[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2487575.2487593acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Cross-task crowdsourcing

Published: 11 August 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Crowdsourcing is an effective method for collecting labeled data for various data mining tasks. It is critical to ensure the veracity of the produced data because responses collected from different users may be noisy and unreliable. Previous works solve this veracity problem by estimating both the user ability and question difficulty based on the knowledge in each task individually. In this case, each single task needs large amounts of data to provide accurate estimations. However, in practice, budgets provided by customers for a given target task may be limited, and hence each question can be presented to only a few users where each user can answer only a few questions. This data sparsity problem can cause previous approaches to perform poorly due to the overfitting problem on rare data and eventually damage the data veracity. Fortunately, in real-world applications, users can answer questions from multiple historical tasks. For example, one can annotate images as well as label the sentiment of a given title. In this paper, we employ transfer learning, which borrows knowledge from auxiliary historical tasks to improve the data veracity in a given target task. The motivation is that users have stable characteristics across different crowdsourcing tasks and thus data from different tasks can be exploited collectively to estimate users' abilities in the target task. We propose a hierarchical Bayesian model, TLC (Transfer Learning for Crowdsourcing), to implement this idea by considering the overlapping users as a bridge. In addition, to avoid possible negative impact, TLC introduces task-specific factors to model task differences. The experimental results show that TLC significantly improves the accuracy over several state-of-the-art non-transfer-learning approaches under very limited budget in various labeling tasks.

References

[1]
C. Andrieu, N. De Freitas, A. Doucet, and M. Jordan. An introduction to mcmc for machine learning. Machine learning, 50(1):5--43, 2003.
[2]
Y. Bachrach, T. Graepel, T. Minka, and J. Guiver. How to grade a test without knowing the answers--a bayesian graphical model for adaptive crowdsourcing and aptitude testing. Arxiv preprint arXiv:1206.6386, 2012.
[3]
B. Cao, N. N. Liu, and Q. Yang. Transfer learning for collective link prediction in multiple heterogenous domains. In J. Fürnkranz and T. Joachims, editors, Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-10), pages 159--166, Haifa, Israel, June 2010. Omnipress.
[4]
H. Daumé, III and D. Marcu. Domain adaptation for statistical classifiers. J. Artif. Int. Res., 26(1):101--126, May 2006.
[5]
K. Duh and A. Fujino. Flexible sample selection strategies for transfer learning in ranking. Inf. Process. Manage., 48(3):502--512, May 2012.
[6]
R. G. Gomes, P. Welinder, A. Krause, and P. Perona. Crowdclustering. In J. Shawe-Taylor, R. Zemel, P. Bartlett, F. Pereira, and K. Weinberger, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 24, pages 558--566. 2011.
[7]
D. R. Karger, S. Oh, and D. Shah. Iterative learning for reliable crowdsourcing systems. In J. Shawe-Taylor, R. Zemel, P. Bartlett, F. Pereira, and K. Weinberger, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 24, pages 1953--1961. 2011.
[8]
S. J. Pan and Q. Yang. A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 22(10):1345--1359, October 2010.
[9]
W. Pan, E. Zhong, and Q. Yang. Transfer learning for text mining. In C. C. Aggarwal and C. Zhai, editors, Mining Text Data, pages 223--257. Springer, 2012.
[10]
V. C. Raykar and S. Yu. Eliminating spammers and ranking annotators for crowdsourced labeling tasks. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 13:491--518, Mar. 2012.
[11]
J. Ross, A. Zaldivar, L. Irani, and B. Tomlinson. Who are the turkers? worker demographics in amazon mechanical turk. Department of Informatics, University of California, Irvine, USA, Tech. Rep, 2009.
[12]
R. Snow, B. O'Connor, D. Jurafsky, and A. Y. Ng. Cheap and fast--but is it good?: evaluating non-expert annotations for natural language tasks. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP '08, pages 254--263, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2008. Association for Computational Linguistics.
[13]
P. Venetis, H. Garcia-Molina, K. Huang, and N. Polyzotis. Max algorithms in crowdsourcing environments. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web, WWW '12, pages 989--998, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM.
[14]
F. L. Wauthier and M. I. Jordan. Bayesian bias mitigation for crowdsourcing. In J. Shawe-Taylor, R. Zemel, P. Bartlett, F. Pereira, and K. Weinberger, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 24, pages 1800--1808. 2011.
[15]
P. Welinder, S. Branson, S. Belongie, and P. Perona. The multidimensional wisdom of crowds. In J. Lafferty, C. K. I. Williams, J. Shawe-Taylor, R. Zemel, and A. Culotta, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 23, pages 2424--2432. 2010.
[16]
J. Whitehill, P. Ruvolo, T. Wu, J. Bergsma, and J. Movellan. Whose vote should count more: Optimal integration of labels from labelers of unknown expertise. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 22:2035--2043, 2009.
[17]
Q. Yang, Y. Chen, G.-R. Xue, W. Dai, and Y. Yu. Heterogeneous transfer learning for image clustering via the social web. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP: Volume 1 - Volume 1, ACL '09, pages 1--9, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2009. Association for Computational Linguistics.
[18]
E. Zhong, W. Fan, J. Wang, L. Xiao, and Y. Li. Comsoc: adaptive transfer of user behaviors over composite social network. In KDD'12, pages 696--704. ACM, 2012.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)“I Prefer Regular Visitors to Answer My Questions”: Users’ Desired Experiential Background of Contributors for Location-based Crowdsourcing PlatformProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642520(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2023)Learning from biased crowdsourced labeling with deep clusteringExpert Systems with Applications10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118608211(118608)Online publication date: Jan-2023
  • (2022)Selecting Workers Wisely for Crowdsourcing When Copiers and Domain Experts Co-existFuture Internet10.3390/fi1402003714:2(37)Online publication date: 24-Jan-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
KDD '13: Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
August 2013
1534 pages
ISBN:9781450321747
DOI:10.1145/2487575
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 11 August 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. crowdsourcing
  2. transfer learning

Qualifiers

  • Poster

Conference

KDD' 13
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

KDD '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 125 of 726 submissions, 17%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,133 of 8,635 submissions, 13%

Upcoming Conference

KDD '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 15 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)“I Prefer Regular Visitors to Answer My Questions”: Users’ Desired Experiential Background of Contributors for Location-based Crowdsourcing PlatformProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642520(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2023)Learning from biased crowdsourced labeling with deep clusteringExpert Systems with Applications10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118608211(118608)Online publication date: Jan-2023
  • (2022)Selecting Workers Wisely for Crowdsourcing When Copiers and Domain Experts Co-existFuture Internet10.3390/fi1402003714:2(37)Online publication date: 24-Jan-2022
  • (2022)A Survey on Task Assignment in CrowdsourcingACM Computing Surveys10.1145/349452255:3(1-35)Online publication date: 3-Feb-2022
  • (2022)Knowledge Learning With Crowdsourcing: A Brief Review and Systematic PerspectiveIEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica10.1109/JAS.2022.1054349:5(749-762)Online publication date: May-2022
  • (2022)Crowdsourcing System for Multi-object Annotation in Surveillance Videos2022 8th International Conference on Big Data Computing and Communications (BigCom)10.1109/BigCom57025.2022.00055(389-397)Online publication date: Aug-2022
  • (2021)Fraud Detection under Multi-Sourced Extremely Noisy AnnotationsProceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management10.1145/3459637.3482433(2497-2506)Online publication date: 26-Oct-2021
  • (2021)Knowledge Graphs Meet Crowdsourcing: A Brief SurveyCloud Computing10.1007/978-3-030-69992-5_1(3-17)Online publication date: 13-Feb-2021
  • (2020)CrowdWTACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data10.1145/342171215:1(1-24)Online publication date: 7-Dec-2020
  • (2020)Prospect Theory Based Crowdsourcing for Classification in the Presence of SpammersIEEE Transactions on Signal Processing10.1109/TSP.2020.300675468(4083-4093)Online publication date: 2020
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media