[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2676652.2676658acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesconextConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Impact of Adaptation Strategies on Perceived Quality of HTTP Adaptive Streaming

Published: 02 December 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Changing network conditions like bandwidth fluctuations and resulting bad user experience issues (e.g. video freezes) pose severe challenges to Internet video streaming. To address this problem, an increasing number of video services utilizes HTTP adaptive streaming (HAS). HAS enables service providers to improve Quality of Experience (QoE) and resource utilization by incorporating information from different layers. However, these adaptation possibilities of HAS also introduce new perceivable impairments such as the fluctuation of audiovisual quality levels over time, which in turn lead to novel QoE-related research questions. The main contribution of this paper is the formulation of open research questions as well as a thorough systematic user-centric analysis of different quality adaptation dimensions and strategies. The underlying data has been acquired through two crowdsourcing and one lab study. The results provide guidance w.r.t. which encoding dimensions are combined best for the creation of the adaptation set and what type of adaptation strategy should be used. Furthermore it provides insights on the impact of adaptation frequency and the true QoE gain of adaptation over stallings.

References

[1]
Alberti, C., Renzi, D., Timmerer, C., Mueller, C., Lederer, S., Battista, S., and Mattavelli, M. Automated QoE Evaluation of Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP. In Proceedings of QoMEX 2013 (Klagenfurt, Austria, 2013).
[2]
Arsan, T. Review of Bandwidth Estimation Tools and Application to Bandwidth Adaptive Video Streaming. In Proceedings of HONET 2012 (Istanbul, Turkey, 2012).
[3]
Cisco. Cisco Visual Networking Index: Forecast and Methodology, 2012--2017. Tech. rep., Cisco, 2013.
[4]
Egger, S., Hossfeld, T., Schatz, R., and Fiedler, M. Tutorial: Waiting Times in Quality of Experience for Web based Services. In IEEE QoMEX 2012, Yara Valley, Australia (2012).
[5]
et al., N. C. User perception of adapting video quality. In: International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64, 8 (2006), 637--647.
[6]
Gardlo, B., Egger, S., and Seufert, M. Crowdsourcing 2.0: Enhancing Execution Speed and Reliability of Web-based QoE Testing. In Proc. IEEE ICC, Sydney, Australia (June 2014).
[7]
Grafl, M., and Timmerer, C. Representation Switch Smoothing for Adaptive HTTP Streaming. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Perceptual Quality of Systems (PQS 2013) (Vienna, Austria, 2013).
[8]
Hoßfeld, T. On Training the Crowd for Subjective Quality Studies. VQEG eLetter 1 (Mar. 2014).
[9]
Hossfeld, T., Egger, S., Schatz, R., Fiedler, M., Masuch, K., and Lorentzen, C. Initial Delay Vs. Interruptions: Between The Devil And The Deep Blue Sea. In Proc. QoMEX 2012, Yarra Valley, Australia (July 2012).
[10]
Hossfeld, T., Keimel, C., Hirth, M., Gardlo, B., Habigt, J., Diepold, K., and Tran-Gia, P. Best practices for qoe crowdtesting: Qoe assessment with crowdsourcing. Multimedia, IEEE Transactions on 16, 2 (Feb 2014), 541--558.
[11]
International Telecommunication Union. Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications. ITU-T Recommendation P.910 (April 2008).
[12]
International Telecommunication Union. Methodology for the Subjective Assessment of the Quality of Television Pictures. ITU-R Recommendation BT.500 (2012).
[13]
Lederer, S., Muller, C., and Timmerer, C. Dynamic adaptive streaming over http dataset. In Proceedings of the 3rd Multimedia Systems Conference (2012), ACM, pp. 89--94.
[14]
Lee, J.-S., De Simone, F., and Ebrahimi, T. Subjective Quality Evaluation via Paired Comparison: Application to Scalable Video Coding. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 13, 5 (2011), 882--893.
[15]
Lewcio, B., Belmudez, B., Mehmood, A., Waltermann, M., and Möller, S. Video Quality in Next Generation Mobile Networks -- Perception of Time-varying Transmission. In Proceedings of CQR 2011 (Naples, FL, USA, 2011).
[16]
McCarthy, J. D., Sasse, M. A., and Miras, D. Sharp or Smooth?: Comparing the Effects of Quantization vs. Frame Rate for Streamed Video. In Proceedings of CHI 2004 Subjective Preference of Spatio (Vienna, Austria, 2004).
[17]
Moorthy, A. K., Choi, L. K., Bovik, A. C., and de Veciana, G. Video quality assessment on mobile devices: Subjective, behavioral and objective studies. Selected Topics in Signal Processing, IEEE Journal of 6, 6 (2012), 652--671.
[18]
Ni, P., Eg, R., Eichhorn, A., Griwodz, C., and Halvorsen, P. Flicker effects in adaptive video streaming to handheld devices. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Multimedia (2011), ACM, pp. 463--472.
[19]
Oyman, O., and Singh, S. Quality of Experience for HTTP Adaptive Streaming Services. IEEE Communications Magazine 50, 4 (2012), 20--27.
[20]
Roettgers, J. Don't Touch That Dial: How YouTube is Bringing Adaptive Streaming to Mobile, TVs, 2013.
[21]
Sackl, A., Zwickl, P., and Reichl, P. The Trouble with Choice: An Empirical Study to Investigate the Influence of Charging Strategies and Content Selection on QoE. In Proceedings of the 9th (CNSM) (Zurich, Switzerland, 2013).
[22]
Wang, D., Speranza, F., Vincent, A., Martin, T., and Blanchfield, P. Toward Optimal Rate Control: A Study of the Impact of Spatial Resolution, Frame Rate, and Quantization on Subjective Video Quality and Bit Rate. In Proceedings of the SPIE VCIP 2003 (Lugano, Switzerland, 2003).
[23]
Wang, Y., Chang, S.-F., and Loui, A. C. Subjective Preference of Spatio-temporal Rate in Video Adaptation Using Multi-dimensional Scalable Coding. In Proceedings of the IEEE ICME 2004 (Taipei, Taiwan, 2004).
[24]
Yao, J., Kanhere, S. S., Hossain, I., and Hassan, M. Empirical Evaluation of HTTP Adaptive Streaming Under Vehicular Mobility. In Proceedings of the 10th International IFIP TC 6 Networking Conference: Networking 2011 (Valencia, Spain, 2011).
[25]
Zink, M., Schmitt, J., and Steinmetz, R. Layer-encoded Video in Scalable Adaptive Streaming. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 7, 1 (2005), 75--84.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)CTC: Content-Aware Tailoring of Adaptive Video Streaming using Multi-Head Critic Network2023 Fourteenth International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN)10.1109/ICUFN57995.2023.10199483(709-712)Online publication date: 4-Jul-2023
  • (2023)Content-aware QoE optimization in MEC-assisted Mobile video streamingMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-023-15163-w82:27(42053-42085)Online publication date: 4-Apr-2023
  • (2022)QoE optimization for HTTP adaptive streamingJournal of Visual Communication and Image Representation10.1016/j.jvcir.2021.10341582:COnline publication date: 1-Jan-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
VideoNext '14: Proceedings of the 2014 Workshop on Design, Quality and Deployment of Adaptive Video Streaming
December 2014
56 pages
ISBN:9781450332811
DOI:10.1145/2676652
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 December 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. crowdsourcing
  2. http adaptive streaming
  3. laboratory studies
  4. qoe
  5. time-varying quality
  6. video quality

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

CoNEXT '14
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

VideoNext '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 6 of 9 submissions, 67%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 6 of 9 submissions, 67%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 23 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)CTC: Content-Aware Tailoring of Adaptive Video Streaming using Multi-Head Critic Network2023 Fourteenth International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN)10.1109/ICUFN57995.2023.10199483(709-712)Online publication date: 4-Jul-2023
  • (2023)Content-aware QoE optimization in MEC-assisted Mobile video streamingMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-023-15163-w82:27(42053-42085)Online publication date: 4-Apr-2023
  • (2022)QoE optimization for HTTP adaptive streamingJournal of Visual Communication and Image Representation10.1016/j.jvcir.2021.10341582:COnline publication date: 1-Jan-2022
  • (2021)Intense: In-Depth Studies on Stall Events and Quality Switches and Their Impact on the Quality of Experience in HTTP Adaptive StreamingIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2021.31076199(118087-118098)Online publication date: 2021
  • (2020)Performance Evaluation of Edge Computing Assisted Adaptive Streaming Algorithms2020 International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN)10.1109/ICOIN48656.2020.9016583(226-231)Online publication date: Jan-2020
  • (2019)A Subjective and Objective Study of Stalling Events in Mobile Streaming VideosIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology10.1109/TCSVT.2017.276854229:1(183-197)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2019
  • (2019)A DASH-based Efficient Throughput and Buffer Occupancy-based Adaptation Algorithm for Smooth Multimedia Streaming2019 15th International Wireless Communications & Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC)10.1109/IWCMC.2019.8766648(643-649)Online publication date: Jun-2019
  • (2019)Edge Computing Assisted Joint Quality Adaptation for Mobile Video StreamingIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2019.29402927(129082-129094)Online publication date: 2019
  • (2019)QoE Modeling for HTTP Adaptive Video Streaming - A Survey and Open ChallengesIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2901778(1-1)Online publication date: 2019
  • (2018)Quality of experience and access network traffic management of HTTP adaptive video streamingNOMS 2018 - 2018 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium10.1109/NOMS.2018.8406136(1-8)Online publication date: Apr-2018
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media