More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Article

The influence of feedback on egocentric distance judgments in real and virtual environments

Authors:

Betty J. Mohler,

Sarah H. Creem-Regehr,

William B. ThompsonAuthors Info & Claims

APGV '06: Proceedings of the 3rd symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization

Pages 9 - 14

https://doi.org/10.1145/1140491.1140493

Published: 28 July 2006 Publication History

Abstract

A number of investigators have reported that distance judgments in virtual environments (VEs) are systematically smaller than distance judgments made in comparably-sized real environments. Many variables that may contribute to this difference have been investigated but none of them fully explain the distance compression. One approach to this problem that has implications for both VE applications and the study of perceptual mechanisms is to examine the influence of the feedback available to the user. Most generally, we asked whether feedback within a virtual environment would lead to more accurate estimations of distance. Next, given the prediction that some change in behavior would be observed, we asked whether specific adaptation effects would generalize to other indications of distance. Finally, we asked whether these effects would transfer from the VE to the real world. All distance judgments in the head-mounted display (HMD) became near accurate after three different forms of feedback were given within the HMD. However, not all feedback sessions within the HMD altered real world distance judgments. These results are discussed with respect to the perceptual and cognitive mechanisms that may be involved in the observed adaptation effects as well as the benefits of feedback for VE applications.

References

[1]

Bingham, G., and Pagano, C. 1998. The necessity of a perception/action approach to definite distance perception: monocular distance perception to guide reaching. Journla of Experimental Psychology: Human Perceptin and Performance 24, 145--168.

[2]

Bingham, G. P., Crowell, J. A., and Todd, J. T. 2004. Distortions of distance and shapre are not produced by a signle continuous transformation of reach space. Percpetion & Psychophysics 66, 1, 152--169.

[3]

Creem-Regehr, S. H., Willemsen, P., Gooch, A. A., and Thompson, W. B. 2005. The influence of restricted viewing conditions on egocentric distance perception: Implications for real and virtual indoor environments. Perception 34, 2, 191--204.

[4]

Durgin, F. H., Fox, L. F., Lewis, J., and Walley, K. A. 2002. Perceptuomotor adaptation: More than meets the eye. In Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, vol. 7, 103--104.

[5]

Durgin, F. H., Pelah, A., Fox, L. F., Lewis, J. Y., Kane, R., and Walley, K. A. 2005. Self-motion perception during locomotor recalibration: More than meets the eye. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31, 398--419.

[6]

Ellard, C. G., and Shaughnessy, S. C. 2002. A comparison of visual and nonvisual sensory inputs to walked distance in a blind-walking task. Perception 32, 5, 567--578.

[7]

Foley, D. J. 2004. personal communication. "University of California, Santa Barbara" (March).

[8]

Hutchison, J. J., and Loomis, J. M. 2006. Does energy expenditure affect the perception of egocentric distance? a failure to replicate experiment 1 of proffitt, stefanucci, banton, and epstein (2003). Vision Sciences Society Conference.

[9]

Keyson, D. V. 2000. Estimation of virtually perceived length. Presence 9, 4 (August), 394--398.

Digital Library

[10]

Knapp, J. M., and Loomis, J. M. 1999. Limited field of view of headmounted displays is not the cause of distance underestimation of distance in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 13, 5 (Oct.), 572--577.

Digital Library

[11]

Loomis, J. M., Da Silva, J. A., Fujita, N., and Fukusima, S. S. 1992. Visual space perception and visually directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18, 906--921.

[12]

Magne, P., and Coello, Y. 2002. Retinal and extra-retinal contributions to position coding. Experimental Brain Research 136, 277--287.

[13]

Mohler, B. J., Thompson, W. B., Creem-Regehr, S. H., Peter Willemsen Herbert L. Pick, J., and Rieser, J. J. (in press). Calibration of locomotion due to visual motion in a treadmill-based virtual environment. ACM Transactions in Applied Perception.

Digital Library

[14]

Proffitt, D. R., Stefanucci, J., Banton, T., and Epstein, W. 2003. The role of effort in perceiving distance. Psychological Science 14, 2 (March).

[15]

Richardson, A. R., and Waller, D. 2005. The effect of feedback training on distance estimation in virtual environments. Applied Cognitive Psychology 19, 1089--1108.

[16]

Rieser, J. J., Ashmead, D. H., Talor, C. R., and Youngquist, G. A. 1990. Visual perception and the guidance of locomotion without vision to previously seen targets. Perception 19, 675--689.

[17]

Rieser, J. J., Pick, Jr., H. L., Ashmead, D., and Garing, A. 1995. Calibration of human locomotion and models of perceptual-motor organization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21, 480--497.

[18]

Sahm, C. S., Creem-Regehr, S. H., Thompson, W. B., and Willemsen, P. 2004. Throwing versus walking as indicators of distance perception in similar real and virtual environments. ACM Transactions in Applied Perception 2, 1, 35--45.

Digital Library

[19]

Schmidt, R. A., and Wrisberg, C. A. 2000. Providing feedback during the learning experience. In Motor Learning and Performance: A Problem-Based Learning Approach. ch. 10.

[20]

Thompson, W. B., Willemsen, P., Gooch, A. A., Creem-Regehr, S. H., Loomis, J. M., and Beall, A. C. 2004. Does the quality of computer graphics matter when judging distance in visually immersive environments? Presence 13, 5 (Oct.), 560--571.

Digital Library

[21]

Willemsen, P., Colton, M. B., Creem-Regehr, S., and Thompson, W. 2004. The effects of head-mounted display mechanics on distance judgments in virtual environments. ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, 35--48.

Digital Library

[22]

Witmer, B., and W. J. Sadowski, J. 1998. Nonvisually guided locomotion to a previously viewed target in real and virtual environments. Human Factors 40, 478--488.

Cited By

Wang XNitsche MResch GMazalek AWelsh T(2025)Mixed reality alters motor planning and controlBehavioural Brain Research10.1016/j.bbr.2024.115373480(115373)Online publication date: Mar-2025
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2024.115373
Solini HRosopa ERosopa PPagano C(2024)Quantifying accuracy on distance estimation tasks: A Monte Carlo studyBehavior Research Methods10.3758/s13428-024-02353-z56:6(6198-6222)Online publication date: 19-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02353-z
Chakraborty SKane AGagnon HMcNamara TBodenheimer B(2024)Comparative Effectiveness of an Omnidirectional Treadmill versus Natural Walking for Navigating in Virtual EnvironmentsACM Symposium on Applied Perception 202410.1145/3675231.3675243(1-10)Online publication date: 30-Aug-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3675231.3675243
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

The influence of feedback on egocentric distance judgments in real and virtual environments
1. Computing methodologies
  1. Computer graphics
    1. Graphics systems and interfaces
      1. Virtual reality
2. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Interaction paradigms
      1. Mixed / augmented reality
      2. Virtual reality

Recommendations

How does presentation method and measurement protocol affect distance estimation in real and virtual environments?

We conducted two experiments that compared distance perception in real and virtual environments in six visual presentation methods using either timed imagined walking or direct blindfolded walking, while controlling for several other factors that could ...
Distance perception in real and virtual environments

We conducted three experiments to compare distance perception in real and virtual environments. In Experiment 1, adults estimated how long it would take to walk to targets in real and virtual environments by starting and stopping a stopwatch while ...
Egocentric distance judgments in a large screen display immersive virtual environment
APGV '10: Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization

People underestimate egocentric distances in head-mounted display virtual environments, as compared to estimates done in the real world. Our work investigates whether distances are still compressed in a large screen display immersive virtual environment,...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

APGV '06: Proceedings of the 3rd symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization

July 2006

181 pages

ISBN:1595934294

DOI:10.1145/1140491

Conference Chairs:
Roland W. Fleming
MPI for Biological Cybernetics
,
Sunghee Kim
Gettysburg College

Copyright © 2006 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 28 July 2006

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Conference

APGV06

Sponsor:

SIGGRAPH

APGV06: ACM Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization

July 28 - 29, 2006

Massachusetts, Boston, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 19 of 33 submissions, 58%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

107
Total Citations
View Citations
746
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)33
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

Reflects downloads up to 03 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Wang XNitsche MResch GMazalek AWelsh T(2025)Mixed reality alters motor planning and controlBehavioural Brain Research10.1016/j.bbr.2024.115373480(115373)Online publication date: Mar-2025
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2024.115373
Solini HRosopa ERosopa PPagano C(2024)Quantifying accuracy on distance estimation tasks: A Monte Carlo studyBehavior Research Methods10.3758/s13428-024-02353-z56:6(6198-6222)Online publication date: 19-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02353-z
Chakraborty SKane AGagnon HMcNamara TBodenheimer B(2024)Comparative Effectiveness of an Omnidirectional Treadmill versus Natural Walking for Navigating in Virtual EnvironmentsACM Symposium on Applied Perception 202410.1145/3675231.3675243(1-10)Online publication date: 30-Aug-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3675231.3675243
Lin WVenkatakrishnan RVenkatakrishnan RBabu SPagano CLin W(2024)An Empirical Evaluation of the Calibration of Auditory Distance Perception under Different Levels of Virtual Environment Visibilities2024 IEEE Conference Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)10.1109/VR58804.2024.00089(690-700)Online publication date: 16-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/VR58804.2024.00089
Wang XSouthwick DRobinson INitsche MResch GMazalek AWelsh T(2024)Prolonged exposure to mixed reality alters task performance in the unmediated environmentScientific Reports10.1038/s41598-024-69116-w14:1Online publication date: 15-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-69116-w
Łukasik AMatulewski JKarkowska KGrzankowska IJoachimiak MPietrykowski DCiesielska GSztramski M(2024)Do we need to squeeze large tele-AR scenes to fit them into a small room?Procedia Computer Science10.1016/j.procs.2024.09.220246(3371-3380)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.09.220
Guzsvinecz TPerge ESzűcs J(2023)Examining the Results of Virtual Reality-Based Egocentric Distance Estimation Tests Based on Immersion LevelSensors10.3390/s2306313823:6(3138)Online publication date: 15-Mar-2023
https://doi.org/10.3390/s23063138
Bosco ASanz Diez PFilippini MFattori P(2023)The influence of action on perception spans different effectorsFrontiers in Systems Neuroscience10.3389/fnsys.2023.114564317Online publication date: 2-May-2023
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2023.1145643
Bai JWarren W(2023)Relative rate of expansion controls speed in one-dimensional pedestrian followingJournal of Vision10.1167/jov.23.10.323:10(3)Online publication date: 7-Sep-2023
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.10.3
Kelly J(2023)Distance Perception in Virtual Reality: A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Head-Mounted Display CharacteristicsIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2022.319660629:12(4978-4989)Online publication date: Dec-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2022.3196606
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents