DeLVE into Earth's Past: A Visualization-Based Exhibit Deployed Across Multiple Museum Contexts
Pages 952 - 961
Abstract
While previous work has found success in deploying visualizations as museum exhibits, it has not investigated whether museum context impacts visitor behaviour with these exhibits. We present an interactive Deep-time Literacy Visualization Exhibit (DeLVE) to help museum visitors understand deep time (lengths of extremely long geological processes) by improving proportional reasoning skills through comparison of different time periods. DeLVE uses a new visualization idiom, Connected Multi-Tier Ranges, to visualize curated datasets of past events across multiple scales of time, relating extreme scales with concrete scales that have more familiar magnitudes and units. Museum staff at three separate museums approved the deployment of DeLVE as a digital kiosk, and devoted time to curating a unique dataset in each of them. We collect data from two sources, an observational study and system trace logs. We discuss the importance of context: similar museum exhibits in different contexts were received very differently by visitors. We additionally discuss differences in our process from Sedlmair et al.'s design study methodology which is focused on design studies triggered by connection with collaborators rather than the discovery of a concept to communicate. Supplemental materials are available at: https://osf.io/z53dq/
References
[1]
Anonymized. Preliminary results from an observational visitor study of a digital geologic time exhibit in a science museum. In Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 2023. 7.
[2]
Anonymized. A design space for visualization with large scale-item ratios. Rejected from IEEE VIS 2024, will be referenced as arxiv paper when de-anonymized, 2024. 2, 4.
[3]
E. P. Baumer, M. Jasim, A. Sarvghad, and N. Mahyar. Of course it's political! A critical inquiry into underemphasized dimensions in civic text visualization. Computer Graphics Forum (Proc. EuroVis), 41(3): pp. 1–14, 2022. 3.
[4]
F. Block, M. S. Horn, B. C. Phillips, J. Diamond, E. M. Evans, and C. Shen. The DeepTree exhibit: Visualizing the tree of life to facilitate in-formal learning. IEEE Trans. Visualization & Computer Graphics (TVCG), 18(12): pp. 2789–2798, 2012. 2, 8.
[5]
K. Börner, A. Maltese, R. N. Balliet, and J. Heimlich. Investigating aspects of data visualization literacy using 20 information visualizations and 273 science museum visitors. Information Visualization, 15(3): pp. 198–213, 2016. 2.
[6]
K. A. Cheek. Students' understanding of large numbers as a key factor in their understanding of geologic time. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(5): pp. 1047–1069, 2012. 3.
[7]
F. Chevalier, R. Vuillemot, and G. Gali. Using concrete scales: A practical framework for effective visual depiction of complex measures. IEEE Trans. Visualization & Computer Graphics (TVCG), 19(12): pp. 2426–2435, 2013. 2, 6.
[8]
C. D. Czajka and D. McConnell. An exploratory study examining under-graduate geology students' conceptions related to geologic time and rates. Journal of Geoscience Education, 66(3): pp. 231–245, 2018. 2, 3.
[9]
K. Dasu, K.-L. Ma, J. Ma, and J. Frazier. Sea of genes: A reflection on visualising metagenomic data for museums. IEEE Trans. Visualization & Computer Graphics (TVCG), 27(2): pp. 935–945, 2020. 1, 2.
[10]
J. Dodick and N. Orion. “Building an understanding of geological time: A cognitive synthesis of the “macro” and “micro” scales of time”. In Earth And Mind: How Geologists Think And Learn About The Earth, pp. 77–93. Geological Society of America, 2006. 2, 3.
[11]
U. Hinrichs, H. Schmidt, and S. Carpendale. EMDialog: Bringing information visualization into the museum. IEEE Trans. Visualization & Computer Graphics (TVCG), 14(6): pp. 1181–1188, 2008. 2.
[12]
M. S. Horn, B. C. Phillips, E. M. Evans, F. Block, J. Diamond, and C. Shen. Visualizing biological data in museums: Visitor learning with an interactive tree of life exhibit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(6): pp. 895–918, 2016. 2.
[13]
E. Hornecker and M. Stifter. Learning from interactive museum installations about interaction design for public settings. In Proceedings of the 18th Australia Conference on Computer-Human Interaction Design: Activities, Artefacts and Environments, pp. 135–142, 2006. 2, 8.
[14]
A. Jolley, F. Jones, and S. Harris. Measuring student knowledge of landscapes and their formation timespans. Journal of Geoscience Education, 61(2): pp. 240–251, 2013. 3.
[15]
K. Karlstrom, S. Semken, L. Crossey, D. Perry, E. D. Gyllenhaal, J. Dodick, M. Williams, J. Hellmich-Bryan, R. Crow, N. B. Watts, and C. Ault. Informal geoscience education on a grand scale: The Trail of Time exhibition at Grand Canyon. Journal of Geoscience Education, 56(4): pp. 354–361, 2008. 3.
[16]
J. C. Libarkin, J. P. Kurdziel, and S. W. Anderson. College student conceptions of geological time and the disconnect between ordering and scale. Journal of Geoscience Education, 55(5): pp. 413–422, 2007. 3.
[17]
J. Ma, I. Liao, K.-L. Ma, and J. Frazier. Living liquid: Design and evaluation of an exploratory visualization tool for museum visitors. IEEE Trans. Visualization & Computer Graphics (TVCG), 18(12): pp. 2799–2808, 2012. 1, 2.
[18]
J. Ma, K.-L. Ma, and J. Frazier. Decoding a complex visualization in a science museum–an empirical study. IEEE Trans. Visualization & Computer Graphics (TVCG), 26(1): pp. 472–481, 2019. 2, 5.
[19]
S. Meier and K. Glinka. The individual in the data — the aspect of personal relevance in designing casual data visualisations. i-com, 16(3): pp. 247–265, 2017. 7.
[20]
A. Nieman. Concrete vs abstract visualisation: the real world as a canvas for data visualisation. in Proceedings of ADS-VIS2011: Making visible the invisible: Art, design and science in data visualisation, pp. 49–56, 2011. 2.
[21]
M. Oppermann and T. Munzner. Data-first visualization design studies. In IEEE VIS Wkshp. Evaluation and Beyond - Methodological Approaches to Visualization (BELIV), pp. 74–80. IEEE, 2020. 2, 9.
[22]
K. Peppler, A. Keune, and A. Han. Cultivating data visualization literacy in museums. Information and Learning Sciences, 122(1/2): pp. 1–16, 2021. 2.
[23]
D. F. Reilly and K. M. Inkpen. White rooms and morphing don't mix: setting and the evaluation of visualization techniques. In ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pp. 111–120, 2007. 1, 8.
[24]
I. Resnick, A. Davatzes, N. S. Newcombe, and T. F. Shipley. Using relational reasoning to learn about scientific phenomena at unfamiliar scales. Educational Psychology Review, 29: pp. 11–25, 2017. 2, 3, 4, 6.
[25]
M. Sedlmair, M. Meyer, and T. Munzner. Design study methodology: Reflections from the trenches and the stacks. IEEE Trans. Visualization & Computer Graphics (TVCG), 18(12): pp. 2431–2440, 2012. 2, 9.
[26]
U. H. Syeda, P. Murali, L. Roe, B. Berkey, and M. A. Borkin. Design study “lite” methodology: Expediting design studies and enabling the synergy of visualization pedagogy and social good. In ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pp. 1–13, 2020. 2.
[27]
F. B. Viégas, E. Perry, E. Howe, and J. Donath. Artifacts of the presence era: Using information visualization to create an evocative souvenir. In IEEE Conf. Information Visualization (InfoVis), pp. 105–111. IEEE, 2004. 2.
[28]
A. Ynnerman, P. Ljung, and A. Bock. “Reaching broad audiences from a science center or museum setting”. In Foundations of data visualization, pp. 341–364. Springer, 2020. 6.
[29]
E.-A. Zen. What is deep time and why should anyone care? Journal of Geoscience Education, 49(1): pp. 5–9, 2001. 1, 3.
Index Terms
- DeLVE into Earth's Past: A Visualization-Based Exhibit Deployed Across Multiple Museum Contexts
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Digital Exhibit Labels in Museums: Promoting Visitor Engagement with Cultural Artifacts
CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsHow can we use interactive displays in museums to help visitors appreciate authentic objects and artifacts that they can't otherwise touch or manipulate? This paper shares results from a design-based research study on the use of interactive displays to ...
Using Eye Movement Data and Visit Contexts to Understand the Experience of Museum Visitors
CHI EA '18: Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsTo understand visitor experience is an important task for curators to provide visitors with a suitable experience and learning context. But due to human memory liMassachusetts Institute of Technologyations, it is often not enough to rely on the ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
1077-2626 © 2024 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See https://www.ieee.org/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
Publisher
IEEE Educational Activities Department
United States
Publication History
Published: 01 January 2025
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 18 Jan 2025