[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2020408.2020470acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A case study in a recommender system based on purchase data

Published: 21 August 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Collaborative filtering has been extensively studied in the context of ratings prediction. However, industrial recommender systems often aim at predicting a few items of immediate interest to the user, typically products that (s)he is likely to buy in the near future. In a collaborative filtering setting, the prediction may be based on the user's purchase history rather than rating information, which may be unreliable or unavailable. In this paper, we present an experimental evaluation of various collaborative filtering algorithms on a real-world dataset of purchase history from customers in a store of a French home improvement and building supplies chain. These experiments are part of the development of a prototype recommender system for salespeople in the store. We show how different settings for training and applying the models, as well as the introduction of domain knowledge may dramatically influence both the absolute and the relative performances of the different algorithms. To the best of our knowledge, the influence of these parameters on the quality of the predictions of recommender systems has rarely been reported in the literature.

References

[1]
G. Adomavicius, R. Sankaranarayanan, S. Sen, and A. Tuzhilin. Incorporating Contextual Information in Recommender Systems Using a Multidimensional Approach. Trans. on Inf. Sys., 23(1):103--145, 2005.
[2]
G. Adomavicius and A. Tuzhilin. Towards the Next Generation of Recommender Systems: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art and Possible Extensions. IEEE Trans. on Knowledge and Data Eng., 17(6):734--749, 2005.
[3]
G. Adomavicius and A. Tuzhilin. Context-aware Recommender Systems. In Proc. of the 2008 ACM Conf. on Rec. Sys., pages 335--336, 2008.
[4]
C. Anderson. The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of More. Hyperion, 2006.
[5]
L. Baltrunas. Exploiting Contextual Information in Recommender Systems. In Proc of the 2008 ACM Conf. on Rec. Sys., pages 295--298, 2008.
[6]
R. Bell, Y. Koren, and C. Volinsky. Chasing 1,000,000: How We Won the Netix Prize. ASA Stat. and Computing Graphics Newsletter, 18(2), 2007.
[7]
Y. Ding, X. Li, and M. E. Orlowska. Recency-based Collaborative Filtering. In Proc. of the 17th Australasian Database Conf., pages 99--107, 2006.
[8]
A. Gunawardana and G. Shani. A survey of accuracy evaluation metrics of recommendation tasks. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 10:2935--2962, 2009.
[9]
J. L. Herlocker, J. A. Konstan, L. G. Terveen, and J. T. Riedl. Evaluating Collaborative Filtering Recommender Systems. ACM Trans. on Inf. Sys., 22(1):5--53, 2004.
[10]
Y. Hu, Y. Koren, and C. Volinsky. Collaborative Filtering for Implicit Feedback Datasets. In Proc. of ICDM, pages 263--272, 2008.
[11]
C. Kim and J. Kim. A Recommendation Algorithm Using Multi-Level Association Rules. In Proc. of the 2003 IEEE/WIC Intl. Conf. on Web Intel., 2003.
[12]
Y. Koren. Factorization Meets the Neighborhood: a Multifaceted Collaborative Filtering Model. In Proc. of SIGKDD, pages 426--434, 2008.
[13]
Y. Koren. Collaborative filtering with temporal dynamics. Commun. ACM, 53(4):89--97, 2010.
[14]
Y. Koren, R. Bell, and C. Volinsky. Matrix Factorization Techniques for Recommender Systems. Computer, 42(8):30--37, 2009.
[15]
T. Q. Lee, Y. Park, and Y.-T. Park. An Empirical Study on Effectiveness of Temporal Information as Implicit Ratings. Expert Syst. Appl., 36(2):1315--1321, 2009.
[16]
G. Linden, B. Smith, and J. York. Amazon.com Recommendations: Item-to-Item Collaborative Filtering. IEEE Internet Computing, 7:76--80, 2003.
[17]
J. Liu, M. Z. Q. Chen, J. Chen, F. Deng, H. Zhang, Z. Zhang, and T. Zhou. Recent Advances in Personal Recommender Systems. J. of Inf. and Sys. Science, 5(2):230--247, 2009.
[18]
B. Marlin. Collaborative Filtering: A Machine Learning Perspective. Master's thesis, University of Toronto, 2004.
[19]
C. Palmisano, A. Tuzhilin, and M. Gorgoglione. Using Context to Improve Predictive Modeling of Customers in Personalization Applications. IEEE Trans. on Knowl. and Data Eng., 20(11):1535--1549, 2008.
[20]
R. Pan and M. Scholz. Mind the Gaps: Weighting the Unknown in Large-Scale One-Class Collaborative Filtering. In Proc of SIGKDD, pages 667--676, 2009.
[21]
N. Pasquier, R. Taouil, Y. Bastide, G. Stumme, and L. Lakhal. Generating a condensed representation for association rules. J. Intell. Inf. Syst., 24(1):29--60, 2005.
[22]
B. Sarwar, G. Karypis, J. Konstan, and J. Riedl. Analysis of Recommendation Algorithms for e-Commerce. In Proc. of the 2nd ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce, pages 158--167, 2000.
[23]
N. Srebro and T. Jaakkola. Weighted Low-Rank Approximations. In Proc. of the 20th Intl. Conf. on Mach. Learn., pages 720--727, 2003.
[24]
X. Su and T. M. Khoshgoftaar. A survey of Collaborative Filtering Techniques. Adv. in Artif. Intell., 2009:2--2, 2009.
[25]
V. Ventos and H. Soldano. Alpha galois lattices: An overview. In ICFCA, pages 299--314, 2005.
[26]
M. Weimer, A. Karatzoglou, and A. J. Smola. Improving maximum margin matrix factorization. Machine Learning, 72(3):263--276, 2008.
[27]
S. Zhang, W. Wang, J. Ford, and F. Makedon. Learning from incomplete ratings using non-negative matrix factorization. In Proc. of SDM, pages 549--553, 1996.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Personalization for web-based services using offline reinforcement learningMachine Language10.1007/s10994-024-06525-y113:5(3049-3071)Online publication date: 1-May-2024
  • (2024)A Reinforcement Learning Approach for Personalized Diversity in Feeds RecommendationArtificial Intelligence10.1007/978-981-99-9119-8_42(463-475)Online publication date: 3-Feb-2024
  • (2023)Measuring the effect of collaborative filtering on the diversity of users’ attentionApplied Network Science10.1007/s41109-022-00530-78:1Online publication date: 25-Jan-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
KDD '11: Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
August 2011
1446 pages
ISBN:9781450308137
DOI:10.1145/2020408
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 August 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. collaborative filtering
  2. recommender systems

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

KDD '11
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,133 of 8,635 submissions, 13%

Upcoming Conference

KDD '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)19
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 01 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Personalization for web-based services using offline reinforcement learningMachine Language10.1007/s10994-024-06525-y113:5(3049-3071)Online publication date: 1-May-2024
  • (2024)A Reinforcement Learning Approach for Personalized Diversity in Feeds RecommendationArtificial Intelligence10.1007/978-981-99-9119-8_42(463-475)Online publication date: 3-Feb-2024
  • (2023)Measuring the effect of collaborative filtering on the diversity of users’ attentionApplied Network Science10.1007/s41109-022-00530-78:1Online publication date: 25-Jan-2023
  • (2022)Data modalities, consumer attributes and recommendation performance in the fashion industryElectronic Markets10.1007/s12525-022-00579-332:3(1279-1292)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2022
  • (2022)The Evaluation of the Angled Antenna Based Direction Estimation Scheme for RFID TagsMobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking and Services10.1007/978-3-030-94822-1_49(754-768)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2022
  • (2021)An RFM Model Customizable to Product Catalogues and Marketing Criteria Using Fuzzy Linguistic Models: Case Study of a Retail BusinessMathematics10.3390/math91618369:16(1836)Online publication date: 4-Aug-2021
  • (2021)How Useful is Meta-Recommendation? An Empirical Investigation2021 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data)10.1109/BigData52589.2021.9671808(600-606)Online publication date: 15-Dec-2021
  • (2020)Explainable Recommendations via Attentive Multi-Persona Collaborative FilteringProceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems10.1145/3383313.3412226(468-473)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2020
  • (2020)Recency Aware Collaborative Filtering for Next Basket RecommendationProceedings of the 28th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3340631.3394850(80-87)Online publication date: 7-Jul-2020
  • (2020)A Comparative Evaluation of Top-N Recommendation Algorithms: Case Study with Total Customers2020 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data)10.1109/BigData50022.2020.9378404(4499-4508)Online publication date: 10-Dec-2020
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media