[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2185677.2185680acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescpsweekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Efficient cross-correlation via sparse representation in sensor networks

Published: 16 April 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Cross-correlation is a popular signal processing technique used in numerous localization and tracking systems for obtaining reliable range information. However, a practical efficient implementation has not yet been achieved on resource constrained wireless sensor network platforms. We propose cross-correlation via sparse representation: a new framework for ranging based on l1-minimization. The key idea is to compress the signal samples on the mote platform by efficient random projections and transfer them to a central device, where a convex optimization process estimates the range by exploiting its sparsity in our proposed correlation domain. Through sparse representation theory validation, extensive empirical studies and experiments on an end-to-end acoustic ranging system implemented on resource limited off-the-shelf sensor nodes, we show that the proposed framework, together with the proposed correlation domain achieved up to two order of magnitude better performance compared to naive approaches such as working on DCT domain and downsampling. Furthermore, compared to cross-correlation results, 30-40% measurements are sufficient to obtain precise range estimates with an additional bias of only 2-6cm for high accuracy application requirements, while 5% measurements are adequate to achieve approximately 100cm precision for lower accuracy applications.

References

[1]
Andy Harter, Andy Hopper, Pete Steggles, Andy Ward, and Paul Webster. The anatomy of a context-aware application. In MobiCom, pages 59--68. ACM, 1999.
[2]
Nissanka Bodhi Priyantha. The Cricket Indoor Location System. PhD thesis, MIT, 2005.
[3]
Andreas Savvides, Chih-Chieh Han, and Mani B. Strivastava. Dynamic fine-grained localization in ad-hoc networks of sensors. In MobiCom, pages 66--179. ACM, 2001.
[4]
Evangelos Mazomenos, Dirk De Jager, Jeffrey S. Reeve, and Neil M. White. A two-way time of flight ranging scheme for wireless sensor networks. In EWSN. Springer-Verlag, 2011.
[5]
P. Misra, D. Ostry, and S. Jha. Improving the coverage range of ultrasound-based localization systems. In WCNC, pages 605--610. IEEE, 2011.
[6]
M. Hazas and A. Hopper. Broadband ultrasonic location systems for improved indoor positioning. IEEE TMC, 5(5):536--547, 2006.
[7]
M. Kushwaha, K. Molnar, J. Sallai, P. Volgyesi, M. Maroti, and A. Ledeczi. Sensor node localization using mobile acoustic beacons. In MASS, pages 9pp.--491. IEEE, 2005.
[8]
Lewis Girod, Martin Lukac, Vlad Trifa, and Deborah Estrin. The design and implementation of a self-calibrating distributed acoustic sensing platform. In SenSys, pages 71--84. ACM, 2006.
[9]
Peng Chunyi, Shen Guobin, Zhang Yongguang, Li Yanlin, and Tan Kun. Beepbeep: a high accuracy acoustic ranging system using cots mobile devices. In SenSys, pages 1--14. ACM, 2007.
[10]
P. Misra, D. Ostry, N. Kottege, and S. Jha. Tweet: An envelope detection based ultrasonic ranging system. In MSWiM, pages 409--416. ACM, 2011.
[11]
Kamin Whitehouse and David Culler. Calibration as parameter estimation in sensor networks. In WSNA. ACM, 2002.
[12]
János Sallai, György Balogh, Miklós Maróti, Ákos Lédeczi, and Branislav Kusy. Acoustic ranging in resource constrained sensor networks. In ICWN, page 04. CSREA Press, 2004.
[13]
David L. Donoho. For most large underdetermined systems of linear equations the minimal l1-norm solution is also the sparsest solution. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 59(6):797--829, 2006.
[14]
P. Zhao and B. Yu. On model selection consistency of lasso. J. Machine Learning Research, 7:2541--2567, 2006.
[15]
R. Tibshirani. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J. Royal Statistical Soc. B, 58(1):267--288, 1996.
[16]
E. Amaldi and V. Kann. On the approximability of minimizing nonzero variables or unsatisfied relations in linear systems. Theoretical Computer Science, 209:237--260, 1998.
[17]
Edoardo Amaldi and Viggo Kann. On the approximability of minimizing nonzero variables or unsatisfied relations in linear systems. Theoretical Computer Science, 209(1-2):237--260, 1998.
[18]
E. J. Candes and T. Tao. Near-optimal signal recovery from random projections: Universal encoding strategies? IEEE Trans. on Inf. Theory, 52(12):5406--5425, 2006.
[19]
D. L. Donoho. Compressed sensing. IEEE Trans. on Inf. Theory, 52(4):1289--1306, april 2006.
[20]
B. F. Logan. Properties of high-pass signals. Ph.D. Thesis, 1965.
[21]
Donoho D. L. and B. F. Logan. Signal recovery and the large sieve. SIAM J. APPL. MATH., 52(2):577--591, 1992.
[22]
S. S. Chen, D. L. Donoho, and M. A. Saunders. Atomic decomposition by basis pursuit. SIAM J. Scientific Computing, 20(1):33--61, 1999.
[23]
D. L. Donoho and X. Huo. Uncertainty principles and ideal atomic decomposition. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 47(7):2845--2862, 2001.
[24]
R. Gribonval and M Nielsen. Sparse representations in unions of bases. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 49(12):3320--3325, 2003.
[25]
David L. Donoho and Michael Elad. Optimally sparse representation in general (nonorthogonal) dictionaries via l1 minimization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(5):2197--2202, 2003.
[26]
M. Elad and A.M. Bruckstein. A generalized uncertainty principle and sparse representation in pairs of bases. IEEE Trans. on Inf. Theory, 48(9):2558--2567, sep 2002.
[27]
R. Baraniuk, M. Davenport, R. DeVore, and Wakin M. A simple proof of the restricted isometry property for random matrices. Constr Approx, 28:253--263, 2008.
[28]
J. Wright, A. Y. Yang, A. Ganesh, S. S. Sastry, and Ma Yi. Robust face recognition via sparse representation. IEEE PAMI, 31(2):210--227, 2009.
[29]
http://sentilla.com/files/pdf/eol/tmote-invent-user-guide.pdf.
[30]
Ben Greenstein, Christopher Mar, Alex Pesterev, Shahin Farshchi, Eddie Kohler, Jack Judy, and Deborah Estrin. Capturing high-frequency phenomena using a bandwidth-limited sensor network. In SenSys. ACM, 2006. 279--292.
[31]
Christopher M. Sadler and Margaret Martonosi. Data compression algorithms for energy-constrained devices in delay tolerant networks. In SenSys, pages 265--278. ACM, 2006.
[32]
G. Oberholzer, P. Sommer, and R. Wattenhofer. Spiderbat: Augmenting wireless sensor networks with distance and angle information. In IPSN, pages 211--222. ACM/IEEE, 2011.
[33]
Kusy Branislav, Sallai Janos, Balogh Gyorgy, Ledeczi Akos, Protopopescu Vladimir, Tolliver Johnny, DeNap Frank, and Parang Morey. Radio interferometric tracking of mobile wireless nodes. In Mobisys. ACM, 2007.
[34]
P. Misra, S. Kanhere, D. Ostry, and S. Jha. Safety assurance and rescue communication systems in high-stress environments: A a mining case study. IEEE Communication Magazine, 48(4):66--73, 2010.

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)From Real to ComplexACM Transactions on Sensor Networks10.1145/333802615:3(1-32)Online publication date: 9-Aug-2019
  • (2018)Energy Efficient GNSS Signal Acquisition Using Singular Value Decomposition (SVD)Sensors10.3390/s1805158618:5(1586)Online publication date: 16-May-2018
  • (2018)Energy Efficient LPWAN Decoding via Joint Sparse ApproximationProceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems10.1145/3274783.3275165(325-326)Online publication date: 4-Nov-2018
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Efficient cross-correlation via sparse representation in sensor networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    IPSN '12: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks
    April 2012
    354 pages
    ISBN:9781450312271
    DOI:10.1145/2185677
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 16 April 2012

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. l1-minimization
    2. compressed sensing
    3. cross-correlation
    4. localization
    5. ranging
    6. sparse representation

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    IPSN '12
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 143 of 593 submissions, 24%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 21 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2019)From Real to ComplexACM Transactions on Sensor Networks10.1145/333802615:3(1-32)Online publication date: 9-Aug-2019
    • (2018)Energy Efficient GNSS Signal Acquisition Using Singular Value Decomposition (SVD)Sensors10.3390/s1805158618:5(1586)Online publication date: 16-May-2018
    • (2018)Energy Efficient LPWAN Decoding via Joint Sparse ApproximationProceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems10.1145/3274783.3275165(325-326)Online publication date: 4-Nov-2018
    • (2017)A Joint Data Compression and Encryption Approach for Wireless Energy Auditing NetworksACM Transactions on Sensor Networks10.1145/302748913:2(1-32)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2017
    • (2017)Learn to RecogniseIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing10.1109/TMC.2016.259391916:6(1705-1717)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2017
    • (2015)Radio-based device-free activity recognition with radio frequency interferenceProceedings of the 14th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks10.1145/2737095.2737117(154-165)Online publication date: 13-Apr-2015
    • (2015)JICE: Joint data compression and encryption for wireless energy auditing networks2015 12th Annual IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication, and Networking (SECON)10.1109/SAHCN.2015.7338346(453-461)Online publication date: Jun-2015
    • (2015)Ear-PhonePervasive and Mobile Computing10.1016/j.pmcj.2014.02.00117:PA(1-22)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2015
    • (2014)Face recognition on smartphones via optimised sparse representation classificationProceedings of the 13th international symposium on Information processing in sensor networks10.5555/2602339.2602366(237-248)Online publication date: 15-Apr-2014
    • (2014)Energy efficient GPS acquisition with sparse-gpsProceedings of the 13th international symposium on Information processing in sensor networks10.5555/2602339.2602357(155-166)Online publication date: 15-Apr-2014
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media