[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2009916.2009938acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Inferring and using location metadata to personalize web search

Published: 24 July 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Personalization of search results offers the potential for significant improvements in Web search. Among the many observable user attributes, approximate user location is particularly simple for search engines to obtain and allows personalization even for a first-time Web search user. However, acting on user location information is difficult, since few Web documents include an address that can be interpreted as constraining the locations where the document is relevant. Furthermore, many Web documents -- such as local news stories, lottery results, and sports team fan pages -- may not correspond to physical addresses, but the location of the user still plays an important role in document relevance. In this paper, we show how to infer a more general location relevance which uses not only physical location but a more general notion of locations of interest for Web pages. We compute this information using implicit user behavioral data, characterize the most location-centric pages, and show how location information can be incorporated into Web search ranking. Our results show that a substantial fraction of Web search queries can be significantly improved by incorporating location-based features.

References

[1]
E. Amitay, N. Har'El, R. Sivan, and A. Soffer. (2004). Web-a-where: geo-tagging web content. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development on Information Retrieval, pp. 273--280.
[2]
L. Andrade and M. Silva. (2006). Relevance ranking for geographic IR. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR Workshop on Geographic Information Retrieval.
[3]
C.J.C. Burges, R. Ragno, and Q.V. Le. (2006). Learning to rank with non-smooth cost functions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 193--200.
[4]
O. Chapelle, Y. Chang, and T.-Y. Liu. (2010). The Yahoo! Learning to Rank Challenge. http://learningtorankchallenge.yahoo.com.
[5]
Z. Dou, R. Song, and J.R. Wen. (2007). A large-scale evaluation and analysis of personalized search strategies. In Proceedings of the International Conference on the World Wide Web, 581--590.
[6]
G. Dupret and B. Piwowarski. (2008). A user browsing model to predict search engine click data from past observations. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development on Information Retrieval, pp. 331--388.
[7]
J. Gao, W. Yuan, X. Li, K. Deng, and J.-Y. Nie. (2009). Smoothing clickthrough data for web search ranking. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development on Information Retrieval, pp. 355--362.
[8]
T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman. (2001). Elements of Statistical Learning. Springer.
[9]
J.R. Hershey and P.A. Olsen (2007). Approximating the kullback leibler divergence between gaussian mixture models. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.
[10]
G. Jeh and J. Widom. (2003). Scaling personalized web search. In Proceedings of the International Conference on the World Wide Web, pp. 271--279.
[11]
T. Joachims, L. Granka, B. Pan, H. Hembrooke, F. Radlinski, and G. Gay. (2007). Evaluating the accuracy of implicit feedback from clicks and query reformulations in web search. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 25(2):7.
[12]
R. Jones, A. Hassan, and F. Diaz. (2008). Geographic features in Web search retrieval. In Proceedings of ACM GIR Workshop on Geographic Information Retrieval, pp. 57--58.
[13]
Y. Li, N. Stokes, L. Cavedon, and A. Moffat. (2006). NICTA I2D2 group at GeoCLEF 2006. In Proceedings of Cross-Language Evaluation Forum, pp. 938--945.
[14]
B. Martins, I. Anastacio, and P. Calado. (2010). A machine learning approach for resolving place references in text. In Proceedings of the AGILE Conference on Geographical Information Science.
[15]
N. Matthijs and F. Radlinski. (2011). Personalizing Web search using tong term browsing history. In Proceedings of the ACM WSDM Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 25--34.
[16]
A. Mehler, Y. Bao, X. Li, Y. Wang, and S. Skiena. (2006). Spatial analysis of news sources. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 12(5): 765--772.
[17]
Q. Mei and K. Church. (2008). Entropy of search logs: how hard is search? with personalization? with backoff? In Proceedings of ACM WSDM Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 45--54.
[18]
Q. Mei, C. Liu, H. Su, and C. Zhai. (2006). A probabilistic approach to spatiotemporal theme pattern mining on web-logs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on the World Wide Web, pp. 533--542.
[19]
R. Purves, P. Clough, C. Jones, A. Arampatzis, B. Bucher, D. Finch, G. Fu, H. Joho, A. Syed, S. Vaid, et al. (2007). The design and implementation of SPIRIT: a spatially aware search engine for information retrieval on the internet. International J. of Geographical Information Science, 21(7).
[20]
F. Radlinski and T. Joachims. Query chains: learning to rank from implicit feedback. (2005). In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 239--248.
[21]
X. Shen, B. Tan, and C. Zhai. (2005). Context-sensitive information retrieval using implicit feedback. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 43--50.
[22]
X. Shen, B. Tan, and C. Zhai. (2005). UCAIR: A personalized search toolbar. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 681--681.
[23]
B. Tan, X. Shen, and C. Zhai. (2006). Mining long-term search history to improve search accuracy. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 718--723.
[24]
J. Tang and M. Sanderson. (2010). Spatial diversity, do users appreciate it? In Proceedings of the ACM GIR Workshop on Geographic Information Retrieval.
[25]
J. Teevan, M.R. Morris, and S. Bush. (2009). Discovering and using groups to improve personalized search. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 15--24.
[26]
N. Ueda and R. Nakano. (1998). Deterministic annealing EM algorithm. Neural Networks, 11(2), pp. 271--282.
[27]
M. J. van Kreveld, I. Reinbacher, A. Arampatzis, and R. van Zwol. (2005). Multi-dimensional scattered ranking methods for geographic information retrieval. GeoInformatica, 9(1): 61--84.
[28]
C. Wang, X. Xie, L. Wang, Y. Lu, and W.-Y. Ma. (2005). Web resource geographic location classification and detection. In Proceedings of the International Conference on the World Wide Web, pp. 1138--1139.
[29]
K. Wang, T. Walker, and Z. Zheng. (2009). PSkip: estimating relevant ranking quality from Web search clickthrough data. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 1355--1364.
[30]
L. Wang, C. Wang, X. Xie, J. Forman, Y. Lu, W.-Y. Ma, and Y. Li. (2005). Detecting dominant locations from search queries. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 424--431.
[31]
R.W. White, P.N. Bennett, and S.T. Dumais. (2010). Predicting short-term interests using activity-based search context. In Proceedings of the ACM CIKM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 1009--1018
[32]
Q. Wu, C. J.C. Burges, K. M. Svore and J Gao. (2008). Ranking, Boosting, and Model Adaptation. Microsoft Research Technical Report MSR-TR-2008-10.
[33]
B. Yu and G. Cai (2007). A query-aware document ranking method for geographic information retrieval. In Proceedings of the ACM GIR Workshop on Geographical Information Retrieval.
[34]
F. Zhong, D. Wang, G. Wang, W. Chen, Y. Zhang, Z. Chen, and H. Wang. (2010). Incorporating post-click behaviors into a click model. In Proceeding of the International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 355--362.
[35]
Z. Zhuang, C. Brunk, and C. L. Giles. (2008). Modeling and visualizing geo-sensitive queries based on user clicks. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Location and the Web, pp. 73--76.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Intent-Oriented Dynamic Interest Modeling for Personalized Web SearchACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/363981742:4(1-30)Online publication date: 8-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Encoding Group Interests With Persistent Homology for Personalized SearchIEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems10.1109/TSMC.2024.341002954:9(5606-5616)Online publication date: Sep-2024
  • (2023)Incorporating Explicit Subtopics in Personalized SearchProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202310.1145/3543507.3583488(3364-3374)Online publication date: 30-Apr-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Inferring and using location metadata to personalize web search

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGIR '11: Proceedings of the 34th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in Information Retrieval
    July 2011
    1374 pages
    ISBN:9781450307574
    DOI:10.1145/2009916
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 24 July 2011

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. location metadata
    2. personalization
    3. web search

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    SIGIR '11
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 792 of 3,983 submissions, 20%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)26
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
    Reflects downloads up to 25 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Intent-Oriented Dynamic Interest Modeling for Personalized Web SearchACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/363981742:4(1-30)Online publication date: 8-Jan-2024
    • (2024)Encoding Group Interests With Persistent Homology for Personalized SearchIEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems10.1109/TSMC.2024.341002954:9(5606-5616)Online publication date: Sep-2024
    • (2023)Incorporating Explicit Subtopics in Personalized SearchProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202310.1145/3543507.3583488(3364-3374)Online publication date: 30-Apr-2023
    • (2023)Characterizing and Early Predicting User Performance for Adaptive Search Path RecommendationProceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/pra2.79960:1(408-420)Online publication date: 22-Oct-2023
    • (2022)Personalized Visualization RecommendationACM Transactions on the Web10.1145/3538703Online publication date: 24-May-2022
    • (2022)IP Geolocation through Geographic ClicksACM Transactions on Spatial Algorithms and Systems10.1145/34767748:1(1-22)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2022
    • (2022)Collecting Geospatial Data Under Local Differential Privacy With Improving Frequency EstimationIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2022.3181049(1-12)Online publication date: 2022
    • (2022)Methodological analysis of personalization in urban recommender systems by distance measuresTelematics and Informatics10.1016/j.tele.2022.10181871:COnline publication date: 1-Jul-2022
    • (2021)Task Intelligence for Search and RecommendationSynthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services10.2200/S01103ED1V01Y202105ICR07413:3(1-160)Online publication date: 9-Jun-2021
    • (2021)Clarifying Ambiguous Keywords with Personal Word Embeddings for Personalized SearchACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/347056440:3(1-29)Online publication date: 22-Nov-2021
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media