[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

Composition of Image Analysis Processes Through Object-Centered Hierarchical Planning

Published: 01 October 1995 Publication History

Abstract

This paper presents a new approach to the knowledge-based composition of processes for image interpretation and analysis. Its computer implementation in the VISIPLAN (VISIon PLANner) system provides a way of modeling the composition of image analysis processes within a unified, object-centered hierarchical planning framework. The approach has been tested and shown to be flexible in handling a reasonably broad class of multi-modality biomedical image analysis and interpretation problems. It provides a relatively general design or planning framework, within which problem-specific image analysis and recognition processes can be generated more efficiently and effectively. In this way, generality is gained at the design and planning stages, even though the final implementation stage of interpretation processes is almost invariably problem- and domain-specific.

References

[1]
J. Aloimonos, Integration of Visual Modules. San Diego: Academic Press, 1989.
[2]
R. Brooks, R. Greiner, and T. Binford, “The ACRONYM model-based vision system,” Proc. Int’l Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence, pp. 105-113, 1979.
[3]
B. Chandrasekaran, “Generic tasks in knowledge-based reasoning: high levelbuilding blocks for expert system design,” IEEE Expert, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 23-30, 1986.
[4]
V. Clement and M. Thonnat, “A knowledge-based approach to integration ofimage processing procedures,” CVGIP: Image Understanding, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 166-184, 1993.
[5]
D. Garvey, “Perceptual strategies for purposive vision,” technical note 117, AI Center, SRI International, 1976.
[6]
L. Gong, “Composition of image analysis processes through object-centeredhierarchical planning,” Technical Report LCSR-TR-180 (PhD thesis), Rutgers Univ., 1992.
[7]
L. Gong, C. Kulikowski, and R. Mezrich, “Automatic generation of plans forbiomedical image interpretation,” Proc. 15th SCAMC, pp. 465-469, 1991.
[8]
L. Gong, C. Kulikowski, and R. Mezrich, “Learning edge-defining thresholdfor local-binary segmentation,” Proc. SPIE/IS&T Symp. Electronic Imaging:Science and Technology, vol. 1, 660, pp. 416-426, 1992.
[9]
L. Gong, C. Kulikowski, and R. Mezrich, “Knowledge-based experimentaldesign for planning biomedical image analysis,” Proc. MEDINFO 92, pp. 628-634, 1992.
[10]
K. Ikeuchi and T. Kanade, “Automatic generation of object recognition programs,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 76, no. 8, pp. 1,016-1,035, 1988.
[11]
S. Hwang, “State-space search for high-level control of machine vision,” Optical Engineering, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 1,264-1,276, 1992.
[12]
I. Kapouleas and C. Kulikowski, “Model-based system for the interpretation of MR human brain scans,” Medical Imaging II, pp. 429-437, 1988.
[13]
C. Kohl, A. Hanson, and E. Riseman, “Goal-directed control of low levelprocesses for image interpretation,” Proc. Image Understanding Workshop, pp. 538-551, 1988.
[14]
J. Lair, A. Newell, and P. Rosenbloom, “SOAR: An architecture for general intelligence,” Artificial Intelligence 33, pp. 1-64, 1987.
[15]
D. Marr, Vision. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman, 1982.
[16]
T. Matsuyama and V. Hwang, “SIGMA: A framework for image understanding,” Proc. Ninth IJCAI, pp. 908-915, 1985.
[17]
T. Matsuyama, “Expert systems for image processing: knowledge-basedcomposition of image analysis processes,” Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, vol. 48, pp. 22-49, 1989.
[18]
M. Minsky, “A framework for representing knowledge,” The Psychology of Computer Vision, P. Winston, ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.
[19]
S. Raya and G. Herman, “Low-level segmentation of multidimensional medicalimages: an expert system,” SPIE Visual Comm. and Image Processing IV, pp. 913-918, 1989.
[20]
A. Rosenfeld and C. Kak, Digital Picture Processing. Academic Press, 1982.
[21]
D. Rosenthal and R. Bajscy, “Visual and conceptual hierarchy: A paradigmfor studies of automated generation of recognition strategies,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 319-324, 1984.
[22]
E. Sacerdoti, “Planning in a hierarchy of abstraction spaces,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 5, pp. 115-135, 1974.
[23]
P. Selfridge, “Reasoning about success and failure in aerial image understanding,” PhD thesis, Univ. of Rochester, 1981.
[24]
M. Stefik, “Planning with constraints,” Report No. 80-784, Computer Science Dept., Stanford Univ., 1980.
[25]
S. Weiss and C. Kulikowski, Computer Systems that Learn: Classification andPrediction Methods from Statistics, Neural Nets, Machine Learning, andExpert Systems. Palo Alto, Calif.: Morgan Kaufmann, 1991.

Cited By

View all
  • (2004)Can web-based recommendation systems afford deep modelsProceedings of the 13th international World Wide Web conference on Alternate track papers & posters10.1145/1013367.1013383(89-93)Online publication date: 19-May-2004
  • (2003)Morphological clustering of the som for multi-dimensional image segmentationProceedings of the Artificial and natural neural networks 7th international conference on Computational methods in neural modeling - Volume 110.5555/1762716.1762795(582-589)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2003
  • (2002)Relative Fuzzy Connectedness and Object DefinitionIEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence10.1109/TPAMI.2002.104616224:11(1485-1500)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2002
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence  Volume 17, Issue 10
October 1995
95 pages

Publisher

IEEE Computer Society

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 October 1995

Author Tags

  1. Image analysis
  2. artificial intelligence
  3. composition of image analysis processes.
  4. hierarchical planning
  5. knowledge-based systems

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 25 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2004)Can web-based recommendation systems afford deep modelsProceedings of the 13th international World Wide Web conference on Alternate track papers & posters10.1145/1013367.1013383(89-93)Online publication date: 19-May-2004
  • (2003)Morphological clustering of the som for multi-dimensional image segmentationProceedings of the Artificial and natural neural networks 7th international conference on Computational methods in neural modeling - Volume 110.5555/1762716.1762795(582-589)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2003
  • (2002)Relative Fuzzy Connectedness and Object DefinitionIEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence10.1109/TPAMI.2002.104616224:11(1485-1500)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2002
  • (2002)Fuzzy-connected 3D image segmentation at interactive speedsGraphical Models10.1016/S1077-3169(02)00005-964:5(259-281)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2002
  • (2001)Relative Fuzzy Connectedness among Multiple ObjectsComputer Vision and Image Understanding10.1006/cviu.2000.090282:1(42-56)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2001
  • (1999)BorgIEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence10.1109/34.74882221:2(128-144)Online publication date: 1-Feb-1999
  • (1996)Image Analysis and Computer VisionComputer Vision and Image Understanding10.1006/cviu.1996.004163:3(568-612)Online publication date: 1-May-1996
  • (undefined)A holistic and adaptive approach for automated prototyping of image processing functionality2016 IEEE 21st International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA)10.1109/ETFA.2016.7733522(1-8)

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media