More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

Towards GeoSpatial semantic data management: strengths, weaknesses, and challenges ahead

Authors:

Kostas Patroumpas,

Giorgos Giannopoulos,

Spiros AthanasiouAuthors Info & Claims

SIGSPATIAL '14: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems

Pages 301 - 310

https://doi.org/10.1145/2666310.2666410

Published: 04 November 2014 Publication History

Abstract

An immense wealth of data is already accessible through the Semantic Web and an increasing part of it also has geospatial context or relevance. Although existing technology is mature enough to integrate a variety of information from heterogeneous sources into interlinked features, it still falls behind when it comes to representation and reasoning on spatial characteristics. It is only lately that several RDF stores have begun to accommodate geospatial entities and to enable some kind of processing on them. To address interoperability, the OGC has recently adopted the GeoSPARQL standard, which defines a vocabulary for representing geometric types in RDF and an extension to the SPARQL language for formulating queries. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive review of the current state-of-the-art in geospatially-enabled semantic data management. Apart from an insightful analysis of the available architectures in industry and academia, we conduct an evaluation study on prominent RDF stores with geospatial support. We also compare their performance and attested capabilities to renowned DBMSs widely used in geospatial applications. We introduce a methodology suitable to assess RDF stores for robustness against large geospatial datasets, and also for expressiveness on a variety of queries involving both spatial and thematic criteria. As our findings demonstrate, the potential for query optimization, advanced indexing schemes, and spatio-semantic extensions is significant. Towards this goal, we point out several challenging issues for joint research by the GIS and Semantic Web communities.

References

[1]

S. Auer, J. Lehmann, and S. Hellmann. LinkedGeoData -- Adding a Spatial Dimension to the Web of Data. In ISWC, pp. 731--746, 2009.

Digital Library

[2]

Basic Geo (WGS84 lat/long) Vocabulary. URL: http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/

[3]

R. Battle and D. Kolas. Enabling the Geospatial Semantic Web with Parliament and GeoSPARQL. Semantic Web Journal, 3(4):355--370, 2012.

Digital Library

[4]

Bigdata Triple Store. URL: http://www.systap.com

[5]

C. Bizer, T. Heath, and T. Berners-Lee. Linked Data - The Story So Far. IJSWIS, 5(3): 1--22, 2009.

[6]

C. Bizer and A. Schultz. The Berlin SPARQL Benchmark. IJSWIS, 5(2):1--24, 2009.

[7]

A. Brodt, D. Nicklas, and B. Mitschang. Deep Integration of Spatial Query Processing into Native RDF Triple Stores. In ACM GIS, pp. 33--42, 2010.

Digital Library

[8]

European Commission. INSPIRE Directive: Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community. URL: http://inspire.jrc.ec.europa.eu/

[9]

Franz Inc. AllegroGraph Triple Store. URL: http://www.franz.com/agraph/allegrograph/

[10]

G. Garbis, K. Kyzirakos, and M. Koubarakis. Geographica: A Benchmark for Geospatial RDF Stores. In ISWC, 2013.

Digital Library

[11]

GeoJSON 1.0. URL: http://geojson.org/

[12]

GeoKnow EU/FP7 project. Deliverable 2.1.1: Market and Research Overview. URL: http://bit.ly/1pElP7L

[13]

Geo OWL Ontology. URL: http://bit.ly/1q9Th3Q

[14]

GeoRDF Profile. URL: http://www.w3.org/wiki/GeoRDF

[15]

GeoRSS. URL: http://georss.org/

[16]

A. Guttman. R-Trees: A Dynamic Index Structure for Spatial Searching. In SIGMOD, pp. 47--57, 1984.

Digital Library

[17]

J. Hellerstein, J. Naughton, A. Pfeffer. Generalized Search Trees for Database Systems. In VLDB, pp. 562--573, 1995.

Digital Library

[18]

H. Hu and X. Du. Linking Open Spatiotemporal Data in the Data Clouds. In RSKT, pp. 304--309, 2010.

Digital Library

[19]

IBM DB2 Spatial Extender. URL: http://ibm.co/1ohWGfv

[20]

IBM DB2 NoSQL Support. URL: http://ibm.co/1mdHnWF

[21]

D. Kolas. A Benchmark for Spatial Semantic Web Systems. In SSWS, 2008.

[22]

D. Kolas, I. Emmons, and M. Dean. Efficient Linked-List RDF Indexing in Parliament. In SSWS, pp. 17--32, 2009.

[23]

W. Kuhn, T. Kauppinen, and K. Janowicz. Linked Data -- A Paradigm Shift for Geographic Information Science. In GIScience, pp. 173--186, 2014.

[24]

K. Kyzirakos, M. Karpathiotakis, M. Koubarakis. Strabon: A Semantic Geospatial DBMS. In ISWC, pp. 295--311, 2012.

Digital Library

[25]

J. Liagouris, N. Mamoulis, P. Bouros, and M. Terrovitis. An Effective Encoding Scheme for Spatial RDF Data. PVLDB, 7(12): 1271--1282, 2014.

Digital Library

[26]

Microsoft SQL Server. URL: http://bit.ly/1lJYj62

[27]

M. Morsey, J. Lehmann, S. Auer, and A. C. N. Ngomo. DBpedia SPARQL Benchmark: Performance Assessment with Real Queries on Real Data. In ISWC, pp 454--469, 2011.

Digital Library

[28]

MySQL Database. URL: http://www.mysql.com/

[29]

NeoGeo Geometry Ontology. URL: http://geovocab.org/

[30]

Ontotext AD. GraphDB (formerly OWLIM) Triple Store. URL: http://www.ontotext.com/ontotext-graphdb-owlim/

[31]

OGC Geography Markup Language Encoding Standard, Version 3.2.1, 2007. URL: http://bit.ly/1x52Cw4

[32]

OGC Geography Markup Language (GML) Simple Features Profile, Version 2.0, 2012. URL: http://bit.ly/1pPKD8I

[33]

OGC Implementation Specification for Geographic Information - Simple Feature Access - Part 2: SQL Option, Version 1.2.1, 2010. URL: http://bit.ly/1mN6NJR

[34]

OGC Implementation Standard for Geographic Information - Simple Feature Access - Part 1: Common Architecture, Version 1.2.1, 2011. URL: http://bit.ly/1qK0gje

[35]

OGC GeoSPARQL Standard - A Geographic Query Language for RDF Data, 2012. URL: http://bit.ly/1vnWA76

[36]

OpenLink Software. Virtuoso Universal Server. URL: http://virtuoso.openlinksw.com/

[37]

OpenSahara uSeekM library. URL: http://bit.ly/1ATPPyC

[38]

OpenStreetMap. URL: http://www.openstreetmap.org/

[39]

Oracle Spatial and Graph. URL: http://bit.ly/1qQo07k

[40]

OWL Web Ontology Language Overview. URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/

[41]

K. Patroumpas, M. Alexakis, G. Giannopoulos, and S. Athanasiou. TripleGeo: an ETL Tool for Transforming Geospatial Data into RDF Triples. In LWDM, pp. 275--278, 2014.

[42]

M. Perry. A Framework to Support Spatial, Temporal and Thematic Analytics over Semantic Web Data. PhD thesis, Wright State University, 2008.

Digital Library

[43]

PostGIS for PostgreSQL. URL: http://postgis.net/

[44]

PostgreSQL Database. URL: http://www.postgresql.org/

[45]

S. Ray, B. Simion, and A. Demke Brown. Jackpine: a Benchmark to Evaluate Spatial Database Performance. In ICDE, pp. 1139--1150, 2011.

Digital Library

[46]

Raytheon BBN Technologies Inc. Parliament Triple Store. URL: http://parliament.semwebcentral.org/

[47]

Resource Description Framework Primer. URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/

[48]

RDF Schema. URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/

[49]

Sesame RDF Framework. URL: http://www.openrdf.org/

[50]

SPARQL 1.1 Query Language for RDF. URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/

[51]

Stardog RDF database. URL: http://www.stardog.com/

[52]

C.-J. Wang, W.-S. Ku, and H. Chen. Geo-Store: A Spatially-Augmented SPARQL Query Evaluation System. In ACM SIGPATIAL GIS, pp. 562--565, 2012.

Digital Library

[53]

D. Wang, L. Zou, Y. Feng, X. Shen, J. Tian, and D. Zhao. S-store: An Engine for Large RDF Graph Integrating Spatial Information. In DASFAA, pp. 31--47, 2013.

[54]

X. Zhai, L. Huang, and Z. Xiao. Geo-spatial Query based on Extended SPARQL. In Geoinformatics, pp. 1--4, 2010.

Cited By

Sunitha GSuma KGalety MDavanam GVarna C(2024)Python for Geospatial Data AnalysisEthics, Machine Learning, and Python in Geospatial Analysis10.4018/979-8-3693-6381-2.ch005(94-119)Online publication date: 10-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-6381-2.ch005
Tran BAussenac-Gilles NComparot CTrojahn C(2022)Semantic Integration of Raster Data for Earth Observation on Territorial UnitsISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information10.3390/ijgi1102014911:2(149)Online publication date: 19-Feb-2022
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11020149
Popa ARamallo González AJaglan GFensel A(2022)A Semantically Data-Driven Classification Framework for Energy Consumption in BuildingsEnergies10.3390/en1509315515:9(3155)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2022
https://doi.org/10.3390/en15093155
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Towards GeoSpatial semantic data management: strengths, weaknesses, and challenges ahead
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Visualization
    1. Visualization application domains
      1. Geographic visualization
2. Information systems
  1. Information systems applications
    1. Spatial-temporal systems

Recommendations

Enabling the geospatial Semantic Web with Parliament and GeoSPARQL
On linked spatiotemporal data and geo-ontologies

As the amount of Linked Open Data on the web increases, so does the amount of data with an inherent spatial context. Without spatial reasoning, however, the value of this spatial context is limited. Over the past decade there have been several ...
Effective and efficient semantic web data management over DB2
SIGMOD '08: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data

With the fast growth of Semantic Web, more and more RDF data and ontologies are created and widely used in Web applications and enterprise information systems. It is reported that the W3C Linking Open Data community project consists of over two billion ...
Towards Adaptive and Semantic Database Model for RDF Data Stores
CISIS '12: Proceedings of the 2012 Sixth International Conference on Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems (CISIS)

RDF Schema is a basic and yet very important language for specifying ontologies in the context of Semantic Web. Ontologies can be used to obtain more information from that explicitly stated. Traditionally, the process of revealing implicit knowledge, ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

SIGSPATIAL '14: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems

November 2014

651 pages

ISBN:9781450331319

DOI:10.1145/2666310

General Chairs:
Yan Huang
University of North Texas
,
Markus Schneider
University of Florida
,
Program Chairs:
Michael Gertz
Heidelberg University, Germany
,
John Krumm
Microsoft Research
,
Jagan Sankaranarayanan
NEC Labs

Copyright © 2014 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

ESRI
Yandex
Google Inc.
NVIDIA
University of North Texas: University of North Texas
Microsoft: Microsoft
ORACLE: ORACLE
Facebook: Facebook
SIGSPATIAL: ACM Special Interest Group on Spatial Information

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 04 November 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

European Commission

Conference

SIGSPATIAL '14

Sponsor:

University of North Texas
Microsoft
ORACLE
Facebook
SIGSPATIAL

SIGSPATIAL '14: 22nd SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems

November 4 - 7, 2014

Texas, Dallas

Acceptance Rates

SIGSPATIAL '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 39 of 184 submissions, 21%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 257 of 1,238 submissions, 21%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

19
Total Citations
View Citations
297
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)28
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

Reflects downloads up to 15 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Sunitha GSuma KGalety MDavanam GVarna C(2024)Python for Geospatial Data AnalysisEthics, Machine Learning, and Python in Geospatial Analysis10.4018/979-8-3693-6381-2.ch005(94-119)Online publication date: 10-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-6381-2.ch005
Tran BAussenac-Gilles NComparot CTrojahn C(2022)Semantic Integration of Raster Data for Earth Observation on Territorial UnitsISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information10.3390/ijgi1102014911:2(149)Online publication date: 19-Feb-2022
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11020149
Popa ARamallo González AJaglan GFensel A(2022)A Semantically Data-Driven Classification Framework for Energy Consumption in BuildingsEnergies10.3390/en1509315515:9(3155)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2022
https://doi.org/10.3390/en15093155
Almobydeen SViqueira JLama M(2022)GeoSPARQL query support for scientific raster array dataComputers & Geosciences10.1016/j.cageo.2021.105023159:COnline publication date: 1-Feb-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.cageo.2021.105023
Zhang FLu QDu ZChen XCao C(2021)A comprehensive overview of RDF for spatial and spatiotemporal data managementThe Knowledge Engineering Review10.1017/S026988892100008436Online publication date: 22-Jun-2021
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888921000084
Ioannidis TGarbis GKyzirakos KBereta KKoubarakis M(2021)Evaluating Geospatial RDF Stores Using the Benchmark Geographica 2Journal on Data Semantics10.1007/s13740-021-00118-x10:3-4(189-228)Online publication date: 23-Apr-2021
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13740-021-00118-x
Jin XEom SShin SLee KHong C(2021)DORIC: discovering topological relations based on spatial link compositionKnowledge and Information Systems10.1007/s10115-021-01603-263:10(2645-2669)Online publication date: 16-Aug-2021
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-021-01603-2
Tran BAussenac-Gilles NComparot CTrojahn C(2020)Semantic Integration of Raster Data for Earth Observation: An RDF Dataset of Territorial Unit Versions with their Land CoverISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information10.3390/ijgi90905039:9(503)Online publication date: 21-Aug-2020
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9090503
Tran BAussenac-Gilles NComparot CTrojahn C(2020)An Approach for Integrating Earth Observation, Change Detection and Contextual Data for Semantic SearchIGARSS 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium10.1109/IGARSS39084.2020.9324064(3115-3118)Online publication date: 26-Sep-2020
https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS39084.2020.9324064
Theocharidis KLiagouris JMamoulis NBouros PTerrovitis M(2019)SRX: efficient management of spatial RDF dataThe VLDB Journal10.1007/s00778-019-00554-zOnline publication date: 18-Jul-2019
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00778-019-00554-z
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents