[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2676652.2676656acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesconextConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Quality of Experience of Web-based Adaptive HTTP Streaming Clients in Real-World Environments using Crowdsourcing

Published: 02 December 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Multimedia streaming over HTTP has gained momentum with the approval of the MPEG-DASH standard and many research papers evaluated various aspects thereof but mainly within controlled environments. However, the actual behaviour of a DASH client within real-world environments has not yet been evaluated. The aim of this paper is to compare the QoE performance of existing DASH-based Web clients within real-world environments using crowdsourcing. Therefore, we select Google's YouTube player and two open source implementations of the MPEG-DASH standard, namely the DASH-JS from Alpen-Adria-Universitaet Klagenfurt and the dash.js which is the official reference client of the DASH Industry Forum. Based on a predefined content configuration, which is comparable among the clients, we run a crowdsourcing campaign to determine the QoE of each implementation in order to determine the current state-of-the-art for MPEG-DASH systems within real-world environments. The gathered data and its analysis will be presented in the paper. It provides insights with respect to the QoE performance of current Web-based adaptive HTTP streaming systems.

References

[1]
Rec. ITU-R BT.500--11. Technical report.
[2]
A. Colwell, A. Bateman, and M. Watson. Media Source Extensions. W3C Candidate Recommendation, July 2014.
[3]
F. De Simone and F. Dufaux. Comparison of DASH Adaptation Strategies based on Bitrate and Quality Signalling. In Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP), 2013 IEEE 15th International Workshop on, pages 087--092, Sept 2013.
[4]
P. Eckersley. How unique is your web browser? In M. Atallah and N. Hopper, editors, Privacy Enhancing Technologies, volume 6205 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 1--18. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010.
[5]
M. Hirth, T. Hossfeld, and P. Tran-Gia. Anatomy of a Crowdsourcing Platform - Using the Example of Microworkers.com. In Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing (IMIS), 2011 Fifth International Conference on, pages 322--329, June 2011.
[6]
T. Hossfeld, C. Keimel, M. Hirth, B. Gardlo, J. Habigt, K. Diepold, and P. Tran-Gia. Best Practices for QoE Crowdtesting: QoE Assessment With Crowdsourcing. Multimedia, IEEE Transactions on, 16(2):541--558, Feb 2014.
[7]
T. Hossfeld, M. Seufert, M. Hirth, T. Zinner, P. Tran-Gia, and R. Schatz. Quantification of YouTube QoE via Crowdsourcing. In IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM) 2011, pages 494{499, 2011.
[8]
S. S. Krishnan and R. K. Sitaraman. Video Stream Quality Impacts Viewer Behavior: Inferring Causality Using Quasi-experimental Designs. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Internet Measurement Conference, IMC'12, pages 211--224. ACM, 2012.
[9]
D. Krishnappa, D. Bhat, and M. Zink. DASHing YouTube: An Analysis of using DASH in YouTube Video Service. In Local Computer Networks (LCN), 2013 IEEE 38th Conference on, pages 407--415, Oct 2013.
[10]
Microworkers. http://www.microworkers.com.
[11]
C. Mueller, S. Lederer, and C. Timmerer. An Evaluation of Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP in Vehicular Environments. In Proceedings of the Fourth Annual ACM SIGMM Workshop on Mobile Video (MoVid12), pages 37--42. ACM, feb 2012.
[12]
N. Nikiforakis, A. Kapravelos, W. Joosen, C. Kruegel, F. Piessens, and G. Vigna. Cookieless Monster: Exploring the Ecosystem of Web-Based Device Fingerprinting. In Security and Privacy (SP), 2013 IEEE Symposium on, pages 541--555, May 2013.
[13]
B. Rainer, S. Lederer, C. Mueller, and C. Timmerer. A Seamless Web Integration of Adaptive HTTP streaming. In B. Pesquet-Popescu and C. Burileanu, editors, Proceedings of the 20th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), pages 1519--1523. European Signal Processing (EURASIP) Society, aug 2012.
[14]
B. Rainer, M. Waltl, and C. Timmerer. A Web based Subjective Evaluation Platform. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX'13), pages 24--25. IEEE, jul 2013.
[15]
I. Sodagar. The MPEG-DASH Standard for Multimedia Streaming Over the Internet. IEEE MultiMedia, 18(4):62--67, 2011.
[16]
Tears of Steel. http://tearsofsteel.org/.
[17]
N. Weil. The State of MPEG-DASH Deployment. Streaming Media Europe, April 2014.
[18]
C.-C. Wu, K.-T. Chen, Y.-C. Chang, and C.-L. Lei. Crowdsourcing Multimedia QoE Evaluation: ATrusted Framework. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 15(5):1121--1137, Aug 2013.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)DashReStreamer: Framework for Creation of Impaired Video Clips under Realistic Network ConditionsACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications10.1145/364001621:1(1-26)Online publication date: 16-Dec-2024
  • (2023)Empowerment of Atypical Viewers via Low-Effort Personalized Modeling of Video Streaming QualityProceedings of the ACM on Networking10.1145/36291391:CoNEXT3(1-27)Online publication date: 28-Nov-2023
  • (2023) HA 2 RS: HTTP Adaptive Augmented Reality Streaming System IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing10.1109/TMC.2021.313266522:5(2741-2755)Online publication date: 1-May-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
VideoNext '14: Proceedings of the 2014 Workshop on Design, Quality and Deployment of Adaptive Video Streaming
December 2014
56 pages
ISBN:9781450332811
DOI:10.1145/2676652
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 December 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. crowdsourcing
  2. dash
  3. dynamic adaptive streaming over http
  4. mpeg
  5. qoe
  6. quality of experience
  7. subjective quality assessment

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

CoNEXT '14
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

VideoNext '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 6 of 9 submissions, 67%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 6 of 9 submissions, 67%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 31 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)DashReStreamer: Framework for Creation of Impaired Video Clips under Realistic Network ConditionsACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications10.1145/364001621:1(1-26)Online publication date: 16-Dec-2024
  • (2023)Empowerment of Atypical Viewers via Low-Effort Personalized Modeling of Video Streaming QualityProceedings of the ACM on Networking10.1145/36291391:CoNEXT3(1-27)Online publication date: 28-Nov-2023
  • (2023) HA 2 RS: HTTP Adaptive Augmented Reality Streaming System IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing10.1109/TMC.2021.313266522:5(2741-2755)Online publication date: 1-May-2023
  • (2023)Quality assessment of higher resolution images and videos with remote testingQuality and User Experience10.1007/s41233-023-00055-68:1Online publication date: 13-Apr-2023
  • (2021)Towards Perceptually Optimized Adaptive Video Streaming-A Realistic Quality of Experience DatabaseIEEE Transactions on Image Processing10.1109/TIP.2021.307329430(5182-5197)Online publication date: 2021
  • (2021)Towards High Resolution Video Quality Assessment in the Crowd2021 13th International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)10.1109/QoMEX51781.2021.9465425(1-6)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2021
  • (2021)AVrate Voyager: an open source online testing platform2021 IEEE 23rd International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP)10.1109/MMSP53017.2021.9733561(1-6)Online publication date: 6-Oct-2021
  • (2021)Delivering User Experience over Networks: Towards a Quality of Experience Centered Design Cycle for Improved Design of Networked ApplicationsSN Computer Science10.1007/s42979-021-00851-x2:6Online publication date: 16-Sep-2021
  • (2017)YouTube context-awareness to enhance Quality of experience between yesterday, today and tomorrow: Survey2017 International Conference on Wireless Networks and Mobile Communications (WINCOM)10.1109/WINCOM.2017.8238187(1-7)Online publication date: Nov-2017
  • (2017)Message From the Incoming Editor-in-ChiefIEEE Transactions on Multimedia10.1109/TMM.2017.265741819:3(446-446)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2017
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media