[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

An integrated model of traffic, geography and economy in the internet

Published: 01 July 2008 Publication History

Abstract

Modeling Internet growth is important both for understanding the current network and to predict and improve its future. To date, Internet models have typically attempted to explain a subset of the following characteristics: network structure, traffic flow, geography, and economy. In this paper we present a discrete, agent-based model, that integrates all of them. We show that the model generates networks with topologies, dynamics, and more speculatively spatial distributions that are similar to the Internet.

References

[1]
J. I. Alvarez-Hamelin and N. Schabanel. An Internet graph model based on trade-off optimization. Eur. Phys. J. B, 38:231--237, 2004.]]
[2]
S. Bar, M. Gonena, and A. Wool. A geographic directed preferential Internet topology model. Computer Networks, 51:4174--4188, 2007.]]
[3]
A.-L. Barabási and R. Albert. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286:509--512, 1999.]]
[4]
E. Bonabeau. Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 99:7280--7287, 2002.]]
[5]
F. Cairncross. The death of distance. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 1997.]]
[6]
J. M. Carlson and J. Doyle. Highly optimized tolerance: a mechanism for power laws in designed systems. Phys. Rev. E, 60:1412--1427, August 1999.]]
[7]
H. Chang, S. Jamin, and W. Willinger. Internet connectivity at the AS-level: an optimization-driven modeling approach. In MoMeTools '03: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Models, methods and tools for reproducible network research, pages 33--46, New York, NY, USA, 2003. ACM.]]
[8]
H. Chang, S. Jamin, and W. Willinger. To peer or not to peer: Modeling the evolution of the Internet's AS-level topology. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2006.]]
[9]
A. Clauset, C. R. Shalizi, and M. E. J. Newman. Power-law distributions in empirical data. e-print arXiv:0706.1062, 2007.]]
[10]
R. Cohen, K. Erez, D. ben Avraham, and S. Havlin. Resilience of the Internet to random breakdowns. Phys. Rev. Lett., 85:4626--4628, 2000.]]
[11]
I. Daubechies, K. Drakakis, and T. Khovanova. A detailed study of the attachment strategies of new autonomous systems in the AS connectivity graph. Internet Mathematics, 2:185--246, 2006.]]
[12]
P. Echenique, J. Gómez-Gardẽnes, and Y. Moreno. Dynamics of jamming transitions in complex networks. Europhys. Lett., 71:325--331, 2005.]]
[13]
A. Fabrikant, E. Koutsoupias, and C. H. Papadimitriou. Heuristically optimized trade-offs: A new paradigm for power laws in the Internet. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Automata, Languages, and Programming, volume 2380 of Lecture notes in Computer science, pages 110--122, Heidelberg, 2002. Springer.]]
[14]
M. Faloutsos, P. Faloutsos, and C. Faloutsos. On power-law relationships of the Internet topology. Comput. Commun. Rev., 29:251--262, 1999.]]
[15]
L. Gao. On inferring autonomous system relationships in the Internet. IEEE / ACM Transactions on Networking, 9:733--745, 2001.]]
[16]
L. Gao and F. Wang. The extent of AS path ination by routing policies. In Proceedings of GLOBECOM'02, volume 3, pages 2180--2184, 2002.]]
[17]
K.-I. Goh, E. Oh, H. Jeong, B. Kahng, and D. Kim. Classification of scale-free networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 99:12583--12588, 2002.]]
[18]
P. Holme. Congestion and centrality in traffic flow on complex networks. Advances in Complex Systems, 6:163--176, 2003.]]
[19]
P. Holme, J. Karlin, and S. Forrest. Radial structure of the Internet. Proc. R. Soc. A, 463:1231--1246, 2007.]]
[20]
W. Isard. Location and space economy. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 1956.]]
[21]
P. L. Krapivsky, S. Redner, and F. Leyvraz. Connectivity of growing random networks. Phys. Rev. Lett., 85:4629 -- 4632, 2000.]]
[22]
A. Lakhina, J. W. Byers, M. Crovella, and I. Matta. On the geographic location of Internet resources. Technical Report BUCS-TR-2002-015, Boston University, 2002.]]
[23]
R. Pastor-Santorras and A. Vespignani. Evolution and structure of the Internet: a statistical physics approach. Cambridge Univeristy Press, Cambridge, 2004.]]
[24]
Y. Rekhter and T. Li. A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4). RFC 1771 (Draft Standard), Mar. 1995. Obsoleted by RFC 4271.]]
[25]
S. Shakkottai, T. Vest, D. Krioukov, and K. C. Claffy. Economic evolution of the Internet AS-level ecosystem. e-print arxiv:cs.NI/0608058, 2006.]]
[26]
V. Sood and P. Grassberger. Localization transition of biased random walks on random networks. Phys. Rev. Lett., 99:098701, 2007.]]
[27]
N. Spring, R. Mahajan, D. Wetherall, and T. Anderson. Measuring ISP topologies with Rocketfuel. IEEE / ACM Transactions of Networking, 12:2--16, 2004.]]
[28]
L. Subramanian, S. Agarwal, J. Rexford, and R. H. Katz. Characterizing the Internet hierarchy from multiple vantage points. In INFOCOM 2002. Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. Proceedings. IEEE, volume 2, pages 618--627, 2002.]]
[29]
S.-H. Yook, H. Jeong, and A.-L. Barabási. Modeling the Internet's large-scale topology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 99:13382--13386, 2002.]]

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)Policy Challenges in Mapping Internet Interdomain CongestionJournal of Information Policy10.5325/jinfopoli.10.2020.000110(1-44)Online publication date: 1-May-2020
  • (2020)Policy Challenges in Mapping Internet Interdomain CongestionJournal of Information Policy10.5325/jinfopoli.10.1.000110:1(1-44)Online publication date: 1-May-2020
  • (2017)The Impact of 16-bit and 32-bit ASNs Coexistence on the Accuracy of Internet AS GraphJournal of Network and Systems Management10.1007/s10922-016-9389-525:2(253-268)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2017
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. An integrated model of traffic, geography and economy in the internet

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
    ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review  Volume 38, Issue 3
    July 2008
    96 pages
    ISSN:0146-4833
    DOI:10.1145/1384609
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 July 2008
    Published in SIGCOMM-CCR Volume 38, Issue 3

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. agent-based model
    2. autonomous system
    3. complex networks
    4. emergent properties
    5. internet
    6. mechanistic model
    7. networks
    8. time evolution

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 17 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2020)Policy Challenges in Mapping Internet Interdomain CongestionJournal of Information Policy10.5325/jinfopoli.10.2020.000110(1-44)Online publication date: 1-May-2020
    • (2020)Policy Challenges in Mapping Internet Interdomain CongestionJournal of Information Policy10.5325/jinfopoli.10.1.000110:1(1-44)Online publication date: 1-May-2020
    • (2017)The Impact of 16-bit and 32-bit ASNs Coexistence on the Accuracy of Internet AS GraphJournal of Network and Systems Management10.1007/s10922-016-9389-525:2(253-268)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2017
    • (2016)Likelihood-based assessment of dynamic networksJournal of Complex Networks10.1093/comnet/cnv031(cnv031)Online publication date: 23-Mar-2016
    • (2015)Deductive way of reasoning about the internet AS level topologyChinese Physics B10.1088/1674-1056/24/11/11890124:11(118901)Online publication date: 10-Nov-2015
    • (2014)Using peeringDB to understand the peering ecosystemACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review10.1145/2602204.260220844:2(20-27)Online publication date: 8-Apr-2014
    • (2014)Estimating linking preferences and behaviors of autonomous systems in the Internet using a discrete choice model2014 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC)10.1109/SMC.2014.6974143(1591-1597)Online publication date: Oct-2014
    • (2014)Open peering by Internet transit providers: Peer preference or peer pressure?IEEE INFOCOM 2014 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications10.1109/INFOCOM.2014.6848203(2562-2570)Online publication date: Apr-2014
    • (2013)A graph-theoretic study of the flattening Internet AS topology2013 19th IEEE International Conference on Networks (ICON)10.1109/ICON.2013.6781991(1-6)Online publication date: Dec-2013
    • (2012)Unusual Evolution of IPv6 Internet Topology2012 8th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing10.1109/WiCOM.2012.6478734(1-4)Online publication date: Sep-2012
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media