More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

Accountable internet protocol (aip)

Authors:

David G. Andersen,

Hari Balakrishnan,

Daekyeong Moon,

Scott ShenkerAuthors Info & Claims

ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, Volume 38, Issue 4

Pages 339 - 350

https://doi.org/10.1145/1402946.1402997

Published: 17 August 2008 Publication History

Abstract

This paper presents AIP (Accountable Internet Protocol), a network architecture that provides accountability as a first-order property. AIP uses a hierarchy of self-certifying addresses, in which each component is derived from the public key of the corresponding entity. We discuss how AIP enables simple solutions to source spoofing, denial-of-service, route hijacking, and route forgery. We also discuss how AIP's design meets the challenges of scaling, key management, and traffic engineering.

References

[1]

ITRS international technology roadmap for semiconductors, 2006.

[2]

D. Andersen, H. Balakrishnan, N. Feamster, T. Koponen, D. Moon, and S. Shenker. Holding the Internet accountable. In Proc. 6th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (Hotnets-VI), Nov. 2007.

Digital Library

[3]

APNIC. The APNIC Resource Certification Page. http://mirin.apnic.net/resourcecerts/.

[4]

K. Argyraki and D. R. Cheriton. Active Internet traffic filtering: Real-time response to denial-of-service attacks. In Proc. USENIX Annual Technical Conference, Apr. 2005.

Digital Library

[5]

T. Aura. Cryptographically Generated Addresses (CGA). Internet Engineering Task Force, Mar. 2005. RFC 3972.

[6]

R. Beverly and S. Bauer. The Spoofer project: Inferring the extent of source address filtering on the Internet. In Proc. SRUTI Workshop, July 2005.

Digital Library

[7]

CNET News.com. Router Glitch Cuts Net Access. http://news.com.com/2100-1033-279235.html, Apr. 1997.

[8]

Z. Duan, X. Yuan, and J. Chandrashekar. Constructing Inter-Domain Packet Filters to Control IP Spoofing Based on BGP Updates. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, Mar. 2006.

[9]

D. Farinacci, V. Fuller, D. Oran, and D. Meyer. Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP). Internet Engineering Task Force, Apr. 2008. Internet Draft (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farinacci-lisp-07). Work in progress, expires October 2008.

[10]

P. Ferguson and D. Senie. Network Ingress Filtering: Defeating Denial of Service Attacks which employ IP Source Address Spoofing. Internet Engineering Task Force, Jan. 1998. RFC 2267.

Digital Library

[11]

P. Ferguson and D. Senie. Network Ingress Filtering. Internet Engineering Task Force, May 2000. BCP 38, RFC 2827.

[12]

V. Fuller. Scaling issues with routing+multihoming, Feb. 2007. Plenary session at APRICOT, the Asia Pacific Regional Internet Conference on Operational Technologies.

[13]

G. Goodell, W. Aiello, T. Griffin, J. Ioannidis, P. McDaniel, and A. Rubin. Working around BGP: An incremental approach to improving security and accuracy in interdomain routing. In Proc. NDSS, Feb. 2003.

[14]

G. Huston, G. Michaelson, and R. Loomans. A Profile for Resource Certificate Repository Structure. Internet Engineering Task Force, June 2006. http://mirin.apnic.net/resourcecerts/project-notes/draft-ietf-sidr-repos-struct-00.html.

[15]

J. Karlin, S. Forrest, and J. Rexford. Pretty Good BGP: Protecting BGP by cautiously selecting routes. Technical report, University of New Mexico, Oct. 2005. TR-CS-2005-37.

[16]

F. Kastenholz. ISLAY: A New Routing and Addressing Architecture. Internet Engineering Task Force, May 2002. http://ietfreport.isoc.org/idref/draft-irtf-routing-islay/.

[17]

S. Kent and R. Atkinson. Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol. Internet Engineering Task Force, Nov. 1998. RFC 2401.

Digital Library

[18]

S. Kent, C. Lynn, and K. Seo. Secure border gateway protocol (S-BGP). IEEE JSAC, 18 (4): 582--592, Apr. 2000.

Digital Library

[19]

T. Killalea. Internet Service Provider Security Services and Procedures. Internet Engineering Task Force, Nov. 2000. RFC 3013.

Digital Library

[20]

D. Krioukov, kc claffy, K. Fall, and A. Brady. On Compact Routing for the Internet. ACM Computer Communications Review, 37 (3): 41--52, July 2007.

Digital Library

[21]

M. Lad, D. Massey, D. Pei, Y. Wu, B. Zhang, and L. Zhang. AS: A prefix hijack alert system. In Proc. 15th USENIX Security Symposium, Aug. 2006.

Digital Library

[22]

J. Leskovec, J. Kleinberg, and C. Faloutsos. Graphs over time: Densification laws, shrinking diameters and possible explanations. In Proc. 11th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Aug. 2005.

Digital Library

[23]

J. Li, R. Bush, Z. M. Mao, T. Griffin, M. Roughan, D. Stutzbach, and E. Purpus. Watching data streams toward a multi-homed sink under routing changes introduced by a BGP beacon. In Passive & Active Measurement (PAM), Mar. 2006.

[24]

X. Liu, X. Yang, D. Wetherall, and A. Li. Passport: Secure and Adoptable Source Authentication. In Proc. 5th USENIX NSDI, Apr. 2008.

Digital Library

[25]

D. Mazières, M. Kaminsky, M. F. Kaashoek, and E. Witchel. Separating key management from file system security. In Proc. 17th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles (SOSP), pages 124--139, Dec. 1999.

Digital Library

[26]

D. McCullagh. How Pakistan knocked YouTube offline. http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9878655-7.html, Feb. 2008.

[27]

D. Meyer, L. Zhang, and K. Fall. Report from the IAB Workshop on Routing and Addressing. Internet Engineering Task Force, Sept. 2007. RFC 4984.

[28]

R. Moskowitz and P. Nikander. Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Architecture. Internet Engineering Task Force, May 2006. RFC 4423.

[29]

M. Ohta. 8+8 Addressing for IPv6 End to End Multihoming, Jan. 2004. draft-ohta-multi6-8plus8-00 (Expired IETF Draft).

[30]

K. Park and H. Lee. On the effectiveness of route-based packet filtering for distributed DoS attack prevention in power-law Internets. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM, Aug. 2001.

Digital Library

[31]

A. Ramachandran and N. Feamster. Understanding the Network-Level Behavior of Spammers. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM, Aug. 2006. An earlier version appeared as Georgia Tech TR GT-CSS-2006-001.

Digital Library

[32]

A. Ramachandran and N. Feamster. Understanding the network-level behavior of spammers. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM, Aug. 2006.

Digital Library

[33]

Renesys. Renesys Routing Intelligence. http://www.renesys.com/products_services/routing_intelligence.shtml.

[34]

M. Shaw. Leveraging good intentions to reduce unwanted network traffic. In Proc. USENIX Steps to Reduce Unwanted Traffic on the Internet workshop, July 2006.

Digital Library

[35]

G. Siganos and M. Faloutsos. Analyzing BGP Policies: Methodology and Tool. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, Mar. 2004.

[36]

T. L. Simon. oof. panix sidelined by incompetence... again. http://merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/2006-01/msg00483.html, Jan. 2006.

[37]

A. C. Snoeren and H. Balakrishnan. An end-to-end approach to host mobility. In Proc. ACM Mobicom, pages 155--166, Aug. 2000.

Digital Library

[38]

Spammer-X. Inside the SPAM Cartel. Syngress, 2004. Page 40.

Digital Library

[39]

G. Varghese. Network Algorithmics. Morgan Kaufmann, 2007.

[40]

P. Verkaik, A. Broido, kc claffy, R. Gao, Y. Hyun, and R. van der Pol. Beyond CIDR aggregation. Technical Report TR-2004-01, CAIDA, Feb. 2004.

[41]

Q. Vohra and E. Chen. BGP Support for Four-octet AS Number Space. Internet Engineering Task Force, May 2007. RFC 4893.

[42]

M. Walfish, J. Stribling, M. Krohn, H. Balakrishnan, R. Morris, and S. Shenker. Middleboxes no longer considered harmful. In Proc. 6th USENIX OSDI, Dec. 2004.

Digital Library

[43]

R. White. Securing BGP through secure origin BGP. The Internet Protocol Journal, 6 (3), Sept. 2003. http://www.cisco.com/web/about/ac123/ac147/archived_issues/ipj_6-3/ipj_6-3.pdf.

[44]

Q. Wu, Y. Liao, T. Wolf, and L. Gao. Benchmarking BGP routers. In Proc. IEEE International Symposium on Workload Characterization (IISWC), Sept. 2007.

Digital Library

[45]

X. Zhang, P. Francis, J. Wang, and K. Yoshida. Scaling IP routing with the core router-integrated overlay. In IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP), Nov. 2006.

Digital Library

Cited By

Bao HZhang XWang GTian RDuan JZhao Y(2023)Smart-PKI: A Blockchain-based Distributed Identity Validation Scheme for IoT DevicesICC 2023 - IEEE International Conference on Communications10.1109/ICC45041.2023.10279752(4749-4754)Online publication date: 28-May-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC45041.2023.10279752
Bao HZhang XWang GZhang MWang YZhao Y(2023)RepuFilter: Prevention of Untrusted Packet Spread Based on Trust Evaluation in Wireless NetworksICC 2023 - IEEE International Conference on Communications10.1109/ICC45041.2023.10278691(5972-5977)Online publication date: 28-May-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC45041.2023.10278691
Alsubhi KAlzahrani BFotiou NAlbeshri AAlreshoodi M(2022)Reliable Application Layer Routing Using Decentralized IdentifiersFuture Internet10.3390/fi1411032214:11(322)Online publication date: 6-Nov-2022
https://doi.org/10.3390/fi14110322
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Accountable internet protocol (aip)
1. Networks

Recommendations

Accountable internet protocol (aip)
SIGCOMM '08: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2008 conference on Data communication

This paper presents AIP (Accountable Internet Protocol), a network architecture that provides accountability as a first-order property. AIP uses a hierarchy of self-certifying addresses, in which each component is derived from the public key of the ...
Internet with transient destination-controlled addressing

Today's Internet makes hosts and individual networks inherently insecure because permanent addresses turn destinations into permanent attack targets. This paper describes an Evasive Internet Protocol (EIP), a change to the data plane of the Internet ...
Protocol design for scalable and adaptive multicast for group communications
ICNP '08: Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols

Currently, IP multicast and Explicit Multi-Unicast (Xcast) are two approaches for multicast communications. IP multicast is designed for large groups but is not scalable in terms of the group number because every router in a multicast tree needs to ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review

ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review Volume 38, Issue 4

October 2008

436 pages

ISSN:0146-4833

DOI:10.1145/1402946

Issue’s Table of Contents

SIGCOMM '08: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2008 conference on Data communication
August 2008
452 pages
ISBN:9781605581750
DOI:10.1145/1402958
General Chairs:
Victor Bahl
Microsoft Research
,
David Wetherall
Intel Research & University of Washington
,
Program Chairs:
Stefan Savage
University of California, San Diego
,
Ion Stoica
University of California, Berkeley

Copyright © 2008 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 17 August 2008

Published in SIGCOMM-CCR Volume 38, Issue 4

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

239
Total Citations
View Citations
2,061
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)104
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)19

Reflects downloads up to 19 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Bao HZhang XWang GTian RDuan JZhao Y(2023)Smart-PKI: A Blockchain-based Distributed Identity Validation Scheme for IoT DevicesICC 2023 - IEEE International Conference on Communications10.1109/ICC45041.2023.10279752(4749-4754)Online publication date: 28-May-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC45041.2023.10279752
Bao HZhang XWang GZhang MWang YZhao Y(2023)RepuFilter: Prevention of Untrusted Packet Spread Based on Trust Evaluation in Wireless NetworksICC 2023 - IEEE International Conference on Communications10.1109/ICC45041.2023.10278691(5972-5977)Online publication date: 28-May-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC45041.2023.10278691
Alsubhi KAlzahrani BFotiou NAlbeshri AAlreshoodi M(2022)Reliable Application Layer Routing Using Decentralized IdentifiersFuture Internet10.3390/fi1411032214:11(322)Online publication date: 6-Nov-2022
https://doi.org/10.3390/fi14110322
Li PSu JWang XXing Q(2021)DIIASecurity and Communication Networks10.1155/2021/19744932021Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1155/2021/1974493
Bu KLaird AYang YCheng LLuo JLi YRen K(2020)Unveiling the Mystery of Internet Packet ForwardingACM Computing Surveys10.1145/340979653:5(1-34)Online publication date: 28-Sep-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3409796
Ma YWu YGe JMa YWu YGe J(2020)A Comprehensive SurveyAccountability and Privacy in Network Security10.1007/978-981-15-6575-5_2(11-25)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2020
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6575-5_2
Schmitt PEdmundson AMankin AFeamster N(2019)Oblivious DNS: Practical Privacy for DNS QueriesProceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies10.2478/popets-2019-00282019:2(228-244)Online publication date: 4-May-2019
https://doi.org/10.2478/popets-2019-0028
Fragkouli GArgyraki KFord B(2019)MorphIT: Morphing Packet Reports for Internet TransparencyProceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies10.2478/popets-2019-00212019:2(88-104)Online publication date: 4-May-2019
https://doi.org/10.2478/popets-2019-0021
Li YKim KVlachou CXie JWu JHall W(2019)Bridging the data charging gap in the cellular edgeProceedings of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication10.1145/3341302.3342074(15-28)Online publication date: 19-Aug-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3341302.3342074
Mohammad Hosseini SJahangir AKazemi M(2019)Digesting Network Traffic for Forensic Investigation Using Digital Signal Processing TechniquesIEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security10.1109/TIFS.2019.291519014:12(3312-3321)Online publication date: Dec-2019
https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2019.2915190
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents