More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

article

KASPAR --a minimally expressive humanoid robot for human--robot interaction research

Authors:

Kerstin Dautenhahn,

Chrystopher L. Nehaniv,

Michael L. Walters,

Hatice Kose-Bagci,

Mike BlowAuthors Info & Claims

Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, Volume 6, Issue 3,4

Pages 369 - 397

https://doi.org/10.1080/11762320903123567

Published: 01 July 2009 Publication History

Abstract

This paper provides a comprehensive introduction to the design of the minimally expressive robot KASPAR, which is particularly suitable for human--robot interaction studies. A low-cost design with off-the-shelf components has been used in a novel design inspired from a multi-disciplinary viewpoint, including comics design and Japanese Noh theatre. The design rationale of the robot and its technical features are described in detail. Three research studies will be presented that have been using KASPAR extensively. Firstly, we present its application in robot-assisted play and therapy for children with autism. Secondly, we illustrate its use in human--robot interaction studies investigating the role of interaction kinesics and gestures. Lastly, we describe a study in the field of developmental robotics into computational architectures based on interaction histories for robot ontogeny. The three areas differ in the way as to how the robot is being operated and its role in social interaction scenarios. Each will be introduced briefly and examples of the results will be presented. Reflections on the specific design features of KASPAR that were important in these studies and lessons learnt from these studies concerning the design of humanoid robots for social interaction will also be discussed. An assessment of the robot in terms of utility of the design for human--robot interaction experiments concludes the paper.

References

[1]

Anderson ML. 2003. Embodied cognition: a field guide. Artif Intell. 149:91-130.

Digital Library

[2]

Aryananda L. 2004. Mertz: a quest for a robust and scalable active vision humanoid head robot. Proceedings of IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots; 2004 Nov 10-12; Santa Monica, Los Angeles, CA. p. 513- 532.

[3]

Aurora. 2008. Available from: www.aurora-project.com [cited 2008 Oct 15].

[4]

Bernieri FJ, Rosenthal R. 1991. Interpersonal coordination: behaviour matching and interactional synchrony. In: Feldman RS, Rimé B, editors. Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 401-432.

[5]

Billard A, Robins B, Dautenhahn K, Nadel J. 2006. Building robota, a mini-humanoid robot for the rehabilitation of children with autism. RESNA Assistive Technol J. 19(1):37-49.

[6]

Blow MP, Dautenhahn K, Appleby A, Nehaniv CL, Lee D. 2006. Perception of robot smiles and dimensions for human-robot interaction design. Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN06); Sep 6-8; Hatfield, UK: University of Hertfordshire. IEEE Press. p. 469-474.

[7]

Breazeal CL. 2002. Designing sociable robots. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

[8]

Breazeal CL, Foerst A. 1999. Schmoozing with robots: exploring the boundary of the original wireless network. In: Proceedings of Third International Cognitive Technology Conference (CT-99); 1999; San Francisco, M.I.N.D. Lab, Michigan State University. p. 375-390.

[9]

Bruner JS, Sherwood V. 1975. Peekaboo and the learning of rule structures. In: Bruner J, Jolly A, Sylva K, editors. Play: its role in development and evolution. New York: Penguin. p. 277-285.

[10]

Cañamero LD. 2002. Playing the emotion game with feelix: what can a LEGO robot tell us about emotion? In: Dautenhahn K, Bond A, Cañamero LD, Edmonds B, editors. Socially intelligent agents: creating relationships with computers and robots. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. p. 69-76.

[11]

Clancey WJ. 1997. Situated cognition: on human knowledge and computer representations. New York: Cambridge University Press.

[12]

Crick C, Munz M, Scassellati B. 2006. Synchronization in social tasks: robotic drumming. Proceedings of IEEE RO-MAN; 2006 Sep 6-8; Hatfield, UK: de Havilland Campus. p. 97- 102.

[13]

Dautenhahn K. 1997. I could be you--the phenomenological dimension of social understanding. Cybernet Syst. 28(5):417- 453.

[14]

Dautenhahn K. 1999. Embodiment and interaction in socially intelligent life-like agents. In: Nehaniv CL, editor. Computation for metaphors, analogy and agents. Springer lecture notes in computer science, vol. 1562. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Verlag. p. 102-142.

[15]

Dautenhahn K. 2002. Design spaces and niche spaces of believable social robots. In Proceedings of IEEE Intl. Workshop Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2002); 2002 Sep 25-27; Berlin, Germany. p. 192-197.

[16]

Dautenhahn K. 2004. Socially intelligent agents in human primate culture. In: Payr S, Trappl R, editors. Agent culture: human-agent interaction in a multicultural world. Philadelphia, PA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. p. 45-71.

[17]

Dautenhahn K. 2007. Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human-robot interaction. Phil Trans R Soc B. 362(1480): 679- 704.

[18]

Dautenhahn K, Billard A. 2002. Games children with autism can play with Robota, a humanoid robotic doll, in universal access and assistive technology. In: Keates S. et al., editor. Proceedings of 1st Cambridge Workshop on Universal Access and Assistive Technology (incorporating 4th Cambridge Workshop on Rehabilitation Robotics); 2002 Mar 25-27; Trinity Hall, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. London: Springer-Verlag. p. 179-190.

[19]

Dautenhahn K, Nehaniv CL. 2000. Living with socially intelligent agents: a cognitive technology view. In: Dautenhahn K, editor. Human cognition and social agent technology (advances in consciousness research series). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing. p. 415-426.

[20]

Dautenhahn K, Werry I. 2004. Towards interactive robots in autism therapy: background, motivation and challenges. Prag Cognition. 12(1):1-35.

[21]

Dautenhahn K, Woods S, Kaouri C, Walters M, Koay KL, Werry I. 2005. What is a robot companion--friend, assistant or butler? Proceedings of IROS 2005, IEEE IRS/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems; 2005 Aug 2-6; Edmonton, Alberta Canada. p. 1488-1493.

[22]

Davis M, Robins B, Dautenhahn K, Nehaniv C, Powell SA. 2005. Comparison of interactive and robotic systems in therapy and education for children with autism. In: Assistive technology: from virtuality to reality--AAATE 2005. Lille, France. IOS Press. p. 353-357.

[23]

Degallier S, Santos CP, Righetti L, Ijspeert A. 2006. Movement generation using dynamical systems: a humanoid robot performing a drumming task. In Proceedings of the IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (HUMANOIDS06); 2006 Dec 4-6; Genova, Italy.

[24]

DiSalvo C, Gemperle F, Forlizzi J, Kiesler S. 2002. All robots are not created equal: the design and perception of humanoid robot heads. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, And Techniques; London, UK. p. 321-326.

[25]

Ekman P, Davidson RJ, Friesen WV. 1990. The Duchenne smile: emotional expression and brain physiology II. J Pers Soc Psychol. 58(2):342-353.

[26]

Fong T, Nourbakhsh I, Dautenhahn K. 2003. A survey of socially interactive robots. Robot Auton Syst. 42(3-4):143-166.

[27]

Goldin-Meadow S, Wagner MS. 2005. How our hands help us learn. Trends Cogn Sci. 9(5):234-241.

[28]

Gong L, Nass C. 2007. When a talking-face computer agent is half-human and half-humanoid: human identity and consistency preference. J Hum Commun Res. 33(2):163-193.

[29]

Goodrich MA, Schultz AC. 2008. Human-robot interaction: a survey. Found Trends Hum-Comput Interact. 1(3):203-275.

Digital Library

[30]

Hall ET. 1983. The dance of life: the other dimension of time. New York: Doubleday/Anchor Press.

[31]

Johnson MJ, Morton J. 1991. Biology and cognitive development: the case of face recognition. Oxford, England: Blackwell.

[32]

Jones BC, Little AC, Burt DM, Perrett DI. 2004. When facial attractiveness is only skin deep. Perception. 33(5):569- 576.

[33]

Jordan R. 1999. Autistic spectrum disorders--an introductory handbook for practitioners. London: David Fulton Publishers.

[34]

Kanda T, Ishiguro H. 2005. Communication robots for elementary schools. In: Proceedings of AISB'05 Symposium Robot Companions: Hard Problems and Open Challenges in Robot-Human Interaction; 2005 Apr; Hatfield Hertfordshire. p. 54- 63.

[35]

Kendon A. 1970. Movement coordination in social interaction: some examples described. Acta Psychol. 32:100-125.

[36]

Kismet. 2009. Available from: http://www.ai.mit.edu/projects/humanoid-robotics-group/kismet/kismet.html [cited 2009 May 28].

[37]

Kose-Bagci H, Dautenhahn K, Nehaniv CL. 2008a. Emergent dynamics of turn-taking interaction in drumming games with a humanoid robot. Proceedings of IEEE RO-MAN 2008; 2008 Aug 1-3; Munich, Germany: Technical University Munich.

[38]

Kose-Bagci H, Dautenhahn K, Nehaniv CL. 2008b. Drumming with a humanoid robot: results from human-robot interaction studies. Proceedings of ECSIS Symposium on Learning and Adaptive Behavior in Robotic Systems, LAB-RS 2008; 2008 Aug 6-8 (published extended abstract of invited lecture); Edinburgh, Scotland. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press.

[39]

Kose-Bagci H, Dautenhahn K, Syrdal DS, and Nehaniv CL. 2007. Drum-mate: a human-humanoid drumming experience. Proceedings of IEEE-RAS Humanoids 2007; 2007 Nov 29-Dec 1; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

[40]

Kotosaka S, Schaal S. 2001. Synchronized robot drumming by neural oscillator. J Robot Soc Jpn. 19(1):116-123.

[41]

Kozima H, Nakagawa C, Yasuda Y. 2005. Designing and observing human-robot interactions for the study of social development and its disorders. Proceedings of 6th IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation--CIRA 2005; 2005 June 27-30; Espoo, Finland. p. 41-46.

[42]

Langlois J, Kalakanis L, Rubenstein A, Larson A, Hallam M, Smoot M. 2000. Maxims ormyths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychol Bull. 126:390-423.

[43]

Langlois J, Roggman L. 1990. Attractive faces are only average. Psychol Sci. 1:115-121.

[44]

Lyons M, Campbell R, Plante A, Coleman M, Kamachi M, Akamatsu S. 2000. The Noh mask effect: vertical viewpoint dependence of facial expression perception. Proc R Soc Lond B. 267:2239-2245.

[45]

LynxMotion 2007. http://www.lynxmotion.com/Product.aspx? productID=395&CategoryID=52. Last accessed 14 July 2009.

[46]

MacDorman KF. 2005a. Androids as an experimental apparatus: why is there an uncanny valley and can we exploit it? In: CogSci-2005 workshop: toward social mechanisms of android science; Stresa, Piedmont, Italy. p. 106-118.

[47]

MacDorman KF, Ishiguro H. 2006. The uncanny advantage of using androids in social and cognitive science research. Interact Stud. 7(3):297-337.

[48]

MacDorman KF, Minato T, Shimada M, Itakura S, Cowley S, Ishiguro H. 2005b. Assessing human likeness by eye contact in an android testbed. In: Proceedings of 20th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society; 2005 July; Stresa, Italy.

[49]

MacDorman KF, Green RD, Ho C-C, Koch C. 2009. Too real for comfort: Uncanny responses to computer generated faces. Computers in Human Behaviour. 25:695-710.

Digital Library

[50]

Maturana HR, Varela FJ. 1987. The tree of knowledge: the biological roots of human understanding. Boston, MA: New Science Library (Shambhala).

[51]

McCloud S. 1993. Understanding comics: the invisible art. New York, NY: Harper Collins Publishers, Inc.

[52]

Michaud F, Duquette A, Nadeau I. 2003. Characteristics of mobile robotics toys for children with pervasive developmental disorders. IEEE Int Conf Syst Man Cybernet. 3:2938- 2943.

[53]

Mirza NA, Nehaniv CL, Dautenhahn K, te Boekhorst R. 2007. Grounded sensorimotor interaction histories in an information theoretic metric space for robot ontogeny. Adapt Behav. 15(2):167-187.

Digital Library

[54]

Mirza NA, Nehaniv CL, Dautenhahn K, te Boekhorst R. 2008. Developing social action capabilities in a humanoid robot using an interaction history architecture. Proceedings of IEEE Humanoids 2008; 2008 Dec 1-3; Daejeon, Korea.

[55]

Miyake Y. 2003. Co-creation in human-computer interaction. In: Stephanidis C, Jacko J, editors, Human-computer interaction. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. p. 513- 517.

[56]

Mori M. 1970. Bukimi no tani [the uncanny valley]. Energy. 7:33- 35.

[57]

Nadel J, Butterworth G, editors. 1999. Imitation in infancy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[58]

NAS. 2008. National Autistic Society, UK. Available from: http://www.nas.org.uk [cited 2008 Oct 9].

[59]

Nehaniv CL, Dautenhahn K, editors. 2007. Imitation and social learning in robots, humans and animals: behavioural, social and communicative dimensions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[60]

Pascalis O, Scott LS, Kelly DJ, Shannon RW, Nicholson E, Coleman M, Nelson CA. 2005. Plasticity of face processing in infancy. PNAS. 102(14):5297-5300.

[61]

Perrett D, May K, Yoshikawa S. 1994. Attractive characteristics of female faces: preference for non-average shape. Nature. 368:239-242.

[62]

Pfeifer R, Bongard J. 2007. How the body shapes the way we think: a new view of intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

[63]

Preece J, Rogers Y, Sharp H. 2002. Interaction design. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[64]

Robins B, Dautenhahn K. 2006. The role of the experimenter in HRI research--a case study evaluation of children with autism interacting with a robotic toy. Proceedings of 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN06); Sep 6-8; Hatfield, UK: University of Hertfordshire. IEEE Press. p. 646- 651.

[65]

Robins B, Dautenhahn K, Dickerson P. 2009. From isolation to communication: a case study evaluation of robot assisted play for children with autism with a minimally expressive humanoid robot. Proceedings of Second International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions; ACHI 09; 2009 Feb 1-7; Cancun, Mexico. IEEE Computer Society Press. p. 205-211.

[66]

Robins B, Dautenhahn K, Dubowski J. 2006. Does appearance matter in the interaction of children with autism with a humanoid robot? Interact Stud. 7(3):509-542.

[67]

Robins B, Dautenhahn K, Nehaniv CL, Mirza NA, François D, Olsson L. 2005a. Sustaining interaction dynamics and engagement in dyadic child-robot interaction kinesics: lessons learnt from an exploratory study. Proceedings of 14th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (Ro-Man 2005); Aug 13-15; Nashville, USA. IEEE Press. p. 716-722.

[68]

Robins B, Dautenhahn K, te Boekhorst R, Billard A. 2004a. Effects of repeated exposure to a humanoid robot on children with autism. In: Proceedings of Universal Access and Assistive Technology (CWUAAT); 2004 Mar 22-24; Cambridge, UK. p. 225-236.

[69]

Robins B, Dautenhahn K, te Boekhorst R, Billard A. 2005b. Robotic assistants in therapy and education of children with autism: can a small humanoid robot help encourage social interaction skills? Special issue "design for a more inclusive world." Intern J Univers Access Inf Soc. (UAIS). 4(2):105- 120. (Springer-Verlag).

Digital Library

[70]

Robins B, Dautenhahn K, te Boekhorst R, Nehaniv CL. 2008. Behaviour delay and robot expressiveness in child-robot interactions: a user study on interaction kinesics. Proceedings of ACM/IEEE 3rd International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '08); New York, NY. ACM. p.17-24.

[71]

Robins B, Dickerson P, Stribling P, Dautenhahn K. 2004b. Robot-mediated joint attention in children with autism: a case study in robot-human interaction. Interact Stud. 5(2):161-198.

[72]

Robins B, Otero N, Ferrari E, Dautenhahn K. 2007. Eliciting requirements for a robotic toy for children with autism-- results from user panels. Proceedings of 16th International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE RO-MAN 2007); 2007 Aug 26-29; Jeju Island, Korea. p. 101-106.

[73]

Robotcub. 2008. Available from: http://www.robotcub.org [cited 2008 Oct 15].

[74]

Rochat P, Querido JG, Striano T. 1999. Emerging sensitivity to the timing and structure of protoconversation in early infancy. Dev Psychol. 35(4):950-957.

[75]

Saldien J, Goris K, Yilmazyildiz S, Verhelst W, Lefeber D. 2008. On the design of the huggable robot probo. Special issue on human interaction with domestic robots. J Phys Agents. 2(2):3-11.

[76]

Sandini G, Metta G, Vernon D. 2004. Robotcub: an open framework for research in embodied cognition. In: Proceedings of IEEE-RAS/RSJ Intl. Conf. Humanoid Robots (Humanoids 2004); 2004 Nov 10-12; Santa Monica, Los Angeles, CA.

[77]

Tanaka F, Cicourel A, Movellan JR. 2007. Socialization between toddlers and robots at an early childhood education center. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104(46):17954-17958.

[78]

The Guardian Weekend 2007. Ophelia of the Seine. Saturday 1 December 2007. Available from: http://www. guardian.co.uk/world/2007/dec/01/france.art Last accessed 13 July 2009.

[79]

Wakamaru. 2009. Available from: http://www.mhi.co.jp/kobe/wakamaru/english/know/design/index.html [cited 2009 May 26].

[80]

Walters ML. 2008a. The design space for robot appearance and behaviour for social robot companions. PhD thesis. School of Computer Science, University of Hertfordshire. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2299/1806 [cited 2008 Oct 14].

[81]

Walters ML, Syrdal DS, Dautenhahn K, te Boekhorst R, Koay KL. 2008b. Avoiding the uncanny valley: robot appearance, personality and consistency of behavior in an attention-seeking home scenario for a robot companion. Auton Robots. 24(2):159-178.

Digital Library

[82]

Weinberg G, Driscoll S. 2007. The interactive robotic percussionist: new developments in form, mechanics, perception and interaction design. Proceedings of ACM/IEEE HR'I07; 2007 Mar 10-12; Arlington, Virginia. p. 97-104.

[83]

Weinberg G, Driscoll S, Parry M. 2005. Musical interactions with a perceptual robotic percussionist. Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2005); Nashville, TN, USA. pp. 456-461.

[84]

Werry I, Dautenhahn K. 2007. Human-robot interaction as a model for autism therapy: an experimental study with children with autism. In: Laubichler M, Müller GB, editors. Modeling biology: structures, behaviors, evolution. Vienna series in theoretical biology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. p. 283-299.

[85]

Yarp. 2008. Available from: http://eris.liralab.it/yarp/ [cited 2008 Oct 15].

Cited By

Passler Bates DDudek SBerzuk JGonzález AYoung J(2024)SnuggleBot the Companion: Exploring In-Home Robot Interaction Strategies to Support Coping With LonelinessProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660702(2972-2986)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3660702
Ghafurian MBudnarain NHoey J(2023)Improving Humanness of Virtual Agents and Users’ Cooperation Through EmotionsIEEE Transactions on Affective Computing10.1109/TAFFC.2021.309683114:2(1461-1471)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TAFFC.2021.3096831
Mahdi HAkgun SSaleh SDautenhahn K(2022)A survey on the design and evolution of social robots — Past, present and futureRobotics and Autonomous Systems10.1016/j.robot.2022.104193156:COnline publication date: 1-Oct-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.robot.2022.104193
Show More Cited By

KASPAR --a minimally expressive humanoid robot for human--robot interaction research
1. Computer systems organization
  1. Embedded and cyber-physical systems
2. Computing methodologies
  1. Artificial intelligence
    1. Control methods
    2. Planning and scheduling

Recommendations

Development of a humanoid robot

This study presents design methodologies, specifications and control strategies for vision-guided object grasping for the developed humanoid robot, Cheng-kung Humanoid RobotIc System (CHRIS). The humanoid robot constructed herein comprises mainly a ...
Long-term LEGO therapy with humanoid robot for children with ASD

To utilise the knowledge gained from highly specialised domains as autism therapy to robot-based interactive training platforms, an innovative design approach is needed. We present the process of content creation and co-design of LEGO therapy for ...
Analysis of Humanoid Appearances in Human–Robot Interaction

Identifying the extent to which the appearance of a humanoid robot affects human behavior toward it is important. We compared participant impressions of and behaviors toward two real humanoid robots in simple human-robot interactions. These two robots, ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Applied Bionics and Biomechanics

Applied Bionics and Biomechanics Volume 6, Issue 3,4

July 2009

140 pages

ISSN:1176-2322

EISSN:1754-2103

Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

IOS Press

Netherlands

Publication History

Published: 01 July 2009

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

38
Total Citations
View Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 18 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Passler Bates DDudek SBerzuk JGonzález AYoung J(2024)SnuggleBot the Companion: Exploring In-Home Robot Interaction Strategies to Support Coping With LonelinessProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660702(2972-2986)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3660702
Ghafurian MBudnarain NHoey J(2023)Improving Humanness of Virtual Agents and Users’ Cooperation Through EmotionsIEEE Transactions on Affective Computing10.1109/TAFFC.2021.309683114:2(1461-1471)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TAFFC.2021.3096831
Mahdi HAkgun SSaleh SDautenhahn K(2022)A survey on the design and evolution of social robots — Past, present and futureRobotics and Autonomous Systems10.1016/j.robot.2022.104193156:COnline publication date: 1-Oct-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.robot.2022.104193
McDonnell RMutlu B(2021)AppearanceThe Handbook on Socially Interactive Agents10.1145/3477322.3477327(105-146)Online publication date: 10-Sep-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3477322.3477327
Park SHealey PKaniadakis AKitamura YQuigley AIsbister KIgarashi TBjørn PDrucker S(2021)Should Robots Blush?Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3411764.3445561(1-14)Online publication date: 6-May-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3411764.3445561
Rojas-Quintero JRodríguez-Liñán M(2021)A literature review of sensor heads for humanoid robotsRobotics and Autonomous Systems10.1016/j.robot.2021.103834143:COnline publication date: 1-Sep-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.robot.2021.103834
Moharana SPanduro ALee HRiek LKim JTapus ASirkin DJung MKwak S(2019)Robots for joy, robots for sorrowProceedings of the 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.5555/3378680.3378757(458-467)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3378680.3378757
Geiskkovitch DThiessen RYoung JGlenwright MKim JTapus ASirkin DJung MKwak S(2019)What?Proceedings of the 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.5555/3378680.3378690(48-56)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3378680.3378690
Spiel KFrauenberger CKeyes OFitzpatrick G(2019)Agency of Autistic Children in Technology Research—A Critical Literature ReviewACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/334491926:6(1-40)Online publication date: 2-Nov-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3344919
Cohen PTumuluri R(2019)Commercialization of multimodal systemsThe Handbook of Multimodal-Multisensor Interfaces10.1145/3233795.3233812(621-658)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3233795.3233812
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents