[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/1127777.1127782acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescpsweekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Near-optimal sensor placements: maximizing information while minimizing communication cost

Published: 19 April 2006 Publication History

Abstract

When monitoring spatial phenomena with wireless sensor networks, selecting the best sensor placements is a fundamental task. Not only should the sensors be informative, but they should also be able to communicate efficiently. In this paper, we present a data-driven approach that addresses the three central aspects of this problem: measuring the predictive quality of a set of sensor locations (regardless of whether sensors were ever placed at these locations), predicting the communication cost involved with these placements, and designing an algorithm with provable quality guarantees that optimizes the NP-hard tradeoff. Specifically, we use data from a pilot deployment to build non-parametric probabilistic models called Gaussian Processes (GPs)both for the spatial phenomena of interest and for the spatial variability of link qualities, which allows us to estimate predictive power and communication cost of unsensed locations. Surprisingly, uncertainty in the representation of link qualities plays an important role in estimating communication costs. Using these models, we present a novel, polynomial-time, data-driven algorithm, pSPIEL, which selects Sensor Placements at Informative and cost-Effective Locations. Our approach exploits two important properties of this problem: submodularity, formalizing the intuition that adding a node to a small deployment can help more than adding a node to a large deployment; and locality, under which nodes that are far from each other provide almost independent information. Exploiting these properties, we prove strong approximation guarantees for our pSPIEL approach. We also provide extensive experimental validation of this practical approach on several real-world placement problems, and built a complete system implementation on 46 Tmote Sky motes, demonstrating significant advantages over existing methods.

References

[1]
B. Awerbuch, Y. Azar, A. Blum, and S. Vempala. New approximation guarantees for minimum-weight k-trees and prize-collecting salesmen. SIAM J. Computing, 28:254--262, 1999.
[2]
A. Cerpa, J. L. Wong, L. Kuang, M. Potkonjak, and D. Estrin. Statistical model of lossy links in wireless sensor networks. In IPSN, 2005.
[3]
N. A. Cressie. Statistics for Spatial Data. Wiley, 1991.
[4]
L. Csato, E. Fokue, M. Opper, B. Schottky, and O. Winther. Efficient approaches to gaussian process classification. In NIPS, 2000.
[5]
A. Deshpande, C. Guestrin, S. Madden, J. Hellerstein, and W. Hong. Model-driven data acquisition in sensor networks. In VLDB, 2004.
[6]
S. Funke, A. Kesselman, F. Kuhn, Z. Lotker, and M. Segal. Improved approximation algorithms for connected sensor cover. In ADHOC, 04.
[7]
N. Garg. Saving an epsilon: a 2-approximation for the k-mst problem in graphs. In STOC, 2005.
[8]
C. Guestrin, P. Bodik, R. Thibaux, M. Paskin, and S. Madden. Distributed regression: an efficient framework for modeling sensor network data. In IPSN, 2004.
[9]
C. Guestrin, A. Krause, and A. Singh. Near-optimal sensor placements in gaussian processes. In ICML, 2005.
[10]
A. Gupta, R. Krauthgamer, and J. R. Lee. Bounded geometries, fractals, and low-distortion embeddings. In FOCS, 2003.
[11]
H. Gupta, S. R. Das, and Q. Gu. Connected sensor cover: Self-organization of sensor networks for efficient query execution. In MobiHoc, 2003.
[12]
D. S. Johnson, M. Minkoff, and S. Phillips. The prize collecting steiner tree problem: theory and practice. In SODA, 2000.
[13]
K. Kar and S. Banerjee. Node placement for connected coverage in sensor networks. In WiOpt, 2003.
[14]
A. Krause, C. Guestrin, A. Gupta, and J. Kleinberg. Near-optimal sensor placements: Maximizing information while minimizing communication cost. Technical report, CMU-CALD-05-110, 2005.
[15]
A. Levin. A better approximation algorithm for the budget prize collecting tree problem. Ops. Res. Lett., 32:316--319, 2004.
[16]
G. Nemhauser, L. Wolsey, and M. Fisher. An analysis of the approximations for maximizing submodular set functions. Mathematical Programming, 14:265--294, 1978.
[17]
D. J. Nott and W. T. M. Dunsmuir. Estimation of nonstationary spatial covariance structure. Biometrika, 89:819--829, 2002.
[18]
V. V. Vazirani. Approximation Algorithms. Springer, 2003.
[19]
M. Widmann and C. S. Bretherton. 50 km resolution daily precipitation for the pacific northwest. http://www.jisao.washington.edu/data sets/widmann/, 1999.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Wireless Communication Infrastructure Building for Mobile Robot Search and Inspection Missions2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)10.1109/ICRA57147.2024.10611561(5970-5976)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • (2023)Loss of Distributed Coverage Using Lazy Agents Operating Under Discrete, Local, Event-Triggered CommunicationProceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems10.5555/3545946.3599006(2574-2576)Online publication date: 30-May-2023
  • (2023)Sustainable Environmental Monitoring via Energy and Information Efficient Multinode PlacementIEEE Internet of Things Journal10.1109/JIOT.2023.330312410:24(22065-22079)Online publication date: 15-Dec-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
IPSN '06: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Information processing in sensor networks
April 2006
514 pages
ISBN:1595933344
DOI:10.1145/1127777
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 19 April 2006

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. approximation algorithms
  2. communication cost
  3. gaussian processes
  4. information
  5. link quality
  6. sensor networks
  7. sensor placement
  8. spatial monitoring
  9. theory

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

IPSN06
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 143 of 593 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)123
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)14
Reflects downloads up to 14 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Wireless Communication Infrastructure Building for Mobile Robot Search and Inspection Missions2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)10.1109/ICRA57147.2024.10611561(5970-5976)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • (2023)Loss of Distributed Coverage Using Lazy Agents Operating Under Discrete, Local, Event-Triggered CommunicationProceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems10.5555/3545946.3599006(2574-2576)Online publication date: 30-May-2023
  • (2023)Sustainable Environmental Monitoring via Energy and Information Efficient Multinode PlacementIEEE Internet of Things Journal10.1109/JIOT.2023.330312410:24(22065-22079)Online publication date: 15-Dec-2023
  • (2023)Informative Path Planning for Scalar Dynamic Reconstruction Using Coregionalized Gaussian Processes and a Spatiotemporal Kernel2023 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)10.1109/IROS55552.2023.10341858(8112-8119)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Environmental sensor placement with convolutional Gaussian neural processesEnvironmental Data Science10.1017/eds.2023.222Online publication date: 3-Aug-2023
  • (2023)A data-driven sensor placement strategy for reconstruction of mode shapes by using recurrent Gaussian process regressionEngineering Structures10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115998284(115998)Online publication date: Jun-2023
  • (2023)Optimum Node Deployment Policy (ONDP) for WSN: Trade-off Between Maximization of Area Coverage and LifetimeWireless Personal Communications: An International Journal10.1007/s11277-023-10804-7133:2(1055-1080)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2023
  • (2023)Improving Distributed Parameter System State Estimation Using UAV-Based Mobile Sensors: Application in Air Pollution MonitoringUnmanned Aerial Vehicles Applications: Challenges and Trends10.1007/978-3-031-32037-8_7(225-242)Online publication date: 30-Jun-2023
  • (2022)Coupled Sensor Configuration and Path-Planning in Unknown Environments with Adaptive Cluster Analysis2022 American Control Conference (ACC)10.23919/ACC53348.2022.9867482(4471-4476)Online publication date: 8-Jun-2022
  • (2022)Deployment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Anisotropic Monitoring TasksIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing10.1109/TMC.2020.301279121:2(495-513)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media