[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2998476.2998487acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescomputeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Semantic Clustering Driven Approaches to Recommender Systems

Published: 21 October 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Recommender Systems (RS) have increasingly evolved from novelties used by few E-commerce sites to an essential component of business tools handling the world of E-commerce. Recommender Systems have been widely used for product recommendations such as books and movies as well as, it is also gaining ground in service recommendations such as hotels, restaurants and travel attractions. Collaborative filtering based on reviews and ratings is usually applied that uses Clustering technique. The primary step of converting textual reviews into a Feature Matrix (FM) can be greatly refined by using semantic similarity between terms. In this paper Wordnet based Synset grouping approach is presented that not only reduces dimensions in FM but also generates Feature vectors (FV) for each cluster with significantly improved cluster quality. The paper presents a three step approach of validating the reviews, grouping of reviews and review based recommendations using Feature vector. Real datasets extracted from travel sites are used for experiments.

References

[1]
Bafna, P.B., Shirwaikar, S. and Pramod, D., 2016. Multi-Step Iterative Algorithm for Feature Selection on Dynamic Documents. International Journal of Information Retrieval Research (IJIRR), 6(2), pp. 24--40
[2]
Beil, F., Ester, M. and Xu, X., 2002, July. Frequent term-based text clustering. In Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 436--442). ACM.
[3]
Castagnos, S. and Boyer, A., 2007, July. Modeling preferences in a distributed recommender system. In International Conference on User Modeling (pp. 400--404). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
[4]
Debnath, S., Ganguly, N. and Mitra, P., 2008, April. Feature weighting in content based recommendation system using social network analysis. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web (pp. 1041--1042). ACM.
[5]
Faridani, S., 2011, October. Using canonical correlation analysis for generalized sentiment analysis, product recommendation and search. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems (pp. 355--358). ACM.
[6]
Glance, N., Meunier, J.L., Bernard, P. and Arregui, D., 2001, September. Collaborative document monitoring. In Proceedings of the 2001 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (pp. 171--178). ACM.
[7]
Goldberg, D., Nichols, D., Oki, B.M. and Terry, D., 1992. Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry. Communications of the ACM, 35(12), pp. 61--70.
[8]
Halkidi, M., Batistakis, Y. and Vazirgiannis, M., 2002. Cluster validity methods: part I. ACM Sigmod Record, 31(2), pp. 40--45.
[9]
Herlocker, Jonathan L., Joseph A. Konstan, Loren G. Terveen, and John T. Riedl. "Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems." ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 22, no. 1 (2004): 5--53.
[10]
Hung, L.V., Anh, N.T.K. and Dang, N.H., 2012, August. Improving Vietnamese web page clustering by combining neighbors' content and using iterative feature selection. In Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Information and Communication Technology (pp. 47--54). ACM.
[11]
Jannach, D., Zanker, M., Felfernig, A. and Friedrich, G., 2010. Recommender systems: an introduction. Cambridge University Press.
[12]
Janssens, F., Glänzel, W. and De Moor, B., 2007, August. Dynamic hybrid clustering of bioinformatics by incorporating text mining and citation analysis. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 360--369). ACM.
[13]
Jashki, A., Makki, M., Bagheri, E. and Ghorbani, A.A., 2009. An iterative hybrid filter-wrapper approach to feature selection for document clustering. In Proceedings of the 22nd Canadian Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AI'09) 2009.
[14]
Jiawei Han, M.K. and Pei, J., 2011. Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques: Concepts and Techniques.
[15]
Jayabharathy, J. and Kanmani, S., 2014. Correlated concept based dynamic document clustering algorithms for newsgroups and scientific literature. Decision Analytics, 1(1), p.1.
[16]
Karypis, G., 2001, October. Evaluation of item-based top-n recommendation algorithms. In Proceedings of the tenth international conference on Information and knowledge management (pp. 247--254). ACM.
[17]
Kumar, A., Kumar, N., Hussain, M., Chaudhury, S. and Agarwal, S., 2014, December. Semantic clustering-based cross-domain recommendation. In Computational Intelligence and Data Mining (CIDM), 2014 IEEE Symposium on (pp. 137--141). IEEE.
[18]
Li, Q. and Kim, B.M., 2003, October. Clustering approach for hybrid recommender system. In Web Intelligence, 2003. WI 2003. Proceedings. IEEE/WIC International Conference on (pp. 33--38). IEEE.
[19]
Li, T., Zhang, Y. and Sindhwani, V., 2009, August. A nonnegative matrix tri-factorization approach to sentiment classification with lexical prior knowledge. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP: Volume 1-Volume 1 (pp. 244--252). Association for Computational Linguistics.
[20]
Lops, P., De Gemmis, M. and Semeraro, G., 2011. Content-based recommender systems: State of the art and trends. In Recommender systems handbook (pp. 73--105). Springer US.
[21]
Melville, P., Gryc, W. and Lawrence, R.D., 2009, June. Sentiment analysis of blogs by combining lexical knowledge with text classification. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 1275--1284). ACM.
[22]
Miller, B.N., Albert, I., Lam, S.K., Konstan, J.A. and Riedl, J., 2003, January. MovieLens unplugged: experiences with an occasionally connected recommender system. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces (pp. 263--266). ACM.
[23]
Pantel, P. and Lin, D., 2002, August. Document clustering with committees. In Proceedings of the 25th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (pp. 199--206). ACM.
[24]
Peis, E., del Castillo, J.M. and Delgado-López, J.A., 2008. Semantic recommender systems. analysis of the state of the topic. Hipertext.net, 6, pp. 1--5.
[25]
Resnick, P. and Varian, H.R., 1997. Recommender systems. Communications of the ACM, 40(3), pp. 56--58.
[26]
Richardson, R., Smeaton, A. and Murphy, J., 1994. Using WordNet as a knowledge base for measuring semantic similariy between words.
[27]
Rafi, M. and Shaikh, M.S., 2013. An improved semantic similarity measure for document clustering based on topic maps. arXiv preprint arXiv:1303.4087.
[28]
Roshchina, A., Cardiff, J. and Rosso, P., 2012. Evaluating the Similarity Estimator Component of the TWIN Personality-based Recommender System.
[29]
Sarwar, B., Karypis, G., Konstan, J. and Riedl, J., 2001, April. Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web (pp. 285--295). ACM.
[30]
Sarwar, B., Karypis, G., Konstan, J. and Riedl, J., 2000, October. Analysis of recommendation algorithms for ecommerce. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM conference on Electronic commerce (pp. 158--167). ACM.
[31]
Sarwar, B., Karypis, G., Konstan, J. and Riedl, J., 2000. Application of dimensionality reduction in recommender system-a case study (No. TR-00-043). Minnesota Univ Minneapolis Dept of Computer Science.
[32]
Sarwar, B.M., Konstan, J.A., Borchers, A., Herlocker, J., Miller, B. and Riedl, J., 1998, November. Using filtering agents to improve prediction quality in the grouplens research collaborative filtering system. In Proceedings of the 1998 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 345--354). ACM.
[33]
Schafer, J.B., Konstan, J. and Riedl, J., 1999, November. Recommender systems in e-commerce. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM conference on Electronic commerce (pp. 158--166). ACM.
[34]
Webster, A. and Vassileva, J., 2007, July. Push-poll recommender system: Supporting word of mouth. In International Conference on User Modeling (pp. 278--287). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
[35]
Wei, T., Lu, Y., Chang, H., Zhou, Q. and Bao, X., 2015. A semantic approach for text clustering using WordNet and lexical chains. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(4), pp. 2264--2275.

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)On Readability Metrics of Goal Statements of Universities and Brand-Promoting Lexicons for IndustriesData Management, Analytics and Innovation10.1007/978-981-15-5616-6_5(63-72)Online publication date: 19-Aug-2020

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
COMPUTE '16: Proceedings of the 9th Annual ACM India Conference
October 2016
178 pages
ISBN:9781450348089
DOI:10.1145/2998476
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 October 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Feature vector
  2. Recommender system
  3. synsets

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

ACM COMPUTE '16
ACM COMPUTE '16: Ninth Annual ACM India Conference
October 21 - 23, 2016
Gandhinagar, India

Acceptance Rates

COMPUTE '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 22 of 117 submissions, 19%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 114 of 622 submissions, 18%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)On Readability Metrics of Goal Statements of Universities and Brand-Promoting Lexicons for IndustriesData Management, Analytics and Innovation10.1007/978-981-15-5616-6_5(63-72)Online publication date: 19-Aug-2020

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media