[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/1083063.1083075acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Towards requirements-driven autonomic systems design

Published: 21 May 2005 Publication History

Abstract

Autonomic computing systems reduce software maintenance costs and management complexity by taking on the responsibility for their configuration, optimization, healing, and protection. These tasks are accomplished by switching at runtime to a different system behaviour - the one that is more efficient, more secure, more stable, etc. - while still fulfilling the main purpose of the system. Thus, identifying and analyzing alternative ways of how the main objectives of the system can be achieved and designing a system that supports all of these alternative behaviours is a promising way to develop autonomic systems. This paper proposes the use of requirements goal models as a foundation for such software development process and sketches a possible architecture for autonomic systems that can be built using the this approach.

References

[1]
A. Dardenne, A. van Lamsweerde and S. Fickas. Goal-Directed Requirements Acquisitions, Science of Computer Programming, 20:3--50, 1993.
[2]
M. S. Feather, S. Fickas, A. Van Lamsweerde, and C. Ponsard. Reconciling system requirements and runtime behavior. In Proc. 9th International Workshop on Software Specification and Design, p. 50. IEEE Computer Society, 1998.
[3]
P. Giorgini, J. Mylopoulos, E. Nicchiarelli, R. Sebastiani. Reasoning with Goal Models. In Proc. 21st International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER2002), Tampere, Finland.
[4]
B. Hui, S. Liaskos, and J. Mylopoulos. Requirements Analysis for Customizable Software: Goals-Skills-Preferences Framework. In Proc. 11th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE'03), Monterrey, CA, pp. 117--126, September 2003.
[5]
K. C. Kang, S. G. Cohen, J. A. Hess, W. E. Novak, and A. S. Peterson. Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis (FODA) feasibility study (CMU/SEI-90-TR-21, ADA235785). Technical Report, SEI/CMU, 1990.
[6]
J. Kephart and D. Chess. The vision of autonomic computing, Computer, 36(1):41--50, 2003.
[7]
S. Liaskos, A. Lapouchnian, Y. Wang, Y. Yu, and S. Easterbrook. Configuring common personal software: a requirements-driven approach. Technical Report CSRG-512, University of Toronto, 2005. Available at: ftp://ftp.cs.toronto.edu/csrg-technical-reports/512/.
[8]
R. Murch. Autonomic Computing. Prentice Hall, 2004.
[9]
J. Mylopoulos, L. Chung, and B. Nixon. Representing and using non-functional requirements: a process-oriented approach, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 18(6):483--497, 1992.
[10]
R. Sebastiani, P. Giorgini, J. Mylopoulos. Simple and Minimum-Cost Satisfiability for Goal Models. In Proc. CAiSE 2004, Riga, Latvia.
[11]
W. Spears, K. De Jong, T. Baeck, D. Fogel, H. Garis. An Overview of Evolutionary Computing. In Proc. European Conference on Machine Learning, 1993.
[12]
K. Sycara, M. Klusch, S. Widoff, and J. Lu. Dynamic Service Matchmaking among Agents in open Information Environments, ACM SIGMOD Record, Special Issue on Semantic Interoperability in Global Information Systems, A. Ouksel, A. Sheth (Eds.), 28(1):47--53, 1999.
[13]
A. van Lamsweerde. Requirements Engineering in the Year 00: A Research Perspective. Proc. ICSE'00, Limerick, Ireland, June, 2000.
[14]
E. Yu. Modeling Organizations for Information Systems Requirements Engineering. In Proc. 1st IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, San Diego, CA, 1993, pp. 34--41.
[15]
Y. Yu, J. Mylopoulos, A. Lapouchnian, S. Liaskos, and J. C. S. P. Leite. From stakeholder goals to high-variability software designs. Technical Report CSRG-509, University of Toronto, 2005. Available at: ftp://ftp.cs.toronto.edu/csrg-technical-reports/509/.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Requirement Specification, Analysis and Verification for Autonomous Systems2021 58th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC)10.1109/DAC18074.2021.9586208(1315-1318)Online publication date: 5-Dec-2021
  • (2018)Certification-Based Cloud AdaptationIEEE Transactions on Services Computing10.1109/TSC.2018.2793268(1-1)Online publication date: 2018
  • (2018)Incorporating Autonomic Capability as Quality Attribute for a Software System2018 7th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO)10.1109/ICRITO.2018.8748488(829-833)Online publication date: Aug-2018
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
DEAS '05: Proceedings of the 2005 workshop on Design and evolution of autonomic application software
May 2005
105 pages
ISBN:1595930396
DOI:10.1145/1083063
  • cover image ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes
    ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes  Volume 30, Issue 4
    July 2005
    1514 pages
    ISSN:0163-5948
    DOI:10.1145/1082983
    Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 May 2005

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. autonomic computing software customization
  2. goal-oriented requirements engineering
  3. self-management
  4. software variability

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 07 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Requirement Specification, Analysis and Verification for Autonomous Systems2021 58th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC)10.1109/DAC18074.2021.9586208(1315-1318)Online publication date: 5-Dec-2021
  • (2018)Certification-Based Cloud AdaptationIEEE Transactions on Services Computing10.1109/TSC.2018.2793268(1-1)Online publication date: 2018
  • (2018)Incorporating Autonomic Capability as Quality Attribute for a Software System2018 7th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO)10.1109/ICRITO.2018.8748488(829-833)Online publication date: Aug-2018
  • (2015)SASSProceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems10.5555/2821357.2821386(168-174)Online publication date: 16-May-2015
  • (2015)SASSProceedings of the 2015 IEEE/ACM 10th International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems10.1109/SEAMS.2015.16(168-174)Online publication date: 18-May-2015
  • (2014)Uncertainty handling in goal-driven self-optimization - Limiting the negative effect on adaptationJournal of Systems and Software10.5555/2747013.274714090:C(114-127)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2014
  • (2014)Self-adaptive system development method for smart control systems in CPS16th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology10.1109/ICACT.2014.6779039(635-639)Online publication date: Feb-2014
  • (2014)Software Architecture and Tools: Distributed and Coordinated Dynamic Reconfiguration ManagementSoftware Architecture 110.1002/9781118930960.ch4(121-169)Online publication date: 8-May-2014
  • (2013)Autonomic Computing: A Framework to Identify Autonomy RequirementsProcedia Computer Science10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.26720(235-241)Online publication date: 2013
  • (2012)A multi-layered control approach for self-adaptation in automotive embedded systemsAdvances in Software Engineering10.1155/2012/9714302012(10-10)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2012
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media