[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2461381.2461415acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescpsweekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Energy-efficient low power listening for wireless sensor networks in noisy environments

Published: 08 April 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Low Power Listening (LPL) is a common MAC-layer technique for reducing energy consumption in wireless sensor networks, where nodes periodically wakeup to sample the wireless channel to detect activity. However, LPL is highly susceptible to false wakeups caused by environmental noise being detected as activity on the channel, causing nodes to spuriously wakeup in order to receive nonexistent transmissions. In empirical studies in residential environments, we observe that the false wakeup problem can significantly increase a node's duty cycle, compromising the benefit of LPL. We also find that the energy-level threshold used by the Clear Channel Assessment (CCA) mechanism to detect channel activity has a significant impact on the false wakeup rate. We then design AEDP, an adaptive energy detection protocol for LPL, which dynamically adjusts a node's CCA threshold to improve network reliability and duty cycle based on application-specified bounds. Empirical experiments in both controlled tests and real-world environments showed AEDP can effectively mitigate the impact of noise on radio duty cycles, while maintaining satisfactory link reliability.

References

[1]
http://www.tinyos.net/.
[2]
http://www.contiki-os.org/.
[3]
http://www.zti-telecom.com/EN/LanTrafficV2.html.
[4]
http://docs.tinyos.net/index.php/CC2420_Hardware_and_Software_Acks.
[5]
M. Bertocco, G. Gamba, and A. Sona. Experimental optimization of CCA thresholds in wireless sensor networks. In EMC, 2007.
[6]
C. A. Boano, T. Voigt, N. Tsiftes, and L. Mottola. Making sensornet mac protocols robust against interference. In EWSN, 2010.
[7]
M. Z. Brodsky and R. T. Morris. In defense of wireless carrier sense. In SIGCOMM, 2009.
[8]
M. Buettner, G. V. Yee, E. Anderson, and R. Han. X-mac: a short preamble mac protocol for duty-cycled wireless sensor networks. In SenSys, 2006.
[9]
K. K. Chintalapudi and L. Venkatraman. On the design of mac protocols for lowlatency hard real-time discrete control applications over 802.15.4 hardware. In IPSN, 2008.
[10]
Crossbow Technology. TelosB mote platform. http://www.xbow.com/Products/Product_pdf_files/Wireless_pdf/TelosB_Datasheet.pdf.
[11]
A. Dunkels. The contikimac radio duty cycling protocol. Technical Report 5128, Swedish Institute of Computer Science, 2011.
[12]
P. Dutta, S. Dawson-Haggerty, Y. Chen, C.-J. M. Liang, and A. Terzis. Design and evaluation of a versatile and efficient receiver-initiated link layer for low-power wireless. In SenSys, 2010.
[13]
P. Dutta, J. Taneja, J. Jeong, X. Jiang, and D. Culler. A building block approach to sensornet systems. In SenSys, 2008.
[14]
O. Gnawali, R. Fonseca, K. Jamieson, D. Moss, and P. Levis. Collection tree protocol. In SenSys, 2009.
[15]
IEEE. Part 15.4: Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications for Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs), 2006.
[16]
A. Kiryushin, A. Sadkov, and A. Mainwaring. Real-world performance of clear channel assessment in 802.15.4 wireless sensor networks. In SENSORCOMM, 2008.
[17]
C.-J. M. Liang, B. Priyantha, J. Liu, and A. Terzis. Surviving wi-fi interference in low power zigbee networks. In SenSys,2010.
[18]
D. Moss and P. Levis. BoX-MACs: Exploiting physical and link layer boundaries in low-power networking. Technical Report SING-08-00, Stanford Information Networks Group, 2008.
[19]
J. Polastre, J. Hill, and D. Culler. Versatile low power media access for wireless sensor networks. In SenSys, 2004.
[20]
I. Ramachandran and S. Roy. On the impact of clear channel assessment on mac performance. In GLOBECOM, 2006.
[21]
M. Sha, G. Hackmann, and C. Lu. Energy-efficient low power listening for wireless sensor networks in noisy environments. Technical Report WUCSE-2011-61, Washington University in St. Louis, 2013. http://cse.wustl.edu/Research/Lists/Technical%20Reports/Attachments/957/aedp.pdf.
[22]
K. Srinivasan, P. Dutta, A. Tavakoli, and P. Levis. An empirical study of low power wireless. In ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks, 2010.
[23]
Y. Sun, O. Gurewitz, and D. B. Johnson. Ri-mac: A receiver-initiated asynchronous duty cycle mac protocol for dynamic traffic loads in wireless sensor networks. In SenSys, 2008.
[24]
Texas Instruments. 2.4 GHz IEEE 802.15.4 / ZigBee-ready RF Transceiver.
[25]
Wi-Spy Spectrum Analyzer. http://www.metageek.net/.
[26]
WUSTL Wireless Sensor Network Testbed. http://wsn.cse.wustl.edu/index.php/Testbed.
[27]
W. Yuan, J.-P. M. G. Linnartz, and I. G. M. M. Niemegeers. Adaptive cca for ieee 802.15.4 wireless sensor networks to mitigate interference. In WCNC, 2010.
[28]
M. Zimmerling, F. Ferrari, L. Mottolay, T. Voigty, and L. Thiele. ptunes: Runtime parameter adaptation for low-power mac protocols. In IPSN, 2012.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Intelligent scheduling algorithms for Internet of Things systems considering energy storage/consumption and network lifespanJournal of Energy Storage10.1016/j.est.2024.114321103(114321)Online publication date: Dec-2024
  • (2024)Secure opportunistic routing in 2-hop IEEE 802.15.4 networks with SMORComputer Communications10.1016/j.comcom.2024.01.024217:C(57-69)Online publication date: 25-Jun-2024
  • (2023)Towards Sustainable Distributed Sensor Networks: An Approach for Addressing Power Limitation Issues in WSNsSensors10.3390/s2302097523:2(975)Online publication date: 14-Jan-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
IPSN '13: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Information processing in sensor networks
April 2013
372 pages
ISBN:9781450319591
DOI:10.1145/2461381
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 April 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. CCA control
  2. low power listening
  3. wireless sensor networks

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

IPSN 2013
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

IPSN '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 24 of 115 submissions, 21%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 143 of 593 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Intelligent scheduling algorithms for Internet of Things systems considering energy storage/consumption and network lifespanJournal of Energy Storage10.1016/j.est.2024.114321103(114321)Online publication date: Dec-2024
  • (2024)Secure opportunistic routing in 2-hop IEEE 802.15.4 networks with SMORComputer Communications10.1016/j.comcom.2024.01.024217:C(57-69)Online publication date: 25-Jun-2024
  • (2023)Towards Sustainable Distributed Sensor Networks: An Approach for Addressing Power Limitation Issues in WSNsSensors10.3390/s2302097523:2(975)Online publication date: 14-Jan-2023
  • (2023)Optimizing Energy Efficiencies of IoT-based Wireless Sensor Network Components for Metaverse Sustainable Development using Carry Resist Adder based Booth Recoder (CRABRA)2023 20th Learning and Technology Conference (L&T)10.1109/LT58159.2023.10092334(91-96)Online publication date: 26-Jan-2023
  • (2023)Transparent and Tamper-Proof Event Ordering in the Internet of Things PlatformsIEEE Internet of Things Journal10.1109/JIOT.2022.322245010:6(5335-5348)Online publication date: 15-Mar-2023
  • (2023)A Survey on Designing Efficient WSN Using Duty Cycle OptimizationAdvanced Communication and Intelligent Systems10.1007/978-3-031-45124-9_17(219-230)Online publication date: 11-Oct-2023
  • (2022)Challenges for Convergence of Cloud and IoT in Applications and Edge ComputingResearch Anthology on Edge Computing Protocols, Applications, and Integration10.4018/978-1-6684-5700-9.ch032(644-662)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2022
  • (2022)SMAC-Based WSN Protocol-Current State of the Art, Challenges, and Future DirectionsJournal of Computer Networks and Communications10.1155/2022/67074132022Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
  • (2022)Collision-Free Dynamic Convergecast in Low-Duty-Cycle Wireless Sensor NetworksIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications10.1109/TWC.2021.310598321:3(1665-1680)Online publication date: Mar-2022
  • (2021)Challenges for Convergence of Cloud and IoT in Applications and Edge ComputingChallenges and Opportunities for the Convergence of IoT, Big Data, and Cloud Computing10.4018/978-1-7998-3111-2.ch002(17-36)Online publication date: 2021
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media