[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

Information systems use as strategy practice

Published: 01 March 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Conceptualize three key challenges within strategic IS implementation.Develop a multi-dimensional view of IS strategy to analyze the IS strategy process.Identify three factors that contribute to strategy blindness during IS strategy implementation.Extend the cognitive framing literature by adopting a cognitive entrenchment lens.Highlight the role of change-recipients as construers of change in implementation. Information systems (IS) are strategic in so far as they are used to realize strategic intent. Yet, while much has been said about aligning IS functionality with the strategic intent and how to organizationally implement strategically aligned systems, less is known of how to successfully implement strategic change associated with system use - a truly critical challenge within strategic IS implementation. Drawing on a strategy-as-practice perspective we address this gap by developing a multi-dimensional view of IS strategy, conceptualizing three key challenges in the IS strategy process, to explain how and why a paper mill, despite successfully implementing a strategic production management system, failed to produce intended strategic change. We call this outcome strategy blindness: organizational incapability to realize the strategic intent of implemented, available system capabilities. Using a longitudinal case study we investigate how cognitive rigidity of key actors and fixed, interrelated practices shaped the implementation of the new production system. We also identify core components and dynamics that constitute a richer multi-dimensional view of the IS strategy implementation (alignment) process. In particular, we identify three salient factors that contribute to strategy blindness - mistranslation of intent, flexibility of the IT artifact and cognitive entrenchment - and discuss how they affect strategic implementation processes. We conclude by discussing implications of our findings for IS strategy theory and practice, especially the contribution of strategy-as-practice to this stream of research.

References

[1]
Managing change: steering a course between intended strategies and unanticipated outcomes. Long Range Plan. v39 i1. 29-49.
[2]
Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking. Acad. Manag. J. v47 i5. 523-549.
[3]
From intended strategy to unintended outcomes: the impact of change recipient sensemaking. Org. Stud. v26 i11. 1573-1602.
[4]
Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Adm. Sci. Q. v31 i1. 78-108.
[5]
First-order, second-order, and third-order change and organizational development interventions: a cognitive approach. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. v23. 483-500.
[6]
Understanding user responses to information technology: a coping model of user adaptation. MIS Quart. v29 i3. 493-524.
[7]
Enacting integrated information technology: a human agency perspective. Organ. Sci. v16 i1. 3-18.
[8]
The matrix of change. Sloan Manage. Rev. v38 i2. 37-54.
[9]
IT alignment: what have we learned?. J. Inform. Technol. v22 i4. 297-315.
[10]
Assessing realized information systems strategy. J. Strateg. Inform. Syst. v6 i4. 273-298.
[11]
Information systems strategy: reconceptualization, measurement and implications. MIS Quart. v34 i2. 233-259.
[12]
De profundis? Deconstructing the concept of strategic alignment. Scandinavian journal of information systems. v9. 67-82.
[13]
Information technology development creativity: a case study of attempted radical change. MIS Quart. v24 i2. 245-276.
[14]
Hierarchical schemas and goals in the control of sequential behavior. Psychol. Rev. v113. 887-916.
[15]
Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach. Manage. Sci. v36 i2. 123-139.
[16]
Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. third ed. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA.
[17]
Reconsidering the trade-off between expertise and flexibility: a cognitive entrenchment perspective. Acad. Manag. Rev. v35 i4. 579-603.
[18]
The role of IS capabilities in delivering sustainable improvements to competitive positioning. J. Strateg. Inform. Syst. v18 i2. 100-116.
[19]
Issues of expert flexibility in contexts characterized by complexity and change. In: Feltovich, P.J., Ford, K.M., Hoffman, R.R. (Eds.), Expertise in Context: Human and Machine, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. pp. 125-146.
[20]
Social Cognition. second ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.
[21]
User response to an online information system: a field experiment. MIS Quart. v10 i1. 29-42.
[22]
Reflections on information systems strategizing. In: Avgerou, C., Ciborra, C., Land, F. (Eds.), The Social Study of Information and Communication Technology: Innovation, Actors, and Contexts, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. pp. 231-262.
[23]
Further developments in information systems strategizing: unpacking the concept. In: Galliers, R.D., Currie, W.L. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Information Systems: Critical Perspectives and New Directions, Oxford University Press, Oxford. pp. 329-345.
[24]
Strategic information systems: reflections and prospectives. J. Strat. Inform. Syst. v21 i2. 85-90.
[25]
Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA.
[26]
Towards a process model of individual change in organizations. Hum. Relat. v54. 419-444.
[27]
Cocreating IT value: new capabilities and metrics for multifirm environments. MIS Quart. v36 i1. 225-232.
[28]
Strategic intent. Harvard Bus. Rev. v83 i7. 148-161.
[29]
High-level scene perception. Annu. Rev. Psychol. v50. 243-271.
[30]
Strategic alignment: a model for organizational transformation through information technology. In: Kochan, T.A., Useem, M. (Eds.), Transforming Organizations, Oxford University Press, New York. pp. 97-116.
[31]
Strategy as Practice: An Activity-Based Approach. Sage, London, UK.
[32]
Strategy as practice: a review and future directions for the field. Int. J. Manage. Rev. v11 i1. 69-95.
[33]
Strategizing: the challenges of a practice perspective. Hum. Relat. v60 i1. 5-27.
[34]
Strategy as Practice: Research Directions and Resources. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
[35]
Why software projects escalate: an empirical analysis and test of four theoretical models. MIS Quart. v24 i4. 631-664.
[36]
A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quart. v23 i1. 67-93.
[37]
Strategy as performative practice: the case of Sydney 2030. Strateg. Org. v9 i2. 136-162.
[38]
A grounded model of organizational schema change during empowerment. Organ. Sci. v11. 235-257.
[39]
Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization. Res. Policy. v17 i5. 251-267.
[40]
Lewandowsky, S., Thomas, J.L., 2009. Expertise: acquisition, limitations, and control. In: Durso, F.T. (Ed.), Reviews of human factors and ergonomics, vol. 5, pp. 140-165.
[41]
Trojan actor-networks and swift translation: bringing actor-network theory to IT project escalation studies. IT People. v17 i2. 210-238.
[42]
Technology adaptation: the case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team. MIS Quart. v24 i4. 569-600.
[43]
A Primer on Decision Making: HOW Decisions Happen. Free Press, New York.
[44]
Technochange management: using IT to drive organizational change. J. Inform. Technol. v19 i1. 4-20.
[45]
Change management strategy: change agentry - the next information systems frontier. In: Galliers, R.D., Leidner, D.E. (Eds.), Strategic Information Management: Challenges and Strategies in Managing Information Systems, Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford. pp. 113-145.
[46]
Why stuff happens: explaining the unintended consequences of using information technology. In: Vendelo, M.T., Andersen, K.V. (Eds.), The Past and Future of Information Systems, Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, London. pp. 61-93.
[47]
Schemas in Problem Solving. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[48]
. Towards a theory of organizational information services. v23 i4. 313-329.
[49]
Review: information technology and organizational performance: an integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quart. v28 i2. 283-322.
[50]
Information systems strategy: Past, present, future?. J. Strateg. Inform. Syst. v21 i2. 125-153.
[51]
Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage, London, UK.
[52]
Errors in creative thought? Cognitive biases in a complex processing activity. J. Creative Behav. v40. 75-109.
[53]
An exploration of expertise of knowledge workers: towards a definition of the universe of discourse for knowledge acquisition. Inform. Syst. J. v4 i2. 129-140.
[54]
Ubiquitous IT: the case of the boeing 787 and implications for strategic IT research. J. Strateg. Inform. Syst. v21 i2. 91-102.
[55]
The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. v3 i3. 398-427.
[56]
Improvising organizational transformation over time: a situated change perspective. Inform. Syst. Res. v7 i1. 63-92.
[57]
Using technology and constituting structure: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. v11 i4. 404-428.
[58]
Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Trans. Inform. Syst. v12 i1. 174-207.
[59]
Desperately seeking the "IT" in IT research - a call to theorizing the IT artifact. Inform. Syst. Res. v12 i2. 121-134.
[60]
Bridging the gap between the IS organization and the rest of the business: plotting a route. Inform. Syst. J. v11 i3. 249-270.
[61]
Beyond strategic information systems: towards an IS capability. J. Strateg. Inform. Syst. v13 i2. 167-194.
[62]
IT-dependent strategic initiatives and sustained competitive advantage: a review and synthesis of the literature. MIS Quart. v29 i4. 747-776.
[63]
ERP systems and the university as a "unique" organization. Inform. Technol. People. v17 i1. 31-52.
[64]
Development of measures to investigate the linkage between business and information technology objectives. MIS Quart. v20 i1. 55-81.
[65]
Computer information systems and organizational structure. Commun. ACM. v24 i10. 679-687.
[66]
Accounting for the contradictory organizational consequences of information technology: theoretical directions and methodological implications. Inform. Syst. Res. v10 i2. 167-185.
[67]
Learning to implement enterprise systems: an exploratory study of the dialectics of change. J. Manage. Inform. Syst. v19 i1. 17-46.
[68]
Shaping agility through digital options: reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quart. v27 i2. 237-263.
[69]
Sanger, S., Singh, J., 2012. Breaking free: understanding leadership entrenchment and disruptive strategies. In: 2nd International Conference on Engaged Management Scholarship.
[70]
Practice mind-ed orders. In: Schatzki, T.R., Knorr-Cetina, K., von Savigny, E. (Eds.), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, Routledge, London, UK.
[71]
The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. 2001. Routledge, London/New York.
[72]
An assessment of package-organisation misalignment: institutional and ontological structures. Eur. J. Inform. Syst. v16 i5. 568-583.
[73]
Fighting against windmills: strategic information systems and organizational deep structures. MIS Quart. v31 i2. 327-354.
[74]
Incubation and the persistence of fixation in problem solving. Am. J. Psychol. v104. 61-87.
[75]
An institutional perspective on sources of ERP package-organisation misalignments. J. Strateg. Inform. Syst. v13 i4. 375-397.
[76]
Making sense of different responses to corporate change. Hum. Relat. v60 i1. 137-177.
[77]
From the editors: what grounded theory is not. Acad. Manag. J. v49 i4. 633-642.
[78]
Crafting and Executing Strategy. 17th ed. McGraw Hill, New York.
[79]
The resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Quart. v28 i1. 107-142.
[80]
Best for whom? The tension between 'best practice' ERP packages and diverse epistemic cultures in a university context. J. Strateg. Inform. Syst. v13 i4. 305-328.
[81]
Managerial and organizational cognition: notes from a trip down memory lane. Organ. Sci. v6. 280-321.
[82]
Interpretative case studies in IS research: nature and method. Eur. J. Inform. Syst. v4 i2. 74-81.
[83]
Information systems strategy: Quo vadis?. J. Strateg. Inform. Syst. v21 i2. 165-171.
[84]
Strategic Planning for Information Systems. third ed. Wiley, Chichester.
[85]
The work of strategizing and organizing: for a practice perspective. Strateg. Org. v1 i1. 117-125.
[86]
Completing the practice turn in strategy research. Org. Stud. v27 i5. 613-634.
[87]
Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage, Newbury Park, CA.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Factors Influencing Data Completeness in Electronic Records: A Case Study in a Chinese Manufacturing EnterpriseDistributed, Ambient and Pervasive Interactions10.1007/978-3-031-59988-0_13(221-240)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2024
  • (2023)Doing good by going digitalThe Journal of Strategic Information Systems10.1016/j.jsis.2023.10180632:4Online publication date: 1-Dec-2023
  • (2022)Linking Competitive Strategies with Human Resource Information SystemInternational Journal of Asian Business and Information Management10.4018/IJABIM.30035013:1(1-21)Online publication date: 26-Aug-2022
  • Show More Cited By
  1. Information systems use as strategy practice

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image The Journal of Strategic Information Systems
    The Journal of Strategic Information Systems  Volume 23, Issue 1
    March, 2014
    93 pages

    Publisher

    Butterworth-Heinemann

    United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 March 2014

    Author Tags

    1. Cognitive entrenchment
    2. Information systems use
    3. Multi-dimensional view of IS strategy
    4. Strategic IS implementation
    5. Strategic change

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 24 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Factors Influencing Data Completeness in Electronic Records: A Case Study in a Chinese Manufacturing EnterpriseDistributed, Ambient and Pervasive Interactions10.1007/978-3-031-59988-0_13(221-240)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2024
    • (2023)Doing good by going digitalThe Journal of Strategic Information Systems10.1016/j.jsis.2023.10180632:4Online publication date: 1-Dec-2023
    • (2022)Linking Competitive Strategies with Human Resource Information SystemInternational Journal of Asian Business and Information Management10.4018/IJABIM.30035013:1(1-21)Online publication date: 26-Aug-2022
    • (2022)Effect of applying independence axiom of Axiomatic Design theory on performance of an Integrated Manufacturing Information SystemSimulation10.1177/0037549721106289298:7(535-561)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2022
    • (2022)Strategy implications of IS planningInformation and Management10.1016/j.im.2022.10362559:3Online publication date: 1-Apr-2022
    • (2022)Information Systems Strategy: A Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis Perspective for Business Performance in SMEsThe Role of Digital Technologies in Shaping the Post-Pandemic World10.1007/978-3-031-15342-6_21(267-276)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2022
    • (2022)Exploring the factors in aligning information systems and organizational strategies in tall organizational structures in an uncertain environmentThe Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries10.1002/isd2.1220588:2Online publication date: 14-Mar-2022
    • (2019)The Shift to Socio-Organizational Drivers of Business Intelligence and Analytics AcceptanceJournal of Organizational and End User Computing10.4018/JOEUC.201904010331:2(37-64)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2019
    • (2018)Peas and carrots just because they are green? Operational fit between green supply chain management and green information systemInformation Systems Frontiers10.1007/s10796-016-9698-y20:3(627-645)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2018
    • (2017)The evolution of the business-IT strategic alignment processInternational Journal of Business Information Systems10.1504/IJBIS.2017.08327925:1(118-143)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2017
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media