[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2901790.2901881acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Revealing the Shopper Experience of Using a "Magic Mirror" Augmented Reality Make-Up Application

Published: 04 June 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Virtual try-ons have recently emerged as a new form of Augmented Reality application. Using motion caption techniques, such apps show virtual elements like make-up or accessories superimposed over the real image of a person as if they were actually wearing them. However, there is as of yet little understanding about their value for providing a viable experience. We report on an in-situ study, observing how shoppers approach and respond to such a "Magic Mirror" in a store. Our findings show that after the initial surprise, the virtual try-on resulted in much exploration when shoppers looked at themselves on a display integrated in the make-up counter. Behavior tracking data from interactions with the mirror supported this. Moreover, survey data measured perceptions of augmentation as well as hedonic and utilitarian value of the app and suggested the augmented experience was perceived to be playful and credible while also acting as a strong driver for future behavior. We discuss opportunities and challenges that such technology brings for shopping and other domains.

References

[1]
Dhiraj Amin and Sharvari Govilkar. 2015. Comparative Study of Augmented Reality SDK's. International Journal on Computational Science & Applications 5, 1: 1--26. http://doi.org/10.5121/ijcsa.2015.5102
[2]
Ronald Azuma, Reinhold Behringer, Simon Julier, and Blair Macintyre. 2001. Recent Advances in Augmented Reality. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 21, 6: 34--47.
[3]
Mark Billinghurst and Hirokazu Kato. 2002. Collaborative augmented reality. Communications of the ACM 45, 7: 64--70. http://doi.org/10.1145/514236.514265
[4]
H Brignull and Y Rogers. 2003. Enticing people to interact with large public displays in public spaces. Proceedings of INTERACT (Vol. 3), 17--24. http://doi.org/10.1.1.129.603
[5]
Giuseppe Caggianese, Pietro Neroni, and Luigi Gallo. 2014. Natural Interaction and Wearable Augmented Reality for the Enjoyment of the Cultural Heritage in Outdoor Conditions. In Augmented and Virtual Reality. Springer International Publishing, 267--282. http://doi.org/10.1061/40339(206)47
[6]
Julie Carmigniani, Borko Furht, Marco Anisetti, Paolo Ceravolo, Ernesto Damiani, and Misa Ivkovic. 2011. Augmented reality technologies, systems and applications. Multimedia Tools and Applications 51: 341--377. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-010-0660-6
[7]
Kuo En Chang, Chia Tzu Chang, Huei Tse Hou, Yao Ting Sung, Huei Lin Chao, and Cheng Ming Lee. 2014. Development and behavioral pattern analysis of a mobile guide system with augmented reality for painting appreciation instruction in an art museum. Computers and Education 71: 185--197. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.022
[8]
Kun-Hung Cheng and Chin-Chung Tsai. 2013. Affordances of Augmented Reality in Science Learning: Suggestions for Future Research. Journal of Science Education and Technology 22: 449--462. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9405-9
[9]
Hyejeung Cho and Norbert Schwarz. 2012. I Like Your Product When I Like My Photo: Misattribution Using Interactive Virtual Mirrors. Journal of Interactive Marketing 26, 4: 235--243. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2012.03.003
[10]
Francesca De Crescenzio, Massimiliano Fantini, Franco Persiani, Luigi Di Stefano, Pietro Azzari, and Samuele Salti. 2011. Augmented reality for aircraft maintenance training and operations support. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 31, 1: 96--101. http://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2011.4
[11]
Elizabeth FitzGerald, Rebecca Ferguson, Anne Adams, Mark Gaved, Yishay Mor, and Rhodri Thomas. 2013. Augmented reality and mobile learning: the state of the art. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning 5, 4: 43--58. http://doi.org/10.4018/ijmbl.2013100103
[12]
Sandra Forsythe, Chuanlan Liu, David Shannon, and Liu Chun Gardner. 2006. Development of a scale to measure the perceived benefits and risks of online shopping. Journal of Interactive Marketing 20, 2: 55--75. http://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20061
[13]
Tseng-Lung Huang and Feng Hsu Liu. 2014. Formation of augmented-reality interactive technology's persuasive effects from the perspective of experiential value. Internet Research 24, 1: 82--109. http://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-07-2012-0133
[14]
Tseng-Lung Huang and Shuling Liao. 2015. A model of acceptance of augmented-reality interactive technology: the moderating role of cognitive innovativeness. Electronic Commerce Research 15, 2: 269--295. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-014-9163-2
[15]
Ana Javornik. 2014. Classifications of Augmented Reality Uses in Marketing. IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Realities 2014.
[16]
Ana Javornik. 2015. "Wow, I can augment myself?" Measuring effects of perceived augmentation and interactivity on affective, cognitive and behavioral consumer responses. 2015 Academy of Marketing Conference -- The Magic in Marketing.
[17]
Jiyeon Kim and Sandra Forsythe. 2008. Adoption of virtual try-on technology for online apparel shopping. Journal of Interactive Marketing 22, 2: 45--59. http://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20113
[18]
Panos Kourouthanassis, Costas Boletsis, Cleopatra Bardaki, and Dimitra Chasanidou. 2015. Tourists responses to mobile augmented reality travel guides: The role of emotions on adoption behavior. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 18: 71--87. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2014.08.009
[19]
D W F Van Krevelen and R Poelman. 2010. A Survey of Augmented Reality Technologies, Applications and Limitations. The International Journal of Virtual Reality 9, 2: 1--20.
[20]
Tobias Langlotz, Stefan Mooslechner, Stefanie Zollmann, Claus Degendorfer, Gerhard Reitmayr, and Dieter Schmalstieg. 2012. Sketching up the world: Insitu authoring for mobile Augmented Reality. Personal and ubiquitous computing 16, 6: 623--630. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0430-0
[21]
Luoqi Liu, Hui Xu, Junliang Xing, Si Liu, Xi Zhou, andShuicheng Yan. 2013. "Wow! you are so beautiful today!" Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Multimedia - MM '13: 3--12. http://doi.org/10.1145/2502081.2502126
[22]
John Mccarthy, Peter Wright, Jayne Wallace, and Andy Dearden. 2006. The experience of enchantment in human -- computer interaction. Personal and ubiquitous computing 10, 6: 369--378. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-005-0055-2
[23]
Aurélie Merle, Sylvain Senecal, and Anik St-Onge. 2012. Whether and How Virtual Try-On Influences Consumer Responses to an Apparel Web Site. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 16, 3: 41--64. http://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415160302
[24]
Ji-won Moon and Young-gul Kim. 2001. Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information & Management 38: 217--230.
[25]
Guda van Noort, Hilde a.M. Voorveld, and Eva a. van Reijmersdal. 2012. Interactivity in Brand Web Sites: Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Responses Explained by Consumers' Online Flow Experience. Journal of Interactive Marketing 26, 4: 223--234. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2011.11.002
[26]
Thomas Olsson, Else Lagerstam, Tuula Kärkkäinen, and Kaisa Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila. 2013. Expected user experience of mobile augmented reality services: A user study in the context of shopping centres. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 17, 2: 287--304. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0494-x
[27]
Jenny Preece, Helen Sharp, and Yvonne Rogers. 2015. Preece, Jenny, Helen Sharp, and Yvonne Rogers. Interaction Design-beyond human-computer interaction. John Wiley & Sons.
[28]
Philipp A. Rauschnabel, Alexander Brem, and Bjoern S. Ivens. 2015. Who will buy smart glasses? Empirical results of two pre-market-entry studies on the role of personality in individual awareness and intended adoption of Google Glass wearables. Computers in Human Behavior 49: 635--647. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.003
[29]
Holger Schnädelbach, Boriana Koleva, Martin Flintham, et al. 2002. The Augurscope?: A Mixed Reality Interface for Outdoors. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Changing our world, changing ourselves, 4: 9--16. http://doi.org/10.1145/503376.503379
[30]
Marcus Specht, Stefaan Ternier, and Wolfgang Greller. 2011. Dimensions of Mobile Augmented Reality for Learning: A First Inventory. Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology 7, 1: 117--127.
[31]
Z Yovcheva, Dimitrios Buhalis, and C Gatzidis. 2012. Smartphone Augmented Reality Applications for Tourism. e-Review of Tourism Research 10, 2: 63--66. Retrieved from http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/20219/4/licence.txt
[32]
Feng Zhou, Henry Been-Lirn Duh, and Mark Billinghurst. 2008. Trends in augmented reality tracking, interaction and display: A review of ten years of ISMAR. 2008 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality: 193--202. http://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2008.4637362

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Virtual Try-On Systems in Fashion Consumption: A Systematic ReviewApplied Sciences10.3390/app14241183914:24(11839)Online publication date: 18-Dec-2024
  • (2024)Understanding the Role of Personalisation in Augmented Reality Applications for Enhancing User ExperienceNMIMS Management Review10.1177/0971102324130320832:3(197-210)Online publication date: 6-Dec-2024
  • (2024)Presentation of Historical Clothing Digital Replicas in MotionIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.335504912(13310-13326)Online publication date: 2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Revealing the Shopper Experience of Using a "Magic Mirror" Augmented Reality Make-Up Application

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    DIS '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems
    June 2016
    1374 pages
    ISBN:9781450340311
    DOI:10.1145/2901790
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 04 June 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Badges

    • Best Paper

    Author Tags

    1. augmented reality
    2. in-the-wild study
    3. make-up
    4. shopper experience
    5. virtual try-on

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • Swiss National Science Foundation

    Conference

    DIS '16
    Sponsor:
    DIS '16: Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2016
    June 4 - 8, 2016
    QLD, Brisbane, Australia

    Acceptance Rates

    DIS '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 107 of 418 submissions, 26%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,158 of 4,684 submissions, 25%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)75
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
    Reflects downloads up to 31 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Virtual Try-On Systems in Fashion Consumption: A Systematic ReviewApplied Sciences10.3390/app14241183914:24(11839)Online publication date: 18-Dec-2024
    • (2024)Understanding the Role of Personalisation in Augmented Reality Applications for Enhancing User ExperienceNMIMS Management Review10.1177/0971102324130320832:3(197-210)Online publication date: 6-Dec-2024
    • (2024)Presentation of Historical Clothing Digital Replicas in MotionIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.335504912(13310-13326)Online publication date: 2024
    • (2024)What drives user interest and purchase of virtual 3D assets? An empirical investigation of 3D model attributes and pricing dynamicsElectronic Commerce Research and Applications10.1016/j.elerap.2024.10145268(101452)Online publication date: Nov-2024
    • (2024)Determinants of Behavioural Intention to Use Mobile Augmented Reality Application in Education Among University Students in MalaysiaProceedings of the International Conference on Advancing and Redesigning Education 202310.1007/978-981-97-4507-4_50(448-454)Online publication date: 14-Jul-2024
    • (2023)The Impact of the Use of Augmented Reality on Online Purchasing Behavior Sustainability: The Saudi Consumer as a ModelSustainability10.3390/su1506544815:6(5448)Online publication date: 20-Mar-2023
    • (2023)Design Principles of a Mixed-Reality Shopping Assistant System in Omnichannel RetailApplied Sciences10.3390/app1303138413:3(1384)Online publication date: 20-Jan-2023
    • (2023)Body x MaterialsExtended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544549.3573807(1-7)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2023) Beyond presence: Creating attractive online retailing stores through the cool AR technology International Journal of Consumer Studies10.1111/ijcs.1289447:3(1139-1156)Online publication date: 18-Jan-2023
    • (2023)Using facial enhancement technology (FET) in online sales of branded color cosmeticsJournal of Systems and Information Technology10.1108/JSIT-12-2022-028225:4(502-530)Online publication date: 19-Oct-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media