[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2463728.2463787acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicegovConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Transforming city government: a case study of Philly311

Published: 22 October 2012 Publication History

Abstract

This paper describes the transformation of a city government led by a 311 program, which provides a consolidated channel for non-emergency services and information. The paper first discusses the concept of "smart city" as a foundation for the examination of the 311 program as a practice of government innovation. The paper then presents the details of the 311 program as instantiated in the City of Philadelphia. In-depth interviews with Philadelphia City government officials and managers responsible for creating and operating the City's 311 system (Philly311) offer insights into the contributions the system is making to a more efficient, effective, transparent, accountable, and collaborative city government. Performance data provided by Philly311 enables more efficient resource allocation and informed decision making. Philly311 is credited with making the process of service delivery more transparent to the public, and providing traceability of requested services which imbues service departments with a sense of accountability. Service level agreements are providing measurable standards of municipal services and are used to support accountability in terms of service status. Regular reviews of service level agreements and content of the system are also recognized as promoting interdepartmental collaboration. 311 systems are broadly recognized as powerful tools to engage residents in improving their neighborhoods. Institutionalizing interdepartmental collaborations emerged from the interviews as a critical capability in advancing from the initiation stage of Philly311-like systems to operations and refinement.

References

[1]
Allwinkle, S. and Cruickshank, P. (2011). Creating smart-er cities: An overview. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 1--16.
[2]
Anavitarte, L. and Tratz-Ryan, B. (2010). Market Insight: 'Smart Cities' in Emerging Markets. Gartner. Available at www.gartner.com/id=1468734.
[3]
Bergeron, B. P. (2003). Essentials of Shared Services. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[4]
Boulton, A., Brunn, S. D., and Devriendt, L. (2011). Cyberinfrastructures and "smart" world cities: Physical, human, and soft infrastructures. In P. Taylor, B. Derudder, M. Hoyler & F. Witlox (Eds.), International Handbook of Globalization and World Cities. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
[5]
Charmaz, K. (1983). The grounded theory methods: An explication and interpretation. In R. M. Emerson (Ed.) Contemporary Field Research: A Collection of Readings. Boston: Little, Brown.
[6]
Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., Pardo, T. A., and Scholl, H. J. (2012). Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. In Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 2289--2297), January 4--7, Maui, Hawaii, USA.
[7]
Denzin, N. K. (2007). Grounded theory and the politics of interpretation. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory. London: Sage.
[8]
Dirks, S. and Keeling, M. (2009). A Vision of Smarter Cities: How Cities Can Lead the Way into a Prosperous and Sustainable Future. Somers, NY: IBM Global Business Services.
[9]
Dirks, S., Keeling, M., and Dencik, J. (2009). How Smart is Your City?: Helping Cities Measure Progress. Somers, NY: IBM Global Business Services.
[10]
Dollery, B. and Akimov, A. (2008). Are shared services as a panacea for Australian local government? A critical note on Australian and international empirical evidence. International Review of Public Administration, 12(2), 89--99.
[11]
Floersch, J., Longhofer, J., Kranke, D., & Townsend, L. (2010). Integrating thematic, grounded theory and narrative analysis. Qualitative Social Work, 9(3), 407--425.
[12]
Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R., Pichler-Milanović, N., and Meijers, E. (2007). Smart Cities: Ranking of European Medium-Sized Cities. Vienna, Austria: Centre of Regional Science (SRF), Vienna University of Technology.
[13]
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
[14]
Goo, J., Kishore, R., Rao, H. R., and Nam, K. (2009). The role of service level agreements in relational management of information technology outsourcing: An empirical study. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 119--145.
[15]
Harrison, C., Eckman, B., Hamilton, R., Hartswick, P., Kalagnanam, J., Paraszczak, J., and Williams, P. (2010). Foundations for Smarter Cities. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 54(4), 350--365.
[16]
Hiles, A. N. (1994). Service level agreements. The TQM Magazine, 6(2), 14--16.
[17]
Hollands, R. G. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial. City, 12(3), 303--320.
[18]
Holton, J. A. (2007). The coding process and its challenges. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory. London: Sage.
[19]
Janssen, M. and Wagennar, R. (2004). Developing generic shared services for e-Government. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 2(1), 31--38.
[20]
Nam, T. and Pardo, T. A. (2011a). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, June 12--15, College Park, MA, USA.
[21]
Nam, T. and Pardo, T. A. (2011b). Smart city as urban innovation: Focusing on management, policy, and context. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, September 26--28, Tallinn, Estonia.
[22]
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[23]
Walsh, P., McGregor-Lowndes, M., and Newton, C. J. (2008). Shared services: Lessons from the public and private sectors for the nonprofit sector. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67(2), 200--212.
[24]
Washburn, D., Sindhu, U., Balaouras, S., Dines, R. A., Hayes, N. M., and Nelson, L. E. (2010). Helping CIOs Understand "Smart City" Initiatives: Defining the Smart City, Its Drivers, and the Role of the CIO. Cambridge, MA: Forrester Research.
[25]
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Transforming city government: a case study of Philly311

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICEGOV '12: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance
    October 2012
    547 pages
    ISBN:9781450312004
    DOI:10.1145/2463728
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    • Macao Foundation, Macao SAR Govt: Macao Foundation, Macao SAR Government
    • University at Albany - State University of New York: University at Albany - State University of New York

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 22 October 2012

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. 311
    2. city government
    3. contact center
    4. customer service
    5. e-government
    6. non-emergency service
    7. service level agreement
    8. smart city

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    ICEGOV '12
    Sponsor:
    • Macao Foundation, Macao SAR Govt
    • University at Albany - State University of New York

    Acceptance Rates

    ICEGOV '12 Paper Acceptance Rate 23 of 98 submissions, 23%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 350 of 865 submissions, 40%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 12 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2021)Back to Basics: City Services and 311 Service RequestsState and Local Government Review10.1177/0160323X21106425354:1(13-31)Online publication date: 8-Dec-2021
    • (2020)Meaningful Inefficiencies10.1093/oso/9780190870140.001.0001Online publication date: 20-Feb-2020
    • (2020)Can I Speak to a Human? Automating Remote Contact in Frontline Public ServiceThe Virtual Public Servant10.1007/978-3-030-54084-5_5(97-124)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2020
    • (2019)A Participative Method for Prioritizing Smart City Interventions in Medium-Sized MunicipalitiesInternational Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age10.4018/IJPADA.20190101036:1(41-63)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2019
    • (2019)Introduction to Digital Transformation in Era 4.0Institutional and Organizational Transformations in the Robotic Era10.4018/978-1-5225-6270-2.ch001(1-26)Online publication date: 2019
    • (2018)Citizen Relationship Management for Civic Participation: How Smart Cities use 311 to Involve CitizensE-Participation in Smart Cities: Technologies and Models of Governance for Citizen Engagement10.1007/978-3-319-89474-4_4(59-77)Online publication date: 2-Aug-2018
    • (2017)Tap the "Make This Public" ButtonProceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3025453.3026034(6304-6316)Online publication date: 2-May-2017
    • (2016)Where’s Wally? In Search of Citizen Perspectives on the Smart CitySustainability10.3390/su80302078:3(207)Online publication date: 26-Feb-2016
    • (2016)Building understanding of municipal operations centers as smart city' initiativesProceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia10.1145/3014087.3014110(19-30)Online publication date: 22-Nov-2016
    • (2016)Contact Center in a Smart Cities ViewProceedings of the 9th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance10.1145/2910019.2910063(215-222)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2016
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media