More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

An overview of the microethics and macroethics education of computing students in the United States

Authors:

Angela R. Bielefeldt,

Madeline Polmear,

Christopher Swan,

Nathan CanneyAuthors Info & Claims

2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)

Pages 1 - 9

https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2017.8190445

Published: 18 October 2017 Publication History

Abstract

The literature does not include a good synthesis of how ethics, particularly macroethical issues, are integrated into the education of computing versus engineering students. Survey responses from faculty who teach computing students (n=188) were compared to other engineering disciplines (n=1161). The most common topics taught by the computing respondents were: professional practice issues (64%) and the societal impacts of engineering and technology (62%); these same topics were the most prevalent among other engineering disciplines. Privacy and civil liberties were taught by 48% of computing educators (vs. 9% of non-computing), while six topics were taught less frequently to computing students. Ethics and societal impact topics were most commonly taught to computing students using discussions and case studies in sophomore or junior level core engineering courses and senior capstone design. Some ethical topics were also infused into co-curricular activities. Among computing instructors, only 32% felt that undergraduate education on both ethics and broader societal impacts in their program was sufficient. Fewer respondents (23%) felt that graduate education of computing students on these issues was sufficient. These perceptions were similar in other engineering disciplines. The research results suggest improvements for the integration of ethics into the education of computing students.

References

[1]

B. Barry and J. Herkert, “Engineering Ethics,” Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds. Cambridge: Cambridge Press, 2014, pp. 673–692.

[2]

C. J. Finelli, M. Holsapple, E. Ra, R. Bielby, B. Burt, D. Carpenter, T. Harding and J. Sutkus, “An assessment of engineering students' curricular and co-curricular experiences and their ethical development,” J. Engrg. Edu., vol. 101, pp. 469–494, July 2012.

[3]

L. Vanasupa, J. Stolk and R. J. Herter, “The four-domain development diagram: a guide for holistic design of effective learning experiences for the twenty-first century engineer,” J. Engrg. Edu., vol. 98, pp. 67–81, Jan. 2009.

[4]

C. L. Isbell, L. A. Stein, R. Cutler, J. Forbes, L. Fraser, J. Impagliazzo, V. Proulx, S. Russ, R. Thomas, and Y. Xu, “(Re) Defining computing curricula by (re) defining computing,” inroads-SIGCSE Bulletin, vol. 41 (4), pp. 195–207, Dec. 2009.

[5]

M. Tedre and E. Sutinen, “Three traditions of computing: what educators should know,” Computer Sci. Edu., vol. 18 (3), pp. 153–170, Sept. 2008.

[6]

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). Curricula Recommendations. http://www.acm.org/education/curricula-recommendations Accessed 5 March 2017.

[7]

J. Courte and C. Bishop-Clark, “Do student differentiate between computing disciplines?” SIGCSE '09, March 3-7, 2009, Chattanooga, TA, pp. 29–33.

[8]

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) and IEEE Computer Society, “Computer Science Curricula 2013: Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Computer Science,” ACM and IEEE, 518 pp., Dec. 20, 2013.

[9]

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) and IEEE Computer Society, “Computer Engineering Curricula 2016 (CE2016): Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Computer Engineering,” ACM and IEEE, 151 pp., Dec. 15, 2016.

[10]

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) and IEEE Computer Society, “Software Engineering 2014: Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Software Engineering,” ACM and IEEE, 134 pp., Feb. 23, 2015.

[11]

ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. Effective for Reviews During the 2017-2018 Accreditation Cycle. 2016. Baltimore MD: ABET.

[12]

ABET Computing Accreditation Commission. Criteria for Accrediting Computing Programs. Effective for Reviews During the 2017-2018 Accreditation Cycle. 2016. Baltimore MD: ABET.

[13]

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct. 1992. https://www.acm.org/about-acm/acm-code-of-ethics-and-professional-conduct Accessed 20 April 2017.

[14]

ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Task Force on Software Engineering Ethics and Professional Practices. Software Engineering Code of Ethics and Professional Practice (version 5. 2). 1999. http://www.acm.org/about/se-code Accessed 20 April 2017.

[15]

IEEE. IEEE Code of Ethics. IEEE Policies, Section 7-Professional Activities. https://www.ieee.org/about/corporate/govemance/p7-8.html Accessed 20 April 2017.

[16]

National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE). NSPE Code of Ethics for Engineers. 2007. https://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics Accessed 20 April 2017.

[17]

M. J. Quinn, “On teaching computer ethics within a computer science department,” Sci. Engrg. Ethics, 12, pp, 335–343, 2006.

[18]

C. Spradling, L-K. Soh, and C. J. Ansorge, “A comprehensive survey on the status of social and professional issues in United States undergraduate computer science programs and recommendations,” Computer Science Education, vol. 19, PP. 137–153, Sept. 2009.

[19]

S. Dexter, E. Buchanan, K. Dins, K. R. Fleischmann, and K. Miller, “Characterizfng the need for graduate ethics education.” Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE) Conference Proc., ACM. Denver CO. March 6-9. 2013.

[20]

M. E. Califf and M. Godwin, “Effective incorporation of ethics into courses that focus on programming.” Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE) Conference Proc., ACM, St. Louis MO, Feb. 23-27, 2005.

[21]

J. Davis and H. M. Walker, “Incorporating social issues of computing in a small, liberal arts college: a case study.” Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE) Conference Proc., ACM, Dallas TX, March 9-12, 2011.

[22]

T. S. Purewal Jr, C. Bennett, and F. Maier, “Embracing the social relevance: computing, ethics and the community.” Special InterestGroup on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE) Conference Proc., ACM, Covington KY, March 7-10, 2007.

[23]

S. Bowers, E. M. Maccarone, and G. D. Ricco, “On the integration ofethical, legal, and societal issues into a computer science senior design capstone program.” Proc., American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition. 14 pp. New Orleans LA, June 26-29, 2016.

[24]

S. Howe, L. Rosenbauer, and S. Poulos, “2015 Castone Design Survey-Initial Results.”. Proceedings of the 2016 Capstone Design Conference. 4 pp. Columbus OH, June 6-8, 2015. http://www.capstoneconf.org/resources/2016%20Proceedings/Papers/0028.pdf

[25]

B. A. Burt, D. D. Carpenter, C. J. Finelli, T. S. Harding, J. Sutkus, M. Holsapple, R. M. Bielby, and E. Ra., “Outcomes of engaging engineering undergraduates in co-curricular experiences.” Proc., American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition. 11 pp. AC2011–1375. Vancouver BC, June 26-29, 2011.

[26]

A. E. Sweeney, P. Vaidyanathan, and S. Seal, “Undergraduate research and education in nanotechnology.” Int. J. Engng. Ed., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 157–170, 2006.

[27]

REU: Computing for Structure. http://www.cs.miami.edu/reu-cfs/ Accessed 31 May 2017.

[28]

A. R. Bielefeldt, N. E. Canney, C. Swan, and D. Knight, “Efficacy of macroethics education in engineering.” Proc., American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition. 21 pp. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.26919, June 2016.

[29]

S. F. Way, D. B. Larremore and A. Clauset, “Gender, productivity, and prestige in computer science faculty hiring networks.” Proc. 2016 World Wide Web Conference, pp. 1169–1179. arXiv:.

[30]

B. L. Yoder. “Engineering by the Numbers.” American Society for Engineering Education. 2015. https://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/college-profiles115EngineeringbytheNumbersPart1.pdf Accessed 25 Apr. 2017.

Cited By

Bielefeldt APolmear MKnight DSwan CCanney N(2018)Education of Electrical Engineering Students about Ethics and Societal Impacts in Courses and Co-curricular Activities2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE.2018.8658888(1-9)Online publication date: 3-Oct-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/FIE.2018.8658888

Recommendations

Determining the effects of computer science education at the secondary level on STEM major choices in postsecondary institutions in the United States

Concerning the marginalization of computer science education in K-12 STEM education in the United States, this study examined the extent to which taking more credits in computer science courses at the secondary level predicts students' STEM major ...
Characteristics of Career and Technical Education Faculty across Institutions of Higher Education in the United States

The purpose of this article was to examine faculty characteristics of CTE programs across the nation as well as identify the challenges and successes of implementing programs. Findings pointed to the overall decline of CTE full-time-equivalent faculty ...
Computing education for secondary school teachers: A cooperative effort between computer scientist and educators
SIGCSE '81: Proceedings of the twelfth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education

The proposed program will establish a Computer Education Institute for computing, mathematics, and science teachers and supervisors in grade 7 to 12. The goals of the program are to: (1) provide teachers with a knowledge of programming in BASIC, and ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings

2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)

Oct 2017

1857 pages

Copyright © 2017.

Publisher

IEEE Press

Publication History

Published: 18 October 2017

Qualifiers

Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

1
Total Citations
View Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 14 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Bielefeldt APolmear MKnight DSwan CCanney N(2018)Education of Electrical Engineering Students about Ethics and Societal Impacts in Courses and Co-curricular Activities2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE.2018.8658888(1-9)Online publication date: 3-Oct-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/FIE.2018.8658888

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents