[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/1873951.1873963acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Personalized photograph ranking and selection system

Published: 25 October 2010 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a novel personalized ranking system for amateur photographs. Although some of the features used in our system are similar to previous work, new features, such as texture, RGB color, portrait (through face detection), and black-and-white, are included for individual preferences. Our goal of automatically ranking photographs is not intended for award-wining professional photographs but for photographs taken by amateurs, especially when individual preference is taken into account.
The performance of our system in terms of precision-recall diagram and binary classification accuracy (93%) is close to the best results to date for both overall system and individual features. Two personalized ranking user interfaces are provided: one is feature-based and the other is example-based. Although both interfaces are effective in providing personalized preferences, our user study showed that example-based was preferred by twice as many people as feature-based.

References

[1]
R. Achanta, S. Hemami, F. Estrada, and S. Susstrunk. Frequency-tuned salient region detection. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009. CVPR 2009. IEEE Conference on, pages 1597--1604, june 2009.
[2]
Z. Cao, T. Qin, T.-Y. Liu, M.-F. Tsai, and H. Li. Learning to rank: from pairwise approach to listwise approach. In ICML '07: Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Machine learning, pages 129{136, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
[3]
R. Chellappa. Two-dimensional discrete Gaussian Markov random field models for image processing. Journal of the Institution of Electronics and Telecommunication Engineers, 35(2):114--120, 1989.
[4]
D. Cohen-Or, O. Sorkine, R. Gal, T. Leyvand, and Y.-Q. Xu. Color harmonization. ACM Trans. Graph., 25(3):624--630, 2006.
[5]
R. Datta, D. Joshi, J. Li, and J. Z. Wang. Studying aesthetics in photographic images using a computational approach. In In Proc. ECCV, pages 7--13, 2006.
[6]
P. Felzenszwalb and D. Huttenlocher. Efficient graph-based image segmentation. International Journal of Computer Vision, 59(2):167--181, 2004.
[7]
T. Grill and M. Scanlon. Photographic composition. Amphoto Books, 1990.
[8]
R. Herbrich, T. Graepel, and K. Obermayer. Support vector learning for ordinal regression. In Artificial Neural Networks, 1999. ICANN 99. Ninth International Conference on (Conf. Publ. No. 470), volume 1, pages 97--102 vol.1, 1999.
[9]
Y. Ke, X. Tang, and F. Jing. The design of high-level features for photo quality assessment. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on, volume 1, pages 419--426, june 2006.
[10]
B. Krages. Photography: the art of composition. Allworth Press, 2005.
[11]
W. Kruskal. Ordinal measures of association. Journal of the American Statistical Association, pages 814--861, 1958.
[12]
L. Liu, R. Chen, L. Wolf, and D. Cohen-Or. Optimizing photo composition. Computer Graphic Forum (Proceedings of Eurographics), 29(2), 2010.
[13]
Y. Luo and X. Tang. Photo and video quality evaluation: Focusing on the subject. In ECCV '08: Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 386--399, Berlin, Heidelberg,2008. Springer-Verlag.
[14]
B. Manjunath and W. Ma. Texture features for browsing and retrieval of image data. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on, 18(8):837--842, aug 1996.
[15]
B. Martinez and J. Block. Visual forces: an introduction to design. Prentice Hall, 1988.
[16]
M. Nishiyama, T. Okabe, Y. Sato, and I. Sato. Sensation-based photo cropping. In MM '09: Proceedings of the seventeen ACM international conference on Multimedia, pages 669--672, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM.
[17]
G. Peters. Aesthetic primitives of images for visualization. In Information Visualization, 2007. IV '07. 11th International Conference, pages 316--325, july 2007.
[18]
V. RIVOTTI and J. PROENAA. J. JORGE J., SOUSA M.: Composition principles for quality depiction and aesthetics. In The International Symposium on Computational Aesthetics in Graphics, Visualization, and Imaging, pages 37--44, 2007.
[19]
Y. Ro, M. Kim, H. Kang, B. Manjunath, and J. Kim. MPEG-7 homogeneous texture descriptor. ETRI journal, 23(2):41--51, 2001.
[20]
J. San Pedro and S. Siersdorfer. Ranking and classifying attractiveness of photos in folksonomies. In WWW '09: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web, pages 771--780, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM.
[21]
A. Santella, M. Agrawala, D. DeCarlo, D. Salesin, and M. Cohen. Gaze-based interaction for semi-automatic photo cropping. In CHI '06: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, pages 771--780, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM.
[22]
G. Sharma, W. Wu, and E. Dalal. The CIEDE2000 color-difference formula: implementation notes, supplementary test data, and mathematical observations. Color research and application, 30(1):21--30, 2005.
[23]
H. Sheikh, A. Bovik, and G. de Veciana. An information fidelity criterion for image quality assessment using natural scene statistics. Image Processing, IEEE Transactions on, 14(12):2117--2128, dec. 2005.
[24]
C. G. M. Snoek, M. Worring, and A. W. M. Smeulders. Early versus late fusion in semantic video analysis. In MULTIMEDIA '05: Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM international conference on Multimedia, pages 399--402, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM.
[25]
X. Sun, H. Yao, R. Ji, and S. Liu. Photo assessment based on computational visual attention model. In MM '09: Proceedings of the seventeen ACM international conference on Multimedia, pages 541--544, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM.
[26]
H. Tong, M. Li, H. Zhang, J. He, and C. Zhang. Classification of digital photos taken by photographers or home users. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 198--205, 2004.
[27]
Z. Wang, A. Bovik, H. Sheikh, and E. Simoncelli. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. Image Processing, IEEE Transactions on, 13(4):600--612, april 2004.
[28]
Z. Wang, H. Sheikh, and A. Bovik. No-reference perceptual quality assessment of jpeg compressed images. In Image Processing. 2002. Proceedings. 2002 International Conference on, volume 1, pages I-477 - I-480 vol.1, 2002.
[29]
Y. H. Yang, P. T. Wu, C. W. Lee, K. H. Lin, W. H. Hsu, and H. H. Chen. Contextseer: context search and recommendation at query time for shared consumer photos. In MM '08: Proceeding of the 16th ACM international conference on Multimedia, pages 199--208, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM.
[30]
C.-H. Yeh, W.-S. Ng, B. A. Barsky, and M. Ouhyoung. An esthetics rule-based ranking system for amateur photos. In SIGGRAPH ASIA '09: ACM SIGGRAPH ASIA 2009 Sketches, pages 1--1, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)User-Guided Personalized Image Aesthetic Assessment Based on Deep Reinforcement LearningIEEE Transactions on Multimedia10.1109/TMM.2021.313075225(736-749)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2023
  • (2023)Attribute-assisted Multimodal Network for Image Aesthetics Assessment2023 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME)10.1109/ICME55011.2023.00422(2477-2482)Online publication date: Jul-2023
  • (2022)Community-Aware Photo Quality Evaluation by Deeply Encoding Human PerceptionIEEE Transactions on Cybernetics10.1109/TCYB.2019.293731952:5(3136-3146)Online publication date: May-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
MM '10: Proceedings of the 18th ACM international conference on Multimedia
October 2010
1836 pages
ISBN:9781605589336
DOI:10.1145/1873951
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 25 October 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. aesthetic rules
  2. color distribution
  3. example-driven re-ranking
  4. ordinal ranking
  5. personalized ranking
  6. photograph composition
  7. photograph ranking

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

MM '10
Sponsor:
MM '10: ACM Multimedia Conference
October 25 - 29, 2010
Firenze, Italy

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 2,145 of 8,556 submissions, 25%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)24
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 24 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)User-Guided Personalized Image Aesthetic Assessment Based on Deep Reinforcement LearningIEEE Transactions on Multimedia10.1109/TMM.2021.313075225(736-749)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2023
  • (2023)Attribute-assisted Multimodal Network for Image Aesthetics Assessment2023 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME)10.1109/ICME55011.2023.00422(2477-2482)Online publication date: Jul-2023
  • (2022)Community-Aware Photo Quality Evaluation by Deeply Encoding Human PerceptionIEEE Transactions on Cybernetics10.1109/TCYB.2019.293731952:5(3136-3146)Online publication date: May-2022
  • (2021)Estimating Visual Saliency for Omnidirectional HDR ImagesAnalyzing Future Applications of AI, Sensors, and Robotics in Society10.4018/978-1-7998-3499-1.ch015(249-272)Online publication date: 2021
  • (2021)A Photocomposition Search System to Improve Your Photo SkillsDesign, User Experience, and Usability: Design for Contemporary Technological Environments10.1007/978-3-030-78227-6_29(396-406)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2021
  • (2020)Photo Composition with Real-Time RatingSensors10.3390/s2003058220:3(582)Online publication date: 21-Jan-2020
  • (2020)Objectivity and Subjectivity in Aesthetic Quality Assessment of Digital PhotographsIEEE Transactions on Affective Computing10.1109/TAFFC.2018.280975211:3(493-506)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2020
  • (2020)Learning with Privileged Information for Photo Aesthetic AssessmentNeurocomputing10.1016/j.neucom.2020.04.142Online publication date: May-2020
  • (2019)Context in Photo AlbumsACM Transactions on Applied Perception10.1145/333361216:2(1-20)Online publication date: 13-Aug-2019
  • (2019)Computational Understanding of Visual Interestingness Beyond SemanticsACM Computing Surveys10.1145/330129952:2(1-37)Online publication date: 27-Mar-2019
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media