[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
article

Assisting Pictogram Selection with Categorized Semantics

Published: 01 November 2008 Publication History

Abstract

Since participants at both end of the communication channel must share common pictogram interpretation to communicate, the pictogram selection task must consider both participants' pictogram interpretations. Pictogram interpretation, however, can be ambiguous. To assist the selection of pictograms more likely to be interpreted as intended, we propose a categorical semantic relevance measure which calculates how relevant a pictogram is to a given interpretation in terms of a given category. The proposed measure defines similarity measurement and probability of interpretation words using pictogram interpretations and frequencies gathered from a web survey. Moreover, the proposed measure is applied to categorized pictogram interpretations to enhance pictogram retrieval performance. Five pictogram categories used for categorizing pictogram interpretations are defined based on the five first-level classifications defined in the Concept Dictionary of the EDR Electronic Dictionary. Retrieval performances among not-categorized interpretations, categorized interpretations, and categorized and weighted interpretations using semantic relevance measure were compared, and the categorized semantic relevance approaches showed more stable performances than the not-categorized approach.

References

[1]
T. Takasaki, “Design and development of a pictogram communication system for children around the world,” in Intercultural Collaboration, ed. T. Ishida, S.R. Fussell, and P. Vossen, LNCS, vol.4568, pp.193–206, Springer. 2007.
[2]
B.R. Baker, “Minspeak, a semantic compaction system that makes self-expression easier for communicatively disabled individuals,” Byte, vol.7, no.9, pp.186–202, 1982.
[3]
C. Beardon, “Discourse structures in iconic communication,” Artif. Intell. Rev., vol.9, pp.189–203, 1995.
[4]
A. Marcus, “Icons, symbols, and signs: Visible languages to facilitate communication,” Interactions, vol.10, no.3, pp.37–43, 2003.
[5]
P.A. Kolers, “Some formal characteristics of pictograms,” American Scientist, vol.57, pp.348–363, 1969.
[6]
M. Aurnhammer, P. Hanappe, and L. Steels, “Augmenting navigation for collaborative tagging with emergent semantics,” ISWC '06 Proc. 5th Int'l Semantic Web Conf., LNCS, vol.4273, pp.58–71, Springer, 2006.
[7]
R. Li, S. Bao, B. Fei, Z. Su, and Y. Yu, “Towards effective browsing of large scale social annotations,” WWW '07 Proc. 16th Int'l World Wide Web Conf., pp.943–952, ACM Press, 2007.
[8]
National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT), The EDR Electronic Dictionary. Available at: http://www2.nict.go.jp/r/r312/EDR/
[9]
I. Niles and A. Pease, “Towards a standard upper ontology,” FOIS '01 Proc. 2nd Int'l Conf. on Formal Ontology in Information Systems, 2001.
[10]
H. Cho, T. Ishida, T. Takasaki, and S. Oyama, “Assisting pictogram selection with semantic interpretation,” ESWC '08 Proc. 5th European Semantic Web Conf., LNCS, vol.5021, pp.65–79, 2008.
[11]
D. Lin, “An information-theoretic definition of similarity,” ICML '98 Proc. 15th Int'l Conf. on Machine Learning, pp.296–304, 1998.
[12]
C. van Rijsbergen, Information Retrieval, Butterworths. 1979.
[13]
M. Palmer, D. Gildea, and P. Kingsbury, “The proposition bank: An annotated corpus of semantic roles,” Computational Linguistics, vol.31, no.1, pp.71–105, 2005.
[14]
K.K. Schuler, “VerbNet: A broad-coverage, comprehensive verb lexicon,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Pennsylvania. 2005.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Detection for Cultural Difference in Impression Using Masked Language ModelCulture and Computing10.1007/978-3-031-34732-0_44(569-579)Online publication date: 23-Jul-2023
  • (2016)EmojiZoomProceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services10.1145/2935334.2935382(510-517)Online publication date: 6-Sep-2016
  • (2011)Polysemy interpretation of graphic symbols for Thai picture-based communication systemProceedings of the 5th International Conference on Rehabilitation Engineering & Assistive Technology10.5555/2500753.2500760(1-4)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2011

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image IEICE - Transactions on Information and Systems
IEICE - Transactions on Information and Systems  Volume E91-D, Issue 11
November 2008
211 pages
ISSN:0916-8532
EISSN:1745-1361
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Oxford University Press, Inc.

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 November 2008

Author Tags

  1. EDR
  2. categorization
  3. pictogram
  4. semantic relevance

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 31 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Detection for Cultural Difference in Impression Using Masked Language ModelCulture and Computing10.1007/978-3-031-34732-0_44(569-579)Online publication date: 23-Jul-2023
  • (2016)EmojiZoomProceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services10.1145/2935334.2935382(510-517)Online publication date: 6-Sep-2016
  • (2011)Polysemy interpretation of graphic symbols for Thai picture-based communication systemProceedings of the 5th International Conference on Rehabilitation Engineering & Assistive Technology10.5555/2500753.2500760(1-4)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2011

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media