[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2072298.2072016acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Learning from search engine and human supervision for web image search

Published: 28 November 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Visual reranking aims at improving the precision of text-based Web image search. In this paper we propose to combine two learning strategies for deriving the reranking model: learning from search engine and learning from human supervision. The first strategy learns the reranking model in a pseudo-supervised fashion by interpreting parts of the initial text-based search result as pseudo-relevant. The second strategy involves manual relevance labeling of the text-based search results obtained for a limited number of representative queries. While learning from search engine is query dependent and can therefore adapt better to individual queries, it is essentially unsupervised and noisy. While human supervision can better relate the search results to true relevance criteria, it needs to be deployed in a way to keep the reranking scalable. A combination of the two is expected to benefit from their respective advantages and reduce the impact of their individual deficiencies. We propose a two-stage learning approach to visual reranking, where in the online stage multiple query-relative meta rerankers are learned in a pseudo-supervised fashion from the search results and in the offline stage human supervision is used to derive the final reranking function based on these meta rerankers. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method significantly outperforms the existing reranking approaches.

References

[1]
http://images.bing.com/.
[2]
http://images.google.com/.
[3]
http://images.yahoo.com/.
[4]
Trec-10 proceedings appendix on common evaluation measures. http://trec.nist.gov/pubs/trec10/appendices/measures.pdf.
[5]
R. Fergus, L. Fei-Fei, P. Perona, and A. Zisserman. Learning object categories from google's image search. In ICCV, 2005.
[6]
M. Fritz and B. Schiele. Decomposition, discovery and detection of visual categories using topic models. In CVPR, 2008.
[7]
W. H. Hsu, L. S. Kennedy, and S.-F. Chang. Video search reranking through random walk over document-level context graph. In ACM Multimedia, 2007.
[8]
K. Järvelin and J. Kekäläinen. IR evaluation methods for retrieving highly relevant documents. In SIGIR, 2000.
[9]
Y. Jing and S. Baluja. Visualrank: Applying pagerank to large-scale image search. IEEE Trans. on PAMI, 30(11):1877--1890, 2008.
[10]
T. Joachims. Making large-scale support vector machine learning practical, pages 169--184. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1999.
[11]
T. Joachims. Optimizing search engines using clickthrough data. In KDD, 2002.
[12]
T. Joachims. Training linear svms in linear time. In KDD, 2006.
[13]
J. Krapac, M. Allan, J. Verbeek, and F. Jurie. Improving web-image search results using query-relative classiffiers. In CVPR, 2010.
[14]
L.-J. Li and L. Fei-Fei. OPTIMOL: automatic Online Picture collecTion via Incremental MOdel Learning. Int. J. Comput. Vision, 2009.
[15]
T.-Y. Liu. Learning to rank for information retrieval. Found. Trends Inf. Retr., 3:225--331, March 2009.
[16]
Y. Liu, T. Mei, X.-S. Hua, J. Tang, X. Wu, and S. Li. Learning to video search rerank via pseudo preference feedback. In ICME, 2008.
[17]
D. G. Lowe. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int. J. Comput. Vision, 60(2), 2004.
[18]
C. D. Manning, P. Raghavan, and H. Schütze. Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press, July 2008.
[19]
J. C. Platt. Fast training of support vector machines using sequential minimal optimization. In Advances in kernel methods: support vector learning. MIT Press, 1999.
[20]
F. Schroff, A. Criminisi, and A. Zisserman. Harvesting image databases from the web. In ICCV, 2007.
[21]
X. Tian, L. Yang, J. Wang, Y. Yang, X. Wu, and X.-S. Hua. Bayesian video search reranking. In ACM Multimedia, 2008.
[22]
X. Tian, L. Yang, X. Wu, and X.-S. Hua. Visual reranking with local learning consistency. In MMM, 2010.
[23]
A. Vedaldi and B. Fulkerson. VLFeat: An open and portable library of computer vision algorithms. http://www.vlfeat.org, 2008.
[24]
R. Yan, A. G. Hauptmann, and R. Jin. Multimedia search with pseudo-relevance feedback. In CIVR, 2003.
[25]
L. Yang and A. Hanjalic. Supervised reranking for web image search. In ACM Multimedia, 2010.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Learning from search engine and human supervision for web image search

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    MM '11: Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Multimedia
    November 2011
    944 pages
    ISBN:9781450306164
    DOI:10.1145/2072298
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 28 November 2011

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. image search reranking
    2. learning to rerank
    3. visual reranking

    Qualifiers

    • Short-paper

    Conference

    MM '11
    Sponsor:
    MM '11: ACM Multimedia Conference
    November 28 - December 1, 2011
    Arizona, Scottsdale, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 2,145 of 8,556 submissions, 25%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 24 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2015)Joint-RerankMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-014-1962-x74:4(1423-1442)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2015
    • (2014)Image Relevance Prediction Using Query-Context Bag-of-Object Retrieval ModelIEEE Transactions on Multimedia10.1109/TMM.2014.232683616:6(1700-1712)Online publication date: Oct-2014
    • (2013)Learning to Rerank Web ImagesIEEE MultiMedia10.1109/MMUL.2012.3020:2(13-21)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2013
    • (2012)A bag-of-objects retrieval model for web image searchProceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Multimedia10.1145/2393347.2393362(49-58)Online publication date: 29-Oct-2012
    • (2012)Query Difficulty Prediction for Web Image SearchIEEE Transactions on Multimedia10.1109/TMM.2011.217764714:4(951-962)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2012

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media