[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2559206.2578876acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A three-dimensional mirror augmented by medical imaging: questioning self-portraying at the limit of iintimacy

Published: 26 April 2014 Publication History

Abstract

With the rapid developments of medical imaging, our personal inner body can be unveiled as never before. Medical images are usually considered as ordinary objects and their potential intimate value is never really considered. In this paper, we present an exploratory installation which anticipates prospective issues when medical and self-images interfere with each other. Primary Intimacy of being acts as a digital mirror reflecting the users' bodies with three-dimensional avatars, which are computed in real time from three medical imaging modalities (Fig. 1). A first evaluation reveals individual differences between users with respect to their personal privacy concerns while interacting with the installation. Thereafter, these issues may be probed in the scope of self-portraying.

References

[1]
Le Breton, D. La Chair à vif, Usages médicaux et mondains du corps humain. Métailié, Paris, 1993.
[2]
Zhang, Q., Eagleson, R. and T. Peters, Volume visualization: a technical overview with a focus on medical applications. J Digit Imaging, 24, 4 (2011) 640--664.
[3]
Botha, C., Preim, B., Kaufman, A., Takahashi, S. and Ynnerman, A. From individual to population: challenges in medical visualization. arXiv 2012.
[4]
Bichlmeier, C., Sielhorst, T. and Navab, N. The Tangible Virtual Mirror: New Visualization Paradigm for Navigated Surgery. in International Workshop on Augmented Reality environments for Medical Imaging and Computer-aided Surgery (AMI-ARCS), 2006.
[5]
Samosky, J. T., Nelson, D. A., Wang, B., Bregman, R., Hosmer, A., Mikulis, B. and Weaver, R. BodyExplorerAR: enhancing a mannequin medical simulator with sensing and projective augmented reality for exploring dynamic anatomy and physiology. in Proc TEI'12, (2012).
[6]
Kevles, B. Naked To The Bone: Medical Imaging In The Twentieth Century. Basic Books, 1998.
[7]
Wilson, M. Six views of embodied cognition. Psychon Bull Rev, 9, 4 (2002) 625--636.
[8]
van Dijck, J. The Transparent Body: A Cultural Analysis of Medical Imaging. University of Washington Press, 2005.
[9]
Anzieu, D. The Skin Ego: A Psychoanalytic Approach to the Self. New Haven: Conn. Yale University Press, 1989.
[10]
Kalender, W. X-ray computed tomography. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 51, 13 (2006) 29--43.
[11]
Tomasi, G., Turkheimer, F. and Aboagye, E. Importance of quantification for the analysis of PET data in oncology: review of current methods and trends for the future. Molecular Imaging and Biology, 14, 2 (2011) 131.
[12]
Blamire, A. The technology of MRI - the next 10 years? British Journal of Radiology, 81(2008) 601--617.
[13]
Hinckley, K., Pausch, R., Goble, J. and Kassell, N. Passive real-world interface props for neurosurgical visualization. in Proc CHI '94, (1994).
[14]
Qi, W. and Martens, J. Tangible user interfaces for 3d clipping plane interaction with volumetric data: a case study. In Proc ICMI '05, (2005).
[15]
Kroes, T., Post, F. H. and Botha, C. P. Exposure render: An interactive photo-realistic volume rendering framework. PLoS ONE, 7, 7 (2012) e38586.
[16]
Kirmizibayrak, C., Radeva, N., Wakid, M., Philbeck, J., Sibert, J. and Hahn, J. Evaluation of gesture based interfaces for medical volume visualization tasks. in Proc VRCAI '11, (2011).
[17]
Dibbell, J. Rape in Cyberspace. The Village Voice, 1993.
[18]
Bailenson, J. N. Doppelgängers - a new form of self? The Psychologist, 25, 1 (2012) 36--39.
[19]
Fox, J., Bailenson, J. N. and Tricase, L. The embodiment of sexualized virtual selves: The Proteus effect and experiences of self-objectification via avatars. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 3 (2013) 930--938.
[20]
Kim, C., Lee, S. and Kang, M. I became an attractive person in the virtual world: Users' identification with virtual communities and avatars. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 5, (2012) 1663--1669.
[21]
Yee, N. and Bailenson, J. The Difference Between Being and Seeing: The Relative Contribution of Self-Perception and Priming to Behavioral Changes via Digital Self-Representation. Journal Media Psychology, 12, 2 (2009) 195--209.
[22]
Rochat, P. and Zahavi, D. The uncanny mirror: A reframing of mirror self-experience. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 2, (2010) 204--213.
[23]
Ainley, V., Tajadura-Jiménez, A., Fotopoulou, A. and Tsakiris, M. Looking into myself: changes in interoceptive sensitivity during mirror self-observation. Psychophysiology, 49, 11, (2012) 1504--1508.
[24]
Ni, T., Karlson, A. K. and Wigdor, D. AnatOnMe: facilitating doctor-patient communication using a projection-based handheld device. in Proc CHI '11, (2011).
[25]
Blum, T., Kleeberger, V., Bichlmeier, C. and Navab, N. Mirracle: Augmented Reality in-situ visualization of human anatomy using a magic mirror. in VR '12, (2012).
[26]
Bichlmeier, C., Wimmer, F., Heining, S. M. and Navab, N. Contextual Anatomic Mimesis Hybrid In-Situ Visualization Method for Improving Multi-Sensory Depth Perception in Medical Augmented Reality. in ISMAR '07, (2007).
[27]
Slatman, J. Transparent bodies: revealing the myth of interiority. in The body within: Art, Medicine and Visualization, Brill Academic Pub, (2009) 107--122.
[28]
Solove, D. J. Understanding privacy, Harvard University Press, 2008.
[29]
Laurenceau J.-P., Rivera, L. M., Schaffer, A. R., Pietromonaco, P. R. and Mashek, D. J. Intimacy as an interpersonal process: Current status and future directions. in Handbook of closeness and intimacy, Lawrence Erlbaum, (2004) 61--78.
[30]
Suma, E., Lange, B., Rizzo, A., Krum, D. and Bolas, M. FAAST: The Flexible Action and Articulated Skeleton Toolkit. in IEEE VR'11, (2011).
[31]
Kueblbeck, C., and Ernst, A. Face detection and tracking in video sequences using the modified census transformation. Journal on Image and Vision Computing, 24, 6, (2006) 564--572.
[32]
"http://www.iis.fraunhofer.de/en/bf/bsy/fue/isyst".
[33]
Longo, M., Schüür, F., Kammers, M., Tsakiris, M. and Haggard, P. What is embodiment? A psychometric approach. Cognition, 107, 3 (2008) 978--998.
[34]
Winter, D. A. Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement, 4th Revised edition, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2009.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Injured Avatars: The Impact of Embodied Anatomies and Virtual Injuries on Well-Being and PerformanceIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.332022429:11(4503-4513)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2023
  • (2020)Full Frontal Intimacy - on HCI, Design & IntimacyCompanion Publication of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3393914.3395889(123-129)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2020
  • (2020)InsideOutProceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3357236.3395484(601-613)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. A three-dimensional mirror augmented by medical imaging: questioning self-portraying at the limit of iintimacy

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI EA '14: CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 2014
    2620 pages
    ISBN:9781450324748
    DOI:10.1145/2559206
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 26 April 2014

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. augmented mirror
    2. embodiment
    3. intimacy
    4. medical imaging
    5. volumetric rendering

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CHI '14
    Sponsor:
    CHI '14: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 26 - May 1, 2014
    Ontario, Toronto, Canada

    Acceptance Rates

    CHI EA '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 1,000 of 3,200 submissions, 31%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

    Upcoming Conference

    CHI 2025
    ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 26 - May 1, 2025
    Yokohama , Japan

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 11 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Injured Avatars: The Impact of Embodied Anatomies and Virtual Injuries on Well-Being and PerformanceIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.332022429:11(4503-4513)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2023
    • (2020)Full Frontal Intimacy - on HCI, Design & IntimacyCompanion Publication of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3393914.3395889(123-129)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2020
    • (2020)InsideOutProceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3357236.3395484(601-613)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2020
    • (2019)The Benefits of an Augmented Reality Magic Mirror System for Integrated Radiology Teaching in Gross AnatomyAnatomical Sciences Education10.1002/ase.186412:6(585-598)Online publication date: 19-Feb-2019
    • (2016)On Looking at the Vagina through LabellaProceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/2858036.2858119(1810-1821)Online publication date: 7-May-2016

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media