research-article

Towards a comparative analysis of meta-metamodels

Authors:

SPLASH '11 Workshops: Proceedings of the compilation of the co-located workshops on DSM'11, TMC'11, AGERE! 2011, AOOPES'11, NEAT'11, & VMIL'11

Pages 7 - 12

https://doi.org/10.1145/2095050.2095053

Published: 23 October 2011 Publication History

Get Access

Abstract

A cornerstone in Domain-Specific Modeling is the definition of modeling languages. A widely used method to formalize domain-specific languages is the metamodeling approach. There are a huge number of metamodeling languages. The choice of a suitable metamodeling approach is a challenging task because there is often a lack of knowledge about the selection criteria and the offered metamodeling features. In this paper, we analyze a set of metamodeling languages (ARIS, Ecore, GME, GOPPRR, MS DSL Tools, and MS Visio), define a comparison framework, and compare the selected meta-metamodels. The comparison forms a first foundation for solving the selection problem.

References

[1]

B. Biafore. Visio 2007 Bible. John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2007.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[2]

F. Budinsky, D. Steinberg, E. Merks, R. Ellersick, and T. J. Grose. Eclipse Modeling Framework. The Eclipse Series. Addison-Wesley, 2004.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[3]

S. Cook, G. Jones, S. Kent, and A. C. Wills. Domain Specific Development with Visual Studio DSL Tools. Addison-Wesley Longman, 2007.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[4]

D. S. Frankel. Model Driven Architecture: Applying MDA to Enterprise Computing. John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2003.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[5]

S. Kelly and J.-P. Tolvanen. Domain-Specific Modeling: Enabling Full Code Generation. John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2008.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[6]

H. Kern. The Interchange of (Meta)Models between MetaEdit+ and Eclipse EMF Using M3-Level-Based Bridges. In J.-P. Tolvanen, J. Gray, M. Rossi, and J. Sprinkle, editors, 8th OOPSLA Workshop on Domain-Specific Modeling, 2008.

Google Scholar

[7]

H. Kern and S. Kühne. Model Interchange between ARIS and Eclipse EMF. In J.-P. Tolvanen, J. Gray, M. Rossi, and J. Sprinkle, editors, 7th OOPSLA Workshop on Domain-Specific Modeling, 2007.

Google Scholar

[8]

H. Kern and S. Kühne. Integration of Microsoft Visio and Eclipse Modeling Framework Using M3-Level-Based Bridges. In 2nd ECMDA Workshop on Model-Driven Tool and Process Integration, Enschede, Netherlands, 2009.

Google Scholar

[9]

A. Ledeczi, M. Maroti, A. Bakay, G. Karsai, J. Garrett, C. Thomason, G. Nordstrom, J. Sprinkle, and P. Volgyesi. The Generic Modeling Environment. In IEEE International Workshop on Intelligent Signal Processing, 2001.

Google Scholar

[10]

Unified Modeling Language: Infrastructure, version 2.0. Object Management Group, 2006.

Google Scholar

[11]

A.-W. Scheer. ARIS: Business Process Modeling. Springer, 2000.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[12]

T. Stahl and M. Völter. Model-Driven Software Development. John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2006.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[13]

J.-P. Tolvanen. Incremental Method Engineering with Modeling Tools: Theoretical Principles and Empirical Evidence. PhD thesis, University of Jyväskylä, 1998.

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Cesal FBork D(2024)Establishing interoperability between EMF and MSDKVS: an M3-level-bridge to transform metamodels and modelsSoftware and Systems Modeling10.1007/s10270-024-01169-x23:4(865-894)Online publication date: 30-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-024-01169-x
Uifălean ȘGhiran ABuchmann R(2023)From BPMN Models to Labelled Property GraphsProceedings of the 30th International Conference on Information Systems Development10.62036/ISD.2022.17Online publication date: 2023
https://doi.org/10.62036/ISD.2022.17
Uifălean ȘGhiran ABuchmann R(2023)Employing Graph Databases for Business Process Management and RepresentationAdvances in Information Systems Development10.1007/978-3-031-32418-5_5(73-92)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32418-5_5
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Towards a comparative analysis of meta-metamodels
1. Software and its engineering
  1. Software notations and tools
    1. General programming languages
      1. Language features

Recommendations

Managing the Coupled Evolution of Metamodels and Textual Concrete Syntax Specifications
SEAA '13: Proceedings of the 2013 39th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications

In the context of Model Driven Engineering (MDE) the definition of a Domain Specific Modeling Language (DSML) consists of a set of coordinated artifacts specifying the abstract and concrete syntax of the language, and possibly further aspects related to ...
Formal Metamodeling for Secure Model-Driven Engineering

Systems and applications aligned with new paradigms such as cloud computing and internet of the things are becoming more complex and interconnected, expanding the areas in which they are susceptible to attacks. Their security can be addressed by using ...
Modularizing and layering metamodels with the modular EMF designer
MODELS '18: Proceedings of the 21st ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems: Companion Proceedings

Metamodels are used in model-driven engineering and model-driven software development to define domain specific languages. Over time, they tend to evolve and grow in complexity to encompass new features. If a modular approach is not taken into account ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

SPLASH '11 Workshops: Proceedings of the compilation of the co-located workshops on DSM'11, TMC'11, AGERE! 2011, AOOPES'11, NEAT'11, & VMIL'11

October 2011

358 pages

ISBN:9781450311830

DOI:10.1145/2095050

General Chair:
Crista Videira Lopes
University of California, Irvine

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 23 October 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

SPLASH '11

Sponsor:

SIGPLAN

SPLASH '11: Conference on Systems, Programming, and Applications: Software for Humanity

October 23 - 24, 2011

Oregon, Portland, USA

Upcoming Conference

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

32
Total Citations
View Citations
309
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)21
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 21 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Cesal FBork D(2024)Establishing interoperability between EMF and MSDKVS: an M3-level-bridge to transform metamodels and modelsSoftware and Systems Modeling10.1007/s10270-024-01169-x23:4(865-894)Online publication date: 30-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-024-01169-x
Uifălean ȘGhiran ABuchmann R(2023)From BPMN Models to Labelled Property GraphsProceedings of the 30th International Conference on Information Systems Development10.62036/ISD.2022.17Online publication date: 2023
https://doi.org/10.62036/ISD.2022.17
Uifălean ȘGhiran ABuchmann R(2023)Employing Graph Databases for Business Process Management and RepresentationAdvances in Information Systems Development10.1007/978-3-031-32418-5_5(73-92)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32418-5_5
Muff FFill HKahlig EKahlig W(2022)Kontextabhängige Rechtsvisualisierung mit Augmented RealityTowards Context Dependent Legal VisualizationsHMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik10.1365/s40702-021-00832-xOnline publication date: 18-Jan-2022
https://doi.org/10.1365/s40702-021-00832-x
Lu JChen DWang GKiritsis DTorngren M(2022)Model-Based Systems Engineering Tool-Chain for Automated Parameter Value SelectionIEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems10.1109/TSMC.2020.304882152:4(2333-2347)Online publication date: Apr-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2020.3048821
Hu XArista RZheng XLentes JSorvari JLu JUbis FKiritsis D(2022)Ontology-based system to support industrial system design for aircraft assemblyIFAC-PapersOnLine10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.04.18955:2(175-180)Online publication date: 2022
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.04.189
Döller VKaragiannis DUtz W(2022)MetaMorph: formalization of domain-specific conceptual modeling methods—an evaluative case study, juxtaposition and empirical assessmentSoftware and Systems Modeling10.1007/s10270-022-01047-422:1(75-110)Online publication date: 6-Oct-2022
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-022-01047-4
Döller V(2022)Formalizing the four-layer metamodeling stack with MetaMorph: potential and benefitsSoftware and Systems Modeling10.1007/s10270-022-00986-221:4(1411-1435)Online publication date: 25-Mar-2022
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-022-00986-2
Cesal FBork D(2022)Establishing Interoperability Between the EMF and the MSDKVS Metamodeling PlatformsThe Practice of Enterprise Modeling10.1007/978-3-031-21488-2_11(167-182)Online publication date: 17-Nov-2022
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21488-2_11
Yang PLu JFeng LWu SWang GKiritsis D(2021)A Knowledge Management Approach Supporting Model-Based Systems EngineeringTrends and Applications in Information Systems and Technologies10.1007/978-3-030-72651-5_55(581-590)Online publication date: 29-Mar-2021
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72651-5_55
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Managing the Coupled Evolution of Metamodels and Textual Concrete Syntax Specifications

Formal Metamodeling for Secure Model-Driven Engineering

Modularizing and layering metamodels with the modular EMF designer