[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2669557.2669575acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Evaluating user behavior and strategy during visual exploration

Published: 10 November 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Visualization practitioners have traditionally focused on evaluating the outcome of the visual analytic process, as opposed to studying how that process unfolds. Since user strategy would likely influence the outcome of visual analysis and the nature of insights acquired, it is important to understand how the analytic behavior of users is shaped by variations in the design of the visualization interface. This paper presents a technique for evaluating user behavior in exploratory visual analysis scenarios. We characterize visual exploration as a fluid activity involving transitions between mental and interaction states. We show how micro-patterns in these transitions can be captured and analyzed quantitatively to reveal differences in the exploratory behavior of users, given variations in the visualization interface.

References

[1]
R. Amar, J. Eagan, and J. Stasko. Low-level components of analytic activity in information visualization. In Information Visualization, 2005. INFOVIS 2005. IEEE Symposium on, pages 111--117. IEEE, 2005.
[2]
W. S. Cleveland. The Elements of Graphing Data. Wadsworth Advanced Books and Software, 1985.
[3]
K. Ericsson and H. Simon. Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. MIT Press, revised edition, 1993.
[4]
T. Green, W. Ribarsky, and B. Fisher. Building and applying a human cognition model for visual analytics. Information Visualization, 8(1):1--13, 2009.
[5]
C. G. Healey and J. T. Enns. Attention and visual memory in visualization and computer graphics. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 18(7):1170--1188, 2012.
[6]
H. Lam. A framework of interaction costs in information visualization. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 14(6):1149--1156, 2008.
[7]
Z. Liu and J. T. Stasko. Mental models, visual reasoning and interaction in information visualization: A top-down perspective. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 16(6):999--1008, 2010.
[8]
E. Mayr, M. Smuc, and H. Risku. Many roads lead to rome: Mapping users' problem-solving strategies. Information Visualization, 10(3):232--247, 2011.
[9]
C. North. Toward measuring visualization insight. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE, 26(3):6--9, 2006.
[10]
P. Parsons and K. Sedig. Distribution of information processing while performing complex cognitive activities with visualization tools. In Handbook of Human Centric Visualization, pages 693--715. Springer, 2014.
[11]
M. Pohl, S. Wiltner, and S. Miksch. Exploring information visualization: describing different interaction patterns. In Proceedings of the 3rd BELIV'10 Workshop: BEyond time and errors: novel evaLuation methods for Information Visualization, pages 16--23. ACM, 2010.
[12]
H. C. Purchase, E. Hoggan, and C. Görg. How important is the "mental map"?--an empirical investigation of a dynamic graph layout algorithm. In Graph Drawing, pages 184--195. Springer, 2007.
[13]
K. Reda, A. Febretti, A. Knoll, J. Aurisano, J. Leigh, A. Johnson, M. Papka, and M. Hereld. Visualizing large, heterogeneous data in hybrid-reality environments. Computer Graphics and Applications, 33(4):38--48, 2013.
[14]
K. Reda, A. Johnson, V. Mateevitsi, C. Offord, and J. Leigh. Scalable visual queries for data exploration on large, high-resolution 3d displays. In SC Companion: High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, pages 196--205. IEEE, 2012.
[15]
K. Reda, C. Offord, A. Johnson, and J. Leigh. Expanding the porthole: leveraging large, high-resolution displays in exploratory visual analysis. In CHI'14 EA on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 2047--2052. ACM, 2014.
[16]
P. Saraiya, C. North, and K. Duca. An insight-based methodology for evaluating bioinformatics visualizations. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 11(4):443--456, 2005.
[17]
K. Sedig and P. Parsons. Interaction design for complex cognitive activities with visual representations: A pattern-based approach. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(2):84--133, 2013.
[18]
L. Shupp, C. Andrews, M. Dickey-Kurdziolek, B. Yost, and C. North. Shaping the display of the future: The effects of display size and curvature on user performance and insights. Human--Computer Interaction, 24(1-2):230--272, 2009.
[19]
A. Treisman. Features and objects in visual processing. Scientific American, 255(5):114--125, 1986.
[20]
J. W. Tukey. We need both exploratory and confirmatory. The American Statistician, 34(1):23--25, 1980.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Understanding Visual Investigation Patterns Through Digital “Field” ObservationsProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3517445(1-16)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
  • (2021)Data Prophecy: Exploring the Effects of Belief Elicitation in Visual AnalyticsProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3411764.3445798(1-12)Online publication date: 6-May-2021
  • (2018)Sense-making strategies in explorative intelligence analysis of network evolutionsBehaviour & Information Technology10.1080/0144929X.2018.1519036(1-18)Online publication date: 11-Sep-2018
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Evaluating user behavior and strategy during visual exploration

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    BELIV '14: Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization
    November 2014
    184 pages
    ISBN:9781450332095
    DOI:10.1145/2669557
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 10 November 2014

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. exploratory visual analysis
    2. insight-based evaluation

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    BELIV '14

    Acceptance Rates

    BELIV '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 23 of 30 submissions, 77%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 45 of 64 submissions, 70%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)82
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)13
    Reflects downloads up to 13 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)Understanding Visual Investigation Patterns Through Digital “Field” ObservationsProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3517445(1-16)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
    • (2021)Data Prophecy: Exploring the Effects of Belief Elicitation in Visual AnalyticsProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3411764.3445798(1-12)Online publication date: 6-May-2021
    • (2018)Sense-making strategies in explorative intelligence analysis of network evolutionsBehaviour & Information Technology10.1080/0144929X.2018.1519036(1-18)Online publication date: 11-Sep-2018
    • (2018)Analytic Provenance as Constructs of Behavioural Markers for Externalizing Thinking Processes in Criminal Intelligence AnalysisCommunity-Oriented Policing and Technological Innovations10.1007/978-3-319-89294-8_10(95-105)Online publication date: 27-Apr-2018
    • (2017)Sense-making Strategies for the Interpretation of Visualizations—Bridging the Gap between Theory and Empirical ResearchMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti10300161:3(16)Online publication date: 26-Jul-2017
    • (2017)Behavioural Markers: Bridging the Gap between Art of Analysis and Science of Analytics in Criminal Intelligence2017 European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference (EISIC)10.1109/EISIC.2017.30(147-150)Online publication date: Sep-2017
    • (2017)Word-Sized Eye-Tracking VisualizationsEye Tracking and Visualization10.1007/978-3-319-47024-5_7(113-128)Online publication date: 4-Feb-2017
    • (2016)A Survey on Interaction Log Analysis for Evaluating Exploratory VisualizationsProceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors on Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization10.1145/2993901.2993912(62-69)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2016
    • (2016)Triangulating user behavior using eye movement, interaction, and think aloud dataProceedings of the Ninth Biennial ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications10.1145/2857491.2857523(175-182)Online publication date: 14-Mar-2016
    • (2016)Visual analysis and coding of data-rich user behavior2016 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST)10.1109/VAST.2016.7883520(141-150)Online publication date: Oct-2016
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media