[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/1964921.1964928acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exploration of continuous variability in collections of 3D shapes

Published: 25 July 2011 Publication History

Abstract

As large public repositories of 3D shapes continue to grow, the amount of shape variability in such collections also increases, both in terms of the number of different classes of shapes, as well as the geometric variability of shapes within each class. While this gives users more choice for shape selection, it can be difficult to explore large collections and understand the range of variations amongst the shapes. Exploration is particularly challenging for public shape repositories, which are often only loosely tagged and contain neither point-based nor part-based correspondences. In this paper, we present a method for discovering and exploring continuous variability in a collection of 3D shapes without correspondences. Our method is based on a novel navigation interface that allows users to explore a collection of related shapes by deforming a base template shape through a set of intuitive deformation controls. We also help the user to select the most meaningful deformations using a novel technique for learning shape variability in terms of deformations of the template. Our technique assumes that the set of shapes lies near a low-dimensional manifold in a certain descriptor space, which allows us to avoid establishing correspondences between shapes, while being rotation and scaling invariant. We present results on several shape collections taken directly from public repositories.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental material. (a33-ovsjanikov.zip)
MP4 File (tp009_11.mp4)

References

[1]
Allen, B., Curless, B., and Popović, Z. 2003. The space of human body shapes: reconstruction and parameterization from range scans. In Proc. SIGGRAPH, 587--594.
[2]
Anguelov, D., Srinivasan, P., Koller, D., Thrun, S., Rodgers, J., and Davis, J. 2005. Scape: shape completion and animation of people. ACM SIGGRAPH 24 (July), 408--416.
[3]
Berner, A., Wand, M., Mitra, N. J., Mewes, D., and Seidel, H.-P. 2011. Shape analysis with subspace symmetries. CGF (Proc. EUROGRAPHICS) 30, 2, 277--286.
[4]
Blanz, V., and Vetter, T. 1999. A morphable model for the synthesis of 3d faces. In Proc. SIGGRAPH, 187--194.
[5]
Boutin, M., and Kemper, G. 2004. On reconstructing n-point configurations from the distribution of distances or areas. Advances in Applied Mathematics 32, 4, 709--735.
[6]
Chaudhuri, S., and Koltun, V. 2010. Data-driven suggestions for creativity support in 3d modeling. In ACM SIGGRAPH Asia, 183:1--183:10.
[7]
Chazal, F., Cohen Steiner, D., and Mérigot, Q. 2010. Geometric Inference for Measures based on Distance Functions. Research Report RR-6930, INRIA.
[8]
Cootes, T. F., Taylor, C. J., Cooper, D. H., and Graham, J. 1995. Active shape models -- their training and application. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 61, 38--59.
[9]
Dryden, I., and Mardia, K. 1998. Statistical Shape Analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
[10]
Fisher, M., and Hanrahan, P. 2010. Context-based search for 3d models. In ACM SIGGRAPH Asia, 182:1--182:10.
[11]
Funkhouser, T., Kazhdan, M., Shilane, P., Min, P., Kiefer, W., Tal, A., Rusinkiewicz, S., and Dobkin, D. 2004. Modeling by example. ACM SIGGRAPH 23, 652--663.
[12]
Golovinskiy, A., and Funkhouser, T. 2009. Consistent segmentation of 3d models. Comput. Graph. 33 (June), 262--269.
[13]
Kalogerakis, E., Hertzmann, A., and Singh, K. 2010. Learning 3d mesh segmentation and labeling. In ACM SIGGRAPH, 102:1--102:12.
[14]
Kazhdan, M., Funkhouser, T., and Rusinkiewicz, S. 2003. Rotation invariant spherical harmonic representation of 3d shape descriptors. In Proc. SGP, 156--164.
[15]
Kilian, M., Mitra, N. J., and Pottmann, H. 2007. Geometric modeling in shape space. vol. 26, #64, 1--8.
[16]
Kim, M.-J., Kim, M.-H., and Shen, D. 2008. Learning-based deformation estimation for fast non-rigid registration. In CVPR workshop, 1--6.
[17]
Kokkinos, I., and Yuille, A. 2007. Unsupervised learning of object deformation models. In IEEE ICCV, 1--8.
[18]
Laga, H., Takahashi, H., and Nakajima, M. 2006. Spherical wavelet descriptors for content-based 3d model retrieval. In SMI, 15.
[19]
Mitra, N. J., Guibas, L., and Pauly, M. 2007. Symmetrization. In ACM SIGGRAPH, vol. 26, #63, 1--8.
[20]
Osada, R., Funkhouser, T., Chazelle, B., and Dobkin, D. 2002. Shape distributions. ACM TOG 21, 807--832.
[21]
Ovsjanikov, M., Bronstein, A. M., Bronstein, M. M., and Guibas, L. 2009. Shapegoogle: a computer vision approach for invariant shape retrieval. In ICCV workshop, NORDIA.
[22]
Saltel, E., 2008. INRIA Gamma team research database. http://www-roc.inria.fr/gamma/download/download.php.
[23]
Shapira, L., Shamir, A., and Cohen-Or, D. 2008. Consistent mesh partitioning and skeletonisation using the shape diameter function. Vis. Comput. 24, 249--259.
[24]
Sorkine, O., and Alexa, M. 2007. As-rigid-as-possible surface modeling. In Proc. SGP, 109--116.
[25]
Sumner, R. W., Zwicker, M., Gotsman, C., and Popović, J. 2005. Mesh-based inverse kinematics. ACM SIGGRAPH 24, 488--495.
[26]
van Kaick, O., Zhang, H., Hamarneh, G., and Cohen-Or, D. 2010. A survey on shape correspondence. Computer Graphics Forum.
[27]
Xu, K., Li, H., Zhang, H., Cohen-Or, D., Xiong, Y., and Cheng, Z.-Q. 2010. Style-content separation by anisotropic part scales. In ACM SIGGRAPH Asia, 184:1--184:10.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)DSG-Net: Learning Disentangled Structure and Geometry for 3D Shape GenerationACM Transactions on Graphics10.1145/352621242:1(1-17)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2022
  • (2020)DeformSyncNetACM Transactions on Graphics10.1145/3414685.341778339:6(1-16)Online publication date: 27-Nov-2020
  • (2020)StructEdit: Learning Structural Shape Variations2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00888(8856-8865)Online publication date: Jun-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGGRAPH '11: ACM SIGGRAPH 2011 papers
August 2011
869 pages
ISBN:9781450309431
DOI:10.1145/1964921
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 25 July 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. 3D database exploration
  2. model variability
  3. morphable models
  4. shape analysis
  5. shape descriptors

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

SIGGRAPH '11
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

SIGGRAPH '11 Paper Acceptance Rate 82 of 432 submissions, 19%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,822 of 8,601 submissions, 21%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 12 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)DSG-Net: Learning Disentangled Structure and Geometry for 3D Shape GenerationACM Transactions on Graphics10.1145/352621242:1(1-17)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2022
  • (2020)DeformSyncNetACM Transactions on Graphics10.1145/3414685.341778339:6(1-16)Online publication date: 27-Nov-2020
  • (2020)StructEdit: Learning Structural Shape Variations2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00888(8856-8865)Online publication date: Jun-2020
  • (2020)PQ-NET: A Generative Part Seq2Seq Network for 3D Shapes2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00091(826-835)Online publication date: Jun-2020
  • (2020)Deep Parametric Shape Predictions Using Distance Fields2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00064(558-567)Online publication date: Jun-2020
  • (2019)PartNet: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Fine-Grained and Hierarchical Part-Level 3D Object Understanding2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)10.1109/CVPR.2019.00100(909-918)Online publication date: Jun-2019
  • (2017)Mining probabilistic color palettes for summarizing color use in artwork collectionsSIGGRAPH Asia 2017 Symposium on Visualization10.1145/3139295.3139296(1-8)Online publication date: 27-Nov-2017
  • (2017)GRASSACM Transactions on Graphics10.1145/3072959.307363736:4(1-14)Online publication date: 20-Jul-2017
  • (2015)CrossLinkACM Transactions on Graphics10.1145/2816795.281809734:6(1-13)Online publication date: 2-Nov-2015
  • (2015)MetaMorpheProceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition10.1145/2757226.2757235(73-82)Online publication date: 22-Jun-2015
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media