Cited By
View all- Gupta SSharaff ANagwani N(2023)Frequent item-set mining and clustering based ranked biomedical text summarizationThe Journal of Supercomputing10.1007/s11227-022-04578-179:1(139-159)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2023
MultiGBS: : A multi-layer graph approach to biomedical summarization
Authors: 
Ensieh Davoodijam, 
Nasser Ghadiri, Maryam Lotfi Shahreza, Fabio RinaldiAuthors Info & Claims
Graphical abstract
Display Omitted
References
[1]
Home - - NCBI, (n.d.). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ (accessed December 15, 2017).
[2]
M.S. Simpson, D. Demner-Fushman, Biomedical Text Mining: A Survey of Recent Progress, in: Min. Text Data, Springer US, Boston, MA, 2012, pp. 465–517,.
[3]
E. Lloret, M. Palomar, Text summarisation in progress: A literature review, Artif. Intell. Rev. 37 (2012) 1–41,.
[4]
M. Gambhir, V. Gupta, M. Gambhir, V. Gupta, Recent automatic text summarization techniques: a survey, Artif. Intell. Rev. 47 (2017) 1–66,.
[5]
Y. Liu, T. Safavi, A. Dighe, D. Koutra, Graph Summarization Methods and Applica-tions: A Survey, ACM Comput. Surv. 51 (2018),.
[6]
L. Plaza, A. Díaz, P. Gervás, A semantic graph-based approach to biomedical summarisation, Artif. Intell. Med. 53 (2011) 1–14,.
[7]
Unified Medical Language System (UMLS), (n.d.). https://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/ (accessed April 25, 2019).
[8]
O. Bodenreider, The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS): integrating biomedical terminology, Nucleic Acids Res. 32 (2004) 267D–270D,.
[9]
MetaMap - A Tool For Recognizing UMLS Concepts in Text, (n.d.). https://metamap.nlm.nih.gov/ (accessed April 25, 2019).
[10]
M. Basaldella, L. Furrer, C. Tasso, F. Rinaldi, Entity recognition in the biomedical domain using a hybrid approach, J. Biomed. Semantics 8 (2017) 51,.
[11]
C. Rahmede, J. Iacovacci, A. Arenas, G. Bianconi, Centralities of nodes and influences of layers in large multiplex networks, J. Complex Networks 6 (2018) 733–752,.
[12]
C.Y. Lin, Rouge: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries, in: Proc. Work. Text Summ. Branches out (WAS 2004). (2004) 25–26.
[13]
K. Ganesan, ROUGE 2.0: Updated and Improved Measures for Evaluation of Summarization Tasks, (2018). http://arxiv.org/abs/1803.01937 (accessed September 12, 2020).
[14]
T. Zhang, V. Kishore, F. Wu, K.Q. Weinberger, Y. Artzi, BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT, (2019). http://arxiv.org/abs/1904.09675 (accessed December 23, 2019).
[15]
K. Spärck Jones, Automatic summarising: The state of the art, Inf. Process. Manag. 43 (2007) 1449–1481,.
[16]
R. Mishra, J. Bian, M. Fiszman, C.R. Weir, S. Jonnalagadda, J. Mostafa, G. Del Fiol, Text summarization in the biomedical domain: A systematic review of recent research, J. Biomed. Inform. 52 (2014) 457–467,.
[17]
V. McCargar, Statistical Approaches to Automatic Text Summarization, Bull. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 30 (2005) 21–25,.
[18]
Y. Ko, J. Seo, An effective sentence-extraction technique using contextual information and statistical approaches for text summarization, Pattern Recogn. Lett. 29 (2008) 1366–1371,.
[19]
H.P. Edmundson, New methods in automatic extracting, J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 16 (1969) 264–285,.
[20]
S. Harabagiu, F. Lacatusu, Topic themes for multi-document summarization, in: ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1145/1076034.1076071.
[21]
J. Kupiec, J. Pedersen, F. Chen, Trainable document summarizer, in: SIGIR Forum (ACM Spec. Interes. Gr. Inf. Retrieval), ACM, 1995, pp. 68–73,.
[22]
J.M. Conroy, D.P. O’leary, Text summarization via hidden Markov models, in: SIGIR Forum (ACM Spec. Interes. Gr. Inf. Retrieval), 2001, pp. 406–407,.
[23]
C. Burges, T. Shaked, E. Renshaw, A. Lazier, M. Deeds, N. Hamilton, G. Hullender, Learning to rank using gradient descent, in: ICML 2005 - Proc. 22nd Int. Conf. Mach. Learn., 2005, pp. 89–96,.
[24]
J.D. Schlesinger, J.D. Schlesinger, M.E. Okurowski, J.M. Conroy, D.P. O’Leary, A. Taylor, J. Hobbs, H.T. Wilson, Understanding Machine Performance in the Context of Human Performance for Multi-Document Summarization, (2002). https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.5.23 (accessed December 10, 2019).
[25]
R. Nallapati, B. Zhou, C.N. dos santos, C. Gulcehre, B. Xiang, Abstractive Text Summarization Using Sequence-to-Sequence RNNs and Beyond, (2016). http://arxiv.org/abs/1602.06023 (accessed May 9, 2018).
[26]
J. Cheng, M. Lapata, Neural summarization by extracting sentences and words, in: 54th Annu. Meet. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. ACL 2016 - Long Pap., Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 2016, pp. 484–494,.
[27]
Z. Cao, F. Wei, S. Li, W. Li, M. Zhou, H. Wang, Learning summary prior representation for extractive summarization, in: ACL-IJCNLP 2015 - 53rd Annu. Meet. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. 7th Int. Jt. Conf. Nat. Lang. Process. Asian Fed. Nat. Lang. Process. Proc. Conf., Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 2015, pp. 829–833,.
[28]
S. Narayan, J. Maynez, J. Adamek, D. Pighin, B. Bratanič, R. Mcdonald, Stepwise Extractive Summarization and Planning with Structured Transformers, n.d. https://github (accessed November 27, 2020).
[29]
W.C. Mann, S.A. Thompson, Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization, Text 8 (1988) 243–281,.
[30]
D. Marcu, D. Marcu, Discourse Trees Are Good Indicators of Importance in Text, Adv. Autom. TEXT Summ. (1999) 123--136. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.46.8292 (accessed December 10, 2019).
[31]
A.U. Khan, S. Khan, W. Mahmood, MRST : A New Technique for Information, Second World Enformatika Conf. WEC’05. (2007) 639–642. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.105.5232&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed April 30, 2020).
[32]
G. Erkan, D.R. Radev, LexRank: Graph-based lexical centrality as salience in text summarization, J. Artif. Intell. Res. 22 (2004) 457–479,.
[33]
K. Sarkar, K. Saraf, A. Ghosh, Improving graph based multidocument text summarization using an enhanced sentence similarity measure, in: 2015 IEEE 2nd Int. Conf. Recent Trends Inf. Syst. ReTIS 2015 - Proc., 2015, pp. 359–365,.
[34]
R. Mihalcea, P. Tarau, TextRank: Bringing order into texts, Proc. EMNLP 85 (2004) 404–411,.
[35]
E. Baralis, P. Torino, L. Cagliero, A. Fiori, Multi-document summarization exploiting frequent itemsets Categories and Subject Descriptors, in: Proc. 27th Annu. ACM Symp. Appl. Comput., 2012, pp. 782–786.
[36]
E. Baralis, L. Cagliero, A. Fiori, P. Garza, MWI-Sum: A Multilingual Summarizer Based on Frequent Weighted Itemsets, ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 34 (2015) 1–35,.
[37]
J.-P. Qiang, P. Chen, W. Ding, F. Xie, X. Wu, Knowle dge-Base d Systems Multi-document summarization using closed patterns, Knowledge-Based Syst. 99 (2016) 28–38,.
[38]
G.-W. Kim, D.-H. Lee, Personalised health document summarisation exploiting Unified Medical Language System and topic-based clustering for mobile healthcare, 16555151772298 J. Inf. Sci. (2017),.
[39]
L. Plaza, Comparing different knowledge sources for the automatic summarization of biomedical literature, J. Biomed. Inform. 52 (2014) 319–328,.
[40]
M. Moradi, N. Ghadiri, Quantifying the informativeness for biomedical literature summarization: An itemset mining method, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 146 (2017) 77–89,.
[41]
M. Nasr Azadani, N. Ghadiri, E. Davoodijam, Graph-based biomedical text summarization: An itemset mining and sentence clustering approach, J. Biomed. Inform. 84 (2018) 42–58,.
[42]
L.H. Reeve, H. Han, A.D. Brooks, BioChain: lexical chaining methods for biomedical text summarization, Sac. (2006) 180–184.
[43]
H.D. Menéndez, L. Plaza, D. Camacho, A genetic graph-based clustering approach to biomedical summarization, in: Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Web Intell. Min. Semant. - WIMS ’13, 2013, p. 1,.
[44]
L. Tang, X. Wang, H. Liu, Community detection via heterogeneous interaction analysis, Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 25 (2012) 1–33,.
[45]
L. Furrer, A. Jancso, N. Colic, F. Rinaldi, OGER++: hybrid multi-type entity recognition, J. Cheminform. 11 (2019) 7,.
[46]
G. Kondrak, N-Gram Similarity and Distance, in: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005: pp. 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/11575832_13.
[47]
The Stanford Natural Language Processing Group, (n.d.). https://nlp.stanford.edu/projects/coref.shtml (accessed November 28, 2020).
[48]
T.C. Rindflesch, M. Fiszman, The interaction of domain knowledge and linguistic structure in natural language processing: Interpreting hypernymic propositions in biomedical text, J. Biomed. Inform. 36 (2003) 462–477,.
[49]
H. Kilicoglu, G. Rosemblat, M. Fiszman, T.C. Rindflesch, Sortal anaphora resolution to enhance relation extraction from biomedical literature, BMC Bioinf. 17 (2016) 163,.
[50]
L. Plaza, J. Carrillo-de-Albornoz, Evaluating the use of different positional strategies for sentence selection in biomedical literature summarization, BMC Bioinf. 14 (2013) 71,.
[51]
SciPy.org — SciPy.org, (n.d.). https://www.scipy.org/ (accessed September 12, 2020).
[52]
J. Devlin, M.-W. Chang, K. Lee, K.T. Google, A.I. Language, BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding, n.d. https://github.com/tensorflow/tensor2tensor (accessed March 28, 2020).
[53]
Document Understanding Conferences, (n.d.). https://duc.nist.gov/ (accessed December 1, 2019).
[54]
Text Analysis Conference (TAC), (n.d.). https://tac.nist.gov/ (accessed December 1, 2019).
[55]
G. Balikas, A. Krithara, I. Partalas, G. Paliouras, BioASQ: A Challenge on Large-Scale Biomedical Semantic Indexing and Question Answering, in: Springer, Cham, 2015: pp. 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24471-6_3.
[56]
P. Vision, G. Paliouras, A. Krithara, BioASQ, (n.d.).
[57]
L. Reeve, H. Han, A.D. Brooks, BioChain, Proc. 2006 ACM Symp. Appl. Comput. - SAC ’06. (2006) 180. https://doi.org/10.1145/1141277.1141317.
[58]
M. Moradi, CIBS: A biomedical text summarizer using topic-based sentence clustering, J. Biomed. Inform. 88 (2018) 53–61,.
[59]
E. Lloret, L. Plaza, A. Aker, The challenging task of summary evaluation: an overview, Lang. Resour. Eval. (2017) 1–48,.
[60]
C.-Y. Lin, Looking for a Few Good Metrics: Automatic Summarization Evaluation-How Many Samples Are Enough?, n.d. http://duc.nist.gov (accessed September 5, 2020).
[61]
D. Miller, Leveraging BERT for Extractive Text Summarization on Lectures, (2019). http://arxiv.org/abs/1906.04165 (accessed January 30, 2020).
[62]
J. Devlin, M.-W. Chang, K. Lee, K. Toutanova, BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding, (2018). http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.04805 (accessed December 23, 2019).
[63]
D. Kim, J. Lee, C.H. So, H. Jeon, M. Jeong, Y. Choi, W. Yoon, M. Sung, J. Kang, A Neural Named Entity Recognition and Multi-Type Normalization Tool for Biomedical Text Mining, IEEE Access 7 (2019) 73729–73740,.
[64]
M. Bada, M. Eckert, D. Evans, K. Garcia, K. Shipley, D. Sitnikov, W.A. Baumgartner, K.B. Cohen, K. Verspoor, J.A. Blake, L.E. Hunter, Concept annotation in the CRAFT corpus, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-161.
Index Terms
- MultiGBS: A multi-layer graph approach to biomedical summarization
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
A topic modeled unsupervised approach to single document extractive text summarization
AbstractAutomatic Text Summarization (ATS) is an essential field in natural language processing that attempts to condense large text documents so that users can assimilate information quickly. It finds uses in medical document summarization, ...
Learning with fuzzy hypergraphs: A topical approach to query-oriented text summarization
Highlights- Topical representations of the sentences of a corpus are computed based on a probabilistic topic model.
AbstractExisting graph-based methods for extractive document summarization represent sentences of a corpus as the nodes of a graph in which edges depict relationships of lexical similarity between sentences. This approach fails to capture ...
Assessing shallow sentence scoring techniques and combinations for single and multi-document summarization
We investigate eighteen shallow sentence scoring techniques and ensemble strategies.Experiments were performed in several datasets for single- and multi-document task.Ensemble strategies lead to improvements over the individual scoring ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Elsevier Inc.
Publisher
Elsevier Science
San Diego, CA, United States
Publication History
Published: 01 April 2021
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- View Citations1Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 13 Dec 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View all- Gupta SSharaff ANagwani N(2023)Frequent item-set mining and clustering based ranked biomedical text summarizationThe Journal of Supercomputing10.1007/s11227-022-04578-179:1(139-159)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2023