[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2030112.2030140acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Are you close with me? are you nearby?: investigating social groups, closeness, and willingness to share

Published: 17 September 2011 Publication History

Abstract

As ubiquitous computing becomes increasingly mobile and social, personal information sharing will likely increase in frequency, the variety of friends to share with, and range of information that can be shared. Past work has identified that whom you share with is important for choosing whether or not to share, but little work has explored which features of interpersonal relationships influence sharing. We present the results of a study of 42 participants, who self-report aspects of their relationships with 70 of their friends, including frequency of collocation and communication, closeness, and social group. Participants rated their willingness to share in 21 different scenarios based on information a UbiComp system could provide. Our findings show that (a) self-reported closeness is the strongest indicator of willingness to share, (b) individuals are more likely to share in scenarios with common information (e.g. we are within one mile of each other) than other kinds of scenarios (e.g. my location wherever I am), and (c) frequency of communication predicts both closeness and willingness to share better than frequency of collocation.

Supplementary Material

JPG File (5-3.jpg)
MOV File (5-3.mov)

References

[1]
Adams, P. The Real Life Social Network. Voices that Matter Web Design Conference, 2010. http://www. slideshare.net/padday/the-real-life-social-network-v2.
[2]
Belk, R. Sharing. Journal of Consumer Research 36, 5 (2010), 715--734.
[3]
Binder, J., Howes, A., and Sutcliffe, A. The problem of conflicting social spheres: effects of network structure on experienced tension in social network sites. In Proc. CHI '09, (2009), 965--974.
[4]
boyd, d.m. and Ellison, N.B. Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. JCMC 13, 1 (2008.
[5]
Burke, M., Marlow, C., and Lento, T. Social network activity and social well-being. In Proc CHI '10 (2010).
[6]
Choudhury, T. and Basu, S. Modeling conversational dynamics as a mixed-memory markov process. In Proc. NIPS '04, (2004).
[7]
Christakis, N.A. and Fowler, J.H. Connected: The Surprising Power of Our Social Networks and How They Shape Our Lives. 2009.
[8]
Consolvo, S., Smith, I.E., Matthews, T., LaMarca, A., Tabert, J., and Powledge, P. Location Disclosure to Social Relations: Why, When, & What People Want to Share. In Proc. CHI '0.
[9]
Cozby, P., Self-disclosure: A literature review. Psychological Bulletin, Vol 79(2), Feb 1973, 73--9.
[10]
Cranshaw, J., Toch, E., and Hong, J. Bridging the Gap Between Physical Location and Online Social Networks. In Proc. Ubicomp '10.
[11]
Danezis, G. Inferring Privacy Policies for Social Networking Services. In Proc. AISec '09.
[12]
De Choudhury, M., Mason, W.A., Hofman, J.M., and Watts, D.J. Inferring relevant social networks from interpersonal communication. Proc. WWW '10, 2010.
[13]
Derlega, V.J. and Chaikin, A.L. Privacy and Self-Disclosure in Social Relationships. Journal of Social Issues 33, 3 (1977), 102--115.
[14]
Eagle, N., Pentland, A., and Lazer, D. Inferring Social Network Structure using Mobile Phone Data. The National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) 106, 36 (2009), 15274--15278.
[15]
Eagle, N. and Pentland, A. Eigenbehaviors: Identifying Structure in Routine. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 63, 7 (2009), 1057--1066.
[16]
Eagle, N. Mobile Phones as Social Sensors. The Handbook of Emergent Technologies in Social Research, (2010).
[17]
Elgan, M. The five stages of Facebook grief. Computerworld, 2010. http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9179258/The_five_stages_of_Facebook_grief.
[18]
Facebook. Statistics. http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics.
[19]
Fang, L. and LeFevre, K. Privacy wizards for social networking sites. In Proc. WWW '10.
[20]
Farnham, S.D. and Churchill, E.F. Faceted identity, faceted lives. In Proc. CSCW '11.
[21]
Gilbert, E. and Karahalios, K. Predicting tie strength with social media. In Proc. CHI '09.
[22]
Goffman, E. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Doubleday, 1959.
[23]
Golder, S.A., Wilkinson, D., and Huberman, B.A. Rhythms of Social Interaction: Messaging within a Massive Online Network. In Proc. C&T '0.
[24]
Google. Check in with Google Latitude. http://googlemobile.blogspot.com/2011/02/check-in-with-google-latitude.html.
[25]
Granovetter, M. The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited. Sociological Theory 1, (1983), 201--233.
[26]
Hidalgo, C.A. and Rodriguez-Sickert, C. The dynamics of a mobile phone network. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 387, 2008.
[27]
Hsieh, G., Tang, K.P., and Hong, J.I. The Design and Evaluation of Privacy Controls and Feedback Mechanisms for Contextual Instant Messaging. (2007).
[28]
Jones, S. and O'Neill, E. Feasibility of Structural Network Clustering for Group-Based Privacy Control in Social Networks. In Proc. SOUPS '10.
[29]
Kelley, P.G., Brewer, R., Mayer, Y., Cranor, L.F., Sadeh, N. An Investigation into Facebook Friend Grouping. In Proc. INTERACT '11.
[30]
Khalil, A. and Connelly, K. Context-aware telephony: privacy preferences & sharing patterns. Proc. CHI '06.
[31]
Lampinen, A., Tamminen, S., and Oulasvirta, A. All My People Right Here, Right Now: management of group co-presence on a social networking site. In Proc. CSCW '09.
[32]
Lederer, S., Mankoff, J.C., and Dey, A.K. Who Wants to Know What When? In Proc. CHI '03.
[33]
Lin, J., Xiang, G., Hong, J.I., and Sadeh, N. Modeling People's Place Naming Preferences in Location Sharing. In Proc. Ubicomp '10.
[34]
McCarty, C. Structure in Personal Networks. Journal of Social Structure 3, (2005).
[35]
Miluzzo, E., Lane, N.D., Fodor, K., et al. Sensing Meets Mobile Social Networks: The Design, Implementation and Evaluation of the CenceMe Application. In Proc. SenSys '08.
[36]
Odom, W., Zimmerman, J., and Forlizzi, J. Teenagers and Their Virtual Possessions: Design Opportunities and Issues. In Proc. CHI '11.
[37]
Olson, J., Grudin, J., and Horvitz, E. A study of preferences for sharing and privacy. In Proc. CHI '05.
[38]
Ozenc, F.K. and Farnham, S.D. Life "Modes" in Social Media. In Proc. of CHI '11.
[39]
Palen, L. and Dourish, P. Unpacking "Privacy" for a Networked World. CHI Letters 5, 1 (2003), 129--136.
[40]
Spencer, L. and Pahl, R.E. Rethinking friendship: hidden solidarities today. Princeton University Press, 2006.
[41]
Tang, J.C., Yankelovich, N., Begole, J., Kleek, M.V., Li, F., and Bhalodia, J. ConNexus to awarenex: extending awareness to mobile users. In Proc.CHI '01.
[42]
Tang, K.P., Keyani, P., Fogarty, J., and Hong, J.I. Putting people in their place: an anonymous and privacy-sensitive approach to collecting sensed data in location-based applications. In Proc. CHI '06.
[43]
Tsai, J., Kelley, P., Drielsma, P.H., Cranor, L.F., Hong, J., and Sadeh, N. Who's viewed you? the impact of feedback in a mobile-location system. In Proc. CHI '09.
[44]
Wilson, C., Boe, B., Sala, A., Puttaswamy, K.P.N., and Zhao, B.Y. User interactions in social networks and their implications. In Proc. EuroSys 09.
[45]
Xiang, R., Neville, J., and Rogati, M. Modeling relationship strength in online social networks. In Proc. WWW '10.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Exploring tenants' preferences of privacy negotiation in airbnbProceedings of the 32nd USENIX Conference on Security Symposium10.5555/3620237.3620268(535-552)Online publication date: 9-Aug-2023
  • (2023)A Model of Contextual Factors Affecting Older Adults’ Information-Sharing Decisions in the U.S.ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/355788830:1(1-48)Online publication date: 4-Apr-2023
  • (2023)Museum Visitor Comfort When Sharing Personal Information for EvaluationJournal of Museum Education10.1080/10598650.2022.213535348:2(136-152)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Are you close with me? are you nearby?: investigating social groups, closeness, and willingness to share

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    UbiComp '11: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Ubiquitous computing
    September 2011
    668 pages
    ISBN:9781450306300
    DOI:10.1145/2030112
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 17 September 2011

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. privacy
    2. relationships
    3. social networking
    4. tie strength

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    Ubicomp '11

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 764 of 2,912 submissions, 26%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)87
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
    Reflects downloads up to 03 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Exploring tenants' preferences of privacy negotiation in airbnbProceedings of the 32nd USENIX Conference on Security Symposium10.5555/3620237.3620268(535-552)Online publication date: 9-Aug-2023
    • (2023)A Model of Contextual Factors Affecting Older Adults’ Information-Sharing Decisions in the U.S.ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/355788830:1(1-48)Online publication date: 4-Apr-2023
    • (2023)Museum Visitor Comfort When Sharing Personal Information for EvaluationJournal of Museum Education10.1080/10598650.2022.213535348:2(136-152)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2023
    • (2023)Lengthy early morning instant messages reveal more than you think: Analysing interpersonal relationships using mobile communication metadataPervasive and Mobile Computing10.1016/j.pmcj.2023.10178191(101781)Online publication date: Apr-2023
    • (2023)What are IBD Patients Talking About on Twitter? Using Natural Language Understanding to Investigate Patients’ TweetsSN Computer Science10.1007/s42979-023-01772-74:4Online publication date: 20-Apr-2023
    • (2022)A Privacy Paradox? Impact of Privacy Concerns on Willingness to Disclose COVID-19 Health Status in the United StatesCompanion Publication of the 2022 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/3500868.3559471(159-162)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2022
    • (2022)Adorned in Memes: Exploring the Adoption of Social Wearables in Nordic Student CultureProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3517733(1-18)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
    • (2022)SoK: Social Cybersecurity2022 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)10.1109/SP46214.2022.9833757(1863-1879)Online publication date: May-2022
    • (2022)What Are IBD Patients Talking About on Twitter?ICT for Health, Accessibility and Wellbeing10.1007/978-3-030-94209-0_18(206-220)Online publication date: 6-Mar-2022
    • (2022)Social Media and PrivacyModern Socio-Technical Perspectives on Privacy10.1007/978-3-030-82786-1_7(113-147)Online publication date: 9-Feb-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media