[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

Breakthroughs in genomics data integration for predicting clinical outcome

Published: 01 December 2012 Publication History

Abstract

With the rapid progression of biotechnologies in the last few decades, molecular biology assays have shifted from limited to high throughput. Indeed, we successively witnessed an accelerated development of 'omics technologies at multiple molecular scales: DNA arrays, DNA methylation screening, proteome-wide interaction screening, Chip-Seq, protein array, next generation sequencing, RNA-seq and next generation protein mass-spectrometry. The availability of large repository of 'omics data has stimulated the prolific growth of analytical methods for clinical outcome prediction specialized for one type of 'omics measurement, but comparatively fewer cross-scales ones (2 molecular scales) and very rare multiple scales ones (>=3 molecular scales; ''multiscale''). Of note, abundant original cross-scale and multiscale 'omics methods have been developed for identifying gene function [1], novel disease-gene [2,3] and diseases' biomodules (e.g. biomodules of microRNA-mRNA co-expression [4]). However, these approaches are insufficient for predicting clinical outcome of complex disorders [5,6]. Here, we provide a framework to illustrate the difficulty of increasing the accuracy of a clinical outcome predictor from multiple scales of 'omics data, and position the significance of Kim et al. [7] that appears in this issue of the Journal of Biomedical Informatics. We also include a brief historical perspective of foundational methodologies in cross-scale and multiscale 'omics analytics (single 'omics analytics are out of scope of this perspective).

References

[1]
Hawkins, R.D., Hon, G.C. and Ren, B., Next-generation genomics: an integrative approach. Nat Rev Genet. v11. 476-486.
[2]
Duan, S., Huang, R.S., Zhang, W., Bleibel, W.K., Roe, C.A. and Clark, T.A., Genetic architecture of transcript-level variation in humans. Am J Hum Genet. v82. 1101-1113.
[3]
Aerts, S., Lambrechts, D., Maity, S., Loo, P.V., Coessens, B. and Smet, F.D., Gene prioritization through genomic data fusion. Nat Biotechnol. v24. 537-544.
[4]
Wang, Y.-P. and Li, K.-B., Correlation of expression profiles between microRNAs and mRNA targets using NCI-60 data. BMC Genom. v10. 218
[5]
Simon, R., Radmacher, M.D., Dobbin, K. and McShane, L.M., Pitfalls in the use of DNA microarray data for diagnostic and prognostic classification. J Natl Cancer Inst. v95. 14-18.
[6]
Kulasingam, V., Pavlou, M.P. and Diamandis, E.P., Integrating high-throughput technologies in the quest for effective biomarkers for ovarian cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. v10. 371-378.
[7]
Kim, D., Shin, H., Song, Y.S. and Kim, J.H., Synergistic effect of different levels of genomic data for cancer clinical outcome prediction. J Biomed Inform. v45. 1191-1198.
[8]
Lu, J., Getz, G., Miska, E.A., Alvarez-Saavedra, E., Lamb, J. and Peck, D., MicroRNA expression profiles classify human cancers. Nature. v435. 834-838.
[9]
Wei, S.H., Chen, C.-M., Strathdee, G., Jaturon, Harnsomburana, Shyu, C-R. and Farahnaz, Rahmatpanah, Methylation microarray analysis of late-stage ovarian carcinomas distinguishes progression-free survival in patients and identifies candidate epigenetic markers. Clin Cancer Res. v8. 2246-2252.
[10]
Li, M., Balch, C., Montgomery, J., Jeong, M., Chung, J. and Yan, P., Integrated analysis of DNA methylation and gene expression reveals specific signaling pathways associated with platinum resistance in ovarian cancer. BMC Med Genom. v2. 34
[11]
Integrative clustering of multiple genomic data types using a joint latent variable model with application to breast and lung cancer subtype analysis. Bioinformatics. v25. 2906-2912.
[12]
Vaske, C.J., Benz, S.C., Sanborn, J.Z., Earl, D., Szeto, C. and Zhu, J., Inference of patient-specific pathway activities from multi-dimensional cancer genomics data using PARADIGM. Bioinformatics. v26. i237-i245.
[13]
A kernel-based integration of genome-wide data for clinical decision support. Genome Med. v1. 39
[14]
Blenkiron, C., Goldstein, L., Thorne, N., Spiteri, I., Chin, S.-F. and Dunning, M., MicroRNA expression profiling of human breast cancer identifies new markers of tumor subtype. Genome Biol. v8. R214
[15]
Kim, H., Huang, W., Jiang, X., Pennicooke, B., Park, P.J. and Johnson, M.D., Integrative genome analysis reveals an oncomir/oncogene cluster regulating glioblastoma survivorship. Proc Natl Acad Sci. v107. 2183-2188.
[16]
Mankoo, P.K., Shen, R., Schultz, N., Levine, D.A. and Sander, C., Time to recurrence and survival in serous ovarian tumors predicted from integrated genomic profiles. PLoS ONE. v6. e24709
[17]
Consortium TICG, International network of cancer genome projects. Nature. v464. 993-998.
[18]
Zhang, S., Liu, C-C., Li, W., Shen, H., Laird, P.W. and Zhou, X.J., Discovery of multi-dimensional modules by integrative analysis of cancer genomic data. Nucl Acids Res.
[19]
Kristensen, V.N., Vaske, C.J., Ursini-Siegel, J., Van Loo, P., Nordgard, S.H. and Sachidanandam, R., Integrated molecular profiles of invasive breast tumors and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) reveal differential vascular and interleukin signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci. v109. 2802-2807.
[20]
Cancer Genome Atlas Network, Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. v490 i7418. 61-70.
[21]
Ciriello, G., Cerami, E., Sander, C. and Schultz, N., Mutual exclusivity analysis identifies oncogenic network modules. Genome Res. v22. 398-406.
[22]
Zhou, D., Bousquet, O., Lal, T.N., Weston, J. and Scholkopf, B., Learning with local and global consistency. Adv Neur Inform Process Syst (NIPS). v16. 321-328.
[23]
Gui, J., Wang, S.-L. and Lei, Y.-K., Multi-step dimensionality reduction and semi-supervised graph-based tumor classification using gene expression data. Artif Intell Med. v50. 181-191.

Cited By

View all
  • (2015)Predicting censored survival data based on the interactions between meta-dimensional omics data in breast cancerJournal of Biomedical Informatics10.1016/j.jbi.2015.05.01956:C(220-228)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2015
  1. Breakthroughs in genomics data integration for predicting clinical outcome

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Journal of Biomedical Informatics
      Journal of Biomedical Informatics  Volume 45, Issue 6
      December, 2012
      200 pages

      Publisher

      Elsevier Science

      San Diego, CA, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 01 December 2012

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 23 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2015)Predicting censored survival data based on the interactions between meta-dimensional omics data in breast cancerJournal of Biomedical Informatics10.1016/j.jbi.2015.05.01956:C(220-228)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2015

      View Options

      View options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media