[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/1147261.1147281acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespdcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Inside the belly of the beast: the challenges and successes of a reformist participatory agenda

Published: 01 August 2006 Publication History

Abstract

Shapiro [38] recently argued that participatory design practitioners should consider pursuing a reformist agenda through engagement with the procurement and development of systems in the public sector. This paper considers the challenges, contradictions and possible arenas for success in the context of a reformist participatory design agenda [38], by reflecting on recent work undertaken from a stance similar to that advocated by Shapiro [38] in a public sector agency. The intention of the paper is to stimulate and extend discussion about arenas in which the political goals that characterized participatory design in its early days can be pursued, and extend discussions about the role of politics in contemporary participatory design [14].

References

[1]
Balka, E. Tidying up loose ends: Theoretical and practical issues related to women's participation in technological design. In H. Rohracher (Ed.), User Involvement in Technological Innovation, Profil-Verlag, Munich, 2005, 147--173.
[2]
Balka, E. The Production of Health Indicators as Computer Supported Cooperative Work: Reflections on the Multiple Roles of Electronic Health Records. In Balka, E. and Wagner, I. (Eds.). Reconfiguring Healthcare: Issues in Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Healthcare Environments, (2005), 67--75
[3]
Balka, E. Notes taken at presentation about the system upgrade, March 18 2005.
[4]
Balka, E. Feminist Technology Assessment: Reflections on Theory and Practice. Atlantis 22, 2 (1998), 112--122.
[5]
Balka, E. Computer Networking: Spinsters on the Web. Canadian Research Institute for the Advancement of Women, Ottawa (1997a).
[6]
Balka, E. Participatory Design in Women's Organizations: The Social World of Organizational Structure and the Gendered Nature of Expertise. Gender, Work and Organizations 4, 2 (1997b), 99--115.
[7]
Balka, E. Women's access to on-line discussions about feminism. The Electronic Journal of Communication/La Revue Electronique de Communication 3, 1 (1993).
[8]
Balka, E. and Doucette, L. The accessibility of computers to organizations serving women in the province of Newfoundland: Preliminary study results. Electronic Journal of Virtual Culture 2, 3 (1994), 739 lines.
[9]
Balka, E., Jones, M., Jorgenson, L. and Sinclair, N. Participatory Design with Island Pacific School: Lessons from the Field, Unpublished paper (1998). http:/pdg.cecm.sfu.ca/IPS/PDC.html
[10]
Balka, E. and Kahnamoui, N. Technology trouble? Talk to us! Findings from an ethnographic field study. Proc. Participatory Design Conference 2004, Artful integration: interweaving media, materials and practices -- Volume 1, New York, NY, ACM Press (2004), 224--234.
[11]
Balka, E., Kahnamoui, N. and Nutland K. Who's in Charge of Patient Safety? Work Practice, Work Processes and Utopian Views of Automatic Drug Dispensing Systems. Proc. Technology in Healthcare, To Err is System, 2004.
[12]
Balka, E., Wagner, I. and Jensen, C. B. Reconfiguring Critical Computing in an Era of Configurability. In. Bertelsen, O. W., Bouvin, N. O., Krough, P. G. and Kyng, M. (Eds.). Proc. The Forth Decennial Aarhus Conference, Critical Computing- Between Sense and Sensibility. New York, NY, ACM Press (2005), 79--88.
[13]
Baskerville, R. L. and Wood-Harper, A. T. A Critical Perpsective on Action Research as a Method for Information Systems Research. Journal of Information Technology, 11, (1996). 235--246.
[14]
Beck, E. P for Political: Participation is Not Enough. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 14, 1 (2002), 77--92.
[15]
Benston, M. Feminism and systems design: Questions of control. In Tomm, W. (Ed.). The effects of feminist approaches on research methodologies. University of Calgary, Calgary, 1989.
[16]
Benston, M. and Balka, E. Participatory Design by Non-Profit Groups. Canadian Woman Studies Journal/les cahiers de la femme 13, 2 (1993), 100--103.
[17]
Benston, M. and Balka, E. Participatory design by nonprofit groups. In Proc. Participatory Design Conference 1990, CPSR, Palo Alto, CA, (1990), 107--113.
[18]
Beyer, H. and Holzblatt, K. Contextual Design. Interactions 6, 1 (1999), 32--42.
[19]
Blythin, S., Hughes, J. and Rouncefield, M. 'Never mind all that ethno stuff: what does it mean and what do we do now?' Ethnography in a Commercial Context. Interactions 4, 3 (1997), 38--47.
[20]
Boulus, N. Making things work: On being an academic researcher working with a community partner. Paper presented at the Urban Health Conference: Achieving Social Justice in Urban Communities, 2005.
[21]
Bowker, G. and Star, S. L. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press, 1999.
[22]
Braverman, H. Labor and monopoly capital. New York, Monthly Review Press, 1974.
[23]
Clement, A. Computing at Work: Empowering Action by 'Low-level Users'. Communications of the ACM, Special Issue on 'Social Computing' 37, 1 (1994), 52--63.
[24]
Damodaran, L. User involvement in the systems design process- A practical guide for users. Behaviour & Information Technology 15, 6 (1996), 363--377.
[25]
Ehn, P. and Kyng (M). The collective resource approach to systems design. In Bjerknes, G., Ehn, P., & Kyng, M. (Eds.), Computers and democracy: A Scandinavian challenge, 17--57. Aldershot, UK: Avebury; Brookfield, VT: Gower., 1987.
[26]
Floyd, C. Being critical in, on or around computing? Proc. Forth Decennial Aarhus Conference, Critical Computing-Between Sense and Sensibility (2005).
[27]
Gärtner J. and Wagner I. Mapping actors and agendas: Political frameworks of systems design and participation. Human-Computer Interaction 11, (1996), 187--214.
[28]
Greenbaum, J. PD: A Personal Statement. In Communications of the Association of Computing Machinists (CACM), Special Issue on Participatory Design, 36, 4 (1993), 47.
[29]
Greenwood, D. J. and Levin, M. Introduction to action research: Social research for social change. Newbury Park, CA, Sage 1998.
[30]
Jensen, C. B. Sorting Attachments: On Intervention and Usefulness in STS and Health Policy. Practices of Assessment and Intervention in Action-Oriented STS Research, 2005.
[31]
Karasti, H. Increasing sensitivity towards everyday work practice in system design (Academic Dissertation), 2001.
[32]
Kensing, F. and Blomberg, J. Participatory Design: Issues and Concerns. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing 7, 3--4 (1998), 167--185.
[33]
Kensing, F. Participatory Design in a Commercial Context --- a conceptual framework. In Proc. Participatory Design Conference 2000, CPSR, Palo Alto, CA, (2000) 116--126.
[34]
Kensing, F., Simonsen, J. and Bødker, K. Participatory Design at a Radio Station. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing 7 3--4 (1998), 243--271.
[35]
Messing, K., Seifert, A. M., Vézina, N., Balka, E., Chatigny, C. Qualitative research using numbers: Analysis developed in France and used to transform work in North America. New Solutions: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy 15(3): (2005), 245--260.
[36]
Noble, D. F. Social choice in machine design: The case of automatically controlled machine tools. In A. Zimbalist (Ed.). Case studies on the labour process. New York, Monthly Review Press, 1979, 18--50.
[37]
Robertson, T. Shoppers and Tailors: Participative Practices in Small Australian Design Companies. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 7 3--4 (1998), 205--221.
[38]
Shapiro, D. Participatory design: The will to succeed. In. Bertelsen, O. W., Bouvin, N. O., Krough, P. G. and Kyng, M. (Eds.). Proc. Forth Decennial Aarhus Conference, Critical Computing- Between Sense and Sensibility. New York, NY, ACM Press (2005), 29--38.
[39]
Suchman, L. and Jordan, B. Computerization and Women's Knowledge (with Jordan, B.) In K. Tijdens, Jennings, M., Wagner, I. and Weggelaar, M. (Eds.) Women, Work and Computerization: Forming New Alliances. Amsterdam, North Holland, (1988), 153--160.
[40]
Vancouver Coastal Health. Briefing note: Patient Care Information System (PCIS) Enhancement Project. April 7, (2005), 1.
[41]
Vancouver Coastal Health, Building the foundation for electronic health records: Recording accurate patient identity data is the key. In Medlink: The VCH physician newsletter September, (2005), 3.
[42]
Wood Harper, A. T., Corder, S., Wood, J. R. G., and Watson, H. How We Profess: The Ethical Systems Analyst. Communications of the Association of Computing Machinists (CACM), 39, 3 (1996), 69--77.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)When design workshops meet chatbots: Meaningful participation at scale?International Journal of Architectural Computing10.1177/14780771241253440Online publication date: 30-May-2024
  • (2024)Mapping User Participation in the Design of Digital Public Services: Is Participatory Design Relevant?Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2024: Full Papers - Volume 110.1145/3666094.3666102(112-122)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2024
  • (2023)A model of programmatic co-design with teachers: five factors for successCoDesign10.1080/15710882.2023.228058220:3(499-514)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
PDC '06: Proceedings of the ninth conference on Participatory design: Expanding boundaries in design - Volume 1
August 2006
149 pages
ISBN:159593460X
DOI:10.1145/1147261
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

  • CPSR: Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 August 2006

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. challenges
  2. participatory design
  3. politics
  4. public sector
  5. terms of engagement

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

PDC'06
Sponsor:
  • CPSR
PDC'06: Expanding Boundaries in Design
August 1 - 5, 2006
Trento, Italy

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 49 of 289 submissions, 17%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 13 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)When design workshops meet chatbots: Meaningful participation at scale?International Journal of Architectural Computing10.1177/14780771241253440Online publication date: 30-May-2024
  • (2024)Mapping User Participation in the Design of Digital Public Services: Is Participatory Design Relevant?Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2024: Full Papers - Volume 110.1145/3666094.3666102(112-122)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2024
  • (2023)A model of programmatic co-design with teachers: five factors for successCoDesign10.1080/15710882.2023.228058220:3(499-514)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2023
  • (2022)Towards Response-able PD: Putting Feminist New Materialisms to Work in the Practices of Participatory DesignProceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2022 - Volume 110.1145/3536169.3537784(98-108)Online publication date: 19-Aug-2022
  • (2018)From computational thinking to computational empowermentProceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 110.1145/3210586.3210592(1-11)Online publication date: 20-Aug-2018
  • (2018)On scale, dialectics, and affectProceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 110.1145/3210586.3210591(1-13)Online publication date: 20-Aug-2018
  • (2018)The Dark (Patterns) Side of UX DesignProceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3173574.3174108(1-14)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2018
  • (2017)Creating a Sociotechnical APIProceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3025453.3025963(2295-2306)Online publication date: 2-May-2017
  • (2016)Reflexive engagementProceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Full papers - Volume 110.1145/2940299.2940302(21-30)Online publication date: 15-Aug-2016
  • (2015)War and peace in codesignCoDesign10.1080/15710882.2015.111281312:3(171-184)Online publication date: 2-Dec-2015
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media