidence from IT-related outsourcing agreements
ICEC '12: Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Electronic Commerce

Contract theory suggests that bargaining power affect contract negotiation and design. Most of contracting research studied the role of bargaining power in initial contract design but ignore its effects on ex post renegotiation. To fill this research ...
Visualization Issues for Software Requirements Negotiation
COMPSAC '01: Proceedings of the 25th International Computer Software and Applications Conference on Invigorating Software Development

Negotiating the right balance between conflicting requirements is often key to the success of software development efforts. Stakeholder perceptions about requirements issues should be identified, and conflicts resolved, early in the project life-cycle ...
From requirements negotiation to software architecture decisions

Architecture design and requirements negotiations are conceptually tightly related but often performed separately in real-world software development projects. As our prior case studies have revealed, this separation causes uncertainty in requirements ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

ICSE '95: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Software engineering

April 1995

336 pages

ISBN:0897917081

DOI:10.1145/225014

Chairman:
Dewayne Perry
AT&T Bell Labs

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 23 April 1995

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Article

Conference

ICSE95

Sponsor:

SIGSOFT
IEEE-CS\TCSE

ICSE95: 17th International Conference on Software Engineering

April 24 - 28, 1995

Washington, Seattle, USA

Acceptance Rates

ICSE '95 Paper Acceptance Rate 28 of 155 submissions, 18%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 276 of 1,856 submissions, 15%

Upcoming Conference

ICSE 2025

2025 IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering

April 26 - May 3, 2025

Ottawa , ON , Canada

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

86
Total Citations
View Citations
1,647
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)95
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9

Reflects downloads up to 12 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Gambo ITaveter K(2022)Stakeholder-Centric Clustering Methods for Conflict Resolution in the Requirements Engineering ProcessEvaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering10.1007/978-3-030-96648-5_9(183-210)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2022
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96648-5_9
Hassine JKroumi DAmyot D(2021)A Game-theoretic approach to analyze interacting actors in GRL goal modelsRequirements Engineering10.1007/s00766-021-00349-1Online publication date: 9-Apr-2021
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-021-00349-1
Hassan THussain MHasan MUllah ZQamar N(2019)Quantitative Based Mechanism for Resolving Goals Conflicts in Goal Oriented Requirement EngineeringIntelligent Technologies and Applications10.1007/978-981-13-6052-7_71(822-831)Online publication date: 12-Mar-2019
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6052-7_71
Sena BAllian ANakagawa ETrinta FFilho MAndrade RRibeiro M(2017)Characterizing big data software architecturesProceedings of the 11th Brazilian Symposium on Software Components, Architectures, and Reuse10.1145/3132498.3132510(1-10)Online publication date: 18-Sep-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3132498.3132510
Hassine JAmyot D(2017)An empirical approach toward the resolution of conflicts in goal-oriented modelsSoftware and Systems Modeling (SoSyM)10.1007/s10270-015-0460-616:1(279-306)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10270-015-0460-6
AlhajHassan SOdeh MGreen S(2016)Aligning systems of systems engineering with goal-oriented approaches using the i∗ framework2016 IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering (ISSE)10.1109/SysEng.2016.7753125(1-7)Online publication date: Oct-2016
https://doi.org/10.1109/SysEng.2016.7753125
Chakraborty SRosenkranz CDehlinger J(2015)Getting to the ShallsACM Transactions on Management Information Systems10.1145/26293515:3(1-30)Online publication date: 23-Jan-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2629351
Murukannaiah PKalia ATelangy PSingh M(2015)Resolving goal conflicts via argumentation-based analysis of competing hypotheses2015 IEEE 23rd International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)10.1109/RE.2015.7320418(156-165)Online publication date: Aug-2015
https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2015.7320418
Jureta IBorgida AErnst NMylopoulos J(2014)The Requirements Problem for Adaptive SystemsACM Transactions on Management Information Systems10.1145/26293765:3(1-33)Online publication date: 18-Sep-2014
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2629376
Sofian HBinti Salim SShahamiri S(2014)A Requirements Negotiation Process Model that Integrates EasyWinWin with Quality Assurance and Multi-Criteria Preference TechniquesArabian Journal for Science and Engineering10.1007/s13369-014-1150-339:6(4667-4681)Online publication date: 28-May-2014
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-014-1150-3
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Contract renegotiation and bargaining power: evidence from IT-related outsourcing agreements

Visualization Issues for Software Requirements Negotiation

From requirements negotiation to software architecture decisions