[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1109/SMC.2015.402guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
research-article

Computational Evaluation of EGFR Dynamic Characteristics in Mutation-Induced Drug Resistance Prediction

Published: 01 October 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Recently, machine learning techniques have become an indispensable alternative for computational studies of cancers and efficient prediction of cancer-drug responses or drug resistance levels. Meanwhile, in cancer characterization, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations can greatly reveal the dynamic and functional features of cancer-related proteins. In our work, MD simulations were implemented to extract the EGFR TK mutation (dynamic) features of a non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)-patient group. Specifically, the relative positions of a drug-binding site and a drug molecule in the dynamics-trajectory were calculated and used for characterizing the dynamic features. These derived features, couples with patient personal features, were subsequently handled by a model called SFABSRM, which combines Supervised Factor Analysis and Softmax Regression Model. SFABSRM first uses factor analysis to evaluate the contributions of the selected features, and in our analysis it suggested that dynamic features play an important role in correlating with the cancer-drug responses. Further, SFABSRM applies the regression model for a drug response prediction, which further verified the important contribution of dynamic characteristics to this prediction. The support vector machine (SVM) model was conducted as a comparison with SFABSRM, leading to an agreement with the earlier conclusion. Overall, these studies can greatly benefit the NSCLC studies and drug discovery.

References

[1]
D. D. Wang, W. Zhou, H. Yan, M. Wong, and V. Lee, “Personalized prediction of EGFR mutation-induced drug resistance in lung cancer”, Scientific reports, vol. 3, 2013.
[2]
W. Zhou, D. D. Wang, H. Yan, M. Wong, and V. Lee, “Prediction of anti-EGFR drug resistance base on binding free energy and hydrogen bond analysis”, in Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (CIBCB), 2013 IEEE Symposium on, 2013, pp. 193–197.
[3]
J. D. Haley and W. J. Gullick, EGFR signaling networks in cancer therapy: Springer Science & Business Media, 2009.
[4]
L. Ma, D. D. Wang, Y. Huang, M. P. Wong, V. H. Lee, and H. Yan, “Decoding the EGFR mutation-induced drug resistance in lung cancer treatment by local surface geometric properties”, Computers in biology and medicine, 2014.
[5]
L. Ma, D. D. Wang, Y. Huang, H. Yan, M. P. Wong, and V. H. Lee, “EGFR Mutant Structural Database: computationally predicted 3D structures and the corresponding binding free energies with gefitinib and erlotinib”, BMC bioinformatics, vol. 16, p. 85, 2015.
[6]
A. L. Jonsson, K. A. Scott, and V. Daggett, “Dynameomics: a consensus view of the protein unfolding/folding transition state ensemble across a diverse set of protein folds”, Biophysical journal, vol. 97, pp. 2958–2966, 2009.
[7]
der Kamp, R. D. Schaeffer, A. L. Jonsson, A. D. Scouras, A. M. Simms, R. D. Toofanny et al., “Dynameomics: a comprehensive database of protein dynamics”, Structure, vol. 18, pp. 423–435, 2010.
[8]
U. Hensen, T. Meyer, J. Haas, R. Rex, G. Vriend, and H. Grubmüller “Exploring protein dynamics space: the dynasome as the missing link between protein structure and function”, PloS one, vol. 7, p. e33931, 2012.
[9]
D. Case, T. Darden, T. E. III Cheatham, C. Simmerling, J. Wang, R. Duke et al., “AMBER 12”, University of California, San Francisco, vol. 142, 2012.
[10]
H.-c. Lin, V. Baracos, R. Greiner, and J. Y. Chun-nam, “Learning patient-specific cancer survival distributions as a sequence of dependent regressors”, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2011, pp. 1845–1853.
[11]
C. B. Anna and J. W. Osborne, “Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assesment”, Research and Evaluation, vol. 10, pp. 1–9, 2005.
[12]
E. Bair, T. Hastie, D. Paul, and R. Tibshirani, “Prediction by supervised principal components”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 101, 2006.
[13]
D. R. Cox, “Regression models and life-tables”, in Breakthroughs in Statistics, ed: Springer, 1992, pp. 527–541.
[14]
O. O. Aalen, “A linear regression model for the analysis of life times”, Statistics in medicine, vol. 8, pp. 907–925, 1989.
[15]
Z. Xuegong, “Introduction to statistical learning theory and support vector machines”, Acta Automatica Sinica, vol. 26, pp. 32–42, 2000.
[16]
H. Abdi and L. J. Williams, “Principal component analysis”, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, vol. 2, pp. 433–459, 2010.
[17]
G.-F. Hao, G.-F. Yang, and C.-G. Zhan, “Structure-based methods for predicting target mutation-induced drug resistance and rational drug design to overcome the problem”, Drug discovery today, vol. 17, pp. 1121–1126, 2012.
[18]
L.-H. Loo, L. F. Wu, and S. J. Altschuler, “Image-based multivariate profiling of drug responses from single cells”, Nature methods, vol. 4, pp. 445–453, 2007.
[19]
Z. W. Cao, L. Y. Han, C. J. Zheng, Z. L. Ji, X. Chen, H. H. Lin et al., “Computer prediction of drug resistance mutations in proteins”, Drug discovery today, vol. 10, pp. 521–529, 2005.

Index Terms

  1. Computational Evaluation of EGFR Dynamic Characteristics in Mutation-Induced Drug Resistance Prediction
              Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

              Information & Contributors

              Information

              Published In

              cover image Guide Proceedings
              2015 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics
              3240 pages

              Publisher

              IEEE Press

              Publication History

              Published: 01 October 2015

              Qualifiers

              • Research-article

              Contributors

              Other Metrics

              Bibliometrics & Citations

              Bibliometrics

              Article Metrics

              • 0
                Total Citations
              • 0
                Total Downloads
              • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
              • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
              Reflects downloads up to 22 Jan 2025

              Other Metrics

              Citations

              View Options

              View options

              Media

              Figures

              Other

              Tables

              Share

              Share

              Share this Publication link

              Share on social media