[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/1571941.1572100acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Modeling search response time

Published: 19 July 2009 Publication History

Abstract

Modeling the response time of search engines is an important task for many applications such as resource selection in federated text search. Limited research has been conducted to address this task. Prior research calculated the search response time of all queries in the same way either with the average response time of several sample queries or with a single probability distribution, which is irrelevant to the characteristics of queries. However, the search response time may vary a lot for different types of queries. This paper proposes a novel query-specific and source-specific approach to model search response time. Some training data is acquired by measuring the search response time of some sample queries from a search engine. Then, a query-specific model is estimated with the training data and their corresponding response times by utilizing Ridge Regression. The obtained model can be used to predict search response times for new queries. A set of empirical studies are conducted to show the effectiveness of the proposed method.

References

[1]
J. Callan. Distributed information retrieval. Advances in Information Retrieval, pages 127--150, 2000.
[2]
D. Dreilinger and A. Howe. Experiences with selecting search engines using metasearch. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 15(3):195--222, 1997.
[3]
J. French, A. Powell, and J. Callan. Effective and Efficient Automatic Database Selection. 1999.
[4]
A. Hoerl and R. Kennard. Ridge Regression: Biased Estimation for Nonorthogonal Problems. TECHNOMETRICS, 42(1):80--86, 2000.
[5]
K. Hosanagar. A utility theoretic approach to determining optimal wait times in distributed information retrieval. In Proceedings of the 28th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 91--97. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2005.
[6]
A. Montgomery, K. Hosanagar, R. Krishnan, and K. Clay. Designing a Better Shopbot. Management Science, 50(2):189--206, 2004.
[7]
C. Yu, K. Liu, W. Meng, Z. Wu, and N. Rishe. A Methodology to Retrieve Text Documents from Multiple Databases. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING, pages 1347--1361, 2002.

Index Terms

  1. Modeling search response time

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGIR '09: Proceedings of the 32nd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
    July 2009
    896 pages
    ISBN:9781605584836
    DOI:10.1145/1571941

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 19 July 2009

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. response time
    2. ridge regression
    3. source selection

    Qualifiers

    • Poster

    Conference

    SIGIR '09
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 792 of 3,983 submissions, 20%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 278
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 12 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media