[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1109/SMC.2016.7844762guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
research-article

Semantic annotation for the “on demand graphical representation” of variable data in Web documents

Published: 09 October 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Visualization is the process of representing data graphically and interacting with these representations in order to gain insight into the data and to assist human information processing by reducing demands on attention, working memory, and long-term memory. The graphical representation of data is also used in the Web as a mean which carries visual and easy to understand information. However, graphics used to be static images that are not always up-to-date compared to the data it should represent. It therefore seems obvious that the best way to be faithful to reality is to build the graphical representation of the dynamically and on demand. In this paper we present an approach allowing to generate graphical representation of data in Web documents dynamically and on demand. The annotation, based on the Resource Description Framework, allows end users to ask for a graphical representation any time they want. This representation is built according to the data existing in the document. This is very convenient, especially if the Web document is a forum in which users express opinions; or any other Web document containing variable data and where the data changes very often.

References

[1]
Berners-Lee, T.: The world Wide Web. Computer Networks and ISDN, pages 454–459 (1992).
[2]
Aghaei, S., Nematbakhsh M.A., Khosravi, Farsani H.: Evolution of the World Wide Web: From Web 1.0 to Web 4.0. International Journal of Web & Semantic Technology (IJWesT) Vol.3, No.1 (2012).
[3]
R. Cyganiak, D. Wood, and M. Lanthaler, “RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax,” February 2014, <http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-rdf-graph>,[viewed 5 April 2016].
[4]
D. Brickley, and R.V. Guha, “RDF Schema 1.1,” February 2014, <http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/>, [viewed 5 April 2016].
[5]
I. Heflin, “An Introduction to the OWL Web Ontology Language,” Lehigh University, 2007.
[6]
N. Chaffar, “Detection and formalization of the quantitative and qualitative information which can be graphically plot,” Master Thesis in Computer Science. University of Tunis El Manar, Higher Institute of Computer Science, 2015.
[7]
S. Van Hooland, M. De Wilde, R. Verborgh, T. Steiner, and R. Van de Walle, “Exploring entity recognition and disambiguation for cultural heritage collections,” Literary and linguistic computing, 2013.
[8]
C.D. Manning, M. Surdeanu, J. Bauer, J. Finkel, S.J. Bethard, and D. McClosky, “The Stanford CoreNLP Natural Language Processing Toolkit,” In: Proceedings of 52nd An-nual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, pp 55–60, 2014.
[9]
M. Stevenon, “Word Sense Disambiguation: The case for combining Knowldge Sources,” CSLI, 2003.
[10]
R. Navigli, and P. Valardi, “Structural Semantic interconnections: A Knowledge-based approach to word sens disambiguation,” IEEE Transactions on Patterns Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI), Vol.27, 2005.
[11]
G. Miller, “WordNet: A Lexical Database for English,” Communication of the ACM, Vol. 38, N°11, pp 39–41, 1995.
[12]
J. Jiang, and D. Conrath, “Semantic Similarity Based on Corpus Statistics and Lexical Taxonomy,” In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Research on Computational Linguistics, Taiwan, 1997.
[13]
R.W. Sembiring, M. Z. Jasni, and A. Embong, “A Comparative Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering Method to Cluster Implemented Course,” Journal of Computing, Vol. 12, Issue 2, pp 1–6, 2010.
[14]
R. Mihalcea, and P. Tarau, “TextRank: Bringing Order into Texts,” In EMNLP, 2004.
[15]
T. R. Gruber, “A Translation Approach to Portable Ontologies,” Knowledge Acquisition, Vol. 5: pp 199–220, 1993.
[16]
M. Uschold, and M. Gruninger, “Ontologies Principles Methods and Applications,” Knowledge Engineering Review, Vol.2, 1996.
[17]
K. Khelif, and R. Dieng-Kuntz, “Ontology-Based Semantic Annotations for Biochip Domain,” In EKAW, pp 483–484, 2004.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings
2016 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC)
Oct 2016
4589 pages

Publisher

IEEE Press

Publication History

Published: 09 October 2016

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 24 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media