[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/1809980.1810062acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebmediaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Visualizing the semantics (not the syntax) of concept descriptions

Published: 26 October 2008 Publication History

Abstract

The development and use of ontologies may require users with no training in formal logic to handle complex concept descriptions (e.g., in the form of necessary conditions in class definitions). To aid such users, alternative representations of concept descriptions have been proposed, such as natural language paraphrases and visualization frameworks. We examine examples of those representations and propose a novel visual framework, where more emphasis is placed on the semantics of concept descriptions than on their syntax.

References

[1]
F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D. McGuinness, D. Nardi, and P. Patel-Schneider, editors. The Description Logic Handbook. Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition, 2007.
[2]
J. Barwise and J. Etchemendy. Heterogeneous logic. In J. Glasgow, N. H. Narayanan, and B. Chandrasekaran, editors, Diagrammatic Reasoning: Cognitive and Computational Perspectives, pages 211--234. MIT Press, Cambridge, UK, 1995.
[3]
F. N. do Amaral and C. Bazílio. Visualization of Description Logic models. In The 21st International Workshop on Description Logics (DL2008), Dresden, Germany, 2008.
[4]
N. E. Fuchs, K. Kaljurand, and G. Schneider. Attempto Controlled English meets the challenges of knowledge representation, reasoning, interoperability and user interfaces. In FLAIRS 2006, 2006.
[5]
B. R. Gaines. Designing visual languages for Description Logics. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 2008. To appear.
[6]
M. Horridge, N. Drummond, J. Goodwin, A. Rector, R. Stevens, and H. Wan. The Manchester OWL syntax. In OWL: Experiences and Directions, 2006.
[7]
J. Howse, F. Molina, S.-J. Shin, and J. Taylor. On diagram tokens and types. In DIAGRAMS '02: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Diagrammatic Representation and Inference, pages 146--160, London, UK, 2002. Springer-Verlag.
[8]
S. Krivov, R. Williams, and F. Villa. GrOWL: A tool for visualization and editing of OWL ontologies. Journal of Web Semantics, 5(2):54--57, 2007.
[9]
A. Rector, N. Drummond, M. Horridge, J. Rogers, H. Knublauch, R. Stevens, H. Wang, and C. Wroe. OWL pizzas: Practical experience of teaching OWL-DL: Common errors & common patterns. In Engineering Knowledge in the Age of the SemanticWeb, volume 3257 of LNCS, 2004.
[10]
R. Schwitter, K. Kaljurand, A. Cregan, C. Dolbear, and G. Hart. A Comparison of three Controlled Natural Languages for OWL 1.1. In 4th OWL Experiences and Directions Workshop (OWLED 2008 DC), Washington, 2008.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Visualizing the semantics (not the syntax) of concept descriptions

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WebMedia '08: Companion Proceedings of the XIV Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web
      October 2008
      420 pages
      ISBN:9788576691990
      DOI:10.1145/1809980

      Sponsors

      • SBC: Brazilian Computer Society

      In-Cooperation

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 26 October 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      Conference

      WebMedia08
      Sponsor:
      • SBC
      WebMedia08: 14th Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and Web Systems
      October 26 - 29, 2008
      Espírito Santo, Vila Velha, Brazil

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 270 of 873 submissions, 31%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 01 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media