[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

BLE-Based Contact Tracing: Characterization of Distance Estimation Errors and Mitigation Options

Published: 02 November 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Contact tracing is an accepted means to keep track of human infection chains during epidemics. Contact tracing smartphone apps such as deployed during the recent COVID-19 pandemic are widely based on distance estimation by privacy-preserving use of Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE). Yet, the BLE received signal strength indicator used for distance estimation is too weakly correlated with the distance in real scenarios. Major impacting factors are varying body shielding and signal propagation characteristics of the environment. We present a method that adjusts the common BLE pathloss model with a context factor, which can be experimentally derived based on phone carry position and environment detection. Experiments with a smartphone testbed show that the distance estimation error can be reduced to about 1 m for four major carry positions in short-distance indoor and outdoor settings. This result is an encouraging first step towards reliable privacy-preserving contact tracing.

References

[1]
N. Haug et al., “Ranking the effectiveness of worldwide COVID-19 government interventions,” Nature Hum. Behav., vol. 4, pp. 1303–1319, 2020.
[2]
B. Etzlinger, B. Nußbaummüller, P. Peterseil, and K. A. Hummel, “Distance estimation for BLE-based contact tracing–A measurement study,” in Proc. IEEE Wireless Days, 2021, pp. 1–5.
[3]
D. Leith and S. Farrell, “GAEN due diligence: Verifying the Google/Apple COVID exposure notification API,” in Proc. Netw. Distrib. Syst. Secur. Symp., 2021, pp. 1–7.
[4]
A. M. Alba and N. Michailow, “Uncertainty-boosted radiomap-based indoor positioning with RSSI fingerprints,” in Proc. IEEE Globecom Workshops, 2022, pp. 148–153.
[5]
Y. Zhuang, C. Zhang, J. Huai, Y. Li, L. Chen, and R. Chen, “Bluetooth localization technology: Principles, applications, and future trends,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 9, no. 23, pp. 23506–23524, Dec. 2022.
[6]
C. Huang, Y. Zhuang, H. Liu, J. Li, and W. Wang, “A performance evaluation framework for direction finding using BLE AoA/AoD receivers,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 3331–3345, Mar. 2021.
[7]
L. Maccari and V. Cagno, “Do we need a contact tracing app?,” Comput. Commun., vol. 166, pp. 9–18, 2021.
[8]
K. Benkic, M. Malajner, P. Planinsic, and Z. Cucej, “Using RSSI value for distance estimation in wireless sensor networks based on ZigBee,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Syst., Signals, Image Process., 2008, pp. 303–306.
[9]
D. Leith and S. Farrell, “Measurement-based evaluation of Google/Apple exposure notification API for proximity detection in a light-rail tram,” PLoS One, vol. 15, no. 9, 2020, Art. no.
[10]
P. Peterseil, D. Maerzinger, and B. Etzlinger, “UWB weak-NLOS structured dataset,” Jun. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/ppeterseil/UWB-weak-NLOS-structured-dataset
[11]
V. Poirot, O. Harms, H. Martens, and O. Landsiedel, “Blueseer: AI-driven environment detection via BLE scans,” in Proc. ACM/IEEE Des. Autom. Conf., 2022, pp. 871–876.
[12]
D. Coskun, O. D. Incel, and A. Ozgovde, “Phone position/placement detection using accelerometer: Impact on activity recognition,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Intell. Sensors, Sensor Netw. Inf. Process., 2015, pp. 1–6.
[13]
K. Fujinami and S. Kouchi, “Recognizing a mobile phone’s storing position as a context of a device and a user,” in Proc. Springer Int. Conf. Mobile Ubiquitous Syst., Comput., Netw., Serv., 2013, pp. 76–88.
[14]
T. Wakaizumi and N. Togawa, “Carrying-mode free indoor positioning using smartphone and smartwatch and its evaluations,” J. Inf. Process., vol. 30, pp. 52–65, 2022.
[15]
F. Subhan et al., “Experimental analysis of received signals strength in Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) and its effect on distance and position estimation,” Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol., vol. 33, no. 2, 2022, Art. no.
[16]
O. Katircioğlu, H. Isel, O. Ceylan, F. Taraktas, and B. Yagci, “Comparing ray tracing, free space path loss and logarithmic distance path loss models in success of indoor localization with RSSI,” in Proc. IEEE Telecommun. Forum, 2011, pp. 313–316.
[17]
F. Potorti et al., “Off-line evaluation of indoor positioning systems in different scenarios: The experiences from IPIN 2020 competition,” IEEE Sensors J., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 5011–5054, Mar. 2022.
[18]
T. Yang, A. Cabani, and H. Chafouk, “A survey of recent indoor localization scenarios and methodologies,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 23, 2021, Art. no.
[19]
J. Bi et al., “PSOSVRPos: WiFi indoor positioning using SVR optimized by PSO,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 222, no. C, 2023, Art. no.

Index Terms

  1. BLE-Based Contact Tracing: Characterization of Distance Estimation Errors and Mitigation Options
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image IEEE Pervasive Computing
        IEEE Pervasive Computing  Volume 22, Issue 4
        Oct.-Dec. 2023
        72 pages

        Publisher

        IEEE Educational Activities Department

        United States

        Publication History

        Published: 02 November 2023

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • 0
          Total Citations
        • 0
          Total Downloads
        • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
        Reflects downloads up to 12 Dec 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        View Options

        View options

        Login options

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media